logo
A Brief History of Our Obsession With Prime Numbers—and Where the Hunt Goes Next

A Brief History of Our Obsession With Prime Numbers—and Where the Hunt Goes Next

Gizmodo31-05-2025
A shard of smooth bone etched with irregular marks dating back 20,000 years puzzled archaeologists until they noticed something unique – the etchings, lines like tally marks, may have represented prime numbers. Similarly, a clay tablet from 1800 B.C.E. inscribed with Babylonian numbers describes a number system built on prime numbers.
As the Ishango bone, the Plimpton 322 tablet and other artifacts throughout history display, prime numbers have fascinated and captivated people throughout history. Today, prime numbers and their properties are studied in number theory, a branch of mathematics and active area of research today.
A history of prime numbers
Informally, a positive counting number larger than one is prime if that number of dots can be arranged only into a rectangular array with one column or one row. For example, 11 is a prime number since 11 dots form only rectangular arrays of sizes 1 by 11 and 11 by 1. Conversely, 12 is not prime since you can use 12 dots to make an array of 3 by 4 dots, with multiple rows and multiple columns. Math textbooks define a prime number as a whole number greater than one whose only positive divisors are only 1 and itself.
Math historian Peter S. Rudman suggests that Greek mathematicians were likely the first to understand the concept of prime numbers, around 500 B.C.E.
Around 300 B.C.E., the Greek mathematician and logician Euler proved that there are infinitely many prime numbers. Euler began by assuming that there is a finite number of primes. Then he came up with a prime that was not on the original list to create a contradiction. Since a fundamental principle of mathematics is being logically consistent with no contradictions, Euler then concluded that his original assumption must be false. So, there are infinitely many primes.
The argument established the existence of infinitely many primes, however it was not particularly constructive. Euler had no efficient method to list all the primes in an ascending list.
In the middle ages, Arab mathematicians advanced the Greeks' theory of prime numbers, referred to as hasam numbers during this time. The Persian mathematician Kamal al-Din al-Farisi formulated the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that any positive integer larger than one can be expressed uniquely as a product of primes.
From this view, prime numbers are the basic building blocks for constructing any positive whole number using multiplication – akin to atoms combining to make molecules in chemistry.
Prime numbers can be sorted into different types. In 1202, Leonardo Fibonacci introduced in his book 'Liber Abaci: Book of Calculation' prime numbers of the form (2p – 1) where p is also prime.
Today, primes in this form are called Mersenne primes after the French monk Marin Mersenne. Many of the largest known primes follow this format.
Several early mathematicians believed that a number of the form (2p – 1) is prime whenever p is prime. But in 1536, mathematician Hudalricus Regius noticed that 11 is prime but not (211 – 1), which equals 2047. The number 2047 can be expressed as 11 times 89, disproving the conjecture.
While not always true, number theorists realized that the (2p – 1) shortcut often produces primes and gives a systematic way to search for large primes.
The search for large primes
The number (2p – 1) is much larger relative to the value of p and provides opportunities to identify large primes.
When the number (2p – 1) becomes sufficiently large, it is much harder to check whether (2p – 1) is prime – that is, if (2p – 1) dots can be arranged only into a rectangular array with one column or one row.
Fortunately, Édouard Lucas developed a prime number test in 1878, later proved by Derrick Henry Lehmer in 1930. Their work resulted in an efficient algorithm for evaluating potential Mersenne primes. Using this algorithm with hand computations on paper, Lucas showed in 1876 that the 39-digit number (2127 – 1) equals 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727, and that value is prime.
Also known as M127, this number remains the largest prime verified by hand computations. It held the record for largest known prime for 75 years.
Researchers began using computers in the 1950s, and the pace of discovering new large primes increased. In 1952, Raphael M. Robinson identified five new Mersenne primes using a Standard Western Automatic Computer to carry out the Lucas-Lehmer prime number tests.
As computers improved, the list of Mersenne primes grew, especially with the Cray supercomputer's arrival in 1964. Although there are infinitely many primes, researchers are unsure how many fit the type (2p – 1) and are Mersenne primes.
By the early 1980s, researchers had accumulated enough data to confidently believe that infinitely many Mersenne primes exist. They could even guess how often these prime numbers appear, on average. Mathematicians have not found proof so far, but new data continues to support these guesses.
George Woltman, a computer scientist, founded the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, or GIMPS, in 1996. Through this collaborative program, anyone can download freely available software from the GIMPS website to search for Mersenne prime numbers on their personal computers. The website contains specific instructions on how to participate.
GIMPS has now identified 18 Mersenne primes, primarily on personal computers using Intel chips. The program averages a new discovery about every one to two years.
The largest known prime
Luke Durant, a retired programmer, discovered the current record for the largest known prime, (2136,279,841 – 1), in October 2024. Referred to as M136279841, this 41,024,320-digit number was the 52nd Mersenne prime identified and was found by running GIMPS on a publicly available cloud-based computing network.
This network used Nvidia chips and ran across 17 countries and 24 data centers. These advanced chips provide faster computing by handling thousands of calculations simultaneously. The result is shorter run times for algorithms such as prime number testing.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is a civil liberty group that offers cash prizes for identifying large primes. It awarded prizes in 2000 and 2009 for the first verified 1 million-digit and 10 million-digit prime numbers.
Large prime number enthusiasts' next two challenges are to identify the first 100 million-digit and 1 billion-digit primes. EFF prizes of US$150,000 and $250,000, respectively, await the first successful individual or group.
Eight of the 10 largest known prime numbers are Mersenne primes, so GIMPS and cloud computing are poised to play a prominent role in the search for record-breaking large prime numbers.
Large prime numbers have a vital role in many encryption methods in cybersecurity, so every internet user stands to benefit from the search for large prime numbers. These searches help keep digital communications and sensitive information safe.
Jeremiah Bartz, Associate Professor of Mathematics, University of North Dakota. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The one thing that could protect your parents from scammers
The one thing that could protect your parents from scammers

