logo
Two cars making MG cool again: IM5 versus IM6 - a head-to-head of the new Tesla rivals

Two cars making MG cool again: IM5 versus IM6 - a head-to-head of the new Tesla rivals

Daily Mail​4 days ago
There are two new MGs in town and they don't look like MGs anymore...
Just when you thought you could pigeonhole modern day MG, the now Chinese-owned brand has launched an entirely new range of cars that are entirely different.
MG has brought parent company SAIC's Intelligence in Motion cars to the UK and in doing so has shaken up everything car buyers can expect from its electric car offerings.
The attention-grabbing IM5 'hatchback' and IM6 SUV stand alone in a new premium MG line, under an arm called 'Technology Showcase'. They sit below the 'Aspirational/Halo' Cyberster EV roadster offering and far above the 'Core' MG EV offerings such as the S5 EV and the M4 EV.
MG says the range centres around four pillars: 'Purposeful Innovation, Ultimate Performance, Intelligent Safety and Elevated Experience.
But corporate speak aside, what are these IM model all about, where does IM come from and are these models going to live up to the hype they've already garnered in China?
To answer all our IM questions, Motoring Reporter Freda Lewis-Stempel drove the IM5 and IM6 back to back on launch in West Sussex - and a head-to-head seemed the natural conclusion.
MGs new IM range – what is it?
IM Motors is a Shanghai-based brand that's a tie-up between SAIC, e-commerce power player Alibaba and Zhangjiang Hi-Tech, a leading R&D specialist.
IM introduced its L7 electric saloon in 2021, but it's the L6 (first launched in China in May 2024) that's arrived in the UK as the IM5.
So, IM sits under the same SAIC umbrella as MG but, whether that's enough for people to be convinced it's an MG, is up to each and every buyer to decide. We don't really think it matters.
When you see them on the road neither the IM5 nor the IM6 will have an MG badge.
Instead, there's just very discrete MG lettering on the back dwarfed by the IM motif front and back.
Not only does this visually sit the IM models apart from the sensible, affordable MG reputation MG has, but it also stops MG itself having to fork out a lot of money to homologate the cars for the UK market.
People certainly gawk at the cars more as you drive by for their lack of MG badge – attention is never a bad thing in marketing they say.
The IM5 and IM6 – how they compare in looks and size
The IM5 is the Tesla Model 3 rival, and the IM6 is the Tesla Model Y rival.
The IM5 is longer and sleeker, with a length of 4,931mm and a height of 1,474mm. The IM6 comparatively has a length of 4,904mm and a height of 1,669mm.
But while the IM6 SUV is chunkier than the sculpted saloon-like IM5 (the IM5 is technically a hatchback but only on paper), it's still far more contoured than the Model Y.
We all like different looking cars (there's probably someone out there who doesn't even believe the E-Type is a beautiful vehicle), but I imagine most people would agree with me when I say both IMs are far sexier (not a word usually used to describe an MG) than their Tesla counterparts.
They are worlds away from MG's family offerings and seriously attractive.
The IM5 and IM6 come with all-wheel drive options (just Performance for the IM5 and Performance and Launch Edition for IM6). Both are cars you'll be happy to get behind the wheel of
Is the IM5 or the IM6 better to drive? And which offers the best range?
The good news is that both the IM5 and IM6 are cars you'll be happy to get behind the wheel of - they share the same architecture after all.
If you want headline stats then go for the Performance variant of the IM5 or IM6.
The IM6 does 0 to 62mph in 3.5 seconds and has 740bhp to raise the hairs on the back of your neck. The IM5 does the same sprint in 3.2 seconds and also delivers this stonking 740bhp.
As you can tell both cars are blisteringly quick, and off the line the power is delivered as a smooth, successive build in both.
The IM5 and IM6 come with all-wheel drive options (just Performance for the IM5 and Performance and Launch Edition for IM6), both of which I drove on launch.
The two cars also share the same pin-drop quiet driving experience thanks to the 'Road Noise Cancellation', laminated glass and double-glazed panoramic roof.
