Retirement expert shares simple way employees can boost pension pots by over £41,000
Workers could boost their pension pots by £41,200 - more than a year's average salary - by opting into their employers' salary exchange scheme, according to new figures from Scottish Widows.
Average salary workers - taking home £37,4301 annually - could increase their take home pay by £150 a year, simply by opting into their employers' salary exchange scheme. If this extra cash is then redirected into their pension pot, alongside the savings the employer makes through reduced national insurance contributions, their pension savings would be boosted by £528 a year.
For a worker aged 30 and retiring at age 67, and assuming 58 per cent investment growth, this would add £41,200 to their pension savings. Those opting in a decade later, at age 40, would see a £24,500 boost to their pension pot.
With the future of salary exchange under the spotlight following recent HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) research, Scottish Widows' analysis emphasises the positive boost that these schemes have on workers' financial empowerment.
Among those workers enrolled in salary exchange, 79 per cent said it makes them feel more confident about maximising their pension savings and being tax efficient when managing their money (77%).
An encouraging three-quarters (74%) believe the scheme helps ensure their money is working as hard as possible, and the same proportion (74%) say it boosts their productivity at work, knowing that they are financially secure.
However, just a third (35%) of workers surveyed are already enrolled in their company's salary exchange scheme, so there is still a significant gap to bridge. A fifth (20%) of workers don't even know if their employer offers salary exchange
Often misinterpreted, salary exchange - also known as salary sacrifice - is an arrangement where employees exchange part of their salary in return for an employer pension contribution.
Because the salary is being exchanged rather than paid directly, it benefits both employers and employees as neither pays National Insurance Contributions on the amount exchanged.
The exchanged amount can then be paid into the employee's pension plan as an employer contribution - creating tangible savings for both employee and employer, while boosting workers' retirement savings.
Commenting on the findings, Susan Hope, Scottish Widows Retirement Expert, said: 'Questions loom over the future of salary exchange, despite it being the best way to maximise workers' retirement savings. Cutting or abolishing it completely would ignore the long-term boost it delivers to people's finances. Our data shows not only the positive impact on people's take home pay, and pension wealth, but also the halo effect it has on people's financial confidence.
'The term 'salary sacrifice' is a red herring because neither the employer nor employee has to give anything up when they take advantage of this scheme. It's truly a win win.
'The key to unlocking additional savings into pensions is awareness, and this needs improving so schemes like salary exchange can positively impact more people's finances. We should be empowering our workforce's future and salary exchange is one way to do this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The countries that let savers access their pension early – even for a house deposit
Do you have a substantial pension pot but can't afford to get on the property ladder? Or have you retired on a good pension but are unable to buy a house? Email us at money@ When George Osborne entered the House of Commons to deliver his 2014 Budget, few predicted the seismic changes coming for pensions. Just minutes later, the then chancellor would strip back decades of restrictions and finally allow savers to access their retirement savings early. While he transformed how pensions could be accessed, strict limits remained. To this day, unless someone is in serious ill health or worked in a very limited set of professions, they cannot touch their nest egg until age 55 – rising to 57 in 2028. Critics say the rules are trapping workers into decades of renting in retirement because despite building up healthy pots, many still cannot afford to buy a home. A study by Scottish Widows found a quarter of workers will be renting or paying a mortgage into retirement, with an annual cost of £10,600 – enough to almost obliterate a full state pension. It is against this backdrop that calls are growing for further radical changes, including allowing people to raid their pension for a house deposit – something that the Government, midway through its major pensions review, continues to rule out. Countries on at least five different continents have allowed people to access their pension early already, according to a report co-authored by investment managers Schroders and the Pensions Management Institute. Here are some of the reasons why – and whether they should come to Britain. Buying a home Savers in Singapore have been able to withdraw cash from their pension and put it towards buying a home since 1968. As a result, home ownership has surged from 58pc in 1980 to more than 90pc now. There are rules on the type of property and how much a prospective homeowner can take out, but anyone meeting the criteria can take advantage. Similar opportunities are available in countries like Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Sir Steve Webb, the former pensions minister, said that by 2045, a million more pension households could be living in rented accommodation. He said: 'Having to fund rent out of an often meagre pension pot is pretty catastrophic for your standard of living in retirement. If we can use the growing pension pot sooner for the specific reason of helping people to buy a house, then this has to be worth looking at. 'I accept that there are risks here, not least that you end up with an even more inadequate pension pot at the end, but that's not as bad as having to fund rent. 'This isn't a panacea, as many people have too little in their pension pot at a relatively young age to be able to make a meaningful contribution towards a deposit, but it will help some – perhaps especially outside the high house price areas of the country.' Taking a home loan In South Africa, pension savers can use their pension pot as collateral for a home loan. This applies across their entire pot, but a cap applies – beginning at 60pc of the first R200,000 (£8,350) and falling as more is borrowed. However, if they fall behind on the repayments, their pension can be used for the repayments – bringing tax implications alongside a threat to their retirement. Paying off mortgage arrears In the event of serious mortgage arrears, some countries allow savers to access their pot early. In New Zealand for example, members can withdraw their own contributions, although not those made by the Government. The amount is capped at 13 weeks of living expenses. Homeowners in Australia and the US can also withdraw some of their pension to avoid the forced sale or repossession of their property. Covering medical expenses Some countries do not offer free universal healthcare, but allow access to pension savings in order to meet the cost. In the US, members can take a penalty-free hardship withdrawal to cover medical expenses for them or a family member are allowed – although they are also taxable. They can also take out funds for funeral costs, tuition fees and other educational expenses. In Singapore, $1.3bn dollars (£750m) was taken out for medical expenses and long-term care in the first three months of 2025. For its part, successive UK governments have already shown they are not averse to borrowing ideas from abroad. The hugely successful auto-enrolment, through which people are signed up to a pension until they opt out, was inspired by the world's first such system in New Zealand. The Labour Government is also midway through a major two-part pension review and lessons have not only been learnt from other countries, they're already on the verge of being implemented. The upcoming Pension Schemes Bill will merge all 86 Local Government Pension Scheme pots into six 'megafunds' –similar to the Canadian and Australian systems. A new form of pension saving popular in the Netherlands, known as collective defined contribution schemes, is also on the way. James Brokenshire, then housing minister, first mooted the idea of using pension funds to buy a home back in 2019. As recently as March this year, it was echoed by Nikhil Rathi, the Financial Conduct Authority's chief. However, the regulator said it had no official plans to explore the idea and the Government has indicated it will not be included in the next round of major pension reforms, which will be published on Monday. Major changes are still expected however, including steps to increase the amount people are saving and increase employer contributions to their workers' retirements as ministers look to tackle poverty in later life. Experts also believe that the affordability of the state pension will come under the microscope.
