USDA faces billions in cuts
With help from Jordan Wolman
QUICK FIX
— The Trump administration is looking to cut nearly $7 billion from agriculture funding for fiscal 2026.
— The Senate is back in Washington and gearing up for a fight over reconciliation cuts to SNAP spending.
— The Energy Department has expanded the range of companies that can claim federal clean fuel production tax credits, a win for biofuels proponents and producers.
IT'S MONDAY, JUNE 2. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow, missing my local Joanns. Send tips and your preferred craft suppliers to gyarrow@politico.com. And don't forget to follow us at @Morning_Ag.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
ICYMI: The Conversation kicked off with Dr. Oz
In the premiere episode of The Conversation, Dasha Burns sat down with Dr. Mehmet Oz — now leading the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — for a candid talk on drug prices, potential Medicaid cuts and why he's getting early morning calls from President Donald Trump. Plus, POLITICO's Jonathan Martin dished on the Ohio governor's race (featuring Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy and former Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel), and Kyle Cheney unpacked Trump's legal battle over 'Liberation Day' tariffs.
Watch the full episode on YouTube. And don't miss a moment — subscribe now on Apple Podcasts or Spotify to get new episodes when they drop.
Driving the day
FACING DOWN USDA CUTS: The Trump administration is requesting $23 billion for USDA for fiscal 2026, a cut of nearly $7 billion from the current year, according to budget documents released late Friday.
The proposal follows President Donald Trump's release earlier this month of his 'skinny budget,' which outlined proposals for billions of dollars in cuts to food, forest and conservation programs and increased funding for the 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative.
This more detailed release signals the spending priorities of the White House, which may not be fully embraced by Congress.
The details: If Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and the Trump administration get their way, USDA would deeply reduce nearly all of the department's major initiatives, from the Risk Management Agency to Rural Development to the Forest Service to the Office of Civil Rights.
The budget request seeks to eliminate programs like the Source Water Protection Program, Dairy Business Innovation initiatives, direct loans for rural single-family housing, conservation technical assistance and the Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
The request aims to reduce the Farm Service Agency, which supports farm loans, conservation and disaster assistance, by $372 million. It would shrink the Natural Resources Conservation Service from $916 million to $112 million. The Forest Service would decrease from $16.8 billion last year to $4 billion, as Rollins looks to transfer wildland fire management appropriations to Interior to create a new U.S. Wildland Fire Service. USDA's research arm would also take a budget hit.
And more: The sweeping cuts would extend to other key areas. The budget request calls for cutting its SNAP funding allocation by more than half, along with child nutrition programs, as GOP lawmakers are looking to slash SNAP spending by up to $300 billion.
And the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children would receive nearly $300 million less than it did last year.
Read more on the budget plans from our Jordan Wolman here.
Happening next: The House Appropriations Ag subcommittee will meet on Thursday morning to mark up its Ag-FDA funding bill. The full House Appropriations committee will then consider the bill the following week.
On The Hill
SENATE'S SNAP FIGHT LOOMS: Congress is back this week, and the Senate is gearing up for a tough fight on agriculture and nutrition policy.
Senate Republicans are already looking at a 'do-over' of the bill, or taking out some provisions of the reconciliation package House Republicans passed before last week's recess, to ensure it can pass the chamber's parliamentary guidelines.
Some conflicts: Controversial comments that Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) made in defense of the GOP bill during a town hall on Friday continued to reverberate on Sunday talk shows.
One audience member, during a discussion of Medicaid and SNAP spending cuts, shouted at the senator: 'People are going to die.'
'Well, we all are going to die,' Ernst responded. (She's since posted a sarcastic apology video.)
Sunday best: OMB Director Russ Vought defended Ernst's comments and Republicans' megabill during an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union' Sunday.
He called worries like those from Ernst's constituents 'totally ridiculous,' arguing that it's 'very important to institute' work requirements for programs like Medicaid and SNAP.
Meanwhile, Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), a member of the Senate AG Committee, bashed the plans on NBC's 'Meet The Press.'
'This is an unfunded mandate at a time when Donald Trump's tariff tax is literally raising the cost of groceries,' Warnock said Sunday.
MAHA CONFLICT: Agriculture lobbying groups and ag policy leaders on Capitol Hill are continuing to fight a Make America Healthy Again assessment as the White House's MAHA Commission gears up to release a full policy recommendation this summer, especially in light of errors found in the report's citations.
