How this Democrat fights Marjorie Taylor Greene's transphobia in Congress with smart preparation
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
In a single act of preparation and truth-telling, Stansbury had exposed the hearing as political theater. The doctored image, which Greene's team presented in an effort to humiliate USA Fencing Chair Damien Lehfeldt, appeared to show him flipping off the committee. But as Stansbury revealed, he was actually flashing a peace sign.
'The document you have up behind you is a misrepresentation of the actual post,' she said as Greene tried to continue speaking.
Greene responded with a furious, uncontrolled banging of the gavel — a scene that quickly became the viral centerpiece of the May 8 Department of Government Efficiency Subcommittee hearing and a late-night comedy segment on Jimmy Kimmel Live!
But Stansbury wasn't trying to be funny. She was trying to expose a lie.
In a Tuesday interview with The Advocate, Stansbury explained that the viral moment was the result of weeks of planning — and a decision to reject silence.
'When we saw that the chairwoman was going to call a hearing on transgender athletes, actually my initial response was, we're not participating in that at all,' she said. 'Because clearly, it really is wholly outside of the scope of anything that the Oversight Committee has anything to do with. And it's just a blatant political attack on the trans community.'
Related: Jasmine Crockett shreds GOP's obsession with trans people over American problems with 'Trump or trans' game
Ultimately, she and her fellow Democrats chose to engage strategically. 'We were prepared to shut them down,' she said. 'We were ready to use every procedural motion we could. We were ready for any shenanigans they would pull.'
The plan worked. Early in the hearing, Stansbury called a motion to adjourn, and when Republicans didn't have enough members in the room to stop her, the delay bought critical time.
'They had to sit there for about 10 or 15 minutes,' she recalled. 'And so during that time, some of our staff saw the poster they were planning on presenting.'
That gave Stansbury the upper hand. When Greene unveiled the image, Stansbury called it out immediately. The gavel slammed. Greene shouted. The internet noticed.
For Stansbury, who has been representing New Mexico's First District since 2021, the hearing was just the latest installment in what she calls a disturbing trend.
'In my personal opinion, I think that the Republican fixation on trans lives is weird,' she said. 'It's just weird. I almost cannot explain it.'
Related: Nancy Mace sits silently as Robert Garcia roasts her anti-trans record in House Oversight hearing
She singled out GOP members like South Carolina U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, saying, 'Who once purported to stand with [the] LGBTQ+ community and now are just so obsessed in a way that is unhealthy — even personally.'
Stansbury made the same point even more bluntly during the hearing itself: 'It's just weird. Your obsession with this is weird.' Greene's retort — 'We'll let the American people decide who the weirdos are' — backfired spectacularly, becoming meme fodder within hours.
'I could tell that it got under the skin of the chairwoman when I said that,' Stansbury told The Advocate.
Stansbury made clear that the GOP's culture war is not organic. 'This was a completely manufactured issue,' she said. 'You know, the Republicans are obsessed with less than 1 percent of the population.'
And she knows exactly where it's coming from.
'If you rewind the tape and look at where it originated from, the same groups that have Heritage Foundation affiliation are the same as those who brought before the Supreme Court for the Dobbs case," she said, referring to the case that led the court to strike down Roe v. Wade, which protected abortion rights nationally. "They are all being funded by dark money behind the scenes. And it is a Christian nationalist agenda that is very explicitly going after the trans community.'
That targeting, she warned, has real consequences. 'I have trans kids in my life, and people are scared. People are afraid just to be themselves. I have a veteran in my district who has shared her story, and she's afraid to leave her house.'
Despite Republicans' fixation, Stansbury said the issue around taking away trans rights is nowhere near the top of mind for her constituents.
'It doesn't come up. It has never once come up. Ever. Once. Never,' she said. 'I don't get asked about it in town halls. I don't get asked about it when I'm on the campaign trail. I don't get asked about it at the doors.'