Leader Live
8 hours ago
- Leader Live
Retail profit warnings more than double as high street pressures mount
The latest report from EY-Parthenon also revealed that overall profit warnings among UK-listed firms jumped by a fifth year-on-year in the second quarter – with a record proportion citing policy changes and geopolitical uncertainty as the leading factor. The data showed that seven UK-listed retailers, including supermarkets, cut profit guidance between April and June. Britain's retail sector has come under significant pressure since last autumn's Budget move to hike National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and the minimum wage, both taking effect in April. But EY said the high street was also facing tough consumer spending challenges, with shoppers cutting back and focusing on value. EY partner Silvia Rindone said the spike in retail warnings 'highlights both softening consumer demand and the deeper structural headwinds facing the sector'. 'Retailers we speak to tell us that falling sales are currently indicative of a longer-term shift, with consumers becoming more value-focused and less brand-loyal, which leaves cost-pressured retailers in a bind,' she said. Tariff woes sparked by US President Donald Trump waging a trade war also featured heavily in the report, contributing to a rise in the number of alerts more widely across corporate plc. The report found that the number of profit warnings issued by UK-listed companies rose by 20% to 59 in the second quarter compared with 49 a year ago. The top factor was policy change and geopolitical uncertainty, cited in nearly half (46%) of all warnings – up from 4% a year earlier and the highest since the study was launched over 25 years ago. Over one in three (34%) warnings flagged tariff-related impacts, such as weaker demand, supply chain disruption and volatility in currency movements. The proportion of warnings to cite contract and order cancellations or delays remained at a record high of 40% in the quarter. Jo Robinson, EY-Parthenon partner and turnaround and restructuring strategy leader, said: 'The latest profit warnings data reflects the scale of persistent uncertainty and how heavy it continues to weigh on UK businesses. 'While this uncertainty has been a recurring theme since mid-2024, it has intensified so far this year – driven largely by geopolitical tensions and policy shifts – compounding pressure on both earnings and forecasts. 'While the announcement of global tariffs has clearly played a part in amplifying uncertainty, they are just one factor among broader geopolitical and policy upheaval.'
South Wales Guardian
8 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Retail profit warnings more than double as high street pressures mount
The latest report from EY-Parthenon also revealed that overall profit warnings among UK-listed firms jumped by a fifth year-on-year in the second quarter – with a record proportion citing policy changes and geopolitical uncertainty as the leading factor. The data showed that seven UK-listed retailers, including supermarkets, cut profit guidance between April and June. Britain's retail sector has come under significant pressure since last autumn's Budget move to hike National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and the minimum wage, both taking effect in April. But EY said the high street was also facing tough consumer spending challenges, with shoppers cutting back and focusing on value. EY partner Silvia Rindone said the spike in retail warnings 'highlights both softening consumer demand and the deeper structural headwinds facing the sector'. 'Retailers we speak to tell us that falling sales are currently indicative of a longer-term shift, with consumers becoming more value-focused and less brand-loyal, which leaves cost-pressured retailers in a bind,' she said. Tariff woes sparked by US President Donald Trump waging a trade war also featured heavily in the report, contributing to a rise in the number of alerts more widely across corporate plc. The report found that the number of profit warnings issued by UK-listed companies rose by 20% to 59 in the second quarter compared with 49 a year ago. The top factor was policy change and geopolitical uncertainty, cited in nearly half (46%) of all warnings – up from 4% a year earlier and the highest since the study was launched over 25 years ago. Over one in three (34%) warnings flagged tariff-related impacts, such as weaker demand, supply chain disruption and volatility in currency movements. The proportion of warnings to cite contract and order cancellations or delays remained at a record high of 40% in the quarter. Jo Robinson, EY-Parthenon partner and turnaround and restructuring strategy leader, said: 'The latest profit warnings data reflects the scale of persistent uncertainty and how heavy it continues to weigh on UK businesses. 'While this uncertainty has been a recurring theme since mid-2024, it has intensified so far this year – driven largely by geopolitical tensions and policy shifts – compounding pressure on both earnings and forecasts. 'While the announcement of global tariffs has clearly played a part in amplifying uncertainty, they are just one factor among broader geopolitical and policy upheaval.'
