'We are on our own'- Africa looks within to weather growing global tariff turmoil
By Colleen Goko and Libby George
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) -African leaders are pushing to speed up implementation of a continent-wide deal to boost trade as growing concerns over U.S. tariffs, including rates as high as 50% for Lesotho, threaten to decimate industries and hit economic growth.
The African Continental Free Trade Area pact designed to unify all 1.4 billion people under Africa's more than 50 nations into a single market, has been legally ratified by 49 countries and officially launched trading in 2021.
But translation into action has been sluggish, with less than half of member states actively trading under the framework.
The World Bank estimates AfCFTA could increase Africa's intra-continental exports by 81% and proponents point to last year's 12.4% boost in intra-African trade, to $208 billion, according to Afreximbank figures, as early signs of success.
"We've got to accelerate the establishment of our own value chain systems. What we are observing now — the weaponisation of trade policy, investment policy, nationalism — is unprecedented and it has a very negative impact on the multilateral trading system," AfCFTA Secretary-General Wamkele Mene told Reuters.
"The lesson to observe is that we are on our own as a continent."
U.S. President Donald Trump's return to the White House in January put trade relations centre-stage for policymakers worldwide, with his breathless cycle of punitive tariff policies poised to upend decades of globalisation and reshape flows of money and goods.
G20 finance chiefs meeting in Durban this week, under South Africa's presidency, have trade high on the agenda.
But despite the urgent need to boost African continental trade, accelerating it is beset with challenges.
African Union countries have a combined GDP of some $3 trillion - not far off the size of France's economy, a G7 nation.
So far, 24 countries are officially trading under AfCFTA, Mene said, including South Africa and Nigeria.
Implementation has been inconsistent, said Raheema Parker of Oxford Economics, with weak governance undermining overall effectiveness and informal trade adding complexities.
"These barriers are especially pronounced in smaller sub-Saharan economies, which are more vulnerable to external shocks and often lack the administrative and financial capacity," Parker said.
INFRASTRUCTURE GAP
The biggest constraint to intra-Africa trade is an infrastructure deficit, Mene said.
The African Development Bank and Afreximbank collectively invested $65 billion in infrastructure projects since 2020 - barely making a dent in the $100 billion plus estimated annual infrastructure investment shortfall.
Johannesburg-based Standard Bank CEO Bill Blackie warned that "without hardened bridges and faster rail links, AfCFTA will remain a paper promise."
Other barriers include border delays and complex paperwork requirements.
"We need to diminish all the commercial barriers," said Chad's ex-finance minister Abbas Mahamat Tolli.
DOWN WITH THE DOLLAR?
Currency is also contentious; nearly two-thirds of payments across more than 40 African currencies are clearing through dollar corridors. Afreximbank has called for a shift away from the dollar, citing volatility and high fees.
"Local-currency corridors must become the norm to slash costs and tame volatility," said Afreximbank group chief economist Yemi Kale.
The recently launched Pan-African Payments and Settlement System links 16 central banks and aims to reduce costs.
Leaders say AfCFTA's transformative potential is worth tackling the challenges.
"We have a generational chance to build value chains that keep wealth on the continent, develop competitive industries, and create millions of jobs while shaping global supply chains from a position of strength," Kenyan President William Ruto said earlier this month.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Fed Will Keep Trump Waiting Amid a Wave of Global Rate Cuts
Donald Trump is struggling to get the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, but policymakers around the world won't need so much convincing. The US president's tariff onslaught is likely to force further measured easing in coming months by most of the 23 central banks featured in this quarterly guide on the global monetary outlook, according to Bloomberg Economics.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs threaten high-value stocks, analysts warn
Markets are underestimating the risk from Washington's existing tariffs, some analysts warned, as US stocks hit new highs last week. Wall Street has largely shrugged off US President Donald Trump's threats of higher duties: Investors believe he will ultimately back down from any action that causes an adverse market reaction. But the tariffs Trump has already implemented are enough to hurt corporate earnings, an HSBC strategist said. Investors will get more clues as to the levies' longer-term impact this week as several big firms with extensive tariff exposure, like General Motors, release their latest earnings. Some experts fear disappointing revenue or other economic data 'could pull the rug out from under the latest rally,' Bloomberg wrote. — J.D. Capelouto
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump seizes on Fed renovations as potential cause for Powell ouster
