
Bombshell report reveals Trump's new position on Russia-Ukraine war days after his high-stake call with Putin
When Trump was campaigning for his presidency for the 2024 elections, he said he could end the war started by Putin in "24 hours"
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump gives up on one of his major promises
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump's position on sanctions
US President Donald Trump has told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders that Moscow and Kyiv must independently end the war started by Russian President Vladimir Putin, reports The New York Times. Trump reportedly told European leaders during a private phone call that Putin is unwilling to end the war in Ukraine because he believes he's currently winning.When Trump was campaigning for his presidency for the 2024 elections, he said he could end the war started by Putin in "24 hours" but after more than 100 days in office, the US President had still appeared optimistic about his abilities as the dealmaker-in-chief.Trump's apparent defense of Putin's absence from last week's peace talks in Istanbul—and reports that he believes it's up to Russia and Ukraine to negotiate peace—have heightened concerns that he is backing away from involvement. This comes just days after he threatened sanctions if Russia failed to join Ukraine in declaring a 30-day unconditional ceasefire.According to the report, Trump, following repeated promises that he can play a role in ending more than two-year long war, had informed Zelensky and his allies that peace was up to Russia and Ukraine, which the paper suggested showed he was distancing himself from the process. Trump would not join European sanctions if Putin refused a ceasefire because of the trade opportunities that Russia offers, NYT reported citing sources."There is a large economic opportunity cost to sanctions, in addition to enforcement costs. The president always wants to maximize economic opportunities for Americans, and sanctions hinder business opportunities," a White House spokesperson told Newsweek.John Foreman, a former U.K. defense attaché to both Kyiv and Moscow, said that Trump's decision to abandon the sanctions-first approach would come as a shock to Europe, which he claimed has been 'played like suckers.'Vuk Vuksanovic, an associate at the London School of Economics' think tank LSE IDEAS, told Newsweek, 'Zelensky never had Trump as a fully committed ally.'U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday that Washington continues to supply Ukraine with weapons, and that Trump is seeking to end a conflict that 'neither side can win.'Since a dispute with the White House in February, Zelensky has accepted Trump's unconditional ceasefire proposal, signed a minerals agreement, and traveled to Turkey for talks convened by Putin—talks which the Russian leader ultimately did not attend.Concerns that President Trump's push for a quick peace deal might give Putin an upper hand were somewhat eased when Trump threatened new tariffs and sanctions against Russia if it refused to agree to a 30-day, unconditional ceasefire—similar to the one proposed on May 8. However, last week, Trump appeared to excuse Putin's absence from the Istanbul peace talks, stating that 'nothing's going to happen until Putin and I get together.'After earlier suggesting he might walk away from negotiations, Trump later posted on Truth Social, following a call with Putin, that it was up to Russia and Ukraine to resolve the conflict themselves.According to Foreman, Trump has strayed from the shuttle diplomacy approach his administration had pursued since January, which involved pushing for a ceasefire and talks under the threat of increased sanctions. Instead, Trump seemed to accommodate Putin's delays. Vuksanovic added that Russia was using the delay to solidify its hold on Ukraine's Donbas region, while Kyiv worked to convince Trump that Moscow was obstructing peace efforts and sought more U.S. support.When Putin rejected the ceasefire proposal on Monday, Trump chose not to impose additional sanctions. A White House official told the Times that Trump was hesitant to jeopardize future economic opportunities with Russia. Meanwhile, the U.K. joined the EU in a 17-sanction package targeting Russia—without U.S. participation. A European official told the New York Times that Trump 'never seemed invested' in the sanctions effort, describing his threats as 'largely performative.'This divergence has created a rift between Washington and NATO allies. Foreman warned that this leaves Ukraine exposed, as President Zelensky shifted strategy from demanding security guarantees to pursuing a ceasefire and talks—only to see U.S. commitment waver. Questions now linger over Trump's willingness to pressure Putin, especially if it risks economic ties.Foreman noted that Trump has not ended arms shipments or intelligence sharing with Ukraine, nor rolled back existing sanctions on Russia. 'As the killing continues, he may change course again,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
'Coercion and pressure': China slams Trump's secondary sanction threat for buying Russian oil
