Two big cases underway over Trump's higher education policy. Here are the key takeaways
In courtroom 18 at the John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse, U.S. District Judge William Young heard closing arguments in American Association of University Professors (AAUP) v. Rubio. The organization's chapters at several universities, as well as the Middle East Studies Association, sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio in March over what it described as an "ideological deportation policy" the administration was using to retaliate against noncitizens for pro-Palestinian speech.
Steps away, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs heard oral arguments in Harvard's lawsuit against the administration over the more than $2.5 billion in federal funding it pulled from the school, citing its alleged inaction on antisemitism.
The First Amendment lies at the heart of both cases, which could have significant implications for the future of higher education and free speech in the U.S.
Here are key takeaways from the trials.
Research, civil rights and lives are at stake, attorneys say
Harvard's attorneys argued that the loss of federal funding would significantly damage the school's ability to conduct research that serves a public benefit while not meaningfully addressing antisemitism, NPR reported.
The Trump administration, on the other hand, said Harvard's Jewish students are harmed by the school's alleged inaction on antisemitism, which it has said amounts to a violation of federal civil rights law.
The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, along with co-counsel Sher Tremonte law firm, sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration on behalf of the association's chapters at several universities, including Harvard, and the Middle East Studies Association in March.
In AAUP v. Rubio, attorneys from the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and Sher Tremonte law firm argued that the Trump administration's 'ideological deportation policy' affected not only the activists who have been arrested thus far but created a chilling effect on the free speech of noncitizen students and faculty.
The government's attorneys disputed the existence of such a policy. If it did exist, lawyer William Kanellis said, 'you'd see many more arrests.'
Judges questioned some arguments
Both judges were skeptical of some of the arguments attorneys attempted to make in their courtrooms.
The notion that the government has the authority to slash Harvard's federal funding for any reason was a 'major stumbling block for me,' Burroughs said. She said there would be 'staggering' implications for constitutional law if the government had the power to make such decisions 'for reasons oriented around speech.'
Burroughs also questioned how revoking Harvard's federal grants contributed to the government's stated objective of combatting antisemitism at the university, as the Harvard Crimson reported.
Young, meanwhile, appeared skeptical of the AAUP's argument that the Trump administration created and implemented a new 'ideological deportation' policy.
He also questioned the plaintiff's arguments surrounding Canary Mission, an organization that says it 'documents individuals and organizations that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American college campuses and beyond.' The plaintiff's attorneys characterized it as an extremist group the government relied upon to identify noncitizens for investigation and arrest.
Young was skeptical of the attorneys' characterization of the group and said it's 'perfectly appropriate for the government to take leads from any source.'
First Amendment issues at the heart of both cases
Alexandra Conlon, a representing the plaintiffs in the deportation case, said that by revoking visas and green cards based on noncitizens' pro-Palestinian activism, the federal government was 'systematically violating the First Amendment' and seeking to chill speech it disagrees with.
On the first day of the trial, Justice Department attorney Victoria Santora said the First Amendment applies to both citizens and noncitizens alike. But she later backtracked to say 'there are nuances to the First Amendment,' Politico reported.
Department of Justice attorney Ethan Kanter continued that argument July 21, saying noncitizens do not have First Amendment rights to the same extent as U.S. citizens. While they may have such rights in some capacity, he said, they are 'context dependent and in relation to the compelling government interest at play.'
Lawyer Steven P. Lehotsky, representing Harvard in the funding lawsuit, said the administration's actions against the university reflect a 'blatant, unrepentant violation of the First Amendment,' the Harvard Crimson reported.
Administration's moves are 'part of a broader attack'
Ramya Krishnan, a Knight First Amendment Institute attorney representing the AAUP in the deportation case, said both that case and the one over Harvard's federal funding were part of the Trump administration's higher education "power grab."
'These are part of a broader attack on higher education in this country in weakening the independence of these institutions, in undermining them as a site for discourse and intellectual inquiry," she said, "and I think that people should be very worried about that.'
The Trump administration has accused schools of engaging in "exploitative and unlawful practices" and said its steps to overhaul higher education would "rebuild public trust" in such institutions.
Burroughs said she would issue an opinion in the Harvard case soon after oral arguments concluded on July 21, the Harvard Crimson reported. The school has requested a ruling by Sept. 3, which is its deadline for submitting paperwork to close out its federal grant funding.