President Trump has seized on the Federal Reserve's multibillion-dollar makeover as a possible avenue for finally ousting its politically independent chair, Jerome Powell. Trump has for months criticized Powell over the Fed's refusal to cut interest rates, a decision partially rooted in uncertainty surrounding the president's tariffs. Trump has expressed his desire to remove Powell, whom he appointed during his first term, but the legality of doing so remains a key question. With the Supreme Court signaling Trump would need a valid reason, the president has held back from terminating the central banker even as he doesn't hesitate to eviscerate other agencies' independence. But Trump might now see his opening at the Fed. Some $2.5 billion in renovations to the central bank's headquarters in Washington have put Powell in the hot seat over management of the project, which has cost about $600 million more than initially expected. Asked Tuesday if the pricey updates are a fireable offense, Trump said, 'I think it sort of is.' Legal scholars say removing Powell over the renovations would be an uphill battle of its own. Powell could claim Trump didn't have 'cause' to terminate him, as required by federal law. 'If Trump removes Powell, and Powell does push back, I think he would say that this is a blatantly illegal and abusive use of the president's power,' said Todd Phillips, a law professor at Georgia State University. Unlike some other independent agencies' governing statutes, which expressly list out fireable offenses such as inefficiency, neglect of duty and malfeasance in office, the Federal Reserve Act does not. It merely states the president must have 'cause.' 'It can't just be that the president doesn't like the tie that Jay Powell is wearing on a certain day,' Phillips said. Still, Trump would be the first president in modern history to fire the Fed chair, making any theory untested. 'Can the president fire Jerome Powell? I'm really not sure,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), a former constitutional lawyer, told reporters in the Capitol. Though Trump could cite the renovations, he might have trouble proving the board's oversight ran afoul of the law. The Federal Reserve Act provides that the Fed's board may 'maintain, enlarge, or remodel any building or buildings so acquired or constructed' and retains 'sole control' of those buildings. As Trump muses about the possibility of firing Powell, administration officials are stepping up investigations into the renovations, laying the groundwork for it to potentially become a valid rationale. Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote in a letter to Powell last week that Trump is 'extremely troubled' by the Fed chair's management, suggesting apparent changes to the overhaul don't match up with his testimony to Congress. Vought also suggested Powell failed to properly consult with the National Capital Planning Commission, which reviews certain building projects in Washington, D.C. Trump recently installed three of his White House officials at the commission. White House staff secretary Will Scharf, most well known for handing Trump executive orders to sign in the Oval Office, now serves as chair of the commission. He works alongside White House deputy chief of staff Michael Blair and Stuart Levenbach, who works in Vought's office. 'We should not be made fools of by those that come ahead of us,' Blair said at a commission meeting this month as he criticized the renovation project, demanding more information from Fed leaders. Powell pushed back on the criticism in a Thursday letter, saying the Fed has 'taken great care.' 'We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources as we fulfill the duties given to us by Congress on behalf of the American people,' Powell wrote. Phillips, the Georgia State law professor, said the renovations would be a 'pretextual reason' for firing Powell, given that the costs of the project have long been public and Trump is only now raising them as a concern. Paul Schiff Berman, a law professor at George Washington University, also stressed there's no allegation Powell is enriching himself, and the renovations aren't part of his core role setting monetary policy. 'I think there would be strong arguments even if Trump tried to fire Powell for cause that the rationale being given is neither sufficient to show malfeasance and that it's probably pretextual, because it's clear that he has long wanted to fire Powell regardless, for political reasons,' said Berman. The renovations would break with how Trump has treated other independent agencies, where he has moved without hesitation to terminate officials with no rationale, even those with removal protections. Lawsuits are now pending over Trump's firings at the National Labor Relations Board, Merit Systems Protection Board, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Credit Union Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission, National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Many of the fired commissioners have succeeded in the lower courts, most recently on Thursday, when a district judge ordered the reinstatement of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. However, the Trump administration believes the real fight is at the Supreme Court, the only court with authority to overrule its 90-year-old precedent permitting removal protections for some agencies. The administration has latched onto signals from several conservative justices that they may further limit the precedent or outright disavow it. But even those sympathetic justices indicate the Federal Reserve may be the rare exception where the president can't fire the chair on a whim. 'The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States,' the court cautioned in an unsigned May ruling as it greenlighted Trump's firings at two independent labor agencies. Berman said he believes Powell could mount a successful legal challenge if Trump doesn't purport to have cause. 'It was, I think, a signal that even if the Supreme Court gets rid of the independence of many other agency heads, they're not inclined to get rid of the for-cause removal protection that protects the Fed chair,' said Berman. Many Republican lawmakers have called for Powell to resign or for Trump to pull the trigger on firing him. But at least one Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.), has urged the president to keep Powell in the job, warning his ouster would disrupt financial markets and threaten long-term economic growth. 'While dramatic fluctuations may not make the wealthy lose sleep at night, they can seriously harm those working-class Americans I grew up with who are already struggling to get by,' Tillis wrote on the social platform X. 'I have been not happy with the leadership there, personally,' he continued. 'But I'm honestly not sure whether that executive authority exists. I'd have to look at that.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.