But while the IM6 has active damping control and advanced air suspension, it still juddered slightly on the typically pothole-ridden roads of Kent and West Sussex, not fairing much better than the IM5 which uses a passive spring-and-damper set up. The IM5's ride quality actually seemed pretty much on par, and managed to add executive-style refinement to a low-ridding, extremely fast 'hatchback'.
They both faired in the very good category, so there's not much in it.
Handling-wise, there's was a little bit of roll in the corners of the IM5 but compared to the IM6's steering which seemed to get itself in a pickle no matter the driving mode, I much preferred threading the IM5 around the leafy country roads and stop-start traffic in towns than I did the IM6.
On a sunny day, the IM5's low centre of gravity, spicy acceleration and interior comfort really hit the spot.
Both the IM5 and the IM6 have the same slightly clunky braking - they just need more bite. Also one pedal drive would be appreciated for the lazy town driver among us.
Did someone forget the tech-first memo here? But really the braking was the only area to mark either car down on significantly.
Family minded buying aside, I'd pick the IM5 over the IM6, which is unusual for me because I tend to favour SUV ride height.
Somehow the IM6's visibility and road presence didn't quite fit with me (but I am only 5'3 so that might not be applicable to other drivers) the same way the IM5's did.
Onto range - and the standout good news here is that both cars have seriously good range, and come with a Long Range option.
The IM5 gives you the absolute maximum mileage you can extract from a single charge with the Long Range coughing up an stonking 441 miles. That just pips the Tesla Model 3's 436-mile maximum offering.
But even if you get the Standard Range IM5 with a 75kW battery or the Performance version with the bigger 100kW battery, you still have 304 and 357 miles of range on offer respectively.
And the difference between the Long Range IM5 and the Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive Model 4 is just a fiver – by the time you've spent almost £50k £5 seems a moot point.
The IM6 might be bigger and heavier, but it can go the long distances no problem with its 313 miles of range for the more powerful Performance 100kW variant. If you go for the Long Range 100kW version then you can cruise across countries with 388 miles of range – one sneaky mile more than the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Rear-Wheel Drive.
You know where MG's new IM models excel where other MG models don't? At ultra-rapid chargers.
The IM5 100 Long Range and 100 Performance and IM6 100 Long Range and 100 Performance are all capable of DC ultra-rapid charging up to 396kW. Only the IM5 is capped at 153kW. In 'pull up, plug in and go' context this gives you 10 to 80 per cent charge in just 17 minutes across all four 100kWh battery models.
This 396kW charging smashes Tesla's 250kW speeds out of the water.
Interior, practicality and comfort
We arrive at the main point of similarity between the two cars – the interior.
Hop from one to the other and except for the actual shape of the cabin, you'd be left scratching your head to find a single point of difference between the two cockpits.
Both the IM5 and IM6 have the option of a leather-style grey interior or an all-white leather-style interior.
While it can be more of a faff to clean, I'd definitely recommend the white – it flatters the car better, makes the interior airier (especially with the panoramic roof) and just feels plusher.
The IMs interiors are a leap up from normal MG interiors. The only hard plastics to be found are on the door bins, the rest is soft touch and there's even velvet-style carpet in the footwell. Whether it's socially acceptable to take your shoes off and wriggle your toes in this underfoot luxurious texture is up to each driver to decree.
It's always socially acceptable though to use the heated and ventilated seats for front passengers, heated seats for rear passengers, and ventilated wireless charging.
There's plenty of rear space in both cars, even the IM5 with its lower height and more sweeping roofline
The front seats are electronically adjustable with memory function and four-way lumbar support, while the rear seats have manual backrest adjustment.
