logo
Shocking footage from rural Australia shows bulldozers tearing up vineyards

Shocking footage from rural Australia shows bulldozers tearing up vineyards

Daily Mail​4 days ago
Shocking scenes are unfolding in one of Australia's top wine regions, where desperate growers are bulldozing once-valuable vineyards.
In the Riverina region of NSW, grapevines are being ripped from the ground as the market is overwhelmed by a massive oversupply of wine that simply isn't selling.
Known for its Mediterranean-style climate and top-quality Chardonnay, Sémillon and Shiraz, the Riverina is now at the heart of a crisis threatening Australia's $45 billion wine industry.
A perfect storm of falling demand, particularly among younger Australians, and crippling Chinese tariffs which were only lifted in March 2024 has pushed the industry to breaking point, with industry leaders now calling it an 'oversupply crisis'.
Jeremy Cass, CEO of Riverina Winegrape Growers (RWG), said many growers have been forced to operate at massive losses for four years, particularly those producing red varieties.
'Our industry is in a real crisis due to the oversupply caused by the Chinese tariffs that were imposed after Scott Morrison challenged China on COVID yet support from the government has been sorely lacking,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
Some growers are out of pocket up to $150,000 a year, Mr Cass said, just to stay afloat, and many are now ripping up vineyards that cost up to $35,000 per hectare to plant.
RWG chair Bruno Brombal said growers need to start making 'difficult but necessary decisions' now to avoid another season of devastating financial loss.
'Whether the decision is to reduce plantings, exit part of the business, or adapt in other ways, growers need to be having these conversations now before they're locked into another season of loss,' Mr Brombal said.
While demand from China is showing signs of recovery, many inland growers have been left behind as consumers both overseas and at home chase trendier alternatives like seltzers, spirits, and so-called 'functional beverages.'
Wine now ranks last among preferred drinks for younger Aussies, with Gen Z turning away from alcohol altogether in favour of 'sober-curious' lifestyles and health-conscious choices.
Even major wineries are scrambling to adapt, experimenting with wine cocktails, liquor-wine blends, and low-alcohol options to stay relevant.
'Australian Grape and Wine has put in a prebudget submission to government two years in a row for $85 million, $30 million of which is earmarked to help some growers transfer to other crops,' he said.
'This has been ignored but we see government spend $70 million a year for 10 years so that we can get an NRL team from Papua New Guinea.'
Australia is home to 2,156 wineries and more than 6,000 grape growers, supporting nearly 165,000 jobs.
But with red wine fetching just 50 cents per bladder in some cases, the bottom has fallen out.
Globally, wine consumption has dropped by 3.1 billion litres in five years - a shift that's rocked even the world's most established producers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to sell your house privately in Australia and avoid agent commissions
How to sell your house privately in Australia and avoid agent commissions

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How to sell your house privately in Australia and avoid agent commissions

Thousands of Australians are opting to sell their homes themselves in a bid to avoid paying increasingly costly agents fees and commissions. Barry Johnston, aged in his 60s, is among the thousands of Australians who have decided to do away with real estate agents and instead sell their homes privately. Mr Johnston initially engaged with a real estate agent who told him to list his four-bedroom Logan Village, Queensland home at about $1.25million. Having lived in the area for 14 years, he believed his property could fetch $1.42million and decided to privately list it at that value. Within five days, he has secured a 'firm offer' at his listing price and a further offer above asking. 'The agents that have been through here have really undervalued our place, they just wanted to make a quick turnover,' he told Daily Mail Australia. He photographed the property himself and engaged with a third-party website that allowed him to advertise his home on real estate portals for a nominal fee. In all, he estimated the process cost him no more than $2,000 - less than the fee an agent had quoted him for professional photography alone. He said it was 'a lot of work', but said much of it - including readying the property for sale - would have been necessary even with an agent. He expected selling privately will end up saving him about $30,000 in commission and adding up to $150,000 to his closing price. 'In today's economy, that's nothing to be sneezed at,' he said. For Mr Johnston, the question was as simple as: 'Can I justify paying someone so much for something I could do myself?' 'There's just nothing that the real estate agent can do that I can't do, that's basically the crux of it.' Real estate expert Neil Jenman told Daily Mail Australia most homeowners could secure as good or better results than most agents with 'a few hours research'. 'Australian home sellers are bluffed, manipulated, misinformed and terrified into believing they have to use a real estate agent to sell their home,' he said. He claimed Australia's rates of private home sales were among the lowest in the world, while the costs of advertising are the highest of anywhere in the world. 'Most agents don't do anything the sellers couldn't do themselves,' he said. For a flat fee, however, homeowners can pay to advertise on third party sites who, as registered agencies, are allowed to list the ads on property portals like and Domain. Colin Sacks, who runs one such third party site, told Daily Mail Australia said sale enquiries had grown 25 per cent in the past 18 months. 'The number of enquiries I get every day for people who are thinking about this, it's just growing more and more,' he said. 'There's no question... it's just getting busier and busier.' Michael Fotheringham, managing director at Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute agreed third party sites appeared to have increased the rate of private sales. 'It's a minority of sales overall, but there is a strong undercurrent of people who are making a choice not to go through agents and do it themselves,' he said. He said buyers could stand to gain just as much as earners from the shift towards private sales. 'There a three parties involved in a property transfer: the buyer, the seller and the middle man. When you cut out the middle man, there can be a lot of savings.' That said, selling privately won't appeal to homeowners of all kinds. Joanne White recently tried unsuccessfully to sell her commercial property in Stawell, north-west of Melbourne, before engaging a real estate agent. She told Daily Mail Australia selling privately is difficult where 'unique' properties like her own - a converted former residence - are involved. 'I think my biggest issue is, basically, I have a unique property that really, there's not anything else like it in the whole of Australia,' she said. Despite the challenges, Ms White said she would consider selling privately again with a less challenging property. President of the Real Estate Institute of Australia Leanne Pilkington said the work of agents extends well beyond arranging a sale. 'Selling a property is not just about listing it online - it involves legal compliance, understanding market conditions, negotiating with buyers and stakeholders, and managing contracts,' Ms Pilkington told Daily Mail Australia. 'Going private may seem appealing, but it can lead to costly mistakes or delays if the process isn't handled correctly according to legal requirements.'

