logo
Why ‘Kill the Boer' still echoes: It's not hate, it's hunger for justice

Why ‘Kill the Boer' still echoes: It's not hate, it's hunger for justice

Al Jazeera04-06-2025

On May 25, Julius Malema, the firebrand leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), closed his campaign rally at the Mminara Sports Ground in Kwakwatsi, Free State, as he often does: by singing his favourite anti-apartheid struggle anthem, 'Dubul' ibhunu'. Sung in Xhosa, the song translates to 'Kill the Boer' or 'Kill the farmer' and has long sparked controversy in South Africa and abroad. In recent weeks, the controversy has flared up once again.
Just four days earlier, on May 21, during a tense meeting at the White House with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, United States President Donald Trump played a video of Malema and his supporters chanting the song. He claimed it was proof of a 'white genocide' in South Africa and demanded Ramaphosa explain 'that man's' conduct.
Yet Malema has been singing this song publicly since 2010. There is no white genocide occurring in South Africa. In fact, in August 2022, the country's Equality Court ruled that the song does not constitute hate speech. By performing it again in Kwakwatsi, Malema was clearly seizing an opportunity to capitalise on Trump's misleading allegations and the global media attention they brought.
The disproportionate attention granted to Malema by Trump and his ally Elon Musk obscures a deeper, more urgent reality: millions of Black South Africans, like many across the continent, are crying out for meaningful socioeconomic change and long-overdue justice for the enduring legacies of colonialism and apartheid.
They are calling for a modern revolution.
Nothing illustrates this more than the EFF's platform. Its policies centre on economic transformation, including land expropriation without compensation and the nationalisation of mines. The party embraces Black nationalism and pan-Africanism, supports Russia in its standoff with NATO, and positions itself in opposition to perceived Western dominance.
While the EFF's agenda is bold and Afrocentric, it is hardly new. Decades before the EFF's founding on July 26, 2013, the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC), a radical anti-apartheid movement, championed many of the same ideals.
Founded on April 6, 1959, by a group that split from the African National Congress (ANC), the PAC was led by Robert Sobukwe, an intellectual, pan-Africanist, and activist. At the party's launch, Sobukwe famously said, 'The Africanists take the view that there is only one race to which we all belong, and that is the human race.'
The PAC advocated for the return of land to Indigenous Africans, asserting that it had been unjustly seized by white settlers. This view – that land dispossession lies at the heart of South Africa's historical injustice – has only recently begun to be addressed by the ANC through the Expropriation Act 13 of 2024, signed into law by Ramaphosa on February 23.
South African history is rich with visions for African renewal. Sobukwe's philosophy laid the groundwork for what is often mischaracterised today as 'radical economic transformation'. Steve Biko's Black Consciousness Movement in the 1970s instilled pride and self-determination. In the late 1990s, President Thabo Mbeki championed the African Renaissance – a cultural, scientific, and economic revival aimed at decolonising African minds and institutions.
Malema is not a theoretical pioneer, but he is a potent political vessel for the ideas long espoused by Sobukwe, Biko, and Mbeki.
Much like elsewhere on the continent, South Africans are revisiting the question of land. It signals a broader resurgence of postcolonial ideology.
In 1969, Muammar Gaddafi provided a powerful example. He nationalised Libya's Western-owned oil companies to uplift the impoverished. Over a decade, Gaddafi provided free education, healthcare, and subsidised housing, giving Libyans Africa's highest per capita income.
In 2000, Zimbabwe launched its land reform programme to reclaim land taken during colonial rule. In more recent examples, Burkina Faso nationalised the Boungou and Wahgnion gold mines in August 2024 and plans to take over more. Mali reclaimed the Yatela mine in October. In December 2024, Niger seized control of the Somair uranium mine, previously run by French nuclear giant Orano.
Across Western and Southern Africa, it is clear: the legacy of colonialism still demands redress. South Africa remains the world's most unequal country. Its Gini coefficient, which measures income inequality, consistently ranks among the highest. Decades after apartheid's fall, systemic racial inequality persists, sustained by disparities in education, employment, and economic access.
Trump's astonishing decision on February 7 to sanction South Africa – partly over the Expropriation Act – reveals the West's historical amnesia and indifference. Many Black South Africans are desperate to move beyond the past, but are continually thwarted by a refusal to correct entrenched inequality.
Ironically, Trump's intervention may serve to galvanise African governments. His public posturing may appeal to his domestic base, but his tone-deafness will only deepen anti-US sentiment among South Africans.
Anti-Western feeling is already rising across the continent, fuelled by historical grievances, neocolonial policies, and the emergence of new global powers like Russia and China. This disillusionment is visible in the rejection of Western-backed institutions and a growing appetite for alternative partnerships.
Instead of attempting to shame Ramaphosa on the world stage, Trump would do better to support equitable and lawful reforms. Obsessing over Malema is futile – he is merely the voice of a generation grappling with economic pain and historical betrayal.
'Dubul' ibhunu' resonates among parts of South Africa's Black population not because they are bloodthirsty, but because the promises of liberation remain unfulfilled.
Trump would do well to understand this: the revolution in Africa is not over.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Senate begins debate on Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'
US Senate begins debate on Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Senate begins debate on Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'

