Taiwan considers chip ban after South Africa capitulates to Chinese pressure
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is considering restricting semiconductor exports to South Africa after the latter unilaterally downgraded Taiwan's representative offices in Pretoria and Cape Town, without prior consultation or bilateral agreement, as reported by the Taipei Times.The South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation announced the changes in the Government Gazette last Monday, stating that the "Taipei Liaison Office" in Pretoria had been renamed the "Taiwan Commercial Office in Johannesburg," while the Cape Town office was similarly renamed. Furthermore, both offices were reclassified from diplomatic missions to "international organisations" on South Africa's official website, the Taipei Times reported.MOFA's Department of West Asian and African Affairs Director-General Philippe Yen Chia-liang condemned the move as a blatant act of political appeasement to Beijing and a violation of the spirit of the 1997 bilateral agreement that allowed Taiwan to maintain a presence in South Africa after diplomatic ties were severed in 1998."MOFA expresses deep regret over South Africa bowing to Chinese pressure and ignoring its years-long friendship with Taiwan," Yen stated, as cited by the Taipei Times.Yen emphasised that this "crude behaviour," done without negotiations or prior notice, severely undermines Taiwan's dignity and sovereignty. In response, MOFA and other government agencies are now weighing economic countermeasures, including a halt to semiconductor exports to South Africa -- a move aimed at signalling Taiwan's unwillingness to tolerate foreign policy shifts dictated by Chinese coercion, the Taipei Times reported.Although Taiwan is not a major chip supplier to South Africa, it plays a dominant role in global semiconductor production, and even limited restrictions may serve as a diplomatic warning. The specific types of chips affected and the timeline for implementing the restrictions are still under discussion.South Africa cited the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 , often misused by Beijing, to justify the downgrading, falsely interpreting it as an international consensus that the People's Republic of China (PRC) has exclusive legitimacy over Taiwan. However, MOFA strongly rejected this stance, asserting that the resolution does not address Taiwan's sovereignty or preclude other nations from engaging with it."MOFA solemnly urges the South African government to negotiate with Taiwan as soon as possible," Yen said. As of now, no dialogue has been initiated.Despite mounting pressure, MOFA confirmed that Taiwan's two offices in South Africa remain operational.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
Good news for Mukesh Ambani, Reliance Industries becomes highest-ranked Indian firm on…, Ratan Tata's Tata Motors at…
Good news for Mukesh Ambani, Reliance Industries becomes highest-ranked Indian firm on…, Ratan Tata's Tata Motors at… It is now the 22nd year of Mukesh Ambani's Reliance being a part of the Fortune Global 500 list much longer than any other private sector company in India. Advertisement Billionaire Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries has once again emerged as the highest-ranked Indian company on the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list. The oil-to-telecom and retail giant secured the 88th position this year, slipping slightly from its 86th rank in 2024. However, the company has gained a whopping 67 places in the last four years, from No.155 in 2021. Advertisement === US retail giant Walmart continues to be the top-ranked company in the world, followed by Amazon. The top 10 has three Chinese companies – state-owned electric utility State Grid at No.3, China National Petrol at No.5 and oil and gas giant Sinopec Group at No.6. World's largest oil exporter Saudi Aramco is ranked at No.4 and Apple at No.8. Advertisement === How Many Indian Companies Are In Fortune's Global 500 list? India has 9 companies in the Fortune's Global 500 list this year – 5 of them from the public sector and 4 from the private sector. Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is ranked at No.95, unchanged from last year. Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) slipped 11 slots to be ranked No.127 in the 2025 ranking. Country's largest lender State Bank of India (SBI) gained 15 slots to be ranked at 163, while HDFC Bank soared 48 places to come in at No.258. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) lost one place to be ranked at 181. Other Indian firms on the list included Tata Motors at No.283 (down 12 positions from 2024), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) at No.285 (down 27 position) and ICICI Bank at No.464 (unchanged). What Is Fortune Global 500 list? The Fortune Global 500 list ranks companies by total revenues for their respective fiscal years ended on or before March 31, 2025. The Indian rupee's depreciation against the USD from 83.35 in March 2024 to 85.45 in March 2025 had a negative impact on Reliance's revenues when converted to USD. Reliance closed FY25 with record high consolidated gross revenues of Rs 1,071,174 crore, up 7.1 per cent year-on-year, and EBITDA of Rs 183,422 crore, up 2.9 per cent, with each of the oil-to-chemical (O2C), oil and gas, retail and digital services businesses posting healthy growth. (With Inputs From PTI)
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Blockades, blackouts and bullets: China invades Taiwan on screen