Instead, she said, New Mexicans take pride in their state's record, which includes gender-affirming care protections, legal safeguards for providers, and some of the most progressive LGBTQ+ rights laws in the country.
As the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico outlines, those seeking gender-affirming care in the state are protected by confidentiality laws and can assert their rights through legal channels if they face discrimination. The law explicitly shields the privacy of patients from out of state, and conversion therapy remains banned.
'One of the biggest applause lines that I get when I do town halls is when I list all of the things that New Mexico did under progressive leadership, including protecting LGBTQ civil rights and transgender care,' she said.
But on taking rights away from trans people in the state? 'It is not a motivating issue for any constituent that I have ever talked to,' Stansbury said.
Amid whispers from some Democrats that the party should tone down its public support for transgender rights to avoid alienating moderate voters, Stansbury offered a sharp rebuttal.
'What I make of the kind of political retreat that I see some people making around this issue is, like, the American people right now — no matter what their ideological affiliation is — they want to see strong leadership,' she said.
'Trump is trying to take us back a half-century, whether that's civil rights, LGBTQ rights, women's rights, whatever it is,' she continued. 'And so we have to be as bold and as fierce in our fight as Democrats in standing up and saying no — and punching back — as they are in attacking people.'
Asked how Democrats should respond to the tidal wave of false narratives, Stansbury was unequivocal: 'Allyship doesn't mean anything if it doesn't come with action.'
'To me, that means saying something when you see something, fighting back in a full-throttled way, speaking up, speaking out, reaching out to the communities that we work with and partnering with them.'
And when it comes to Trump's broader agenda?
'They're trying to rewrite the Civil Rights Act. They're trying to undo all of these things that are not the result of policy and politics — they're the result of culture changing, of people's movements for generations,' she said. 'They think they can just go and write a few executive orders and undo generations of social struggles. They're crazy. That's not going to happen.'
Stansbury finds hope in younger generations. 'I look at people in my life who are Gen Z and Alpha ... this younger generation doesn't even think about these issues the same way the older generation does,' she said. 'There's not only going not to be a demand for this, there's not going to be any tolerance for this.'
But until that future arrives, Stansbury isn't waiting for permission to lead.
'We see you. We're fighting for you,' she said of her message to transgender Americans. 'You're loved, you're cared for, and we see what's happening — and we're going to continue to fight back.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, is moved to minimum-security women's prison in Texas
Advertisement Minimum-security federal prison camps house inmates the Bureau of Prisons considers to be the lowest security risk. Some don't even have fences. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The prison camps were originally designed with low security to make operations easier and to allow inmates tasked with performing work at the prison, like landscaping and maintenance, to avoid repeatedly checking in and out of a main prison facility. Prosecutors have said Epstein's sex crimes could not have been done without Maxwell, but her lawyers have maintained that she was wrongly prosecuted and denied a fair trial, and have floated the idea of a pardon from President Trump. They have also asked the US Supreme Court to take up her case. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the Justice Department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists, and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government coverup. Advertisement Since then, administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. Maxwell, meanwhile, was interviewed at a Florida courthouse over two days last week by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and the House Oversight Committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said this week that they would be open to an interview, but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Friday to Maxwell's lawyers, US Representative James Comer, the committee chair, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team. Two women who have accused Epstein and Maxwell of abusing them, Maria and Annie Farmer, and the family members of another, Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide this spring, reacted angrily to the news of Maxwell's relocation. 'It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received,' they said in a statement Friday. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency.' Advertisement 'President Trump has sent a clear message today: Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter,' the statement said.