Young did not offer a timeline for issuing his opinion in the deportation case.
BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@usatoday.com.
USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump funding cuts, deportation hearings underway. What to know.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Venezuelan Little League World Series team gets exemption to President Trump's travel ban
Youth baseball players from Venezuela, one of 19 countries on President Trump's travel ban list, have been granted a 'national exemption' to participate in this month's Little League World Series, an event official told The Athletic. Securing the exemption last week required the intervention of a Trump-aligned U.S. senator and the personal sign-off of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Advertisement Before then, the Venezuelan team's participation had been in limbo thanks to a visa process that had often been complicated by strained diplomatic relations with the United States. Venezuela's recent inclusion in the travel ban only added another layer of complexity. Last month, the policy blocked another youth baseball team from Venezuela from playing in a less prominent tournament in South Carolina, a situation that drew the ire of the St. Louis Cardinals' Willson Contreras. In an interview on Monday, Contreras, a three-time All-Star and one of baseball's most prominent Venezuelan players, lamented the perceived fallout from the travel restrictions. 'To be treated like we are criminals here, we're not,' Contreras told The Athletic. 'We're here to provide for our family, to chase our dreams, to do the right things.' The Venezuelan Little League team learned of its exemption from the travel ban on Friday, just six days before it was scheduled to play in the tournament, which showcases players ages 10-12 and remains a signature event that is nationally televised on ESPN. 'The dream of our children will soon come true,' the team said in a translated Instagram post. 'Williamsport, here we come.' In a statement, Little League spokesman Brian McClintock said, 'We are grateful for all those who supported these players throughout this process, including the U.S. Department of State.' While the exemption was ultimately granted, it highlighted a shifting landscape for some international athletes entering the U.S. under the Trump Administration. Under the travel ban instituted in June, exemptions have been made for certain high-profile sporting events, such as the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles and next year's World Cup. But those carve-outs did not cover other events like the Little League World Series. Advertisement Sen. David McCormick, a Republican elected from Pennsylvania in 2024 and a political ally of Trump's on immigration policy, offered the Venezuelan team an assist. A native of central Pennsylvania who lives less than an hour's drive from the longtime site of the tournament, Williampsort, McCormick worked with the State Department to help ensure approval of the visas. 'I am thrilled my team and I were able to play a small role in making sure young athletes are able to chase their dreams and participate in this timeless Pennsylvania tradition,' McCormick said in a statement to The Athletic. But even with McCormick's backing, securing an exemption ultimately required a green light from Rubio. 'In very limited circumstances, the Secretary may find an individual's travel would serve a United States national interest, consistent with Executive Order 14150, 'America First Policy Directive to the Secretary of State,'' a state department spokesperson said in a statement. 'These exceptions may only be approved by the Secretary of State or his designee in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security or her designee.' The visa process has typically been more complicated for Venezuela than for other teams attending the Little League World Series. In 2019, political and diplomatic tensions in the country prompted the U.S. to suspend operations at its embassy in the Venezuelan capital of Caracas. Teams seeking entry to the U.S. have instead had to travel to a neighboring country, Colombia, where the capital Bogotá is hosting the diplomatic mission to Venezuela. Once there, players and staff are subjected to interviews ahead of approval. The travel ban has introduced another layer of uncertainty. On July 18, Cacique Mara, a different youth team from Venezuela, could not travel to South Carolina for the Senior League Baseball World Series (ages 13-16) after its visas were denied. In a photo of a letter from the U.S. government to the team from Cacique Mara — posted to the team's since deactivated Instagram account — the reason given was the 'Immigration and Nationality Act,' which the letter said serves to restrict 'the Entry of foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.' Advertisement 'What pisses me off is they earned the right to be here,' Contreras said of the team that was barred last month. 