logo
Afghanistan: Russia recognizes the Taliban government

Afghanistan: Russia recognizes the Taliban government

Yahoo6 days ago
"This brave decision will be an example for others." With these words, Amir Khan Muttaqi, foreign minister in Afghanistan's Taliban government, welcomed the announcement by Russia that it was officially recognizing the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
The Afghan Foreign Ministry wrote on X that this would be the start of "a new phase of positive relations, mutual respect, and constructive engagement." It also posted a video of the meeting in Kabul between Russia's ambassador to Afghanistan, Dmitry Zhirnov, and Muttaqi, in which Muttaqi declares: "Now that the process of recognition has started, Russia was ahead of everyone."
The Ambassador of the Russian Federation, Mr. Dmitry Zhirnov, called on IEA-Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi.During the meeting, the Ambassador of Russian Federation officially conveyed his government's decision to recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, pic.twitter.com/wCbJKpZYwm
— Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Afghanistan (@MoFA_Afg) July 3, 2025
The radical Islamist Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan in August 2021 after the withdrawal of international troops. The government is not democratically elected, and enforces a severe interpretation of Islamic Sharia law. Girls and women are banned from attending school after the age of 12. Until now, no country in the world has recognized the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan.
Afghanistan expert Conrad Schetter, the director of the Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies (bicc), commented that Russia may have very specific reasons for recognizing the Taliban. It may, he told DW, have considerable interests in establishing economic ties with Afghanistan, not least as a potential hub for trade with Asia. Russia has been under international sanctions since the start of the war in Ukraine.
The Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace drew the same conclusion in a study published in 2024. "Russian officials have again begun speaking about using Afghanistan as a transit hub — for exporting Russian natural gas to India, and other goods to ports in Pakistan," it said. "However, this requires a gas pipeline to be built through the mountains, and a railroad, which currently ends at Mazar-i-Sharif at the Uzbek border, to be extended."
Until now, the construction of a railroad from Russia to Pakistan via the countries of Central Asia and Afghanistan has been nothing more than a pipe dream. If it were built, it would give Russia direct access to the Indian Ocean.
According to a study by the consultancy SpecialEurasia published on Friday, Moscow is hoping that its formal recognition of Afghanistan means it will become a major supplier and economic partner for the country "by expanding trade in oil, gas, and wheat, and by collaborating on infrastructure, energy, and agriculture projects."
Schetter believes that Moscow wants to be the trendsetter in establishing a new way of dealing with Afghanistan, and that this is probably also a major factor in the decision. "They're now hoping that other countries under authoritarian rule will follow suit," he says. "With this step, they want to assume a leading role among the autocratic states. This too is probably a significant motivation behind this decision."
While Russia is the first country to recognize the Taliban officially, others, mostly countries under authoritarian rule, have maintained relations with the Taliban for some time. The Chinese embassy in Kabul is still open, for example, and meetings between the two countries have taken place at ministerial level. Iran also maintains diplomatic contacts with the Taliban, and it too has an embassy in Kabul.
Pakistan has a close relationship with Afghanistan, despite political tensions caused by the activities of Sunni extremists along the border between the two countries. The region is seen as a breeding ground for extremist and terrorist activity around the world. The forced mass exodus of ethnic Afghans from Pakistan to Afghanistan shows the extent to which the two countries actually cooperate.
Qatar is acting as an intermediary between the Taliban government and the West, and the 2020 Agreement between the US and Taliban governments that regulated the withdrawal of US troops was signed in Doha.
Schetter comments that if these countries were to follow the Russian example, it would put considerable political pressure on Western states to do the same. "These states would then have to consider their attitude toward the Taliban. And this is precisely what could create a diplomatic dynamic that the Taliban now, because of this latest move by Russia, are more hopeful for."
Afghan women's rights activists fear that Russia's recognition of the Taliban bodes ill for people in Afghanistan, especially women and girls.
Shaharzad Akbar, the former chairperson of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, says the decision did not come as a surprise, but that it is very worrying, as it normalizes the Taliban's extensive crimes against their own people, especially women. "This recognition sends a signal to all countries that work against women and human rights, that oppress women, and base their politics on religion, repression, and ethnic affiliation," she says.
Schetter is also concerned. "This step indicates that the international community prioritizes recognition of the Taliban over the observance of human rights," he says. "This is about sheer power politics, in which the question of human or women's rights really plays a very subordinate role."
He believes there is reason to hope that the Taliban might grant women more rights again one day. "But this will have to happen according to the Taliban's rules. The current logic of the Islamist group in Afghanistan consists of depriving women of all their rights in order to reinstate them at some later stage. But this will happen based on a decision that the Taliban will make themselves, not as a result of international pressure. For now, though, the Taliban may feel that the recognition by Russia validates the domestic policy they're pursuing."
This article has been translated from German.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump considers greenlighting new funding for Ukraine, sources say
Trump considers greenlighting new funding for Ukraine, sources say