They're made for comfort and not sportiness which explains their chocolate bar appearance, and while not very supportive during fast cornering, they are very plush.
Obviously, there's more room in the IM6 for rear passengers, but even the IM5 has a good amount of legroom and headroom.
Those travelling with a brood will appreciate the practicality of both cars, with the IM5 offering an 18L frunk and 457 litres of boot space, and the IM6 giving you a larger 32-litre frunk and 665 litres in the boot.
The 26.3-inch infotainment screen dominates the car and isn't accompanied by any buttons
IM infotainment and driving assists
The rest of the interior in both models is dominated by a huge 26.3-inch infotainment screen with a 10.5-inch touchscreen below for driver functions and vehicle setup.
They look good and are easy to use (when stationary) and wireless CarPlay connection is one of the best I've tried in a while. CarPlay even managed to seamlessly reconnect itself each time I got back in the car, which sounds like a small thing, but 80 per cent of the cars I test drive can't seem to manage this.
However, it is just too much screen in both models.
The cockpit is a barren buttonless landscape, which means you're constantly having to look away from the road for everything, even changing the temperature or driving modes.
To be fair to MG they've tried to work around this with customisations and shortcuts, but you still have to take your eyes off the road. And you're not looking sideways but rather down to the centre console – so properly off the road.
When I changes the aircon, the driver awareness safety system ironically told me I was distracted. I wanted to tell it a far less polite version of 'you don't say'.
With the IM focus on tech comes the 800 driving assists now fitted to modern EVs, but because you can customise them they aren't too annoying actually.
The most useful features are the 360 degree parking camera with 'transparent chassis', the 'One Touch Automatic Park Assist' which reverses, pull outs and curbside parks for you, and the rear cameras which can be accessed via one roll of the steering wheel button and give you a crystal-clear view of the road behind. You'll be relying on these rear cameras because the rear windows are the smallest slivers I've ever come across, especially in the IM5.
The most fun tech by far though? 'Crab mode' - the car scuttles around diagonally to allow movement in tight spaces.
How much do the IM5 and IM6 cost and when can you buy them?
The IM5 75 Standard Range, 100 Long Range and 100 Performance cost the following: £39,450, £44,995 and £48,495.
To compare, the Tesla Model 3 starts from £39,990 and hits £59,990 for the Performance spec.
The IM6 is more expensive than the IM5. The 100 Long Range costs £47,995, the 100 Performance is £50,995 and the Launch Edition is £52,995.
Again for comparison the Audi e-Tron starts at £47,305 and goes up to £57,540, and the Model Y begins at £49,990 and peaks at £51,990.
MG dealers will have both the IM5 and IM6 available to test drive from September.
IM makes MG cool, and let's be honest MG are many a very good thing - affordable, safe, well-specced as standard - but they aren't cool. Until now that is...
Cars and Motoring verdict: Will the IM5 and IM6 make people buy an MG for more than just affordability?
As you've probably deduced I prefer the IM5, but there are so many similarities between the cars that it really comes down to what you need - are you needing a family EV or an electric hatchback/executive drive?
They aren't perfect but they are transformative for MG. And honestly if I were Elon Musk right now I'd be adding these two cars straight to the top of my ever growing list of problems.
Actually they could cause a headache for more than just Tesla because the IM5 and IM6 take MG into a new upmarket sales arena that a lot of snooty brands would never have dreamt MG would appear in.
IM makes MG cool, and let's be honest MG are many a very good thing - affordable, safe, well-specced as standard - but they aren't cool.
Until now that is.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rail & Sail ferry service to Belfast ‘set up to fail'
Rail & Sail ferry service to Belfast ‘set up to fail'

