logo
BRICS nations slam Trump tariffs, condemn strikes on Iran

BRICS nations slam Trump tariffs, condemn strikes on Iran

eNCA12 hours ago
BRFAZIL - BRICS leaders at a summit on Sunday took aim at US President Donald Trump's "indiscriminate" import tariffs and recent Israeli-US strikes on Iran.
The 11 emerging nations - including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - account for about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output.
The bloc is divided about much, but found common cause when it comes to the mercurial US leader and his stop-start tariff wars - even if they avoided naming him directly.
Voicing "serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff" measures, BRICS members said the tariffs risked hurting the global economy, according to a summit joint statement.
They also offered symbolic backing to fellow member Iran, condemning a series of military strikes on nuclear and other targets carried out by Israel and the United States.
AFP | Mauro PIMENTEL
In April, Trump threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive duties, before offering a months-long reprieve in the face of a fierce market sell-off.
Trump has now warned he will impose unilateral levies on partners unless they reach "deals" by August 1.
In an apparent concession to US allies such as Brazil, India and Saudi Arabia, the summit declaration did not criticize the United States or its president by name at any point.
- No show -
Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to US and western European power.
But as the group has expanded to include Iran, Saudi Arabia and others, it has struggled to reach meaningful consensus on issues from the Gaza war to challenging US global dominance.
BRICS nations, for example, collectively called for a peaceful two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict - despite Tehran's long-standing position that Israel should be destroyed.
An Iranian diplomatic source said his government's "reservations" had been conveyed to Brazilian hosts. Still, Iran stopped short of rejecting the statement outright.
In perhaps a further sign of the diplomatic sensitivities, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister skipped Sunday's discussions entirely, according to a Brazilian government source.
Saudi Arabia is among the world's leading beneficiaries of high-tech US military exports and is a long-standing US partner.
AFP | Mauro PIMENTEL
The political punch of this year's summit has been depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who skipped the meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president.
The Chinese leader is not the only notable absentee. Russian President Vladimir Putin, charged with war crimes in Ukraine, also opted to stay away, participating via video link.
He told counterparts that BRICS had become a key player in global governance.
The summit also called for regulation governing artificial intelligence and said the technology could not be the preserve of only rich nations.
The commercial AI sector is currently dominated by US tech giants, although China and other nations have rapidly developing capacity.
By Facundo Fernández Barrio
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gwamanda exposes Sibiya's alleged rogue network as the crisis within SAPS worsens
Gwamanda exposes Sibiya's alleged rogue network as the crisis within SAPS worsens

IOL News

time24 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Gwamanda exposes Sibiya's alleged rogue network as the crisis within SAPS worsens

Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya is accused of running a rogue intelligence operation within the City of Johannesburg. In a dramatic public statement released this week, Johannesburg Councillor Kabelo Gwamanda accused Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya of running a rogue intelligence operation within the City of Johannesburg, unlawfully procuring surveillance equipment from Israeli contractors and using his position to target political opponents. Gwamanda's statement, issued in his capacity, laid out a chilling picture of institutional capture, political retaliation, and deep-rooted corruption inside the South African Police Service. Gwamanda, who briefly served as Executive Mayor of Johannesburg, alleges that during Sibiya's tenure as Group Head of the City's Forensic and Investigation Services (GFIS), the unit acquired intelligence-gathering tools through illegal channels, concealed damaging forensic reports, and weaponised law enforcement to protect political allies. 'This raises serious questions about political interference and institutional failure,' said Gwamanda, pointing to a 2022 criminal case he opened against former Mayor Mpho Phalatse, then-Speaker Vasco Da Gama, and the Democratic Alliance, which remains unresolved three years later. Gwamanda's warning was unambiguous: 'The appointment of Sibiya as Deputy Commissioner while he is under investigation is an affront to justice. The president must account for how such an appointment was made.' The councillor also described how, after raising alarms about the illegal operations within GFIS, he became the target of a 'politically motivated smear campaign' led by the same individuals he had accused. Gwamanda claims he was unlawfully arrested in October 2024 without a charge sheet, based on manipulated evidence allegedly manufactured by Sibiya and his allies. After 18 months, the charges were quietly withdrawn due to lack of evidence, but the damage to his reputation remained. His statement referenced recent developments in KwaZulu-Natal, commending Provincial Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi for speaking out against alleged interference by Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and Sibiya. 'It is precisely this kind of leadership that victims of politically motivated persecution hope to see,' said Gwamanda. 'I now raise my voice on behalf of countless South Africans who suffer the miscarriage of justice, where victims rely on perpetrators for protection.' Mkhwanazi ignited national controversy on Sunday by accusing Mchunu and Sibiya of undermining critical police investigations into politically motivated killings. He claimed they disbanded a specialised task team without his knowledge and interfered directly with the operations of the KwaZulu-Natal SAPS. Mkhwanazi also presented screenshots of WhatsApp conversations between Mchunu and individuals linked to organised crime, suggesting an active relationship between the Minister and suspected criminal networks. His press conference was backed by armed officers in tactical gear, and his tone was unequivocal: South Africa's crime-fighting machinery is being systematically sabotaged from the top. Yet in the face of these revelations, forensic investigator Paul O'Sullivan launched a scathing counteroffensive — not against the accused officials, but against Mkhwanazi. In a media interview, O'Sullivan said he wanted Mkhwanazi 'to fall,' accusing the commissioner of abusing his position and violating the principle of civilian oversight of the police. This isn't O'Sullivan's first clash with SAPS leadership. Last week, he issued an ultimatum to National Commissioner Fannie Masemola to suspend officers recently arrested for corruption or face a court challenge. O'Sullivan claimed these arrests were the result of his 20-year anti-corruption crusade, during which he says he spent over R15 million of his funds and helped bring down two national commissioners and dozens of senior officers. But conspicuously missing from O'Sullivan's criticism is any meaningful scrutiny of Mchunu. Despite the minister being directly accused of colluding with crime syndicates, O'Sullivan has expressed confidence in his integrity. This has prompted some observers to ask a difficult question: Why is Paul O'Sullivan going out of his way to shield Mchunu?