New Anglo-Australian defence treaty should include more nations
New Anglo-Australian defence treaty should include more nations

Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Times

New Anglo-Australian defence treaty should include more nations

Nuclear-powered submarines are among some of the most complex objects built by man. They ­require exceptional build quality, such as in the welds used to ensure structural integrity. The skills required are scarce and in high demand, which is why even the United States finds it challenging to launch more than one a year. Together with the US, China, Russia, France and now India, the United Kingdom is a member of the small club of nations capable of producing these deadly prowlers of the ocean depths, the presence of which can send lesser navies scurrying for port. However, the immense cost of these vessels, the capital ships of the modern era, means that it is difficult to maintain a steady drumbeat of production. Gaps in orders can result in the running down of supply chains and an exodus of trained workers. That is why the signing this weekend of the 50-year Geelong treaty between the UK and Australia is so important. The agreement covers the construction in ­Barrow-in-Furness and Adelaide of a new class of hunter-killer sub (SSN), nuclear powered but conventionally armed. Britain is looking to build 12 in a move that would take the Royal Navy back to its Cold War strength. Australia may build half a dozen. Good news for Barrow, home to Britain's only nuclear yard, and Rolls Royce in Derby, where submarine reactors are made. Some 7,000 jobs will be created at Barrow and in the supply chain; the export of components to Australia will earn­ £20 billion over 25 years. There is, however, uncertainty hanging over the deal. Geelong is a subsidiary part of the Aukus agreement involving the US, UK and Australia. The idea is for the Americans to sell Australia three to five off-the-shelf SSNs to serve as a stop-gap before the arrival of its home-built subs in the 2040s. But Aukus, a child of the Biden era, is now in danger of falling victim to the Trump administration's 'America first' policy. There is fear in Washington that the loss of the subs would seriously undermine the US Navy's ability to defend Taiwan from invasion by China. This wavering American commitment to Aukus is further ­evidence of the need for US allies to future-proof their armed forces against its increasingly mercurial security policy. That means not being overly reliant on the US for equipment. Britain is already cooperating with Italy and Japan on the Tempest combat aircraft project, and growing closer to France and Germany in the nuclear and conventional fields. Geelong suggests another, complementary route: the rebuilding of Britain's defence-industrial ties with its most trusted friends in a 'Canzuk' ­alliance of Canada, Australia, the UK and New Zealand. These countries have gone their own way on trade, with old Commonwealth patterns of commerce replaced by regional ones, but they can all benefit from economies of scale. Together, ­Canzuk has a joint GDP that is fourth behind China, the US and the European Union. That promises economies of scale in defence procurement without the overweening influence of the US. The Canzuk concept joins together nations with shared histories and values. Trade may have declined, but not trust. The four are already partners in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance and can do a lot more to strengthen mutual security. In this uncertain world, where authoritarian powers threaten the international order and the US insurance policy is expiring, old ties can be put to new uses.

UN urges Australia to step up climate action
UN urges Australia to step up climate action

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

UN urges Australia to step up climate action

SYDNEY, July 28 (Reuters) - The United Nations climate chief has called on Australia to set an ambitious 2035 emissions target and accelerate its clean energy transition, warning a failure to act risks eroding living standards and regional stability. Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said Australia should "go for what's smart by going big". "Don't settle for what's easy. Bog standard is beneath you," he said at a Smart Energy Council event in Sydney. Australia faces scrutiny for backing new fossil fuel projects while seeking to co-host the UN COP31 climate summit with the Pacific next year. The centre-left Labor government, which took power in 2022 with a mandate to reduce carbon emissions, cleared the country's largest gas plant to run until 2070 in May – a decision that critics said called into question Australia's commitment to tackling climate change. Australia is also among the highest polluting countries per capita due to its coal power generation. Consultancy Wood Mackenzie has projected Australia is set to fall far short of its target of 82% renewable generation by 2030 due to state-level rollbacks, grid connection delays and inadequate investment. Stiell said the country's 2035 emissions reduction target, due in September, would be a 'defining moment' that could send a message that 'this country is open for clean investment, trade, and long-term partnerships'. Australia also had the opportunity to become a global leader in renewables and that 'doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer', he said. He warned that a lack of action would erode living standards and destabilise Australia's neighbours in the Pacific and Southeast Asia, which were more susceptible to rising sea levels and extreme weather. 'This is the moment: to get behind a climate plan that doesn't just write that vision into policy – but delivers in spades for your people,' Stiell said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store