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Rail & Sail ferry service to Belfast ‘set up to fail'

​The number of passengers using a flagship rail and ferry service between Scotland and Northern Ireland has tumbled to 12 a day. Freedom of Information figures obtained by The Times reveal the 'Rail & Sail' service carried 4,400 passengers in the year to 2025, compared with 15,​000 passengers five years previously. A drastic cut in service levels has been blamed for the 71 per cent drop in annual passenger numbers since 2019. Services were curtailed during the Covid-19 lockdowns, with tickets valid only on a single train, coach and ferry combination each day. This system remains in place. Before the pandemic, several options were available daily. ​Colin Smyth​, Labour's MSP for South Scotland​, accused ​SNP ministers of allowing the service to be 'set up to fail' and called for a direct rail link to Cairnryan port, which replaced Stranraer as Scotland's ferry gateway to Belfast. Currently, passengers must take a coach from Ayr to the port, a transfer that a rail expert says is the root of the problem. 'The rot set in when Stena Line moved operations from Stranraer, where the port directly adjoined the railway station, to the remote Cairnryan,' said Mark Smith, who founded the travel website The Man in Seat 61. He said the service 'appears to have reneged on the promise to provide a bus connection, reducing service to one per day'. Colin Smyth said the once-popular 'boat train' was no longer viable for most travellers owing to its inflexibility. 'By cutting the connection back to a single daily coach, the journey has been made so awkward and inflexible that it's no longer a viable option for most travellers,' he said. He believes the service is being intentionally run down so it can be written off due to 'lack of demand', a move that he says goes against the Scottish government's commitment to promote public transport and reduce transport emissions. Despite the low usage, some travellers have complained that the service was often sold out when they try to book online, with some opting for direct coach transfers from Glasgow instead. The low numbers have also led to instances of the bus leaving Cairnryan with a single passenger onboard. Transport Scotland said that a rail link to the port had been considered in 2022 as part of a strategic transport review but the idea was rejected because it 'was not expected to provide value for money'. Campaigners argue that the current situation goes against Scotland's national transport strategy, which prioritises public transport over cars. Ellie Harrison, a transport campaigner, said this strategy needs to be 'reflected in the cost of the different transport modes, so that the lower-carbon journeys are always cheaper.' She added that with ScotRail now in public ownership, it should be a priority for the government to promote the service and help reduce short-haul flights. In response, ScotRail's commercial director, Claire Dickie, said the company was 'committed to supporting the Rail & Sail route and encouraging sustainable travel options'. She said that ScotRail was working with Stena Line to make the service more 'appealing and reliable for customers' and that ticket sales to Belfast via Cairnryan were 'up 35​ per cent so far in 2025'. Stena Line echoed this sentiment, calling the Rail & Sail service 'a key part of the Stena Line travel offer' and stating that the company 'would welcome improvements in rail services and products'. A Transport Scotland spokesman said any commercial decisions related to ticket initiatives would be for Stena Line to decide, in liaison with other operators such as ScotRail.

Villagers whose country idyll was 'destroyed' by traveller site overnight furious after family submits retrospective permission to make site permanent and some are even considering moving
Villagers whose country idyll was 'destroyed' by traveller site overnight furious after family submits retrospective permission to make site permanent and some are even considering moving

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Villagers whose country idyll was 'destroyed' by traveller site overnight furious after family submits retrospective permission to make site permanent and some are even considering moving