Fox News

time16 hours ago

  • Fox News

The one thing that could protect your parents from scammers

In Greek mythology, the Sirens were creatures whose irresistible song lured sailors to their doom. Odysseus, the hero of "The Odyssey," wanted to hear that famous song. But he knew it was dangerous. So, he had his men tie him to the mast and block their ears with beeswax. Then, they sailed toward the Island of the Sirens. Why? Because Odysseus understood that once he heard their song, he wouldn't be able to resist. And that song always leads to trouble. Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join my What does this have to do with protecting your parents from scammers? None of us is invulnerable, not even a hero like Odysseus. The trick is knowing what you can't resist and, one way or another, avoiding it. You can teach your parents all there is to know about modern-day fraud and the dangers of sharing personal information, but there's still this Siren song out there that will have them throwing all that knowledge out the window in a heartbeat. What this Siren song is varies from person to person and day to day. It might be a near-perfect clone of a grandchild's voice, calling in a panic and asking for an urgent transfer to bail them out of trouble, if not jail. Alternatively, a financial adviser could be deftly playing on your parents' anxieties around money since retiring. Another common scam involves a suspiciously foreign-sounding Microsoft customer-support worker calling to inform your parents that the computer they don't have or never use has been infected with a virus. The point is that all of us, no matter how well-informed, careful, or clever, can be exploited by a fast-talking scammer. All it takes is the right hook at exactly the wrong moment, and we're along for the ride. All the more so as we get older and technology advances rapidly, leaving us behind. Scammers rely on emotional reactions as much as, if not more than, ignorance. Letting your parents know about the dangers of engaging with strangers (even if they claim to be from Visa or the IRS) is crucial, but it's not enough. Scammers exploit fear, greed, and the desire to please others or simply be a good citizen. They're experts at raising the emotional toll of interrupting, interrogating, or ignoring them. In short, getting drawn into discussions with scammers is playing with fire. So, what's the solution? Stop the scammers from making contact in the first place. They're getting your parents' contact information and much more personal data besides, from somewhere. Stop them from getting their hands on it, and they won't have the chance to manipulate your parents into doing something they'll regret. People-search sites are a great source of information for scammers. Fast, easy, and inexpensive, they fuel smaller operations and individual scammers. People-search sites are a kind of data broker; the other major kind, sometimes called private-database data brokers, are even worse. These data brokers sell personal data in bulk to other businesses. They've been caught selling the personal data of vulnerable adults before, offering data packs that focused on people who needed in-home care or were suffering from cognitive impairment or decline, for example. This is worse than posting your parents' details publicly. This is packaging up those details and marketing them directly to scammers. The good news is that a data removal service can scrub both people-search sites and the databases of those other, more shadowy data brokers clean of your parents' information. Names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, property values, health information, shopping habits, political preferences, and more. You can take all this down in one fell swoop with a personal data removal service. While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is really a smart choice. They aren't cheap and neither is your privacy. These services do all the work for you by actively monitoring and systematically erasing your personal information from hundreds of websites. It's what gives me peace of mind and has proven to be the most effective way to erase your personal data from the internet. By limiting the information available, you reduce the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information they might find on the dark web, making it harder for them to target you and your parents. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: At the end of the day, protecting your parents isn't just about warnings or knowledge. It's about cutting off scammers before they even get a chance to call or reach out in some way. Removing personal data from sketchy sites is the secret weapon here. It's simple, effective, and frees your loved ones from emotional traps. Isn't preventing contact better than trying to clean up the mess afterward? Let us know by writing us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.