'They are little kids chasing dreams. I put myself in their shoes because I was a kid once, and I dreamed of being in the Little League World Series once.' Major League Baseball, which has been officially partnered with Little League International since 2017, declined to comment on that case. So did the state department, though a spokesperson noted the ability to 'make a determination regarding a national interest exception on a case-by-case basis.' Another recent exception, McClintock said, cleared the way for a different youth baseball team from Venezuela, this one from the city of Valencia, to secure visas ahead of a Little League Intermediate Tournament in Livermore, Calif. Since Trump's return to office, the Dodgers have made an official visit to the Oval Office. The league also reinstated Pete Rose from its permanently ineligible list, a move that came after Trump publicly called for it. And in the wake of Trump administration policy changes targeting such programs, MLB removed official language surrounding Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives from the league's website. Still, MLB remains the largest and most diverse baseball league in the world. Its teams employ dozens of Venezuelan players. And when the league hosts the Little League Classic between the Mets and Mariners in Williamsport on Aug. 17, the game will feature Venezuelan players like Eugenio Suárez and Francisco Alvarez. MLB officials were in communication with their Little League counterparts regarding the visa process for the Little League World Series, according to a source briefed on the matter, and offered assistance if needed. On Monday, with the Barquisimeto-based Venezuelan team now bound for historic Williamsport, Contreras made a similar offer. Advertisement 'I'm here for them,' Contreras said. 'If something happens, I want them to know not to hesitate to reach out to me. I'm outspoken for justice. They are kids chasing the dream. Their dream is to come to Williamsport. That could be my brother out there. But I'm glad everything worked out and I'm glad they're going to be allowed to come to the United States.' (Photo of 2024 LLWS signage: Dylan Buell / Getty Images)
Wall Street Journal
a few seconds ago
- Wall Street Journal
Britain Is on the Verge of Regime Change
London Friends don't let friends drive their economies into a wall and their people into a ditch. That was President Trump's message to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Turnberry, Mr. Trump's Scottish golf resort, last month.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Rwanda agrees to take in up to 250 migrants deported from the US
FacebookTweetLink Rwanda has reached a deal with the Trump administration to take in migrants deported from the United States, becoming the third African nation to do so, amid complaints that governments on the continent are being pressured by the White House to receive them. Foreign US deportees, originally from other nations, had earlier been sent to South Sudan and Eswatini; a US Department of Homeland Security spokesperson described both groups as 'barbaric' criminals. Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo confirmed to CNN on Tuesday that the East African nation had 'agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants,' in a deal that allows the government 'to approve each individual proposed for resettlement.' When approved, the migrants, she said, 'will be provided with workforce training, health care, and accommodation support to jump start their lives in Rwanda,' allowing them to 'contribute to one of the fastest growing economies in the world over the last decade.' Rwanda, a nation of less than 15 million people, is not new to discussions around third-country deportations to its territory. It has previously partnered with the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) to temporarily host asylum seekers and refugees evacuated from North African nation Libya, with nearly 3000 arrivals recorded between 2019 and 2025, according to the UN organization. In 2022, it reached a controversial migrant deal with the United Kingdom to receive deported asylum seekers who arrived illegally in the UK. The deal did not materialize due to legal disputes and was subsequently scrapped after Keir Starmer became prime minister last July. Rwanda suggested at the time that it had no plans to reimburse the more than $300 million it received from the UK for the deportations. Makolo did not tell CNN how Rwanda stands to benefit from housing US deportees. She also did not disclose whether the US migrants would be kept in the same accommodation that Rwanda had planned to house deported UK asylum seekers. 'We will provide more details once these have been worked out,' Makolo said. Rwanda revealed in May that the nation was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the US, according to Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe. The Trump administration has persevered in its attempts to strike agreements with several African countries to accept its unwanted deportees despite outrage from Africans who insist that their continent should not be treated as a 'dumping ground' for individuals considered unfit to live in the US. In early July, the US Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to deport certain migrants to countries other than their homeland with little notice. One major hurdle for previous administrations had been dealing with countries who refuse to accept returns of their own nationals, and US President Donald Trump had directed top officials in a January executive order to facilitate international agreements to send migrants elsewhere. 'The United States is constantly engaged in diplomatic conversations with foreign nations who are willing to assist us in removing the illegal aliens that (former US President) Joe Biden allowed to infiltrate American communities,' a White House official told CNN Tuesday. The US has also faced criticism for allegedly pressuring some of Africa's powerhouses, such as Nigeria and South Africa, to take in its foreign deportees. In the case of Rwanda, concerns linger over the safety of refugees given the nation's human rights record. During the heated debate over Rwanda's deal with the UK, the UNHCR commended Rwanda for 'generously hosting thousands of refugees…on a temporary basis,' but warned there were 'serious risks' that 'externalization poses to refugees, including refoulement (sending refugees to a country where they could face persecution).' At the time, Rwanda pushed back against the UNHCR, insisting it 'does not refoule asylum seekers.' CNN's Kit Maher contributed to this report.