US envoy says satisfied with Lebanese response on disarming of Hezbollah
US envoy says satisfied with Lebanese response on disarming of Hezbollah

eNCA

time29 minutes ago

  • eNCA

US envoy says satisfied with Lebanese response on disarming of Hezbollah

US envoy Thomas Barrack said Monday he was satisfied by the Lebanese authorities' response to Washington's request to disarm Hezbollah, which was heavily weakened in a recent war with Israel. Lebanese leaders who took office in the aftermath of the conflict have vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms, while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities with the Iran-backed group. "I'm unbelievably satisfied with the response," Barrack, Washington's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, told a press conference after meeting President Joseph Aoun. "It's thoughtful, it's considered. We're creating a go-forward plan. To create that, we need dialogue. What the government gave us was something spectacular," he said. "Now what it takes is a... thrust to the details, which we're going to do. We're both committed to get to the details and get a resolution," he said, adding: "I'm very, very hopeful." The presidency said on X that Aoun handed Barrack "ideas for a comprehensive solution". A Lebanese official told AFP that late last week, Beirut submitted an initial response to Washington, which then requested modifications. Lebanese officials then worked through the weekend to develop the final version, the source added, requesting anonymity as they were not authorised to brief the media. During a visit last month, Barrack asked Lebanese leaders to formally commit to fully disarming Hezbollah. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem said Sunday his group would not surrender or lay down its weapons in response to Israeli threats. - 'Future for them' - Israel's military has continued to occupy positions in Lebanon and to strike the country despite the ceasefire, saying it is targeting Hezbollah sites and operatives and accusing Beirut of not doing enough to disarm the group. Barrack said that Hezbollah "needs to see that there's a future for them, that that road is not harnessed just solely against them, and that there's an intersection of peace and prosperity for them also." He warned that "the rest of the region is moving at Mach speed, and you will be left behind", noting that "dialogue has started between Syria and Israel, just as the dialogue needs to be reinvented by Lebanon." Under the ceasefire, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30 kilometres from the Israeli frontier. Israel was to withdraw its troops from Lebanon, but has kept them deployed in five areas that it deemed strategic. Lebanese authorities say they have been dismantling Hezbollah's military infrastructure in the south near the Israeli border. Hezbollah's Qassem said Israel must abide by the ceasefire agreement, "withdraw from the occupied territories, stop its aggression... release the prisoners" detained during last year's war, and that reconstruction in Lebanon must begin. Only then "will we be ready for the second stage, which is to discuss the national security and defence strategy" which includes the issue of group's disarmament, he added.

Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries
Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries

Mail & Guardian

timean hour ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries

These countries need to rethink the prohibitive tariffs they place on each other Many themes are on the minds of the political leaders attending the Brics Summit in Brazil, but one aspect that is certainly important for all is easing trade friction in this group. For the long-term sustainability of Brics, there must be a stronger economic ambition that ties the grouping together beyond its political and geopolitical alignments. Across all Brics countries, researchers, policymakers and business people have been attempting to adapt and address the restrictions caused by the United States Liberation Day tariff. There remains profound uncertainty about the path ahead, as the 90-day pause comes to an end this coming week. What the Brics countries have not reflected on is the prohibitive tariffs they place against each other, which limit intra-Brics trade. The blame, while correct, cannot be placed solely on the US for its higher tariffs; the Brics countries should also consider taking a serious look inward and assess how they could deepen intra-trade and increase investments. The ideas of this path have long been documented in the business arm of this grouping, the Brics Business Council Forum, in its various annual reports. Still, few of these ideas have made their way into the political groupings' resolutions in a manner that changes the economic engagement landscape among these countries. The current environment necessitates such a strong approach. Consider the South African agricultural sector, which, because of the lack of a trade agreement, faces higher tariffs in Brics member countries. Take China as an example; South Africa's macadamias face a 12% import tariff and the wine industry tariffs of 14% to 20%. In addition to higher tariffs, exporters also face phytosanitary barriers. I am singling out China here, but the same can be said about India, another major agricultural importer in Brics. For South Africa, agriculture is one of the key strategic industries for driving economic growth and revitalising rural communities. Notably, the sector cannot grow robustly without an expansion into new export markets. Already, the South African agricultural industry exports roughly half of its produce in value terms, amounting to about $13.7 billion in 2024. But the Brics countries account for a small share of these exports. Roughly two-thirds of South Africa's agricultural exports go to the African continent and the European Union. While China has signalled optimism and an intention to lower import tariffs for various goods from Africa, there is no demonstrable evidence of the actual path of implementing this, along with the timelines. Currently, it primarily serves as a political statement. The Brics grouping should build on these political statements, and argue for a proper framework that technocrats and business can start refining, which can be launched at the next summit in India as the Brics trade agreement. This would encompass the agricultural sector, as this grouping is a big market, accounting for roughly half of global agricultural imports, but filled mainly by non-Brics members. The US authorities' tough trade stance necessitates this approach to trade policy, which will allow Brics countries to expand the avenues for trade for their domestic businesses and alleviate the friction in this grouping. This economic ambition of deepening trade is vital for the long-term sustainability of Brics. Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store