On an island in the Kinmen archipelago, in the Taiwan Strait, Taiwanese soldiers are marching through a dark tunnel. 'The enemy is landing,' one of their number says. As they emerge onto a gloomy beach, they begin to notice hordes of fighters from the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) camouflaged in the shadows. Lights flash in the darkness; the sound of machine-gun fire pierces the air. 'Zero Day Attack', a ten-episode drama, makes its debut on Taiwanese TV on August 2nd. It is the first mainstream film or TV show made in the country to imagine how China might try to annex the island, making its broadcast a cultural milestone. (The show will be released in Japan later in the month, but international distribution has yet to be announced.) Taiwan's screenwriters have avoided depicting a cross-strait war, considering the subject too contentious. But Cheng Hsin-mei, the showrunner of 'Zero Day Attack', is concerned, having observed the Chinese Communist Party's crackdown in Hong Kong in recent years. 'We want to bring awareness while we have the freedom to create,' she says. 'We could lose our freedom in the future.' Ever since the Kuomintang (KMT) fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing the Chinese civil war, China's leaders have threatened to retake the island. At first, this did not seem realistic, as China did not have much firepower. Then, after China began to open up and reform its economy in 1978, Taiwanese began investing in China: the resulting economic intertwinement encouraged many Taiwanese to think a war with China was improbable. Most Taiwanese are still blasé about the Chinese threat. But Russia's invasion of Ukraine—not to mention China's recent military exercises in the Taiwan Strait—have convinced some that conflict could happen. Puma Shen, a member of Taiwan's parliament who acted as a consultant on 'Zero Day Attack', says the show reflects such shifting attitudes. In 2021, when he co-founded the Kuma Academy, a non-governmental organisation which teaches civil defence, many Taiwanese were critical of such efforts and denied that Taiwan needed a 'pre-war mentality'. Now, however, increasing numbers are signing up for workshops on topics such as information warfare and evacuation planning. Taiwan's government, too, wants to up the ante. Last year a new policy on conscription came into effect, extending the term from four months to 12. This year Lai Ching-te, the president, announced plans to increase defence spending to over 3% of GDP, up from 2.5%. So how does 'Zero Day Attack' envisage an attack unfolding? It begins with a Chinese spy plane disappearing in waters near Taiwan. Under the guise of a search-and-rescue mission, China deploys aeroplanes and ships and starts to enact a blockade. Taiwan's outgoing president tells the president-elect that an American aircraft-carrier is nearby and the Americans will help if he gives the word, but she is reluctant to take him up on the offer, fearing that any intervention would escalate the conflict. Such worries about appearing the provocateur echo real officials' concerns when it comes to handling China's military manoeuvres. 'Zero Day Attack' underscores that a Chinese attack on Taiwan will involve a range of weapons, not all of them ballistic. There are blackouts. Phone signal becomes patchy; the island sees its biggest internet outage ever, one which lasts for more than a day. News stations temporarily go off air. The aim is to create chaos and undermine any sense of social cohesion. Jets are often seen flying overhead and tanks are on the streets. Many Taiwanese start to flee from the island. Particularly effective is China's information warfare. Doctored videos circulate on social media, spreading fake news about a missile strike. Pro-China influencers start agitating online and presenting Taiwan's democracy as a sham. China's government infiltrates criminal gangs, using them to create havoc on the streets. China proposes a peace agreement, which stipulates that Taiwan accept the policy of 'one country, two systems'—the model of governance China imposes on Hong Kong, which supposedly allows for autonomy but in practice leaves Hong Kong at the mercy of the Communist Party. Some politicians, desperate for resolution, support the agreement. Each episode of 'Zero Day Attack' is directed by a leading Taiwanese film-maker and looks at the events from a particular perspective. One episode follows the president-elect; another focuses on the tv stations; still others explore how rich Taiwanese or working-class people would be affected. The result is a scorching depiction of how war would shake society. Warning shots As you might expect for a drama about a loaded geopolitical subject, 'Zero Day Attack' has not had zero problems in production. Some consider the show to be propaganda for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, which firmly rejects China's claim to the island. Politicians in the KMT, which favours more cordial ties with China, have pointed out that Taiwan's culture ministry had invested in the series (though the ministry does this for many local productions). Another of the show's main investors is Robert Tsao, a billionaire founder of a semiconductor company, who has also given money to civilian-defence initiatives including the Kuma Academy. Both Mr Tsao and Mr Shen have been labelled 'separatists' by China. Ms Cheng says some Taiwanese talent agents refused to put forward their actors for the show for fear that they would get blacklisted in China—which would be bad for business, given that China has the world's biggest tv and film audience. So Ms Cheng sought out people who were not worried about being banned. One of the show's China-backed rabble-rousers, Big John, is played by Chapman To, an actor from Hong Kong turned Taiwanese immigrant. He was a vocal supporter of Hong Kong's democracy movement in 2014, which caused Chinese audiences to boycott his films and production companies to refuse to work with him. What is most intriguing is that the series is