'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests. Tariff wars have no winners. Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything…,' said China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson read more US President Donald Trump meets with China's President Xi Jinping at the start of their bilateral meeting at the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. File Photo/Reuters Beijing on Wednesday slammed US President Donald Trump for threatening to impose secondary sanctions on countries that continue purchasing oil from Russia, calling the move an act of 'coercion and pressure.' In a strongly worded response on X, a spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry said, 'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests. Tariff wars have no winners. Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Response to U.S. suggestion that it will significantly raise tariffs if China continues to purchase Russian oil: China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests. Tariff wars have no winners. Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything.… — CHINA MFA Spokesperson 中国外交部发言人 (@MFA_China) July 30, 2025 Earlier in the day, President Trump imposed 25% tariffs and imposed a penalty on India for buying Russian oil amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. He also warned China and threatened to impose tariffs on Beijing. '…Also, they (India) have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!' Trump posted on Truth Social. On Tuesday, the US and China agreed to extend their mutual tariff pauses for another 90 days, following two days of high-level bilateral talks held in Stockholm, Sweden. Under the extension, the US will maintain its 30% tariffs on Chinese goods, while China will continue its 10% tariffs on American products. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Welcoming the development, China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, who led the Chinese delegation, said: 'A stable, healthy and sustainable China-US economic and trade relationship serves not only the two countries' respective development goals but also contributes to global economic growth and stability.' U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, part of the American delegation, described the discussions as 'very fulsome,' noting that the two sides covered a wide range of issues, including China's trade relations with Russia and its oil imports from Iran. 'We just need to de-risk with certain, strategic industries, whether it's the rare earths, semiconductors, medicines, and we talked about what we could do together to get into balance within the relationship,' Bessent added. The agreement marks a temporary easing of tensions in a trade relationship that remains under strain due to strategic concerns and geopolitical alignments. With inputs from agencies


First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Says Beyonce, Oprah, Kamala Harris Took Illegal Money from Democrats Firstpost America
Trump Says Beyonce, Oprah, Kamala Harris Took Illegal Money from Democrats |Firstpost America | N18G US President Donald Trump has accused Beyonce, Oprah Winfrey, and Al Sharpton of receiving illegal payments from the Democratic Party to endorse Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign. In a Truth Social post made from Scotland, Trump alleged that Beyoncé was paid $11 million despite not performing, while Oprah and Sharpton received millions for "doing nothing." However, campaign finance records contradict these claims, listing payments as event production costs. Critics say Trump's accusations are a diversion from ongoing scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The explosive post adds to Trump's ongoing battles with the media and political rivals. Watch the video to know more. See More

Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Indian equity markets set for losses after Donald Trump's tariff surprise
Indian equity markets are expected to open lower on Thursday after US President Donald Trump's unexpected announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, effective August 1. President Trump also indicated possible further penalties on India's energy imports from Russia. Following Trump's announcement the Nifty derivatives contracts traded at the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City) shed over half a per cent. Experts said the markets could decline between 1 and 2 per cent on Thursday. Most vulnerable stocks will be from garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, automotive and petrochemicals sector. However, those with no US exposure could also be impacted due to the concerns of overall impact on the economic growth. Analysts said if no deal is reached with the US or could shave off GDP growth by 20 basis points. 'Markets will react negatively to the tariff imposition. Despite the unpredictability of US policy, investors anticipated a deal given the aligned long-term interests between the US and India,' said Nilesh Shah, MD, Kotak Mahindra AMC. Sectorally, the inclusion of pharmaceuticals among the tariffed goods could have a significant impact, as the US accounts for over 30 per cent of India's pharma exports. 'Markets may fall 1-1.5 per cent but should stabilise soon after. While several sectors will feel the pain, the broader impact may be contained as long as IT and service exports remain unaffected,' said Chokkalingam G, founder, Equinomics. The US President's threats of additional penalties came a day after he formally announced to Russia a 10-day deadline to reach a truce with Ukraine. The US had threatened secondary levies that would target countries that import Russian exports, such as oil. India was among the first to engage with the US in trade talks. The US is India's largest trading partner and top export market. Market experts said that a 25 per cent tariff rate is a negative development compared to lower rates for peers such as Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, which compete with India in similar categories of labour-intensive products and electronic goods, as well as for foreign portfolio investment (FPI) flows. FPIs have been net sellers in India this month while being buyers in other emerging markets.