Hamilton Spectator
a minute ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Disappointment, but no shock in Hamilton as tariff deadline passes without a deal
A deadline that could have spelled the end of an ongoing trade war with the United States has passed with no agreement — and increased across-the-board tariffs on Canadian goods. U.S. President Donald Trump's increased 35 per cent tariffs — up from 25 per cent — came into effect Aug. 1 and apply to goods not included in the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). The move, the U.S. government said, is due to 'Canada's lack of co-operation in stemming the flood of fentanyl.' Most Canadian goods meet the terms dictated by CUSMA, meaning they are not hit by the tariffs, which are separate from those targeting specific sectors. However, tariffs impacting Hamilton's steel industry — as well as aluminum and copper tariffs — remain unchanged at 50 per cent. Trump doubled them to 50 per cent in June, after previously hitting the Canadian industries with 25 per cent tariffs. Ron Wells, the president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, which represents around 600 workers at Stelco's Hamilton site, said while he is disappointed a deal wasn't reached, it 'wasn't a shock.' Ron Wells is president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, which represents about 600 workers at Stelco's Hamilton site. While he is disappointed a tariff deal wasn't reached before the Aug. 1 deadline, he said it wasn't a shock. 'This is the new normal,' he said of the tariffs, adding he was 'not really hopeful' about the potential for a deal in the lead-up to the deadline — particularly after Trump suggested Canadian plans to back Palestinian statehood at the United Nations would make it 'very hard to reach a deal.' Since the deadline has passed, Wells said Canada should hit back against the United States and match American tariffs on steel and aluminum, doubling them to 25 per cent. That echoes the sentiment of Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who called on the federal government to 'hit back' with a 50 per cent tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum in a post on X. 'The federal government needs to maximize our leverage and stand strong in the face of President Trump's tariffs,' Ford posted. Wells said he is hopeful measures announced by the Liberal government in July — including caps on imported steel, stiff tariffs if those caps are exceeded, prioritizing the use of Canadian steel in government procurement and $70 million in new funding over three years to help steel workers get retrained — help Canadian steelmakers. Hamilton Chamber of Commerce CEO Greg Dunnett said Hamilton may be the community that is 'getting hit the hardest' in Canada, due to the continued steel and aluminum duties – in addition to the new 35 per cent tariffs. Hamilton Chamber of Commerce CEO Greg Dunnett said Hamilton may be the community that is 'getting hit the hardest' in Canada, due to the continued steel and aluminum duties — in addition to the new 35 per cent tariffs. He noted creating a fair long-term deal is 'very, very difficult' due to the 'moving goalposts' from Trump. 'I think it is imperative of our government right now to be strategic,' he said, adding the government should work to strengthen the economy, diversifying trade within the country to move Canada forward in the long-term without a dependence on the U.S. 'Escalation is risky, but so is inaction.' He said the tariffs have been disruptive, bringing uncertainty and cost increases across the board — which is impacting jobs, investment and trade relationships. While he said Hamilton is 'resilient,' the longer the trade war drags on, the more difficult it will get for businesses. Dunnett noted the uncertainty due to the tariff situation is hurting innovation due to a lack of investment, and the chamber continues to advocate to all levels of government for support for the local business community. He added among the businesses hardest hit are restaurants, whose business drops when customers have less disposable income. Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said spending 'a little more time' on the right deal is worth the wait because it can 'deliver lasting benefits.' However, Laing stressed businesses in Canada and the U.S. 'urgently' need more certainty. Keanin Loomis, the president of the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC), said while he was hopeful for a deal, comments from the government and Prime Minister Mark Carney had made it clear negotiations were difficult. Prime Minister Mark Carney and Keanin Loomis, president and CEO of the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, chat with employees of Walters Steel during a July funding announcement for the steel industry. 'We will give our government the time and space it needs to make a good deal, because we don't want them to rush into a bad deal,' he said. While there is disappointment the situation is ongoing, Loomis said 'everyone in Canada' likely understands the difficulty of dealing with the Trump administration. Loomis said the increase of tariffs from 25 to 35 per cent is somewhat 'token' when all CUSMA trade is tariff-free — and shouldn't cause 'major concern' in the broader economy. However, he said the ongoing 50 per cent U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum are 'not sustainable' for the industry — and something needs to change in the next couple of months. 