The United States Senate has begun debating President Donald Trump's 940-page 'Big, Beautiful Bill' of tax breaks and sweeping cuts to healthcare and food programmes. The all-night session on Sunday came as the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said the bill would add an estimated $3.3 trillion to the US debt over a decade. It also said that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. Republican leaders, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are rushing to meet Trump's deadline of July 4, the country's Independence Day. But they barely secured enough support to muscle the bill past a procedural vote on Saturday night. A handful of Republican holdouts revolted, and it took phone calls from Trump and a visit from Vice President JD Vance to keep the legislation on track. Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who voted against the bill on Saturday, announced he would not seek re-election after Trump threatened to back a primary challenger in retribution for his 'no' vote. Tillis said he could not vote for the bill with its steep Medicaid cuts. Trump welcomed Tillis's decision not to run again, saying in a post on TruthSocial: 'Great News! 'Senator' Thom Tillis will not be seeking reelection.' But other Senate Republicans, along with conservatives in the House of Representatives, are pushing for steeper cuts, particularly to healthcare, drawing their own unexpected warning from Trump. The US president addressed 'all cost cutting Republicans,' and said: 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected. Don't go too crazy! We will make it all up, times 10, with GROWTH, more than ever before.' All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide, and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements and making sign-up eligibility more stringent. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350bn infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Democratic Senators, who are all opposed to the bill, continued efforts to delay its passage, after earlier requesting the entirety of the draft legislation be read on the Senate floor, a process which took some 16 hours. Minority Senate leader Chuck Schumer said Republicans were trying to rush through the extensive bill before Americans knew what was in it, and said Democrats would continue to 'shine a light' on the bill in the coming days. 'Some Republicans are trying to rush through a bill that they released less than two days ago under the cloak of darkness, written behind closed doors,' he said. The latest version of the bill, Schumer added, includes changes such as 'even worse' cuts to clean energy, which would see Americans pay 10 percent more on electricity bills and 'kill 900,000 good paying jobs in clean energy'. Independent Senator Bernie Sanders called it 'the most dangerous piece of legislation in the modern history of our country'. 'We don't have enough money to feed hungry children. We don't have enough money to make sure that people continue to have the health care that they need,' he said. 'But somehow, the military industrial complex is going to get another $150bn, 15 percent increase.' He added that Tillis's decision not to seek re-election shows the hold that Trump's cult of personality has over the Republican Party. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is a gift to the billionaire class while causing massive pain for working families. It is the most dangerous piece of legislation in the modern history of our country. I'm LIVE on the floor to oppose this disastrous bill. — Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) June 29, 2025 The legislation has been the sole focus of this weekend's marathon congressional session. Following up to 20 hours of debate, the Senate will enter an amendment session, known as a 'vote-a-rama,' before voting on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. If the Senate can pass the bill, it would need to return to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson has told legislators to be on call for a return to Washington, DC, this week. Al Jazeera's Mike Hanna, reporting from Washington, DC, said the bill still faces a 'lengthy process' with 'a lot of discussion, debate lying ahead'. 'Trump and his followers insist that, yes, it's going to meet, they claim, a lot of the promises he made during his campaign,' he said. 'Democrats point out that the massive tax relief is aimed at very wealthy individuals as well as corporations. They also argue very strongly that all of these tax cuts for the wealthy are being funded largely by massive cuts to social welfare programmes like Medicare, like food stamps,' he said. 'The other way it's going to impact on Americans is where the money is going as well. It's a massive increase in funding for the military. It's a massive increase in funding for those forces fighting against immigration.' According to the American Immigration Council, the bill also includes increased funding for Trump's border control policies, including as much as '$45 billion for building new immigration detention centres, including family detention facilities'. This comes as the 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre in the Florida Everglades is expected to open on Tuesday this week, as the Trump administration continues to call for 3,000 daily immigration arrests.

Canada rescinds digital services tax after Trump suspends trade talks
Canada rescinds digital services tax after Trump suspends trade talks

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Canada rescinds digital services tax after Trump suspends trade talks

Canada has rescinded its digital services tax in a bid to advance trade negotiations with the United States, days after President Donald Trump called off talks in retaliation for the levy. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, in a statement on Sunday, said he and Trump have now agreed to resume trade negotiations. 'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Carney said. The Canadian levy on technology firms had been set to go into effect on Monday. Trump, in a social media post on Friday, described the tax 'on our American Technology Companies' as 'a direct and blatant attack on our Country'. He then announced the suspension of trade talks with Canada. The US is home to some of the world's biggest technology companies, including Apple, Alphabet/Google, Amazon and Meta. Canada's Digital Services Tax Act (DSTA) came into force in June last year. It is a levy on tech revenues generated from Canadian users – even if providers do not have a physical presence in the country. The DSTA was first proposed during the 2019 federal election under then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and received approval in Canada on June 20, 2024. It came into force a week later, on June 28. The first payments of this tax are due on Monday, June 30, 2025. Large technology firms with global revenues exceeding $820m and Canadian revenues of more than $14.7m must pay a 3 percent levy on certain digital services revenues earned in Canada. Unlike traditional corporate taxes based on profits, this tax targets gross revenue linked to Canadian user engagement. Digital services the levy will apply to include: Online marketplaces, social media platforms, digital advertising and the sale or licensing of user data. One of the most contentious parts of the new framework for businesses is its retroactive nature, which demands payments on revenues dating back to January 1, 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store