One GOP Hill aide, granted anonymity to discuss the fallout from the report, called HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. a 'Democrat who profited handsomely off junk science.'
'While his report and his rhetoric are not new, it is astonishing the president and some aides continue to support him,' the aide added.
ICYMI: Calley Means, a key architect of the Trump administration's MAHA goals, pushed back on ag groups' complaints that they weren't listened to in the drafting of the MAHA Commission's initial assessment. He also insisted that the commission's policy work will not impact farmers.
'There is ZERO plan - and in fact it would be insane - to do anything rash to hurt the American farmer,' Means wrote on X in response to MA's Monday edition last week.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
BIOFUELS NEWS: The Energy Department on Friday expanded the range of companies and producers that can claim the clean fuel production tax credit under Democrats' climate law. It's a win for biofuels proponents in the agriculture world on a tax incentive that was the subject of intense debate during the Biden administration, our Kelsey Tamborrino writes for Pros.
The Trump administration announced it was updating the modeling tool used to determine eligibility to claim the credit, which it said would account for new feedstocks and methods of production like ethanol from corn wet-milling and natural gas from coal mine methane.
Guidance surrounding how to claim the clean fuels tax credit, created under the Inflation Reduction Act, was intensely debated as former President Joe Biden's administration grappled with pressures from environmental and ag advocates.
The Biden administration ultimately proposed guidance for the credit in its final weeks, but left key decisions for the next administration.
The reconciliation bill passed by House Republicans would dismantle key elements of the climate law's tax incentives, but would update and extend the clean fuel production tax credit that is set to expire at the end of 2027.
Row Crops
— USDA is sending more than 150 firefighters and support personnel to help with the response to fast-moving wildfires across Canada, the department announced Friday.
— The Senate Agriculture Committee will hold a hearing Tuesday on the nomination of Michael Boren to be Agriculture undersecretary for natural resources and environment. Boren is facing new scrutiny from the Forest Service, this time for diversion of a geothermal stream to a home on his Idaho ranch, as Marc Heller writes for POLITICO's E&E News.
— ICYMI: A group of retired generals and admirals, known as Mission: Readiness, sent a letter to Congress opposing cuts to SNAP, arguing that the proposed House budget would hurt the nation's military readiness.
THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@politico.com, marciabrown@politico.com, jwolman@politico.com, sbenson@politico.com, rdugyala@politico.com and gmott@politico.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU chief von der Leyen heads to Scotland for trade talks with Trump
By Andrew Gray and Andrea Shalal BRUSSELS/EDINBURGH (Reuters) -EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen headed to Scotland on Saturday ahead of a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday afternoon, commission spokespeople said, as EU officials said the two sides were nearing a trade agreement. Trump, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that he was looking forward to meeting with von der Leyen, calling her a "highly respected" leader. He repeated his view that there was a 50-50 chance that the U.S. and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to "make a deal very badly". If it happened, he said it would be the biggest trade agreement reached yet by his administration, surpassing the $550 billion accord agreed with Japan earlier this week. The White House has released no details about the planned meeting or the terms of the emerging agreement. The European Commission on Thursday said a negotiated trade solution with the United States was within reach, even as EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in case the talks collapse. To get a deal, Trump said the EU would have to "buy down" that tariff rate, although he gave no specifics. EU diplomats say a possible deal between Washington and Brussels would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum. The broad tariff rate would be half the 30% duties that Trump has threatened to slap on EU goods from August 1. It remains unclear if Washington will agree to exempt the EU from sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending. Combining goods, services and investment, the EU and the United States are each other's largest trading partners by far. The American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels warned in March that any conflict jeopardized $9.5 trillion of business in the world's most important commercial relationship. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Days Away From Securing His Questionable Air Force One Jet From Qatar
President Donald Trump is days away from getting a $400 million 'gift' from a foreign nation. The U.S. government is expected to finalize an agreement with Qatar next week to receive a Boeing 747 aircraft to be used as Air Force One, The Washington Post reported Friday. A July 7 communication reviewed by The Post and signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of State for Defense Affairs Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, confirms that Qatar will give the 'donation' to the Department of Defense. The deal, months in the making, raises legal, ethical and national security concerns. While the U.S. Constitution forbids anyone holding public office from accepting gifts from foreign governments without approval from Congress, Republicans have largely shrugged off the deal. 'Can't beat free,' Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) told reporters when asked about the offer in May. Trump, who has referred to the jet as a 'palace in the sky,' predictably feels the same way. 'Why wouldn't I accept a free gift?' Trump asked Fox News' Sean Hannity in May while aboard the current Air Force One. The ethical ramifications are so apparent that even the document reviewed by The Post appears to take extra effort to explicitly state that this isn't a bribe. 'Nothing in this [memorandum of understanding] is, or shall be interpreted or construed as, an offer, promise or acceptance of any form of bribery, undue influence, or corrupt practice,' the document reportedly said. The jet would become the new presidential plane until the end of Trump's term before being turned over to Trump's presidential library foundation. However, even before it can be used, the U.S. Air Force will likely spend hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money on renovating the plane — a process that could take years. Trump has made clear he'll accept 'gifts' from any nation willing to give them. At a White House meeting in May, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa jokingly told Trump he was 'sorry I don't have a plane to give you.' 'I wish you did,' Trump responded. 'I'd take it. If your country offered the United States Air Force a plane, I would take it.'