not nearly as apocalyptic as the original 17-minute trailer, released last year, promised. It imagined 'Total Chaos. Shortages of supplies, complete interruption of water, electricity and telecommunication.' These things do not transpire in the finished show. Ms Cheng says the trailer was designed to be terrifying as a hook to get audiences interested. Mr Shen, the consultant, denies that alarming scenes were cut because of political pressure. Lo Ging-zim, one of the directors, has been adamant that 'Not a single word of the script had been modified by the government.' Yet Yen Chen-shen, a political scientist at National Chengchi University, who was not involved in the project, reckons the Taiwanese government may well have pressed the film-makers to tone down some of the story's scariest parts. Officials he knows want the public to be prepared for an invasion, but they do not want to petrify them. 'Zero Day Attack' is not without its artistic flaws. America is portrayed as a staunch ally—a description few would apply to the current administration. China-backed characters, such as Big John, are generally portrayed as cartoonish spies and gangsters. Many people in China, Taiwan and the Chinese diaspora do not want to see Taiwanese people mistreated but nonetheless believe that, because of their shared culture, Taiwan ought to be part of China. How that might be achieved, given the overwhelming opposition of Taiwanese people to being ruled by the Communist Party, is a tricky question. Still, the series could have portrayed Taiwanese who favour unification more sympathetically. 'Zero Day Attack' arrives on screen months after the pLA rehearsed an amphibious invasion and naval blockades, as well as disrupting supply lines and bombing energy facilities. No one knows whether China will one day make good on its threats. But after watching this show, no one can claim not to have been warned. For more on the latest books, films, TV shows, albums and controversies, sign up to Plot Twist, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Pausing foreign applications to American universities is a terrible idea
The Trump administration's decision to pause all visa interviews for foreign students who want to study in America, pending a review of how applicants' social-media posts are vetted, is yet another escalation in the power struggle over who controls the world's best universities. The policy may be modified. It may prove less onerous than it looks at first glance. Even if that happens, though, this is another blow to a great American success story. President Donald Trump cares about America's trade deficit. So it is perverse for him to make it harder for one of America's most prodigious exporters—the education industry—to sell its services to foreigners. Some of his supporters imagine that foreign students are taking places that could have gone to Americans. This could be called the lump-of-college fallacy. In fact, by paying higher fees, foreign students tend to subsidise locals. American universities attract a wider variety of the best minds from around the world than any of their global rivals. That makes them more dynamic and innovative. And by pulling foreign elites into America's cultural orbit, they magnify America's soft power abroad. Unfortunately, that is not how Mr Trump and his cabinet see it. To them, elite universities, in particular, are hotbeds of antisemitism and wokery. They are factories for future Democratic Party leaders and donors. And they must be brought to heel. 'The universities are the enemy," as J.D. Vance (Ohio State and Yale Law) told a conference of national conservatives before he became the vice-president. There is some truth to MAGA criticisms of elite universities. Some have indeed been too soft on antisemitism and too dismissive of conservative viewpoints. But that hardly justifies the cudgels the administration is wielding against the entire college system. So far they include: deporting foreign students for wrongthink, freezing applications from foreign students, suspending government research grants and promising to increase taxes on big college endowments. Mr Vance has often complained, with some justification, about censorship on campus. So it is galling for him now to favour deporting foreign students for their views and making new student applications subject to social-media vetting. College is supposed to be a place where the young explore new ideas, not a place where they venture only with burner phones, terrified to reveal they once shared a meme sympathising with Palestinians or mocking Mr Trump. The only students likely to have clean social-media feeds will be those from police states like China, who have internalised the lesson that free expression attracts unwelcome attention. Perhaps that is why the administration has also said that it will 'aggressively" revoke visas of Chinese students. In the global war for talent, America's universities have long been its most persuasive recruiters, with huge benefits for American science, business and arts. Mr Trump's policies will make them less attractive. Foreigners have other options. Why pay to study in a country where the president doesn't want you, your visa could be revoked before you graduate, you will be snooped on and you may not be allowed to work? American universities are so good that large numbers of foreigners will still jostle to attend them. However, the early signs are that all this really is deterring applicants. Mr Trump and his supporters may think that, by cutting snooty lefty institutions down to size and shutting out foreigners with distasteful views, they are making higher education in America great again. They are on course to make it mediocre. This story has been updated Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.