'It would be really hard to see us being able to continue this way into the fall,' he said. While noting he doesn't speak for ArcelorMittal Dofasco and Stelco, he said he's 'really concerned' for them, adding it is alarming how much the steel producers have dealt with due to the tariffs. But for the CISC members, he said while some have suffered already, many are still working on previously arranged projects. The concern, Loomis said, is what happens in six months, as the tariff uncertainty means a lack of long-term investments — and future jobs for the industry. John McElroy, the United Steelworkers local union president at Stelco's Nanticoke steelmaking hub, said he had hoped for a resolution to the tariff war by now. McElroy said he and other USW local presidents were able to speak privately with Carney and share their concerns during his most recent visit to Hamilton. 'He basically told us, 'I could sign a deal now, but it would be a crappy deal,' recalled McElroy. 'I understand that.' McElroy added Stelco seems to be holding its own despite 50 per cent tariffs, thanks in part to higher steel prices and success finding new Canadian customers. 'We're kind of weathering the storm for now.' —With files from Matthew Van Dongen


Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
New Poll Shows Top 2028 Presidential Candidates in Swing State
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new poll by Emerson College Polling released on Friday shows potential 2028 Republican and Democratic presidential contenders picked by North Carolina primary voters. Why It Matters Early polls in crucial swing states like North Carolina have gained significance as potential contenders for the 2028 presidential election begin to emerge. Even with the election still a few years away, polling can offer insight into candidate viability, voter sentiment, and evolving party dynamics, particularly after the pivotal 2024 election cycle. North Carolina, often considered determinative in recent presidential contests, could offer a bellwether for national trends as both major parties consider their direction and platform for 2028. What To Know In the Emerson College survey conducted from July 28 to 30, of 1,000 North Carolina registered voters, Vice President JD Vance is leading the Republican nomination with 53 percent among likely Republican primary voters—well ahead of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis with 7 percent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio with 5 percent. Vance jumped 7 points from a previous survey taken in June by Emerson. In the Democratic field, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg was the top choice among likely primary voters at 17 percent, followed by former Vice President Kamala Harris at 12 percent and California Governor Gavin Newsom at 10 percent. The survey shows 24 percent are undecided. The poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, with separate credibility intervals for primary subgroups. Harris, meanwhile, announced this week that she is not running for California governor in the next cycle, fueling speculation she is considering another presidential run. In an interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Thursday, the former vice president said she thinks the political system is "broken" and does not want to be in it right now. She added she would always "be part of the fight" though. Friday's poll also shows that 40 percent of the swing state voters say their family's finances are worse off than one year prior, 32 percent say they are about the same and 28 percent say they are better off now. Former Vice President Kamala Harris and then Vice President-elect, JD Vance can be seen departing the White House ahead of the Inauguration of then President-elect Donald Trump on January 20 in Washington, D.C. Former Vice President Kamala Harris and then Vice President-elect, JD Vance can be seen departing the White House ahead of the Inauguration of then President-elect Donald Trump on January 20 in Washington, D.C. Photo byWhat People Are Saying Political science professor at Columbia University Robert Y. Shapiro to Newsweek via email Friday: "The Democratic primary polling is much too early and all we are seeing is name recognition for past presidential candidates and ones in the news lately in a visible way. On the Republican side, DeSantis and Rubio are damaged goods as past losers in the past Republican primaries in 2016 and 2024. Vance is on the rise by virtue of being Vice President and visible when he echoes or advocates more strongly Trump's MAGA positions and what Trump—and he—have done. He has not been defeated in any past major election so untarnished in that respect." What Happens Next Major candidates are not expected to announce their 2028 campaigns until after the 2026 midterm elections, in keeping with recent electoral cycles. However, the field of likely contenders is potentially taking shape as politicians such as Buttigieg, Newsom, and others make public appearances and pursue national media opportunities. Vance's strong polling position places him at the forefront of Republican prospects.