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Democratic Party's Brand Is Cooked
Voters have increasingly little faith in the Democrats, a new Wall Street Journal poll found, with the party reaching its lowest favorability rating in more than three decades. Voters overwhelmingly believe that Republicans are better able to handle key issues in Congress than Democrats. The survey found that the majority of voters, 63 percent, have an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party. Only 33 percent hold a favorable view. This is the most unpopular that Democrats have been according to Journal polls dating back to 1990. As President Donald Trump enacts an increasingly authoritarian agenda and provides little economic benefit to the average American, Democrats are hopeful anti-Trump backlash will give them a strong showing in the 2026 midterm election. While slightly more people expect to vote for Democrats next year than Republicans, according to the Journal poll, Democrats' overall favorability has only dropped since Trump took office. 'The Democratic brand is so bad that they don't have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,' John Anzalone, a Democratic pollster who worked on the survey, told the Journal. 'Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they're for and what their economic message is, they're going to have problems.' Anzalone's firm, which consulted for both President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential campaigns, worked on the survey with Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio. According to the survey, voters think Republicans in Congress are more capable at handling the economy, inflation and rising prices, tariffs, immigration, 'illegal' immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war, and foreign policy. On the topic of 'illegal' immigration, 48 percent have their faith in Republicans and 24 percent choose Democrats. Democrats scored higher on health care and vaccine policy. Both parties tied at 37 percent on the issue of looking out for middle class families. 'As much as I fully believe that Democrats are not doomed for all eternity, I also believe that many Democrats aren't quite grappling with the serious credibility problems the party still faces,' Democratic operative Tré Easton posted on X. 'The podcasts and everything are real cute, but we've got work to do.' Democrats also scored low in a Quinnipiac poll released earlier this month. In that survey, approval of congressional Democrats reached a new low of 19 percent, with 72 percent of voters saying they disapproved. 'This is a record low since March 2009 when the Quinnipiac University Poll first began asking this question of registered voters,' the university wrote. The Quinnippiac poll found that even registered Democrats disapproved of the party: Thirty-nine percent approved of how Democrats in Congress were handling their jobs, while 52 percent disapproved. Among registered Republicans, 77 percent approved of how Republicans are operating in Congress. In the findings from the Journal, voters are mixed on Trump. About half, or 55 percent, of voters say the country is headed in the wrong direction. This is down from 70 percent in January, meaning voters have become more optimistic since Trump took office, yet Trump is not wildly popular. He has a favorability rating of 45 percent, and an unfavorability rating of 52 percent. A total of 46 percent approve of what Trump is doing as president, and 52 percent disapprove. Fifty-three percent disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, while 44 percent approve. On the issues of inflation, tariffs, immigration, looking out for middle class families, health care, vaccine policy, foreign policy, and the Russia-Ukraine war, voters disapprove of the job Trump is doing. On the topic of 'illegal' immigration, though, 51 percent approve and 49 percent disapprove. The Republican Party is not wildly popular either, though, with 54 percent of voters having an unfavorable view, compared to the 43 percent who have a favorable view. More from Rolling Stone Trump Claims Someone May Have Forged His Signature on Birthday Letter to Epstein I Worked With Stephen Colbert. Here's Why His Cancellation Should Scare You Yes, America Is an Oligarchy Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