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump considers greenlighting new funding for Ukraine, sources say

President Trump is considering authorizing fresh funding for Ukraine for the first time since he took office in January, multiple diplomatic sources told CBS News. The sources indicated the new funding could be intended to send a message to Russia, which has pounded Ukraine with drone and missile attacks in recent days. Russia this week launched what Ukraine described as the largest drone attack since its full-scale invasion began in February 2022 — the latest in a wave of aerial assaults that have pummeled Kyiv and other cities. Mr. Trump hinted earlier this week that he planned to send Ukraine more defensive weapons. Just days earlier, his administration paused some arms shipments — a move one White House official cast as one part of a wider global review of weapons transfers. The source of the possible new funding for Ukraine is unclear. But U.S. officials told CBS News Mr. Trump has $3.85 billion in leftover Biden-era presidential drawdown authority sitting at his fingertips, which could be used to send American military equipment to Ukraine. Former officials also told CBS News the president has the authority to seize around $5 billion in foreign Russian assets and direct the funds to Ukraine, though neither he, nor former President Joe Biden have used that power. CBS News has reached out to the White House for comment. The U.S. has sent tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine since early 2022. Mr. Trump has previously been critical of that spending, and has pressed Ukraine and Russia to work toward a peace agreement — periodically lashing out at both countries. In recent days, Russia has drawn the president's ire. He told reporters last week he was "very disappointed" with a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and he later suggested that Russia's strikes on Ukraine could prompt him to send more arms to Ukraine. "Putin is not treating human beings right. He's killing too many people," Mr. Trump told reporters during a Cabinet meeting Tuesday. "So we're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I've approved that." At other points, Mr. Trump has attacked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. A February Oval Office meeting with the Ukrainian leader descended into a verbal argument, leading to a brief pause on U.S. aid, and Mr. Trump has accused Zelenskyy of prolonging the war. Trump says "NATO is paying" for Ukraine aid Meanwhile, Mr. Trump has pushed European countries to take on a larger share of the burden of supporting Ukraine. NATO told CBS News on Friday it was working with member states to "urgently" move U.S.-made ammunition and air defenses to Ukraine, but declined to explain if any new mechanism had been established to do so. A day earlier, Mr. Trump spoke with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to discuss European partners purchasing U.S.-made equipment, according to diplomatic sources. U.S. law requires countries to seek approval before transferring any American-made equipment to a third party such as Ukraine. Under both Mr. Trump and Biden, the federal government has approved transfers by other countries to Ukraine. In an interview with NBC News on Thursday, Mr. Trump suggested NATO would buy weapons from the U.S. to transfer to Ukraine. That would mark a dramatic shift in policy since, in the past, NATO as an institution has not directly armed non-member state Ukraine. Instead, individual members of the alliance have chosen to assist Ukraine on their own. "We're sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons, 100%," Mr. Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker. When asked about the NATO plan during a press availability in Malaysia on Friday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declined to detail any new mechanism and referred to plans for European countries to buy weapons. "At the end of the day, some of the systems that Ukraine requires are systems that Europe doesn't make. They would have to purchase them from the United States," Rubio said. ICE raids in California turn violent after protesters clash with agents One year after Thomas Crooks tried to kill President Trump, here's what's known about him Reflecting on the selfless heroism shown during the Texas floods

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store