DeFi Sector TVL Hits 3-Year High of $153B as Investors Rush to Farm Yields
DeFi Sector TVL Hits 3-Year High of $153B as Investors Rush to Farm Yields

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

DeFi Sector TVL Hits 3-Year High of $153B as Investors Rush to Farm Yields

The decentralized finance (DeFi) market ballooned to a three-year high of $153 billion on Monday, spurred by ETH's ascent toward $4,000 and significant inflows into restaking protocols. DefiLlama data shows that the uptick in inflows and asset prices over the past week lifted the sector above its December 2024 high to its highest point since May 2022, at the time of $60 billion collapse of Do Kwon's Terra network. ETH has risen 60% from $2,423 to $3,887 over the past 30 days following a wave of institutional investment including a $1.3 billion treasury investment from Sharplink Gaming and BitMine's $2 billion acquisition. Ethereum still commands the monopoly over DeFi total value locked (TVL) with 59.5% of all capital locked on-chain, the majority of which can be attributed to liquid staking protocol Lido and lending platform Aave, both of which have between $32 billion and $34 billion in TVL. Institutions acquiring assets like ether is one part of the equation, the other is securing a yield on top of that investment. Investors can stake ETH directly and earn a modest annual yield between 1.5% and 4%, or they can go one step further and use a restaking protocol, which will award native yield and a liquid staking token that can be used elsewhere across the DeFi ecosystem for additional yield. X user OlimpioCrypto revealed a more complex strategy that can secure an annual return of up to 25% on USDC and sUSDC with low risk and full liquidity. It loops assets between Euler and Spark on Unichain: Users supply USDC on Euler, borrow sUSDC, re-supply it, and repeat. Incentives from Spark (SSR + OP rewards) and Euler (USDC subsidies, rEUL) boost returns. An easier but less profitable alternative starts by minting sUSDC via Spark and looping with USDC borrow/lend on Euler. Despite UI discrepancies, both methods are reportedly yielding strong returns, likely lasting about a week unless incentives change. While much of the attention is understandably on the Ethereum network, Solana's TVL has grown by 23% in the past month to $12 billion, with protocols like Sanctum, Jupiter and Marinade all outperforming the wider SOL ecosystem with significant inflows, according to DefiLlama. Investors have also been pouring capital into Avalanche and Sui, which are up 33% and 39%, respectively, in terms of TVL this month. The Bitcoin DeFi ecosystem has been more muted, rising by just 9% to $6.2 billion despite a recent drive to new record highs at $124,000.

Euler DAO votes to boost revenue 414% with new fees amid red-hot lending competition
Euler DAO votes to boost revenue 414% with new fees amid red-hot lending competition

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Euler DAO votes to boost revenue 414% with new fees amid red-hot lending competition

Euler DAO, the crypto collective behind the popular lending protocol, is voting on a proposal to selectively increase fees on its products, potentially boosting revenue by 414%. If passed, the proposal will add a 10% fee on Euler Prime stablecoin vaults and a 10% fee on all Euler Yield vaults. Fees on all other products will remain the same. 'The selective strategy is smarter because the fee rate can be adjusted to suit the unique profiles of lenders and borrowers in each vault,' Anton Totomanov, founder of Objective Labs, told DL News. Objective Labs, a risk management partner of Euler Labs, devised the proposal's fee recommendations. According to Objective Labs' calculations, the new fees will increase the DAO's annual revenue from $714,000 to over $3.6 million, giving the crypto collective a bigger pool of funds to play with. However, the new fees will cut into the profit that Euler users can earn on their crypto. Some could look elsewhere for better places to deposit their assets. Euler is a DeFi lending protocol similar to Aave. It is made up of dozens of vaults where users can borrow crypto against various forms of collateral, such as other crypto assets or even DeFi protocol deposits. In 2023, the protocol was hit by a $200 million hack. Although the attacker later returned the funds, the incident shook investor confidence in Euler, and the protocol remained dormant for over a year before relaunching in September. Increased competition In recent months, competition among DeFi lenders has intensified as the market reaches an all-time high of $112 billion. Earlier this month, Aave's DAO voted to launch a white-label lending protocol on Kraken's Ink blockchain in a bid to tap into the centralised exchange's customer base. In January, Morpho did something similar when it signed a deal with Coinbase to facilitate Bitcoin-backed loans for the exchange's customers. Other DeFi lenders, such as Maple and Sky, are also locked in battle over institutional customers. Euler adding more fees at such a critical time could be risky. The protocol held off doing so initially to be as attractive and competitive as possible when it relaunched. But now the protocol has grown to almost $2.5 billion in deposits, it could add fees without having a negative impact, Seini, the proposal's pseudonymous author said. Balancing act Totomanov said that introducing fees to the Euler Yield vaults is unlikely to have a negative impact because they are already designed to offer higher yields to investors by taking on more risk. However, for other vaults, such as those facilitating the lending and borrowing of Ethereum, adding a fee could be more detrimental. That's because 90% of Ethereum borrowers on Euler are engaged in looping, a strategy where lenders juice their Ethereum staking yields by repeatedly depositing and borrowing Ethereum. These users are particularly sensitive to changes in borrowing rates. Last week, the sudden withdrawal of $1.7 billion in Ethereum from Aave caused Ethereum borrowing rates to spike, triggering a scramble to unwind looping trades. 'Charging high fees on ETH inside Euler Prime would lead to a modest revenue increase while possibly leading to outflows,' Totomanov said, explaining why Objective Labs decided not to implement a fee on Euler Prime's Ethereum market. So far, 100% of voters support enabling fees in accordance with Objective Labs' recommendations, or going further and giving the firm full control over fee management. The vote is set to end on Wednesday. Tim Craig is DL News' Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store