A luxurious property has gone on the market just weeks after an illegal travellers' site appeared on its doorstep. The stunning four-bedroom detached bungalow – priced at offers around £950,000 – is less than 150 yards from the caravan park, which is built on green belt land and without planning permission. Set in 3.5 acres of rural land, the high-specification property includes stables and a hot tub area, perfect for entertaining friends. Estate agents Stapleton Derby described the home as: 'Set within a peaceful rural location and offering superb access to all major motorway connections. 'This absolutely stunning, newly built four-bedroom detached bungalow presents a rare opportunity to acquire a luxurious home with its own equestrian facilities and expansive land. 'Designed with elegance and practicality in mind, the property is a true sanctuary, combining high-end finishes with thoughtful architectural detail. 'Externally, the front of the property welcomes you with a charming courtyard and ample parking for multiple vehicles. 'To the rear, a private oasis awaits, featuring patios, a hot tub, decking with seating areas, an Astro turf lawn, and a large pergola with its own bar and social space —perfect for entertaining or unwinding in style.' The current owners made the decision to sell as villagers fear the caravan camp, which sprung up in May – will knock hundreds of thousands of pounds off property prices. Rex Bennett, 78, said: 'Judging from past experiences of travellers' sites appearing close by, house prices will definitely fall. 'I've lived here nearly 40 years, and it's happened before when travellers' site spring up. 'The value of people's houses will fall and the owners lose money. 'Whether the reasons are justified or not, no one would choose to live near a caravan site.' He added: 'I haven't heard of anyone having trouble with the travellers but that doesn't make what they have done right. 'They have been very clever about how they have gone about building it. 'Turning up on a Bank Holiday weekend, knowing full well they wouldn't be stopped. 'It was very well thought out.' Stephen Holgate, 55, said: 'I don't have a problem with the site but then again, I don't have to live next to it. 'I'm not sure how I'd feel if they were my neighbours.' The travellers tore up the protected six-acre greenbelt plot, in Burtonwood, Cheshire, in just 72 hours – covering it in hardstanding and erecting a 10ft perimeter fence. The site located between Tan House Lane and Farmer's Lane was lit up like 'Blackpool Illuminations' at night according to one neighbour. Warrington Borough Council said it was aware of the 'potential breach of planning control' and vowed to 'take strong enforcement action within the legal framework.' A retrospective application has been submitted seeking full planning permission for a change of use of land associated with Tan House Farm. The documents state the change of use is for a gypsy and traveller residential site, with four pitches and associated landscaping, and the installation of a farm gate to a footpath on the corner of Tan House Lane and Farmers Lane. Applicant John Varey said the pitches can accommodate a mix of 16 caravans and mobile homes, occupied by Romani gypsies. The report added: 'All of the proposed occupants grew up in nomadic families and have continued to follow that way of life. The families travel in caravans for work and to attend fairs. 'The site is in the greenbelt, however, the land represents 'grey belt', and on that basis, the development is not necessarily inappropriate within the green belt.' Planning documents continued: 'The proposed site provides four gypsy and traveller pitches which are safe, well-designed, and ensure that the site will be private and provide a favourable living environment. 'The proposals include substantial planting and screening, which will result in an on-site biodiversity net gain 'The site will be well screened and capable of integrating with the area, which is characterised by farmland and some other pockets of residential development. 'The site is already connected to water, and connection to the electricity grid is proposed and achievable. 'The package treatment plant and welfare units facilitate the effective management of foul waste. 'The entire site remains permeable, ensuring that surface water will soak away, and the site is well drained with a ditch along the northern boundary. 'Given the families' lack of alternative accommodation, their living standards have been greatly improved since moving onto the application site.' Villagers have already expressed concerns that a metal gate has been installed on a public right-of-way. The planning document read: 'The metal gate is 3.6m, and a 1.2m gap is left to the right-hand side for pedestrians which enables continued access to the public right of way. 'The road is owned by the applicant and the gate is locked with a padlock. For reasons relating to fly-tipping and security, we would argue that the gate should be approved as part of the planning application.' The council has been inundated with objections by villagers. One objector wrote: 'The land has been destroyed without any planning permission, our greenbelt completely vandalised with absolutely no regard to the rules or residents. 'It is absolutely disgusting that this has been allowed to happen.' Another said: 'The site has damaged the natural beauty of the area and transformed once green belt land into a caravan park. 'Not only this, but a footpath has been obstructed with little to no consideration for anyone who plans to use this regularly used route. 'Failure to reject this planning application will only lead to further exploitation of the system in similar ways around the area, which will seriously damage an area of considerable natural beauty and wildlife.' But one letter of support read: 'I have spoken with some of the people on the caravan park at the village café. 'They were polite, friendly, and explained the situation of Warrington having no caravan sites for them to live on. I am happy with them being there. It is better than them on our parks.' The council is expected to reach a decision on the retrospective planning application later in the year.

Concrete sales plunge to 62-year low as hopes for Labour's building boom fade
Concrete sales plunge to 62-year low as hopes for Labour's building boom fade

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Concrete sales plunge to 62-year low as hopes for Labour's building boom fade

Demand for concrete has fallen to its lowest level since 1963 in a serious blow to Labour's hopes of building more houses. Sales of ready-mixed concrete fell by 11.5pc in the three months to June against the previous three months, according to data from the Mineral Products Association (MPA), which represents producers. The product is widely-used in housebuilding to lay foundations, and provide the base for flooring and driveways. The figures suggest that Labour will miss its target of building 1.5m new homes by the end of this Parliament 'by a significant margin', the MPA said. Concrete sales have fallen by a third in 10 years, and more than halved over the last 20 years. The drop means that annual sales have not been this low since 1963 – before the nationwide housing and infrastructure building boom that transformed Britain. The MPA said that sales of other building materials, such as mortar and sand, also fell, with demand for most products at 'historically low levels'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store