
Report on Commissioner Théberge's interventions before the courts from 2018 to 2025: The importance of building a foundation for language rights
The report highlights 13 interventions in which the Commissioner participated, including two appeals concerning Canada's Official Languages Act that he himself initiated. Also of note are his five interventions before the Supreme Court of Canada to put forth innovative arguments regarding the right to minority‑language education.
The document enables readers to fully appreciate the need for the Commissioner to take a position before the courts in order to contribute to the protection of language rights and the advancement of case law in this field.
Specifically, Commissioner Théberge has defended fundamental rights such as access to the courts in the language of one's choice, the public's right to receive services and communications in the language of their choice and the right to work in the official language of one's choice in the public service. In this way, the Commissioner has directly contributed to the rich heritage of case law that Canadians can rely on to ensure that their language rights are respected.
Significant effort and resources are required to file proceedings or appeal a decision. While the Commissioner's interventions have helped advance the language rights of Canadians, it is important to note that it would be better to prevent violations rather than try to resolve them once the damage has been done. Decision makers must take concrete measures and propose long-lasting solutions to ensure the protection of language rights in Canada.
Quote
'The decisions obtained during my interventions before the courts have been favourable to the protection of language rights in Canada. Each decision has helped enrich the case law that is the very foundation Canadians stand on to claim their language rights when it comes to accessing justice, education and even the vitality of official language minority communities.
Nevertheless, the progress achieved during my mandate is not immutable. We must all stay vigilant against anything that would erode our language rights.'
- Raymond Théberge, Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada
Highlights
Seven cases in which the Commissioner intervened under Canada's Official Languages Act (the Act)
2018
Mazraani v Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc., 2018 SCC 50, in regard to Part III of the Act
2019
Thibodeau v Air Canada, 2019 FC 1102, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Thibodeau v Halifax International Airport Authority, 2019 FC 1149, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Dionne v Canada (Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions), 2019 FC 879, in regard to Part V of the Act
2020
Thibodeau v St. John's International Airport Authority, 2022 FC 563, in regard Part IV of the Act
Thibodeau v Greater Toronto Airports Authority, 2024 FC 274, in regard to Part IV of the Act
2022
St. John's International Airport Authority v Thibodeau, 2024 FCA 197, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Two cases in which the Commissioner intervened under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2020
Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique v British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13, in regard to Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2023
Commission scolaire francophone des Territoires du Nord-Ouest v Northwest Territories (Education, Culture and Employment), 2023 SCC 31, in regard to Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Two cases in which the Commissioner intervened under the Criminal Code
2019
Bessette v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 31, in regard to Section 530 of the Criminal Code and section 133 of the Offence Act, RSBC 1996, c 338
2023
R v Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16, in regard to Subsection 530(3) of the Criminal Code
Two appeals initiated by the Commissioner under the Act
2018
Canada (Commissioner of Official Languages) v Canada (Employment and Social Development), 2022 FCA 14, in regard toParts IV and VII of the Act
2021
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
16 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Disruptive ‘scam' or legitimate protest? Here's why Pierre Poilievre's byelection ballot will have dozens of candidates
OTTAWA—One candidate is a 22-year-old university student living four hours north of Toronto. Another is a Montreal-area teacher and tour guide with a fondness for dinosaurs. A third lives in Nebraska, working in IT. And there are more than 175 people, just like them, on the ballot for a byelection in a sprawling riding sandwiched between Calgary and Edmonton. Battle River—Crowfoot is the Alberta riding vacated by Conservative MP Damien Kurek so his seatless leader, Pierre Poilievre, can run in a byelection and return to the House of Commons. It's also the sixth target for the Longest Ballot Committee, a protest group that swamps ballots with dozens of independent candidates to drum up attention about electoral reform. The idea is simple: when voters notice the colossal lists of contenders on their ballots, candidates and organizers use that opening to promote alternative electoral systems and their belief that politicians should not be in charge of shaping election rules that may benefit them. This week, the Conservative leader, whose former riding of Carleton was targeted during the last federal campaign, said he'd had enough. Poilievre penned a letter to Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon, calling the effort a 'blatant abuse' of Canada's democracy and elections integrity, and demanded the Liberals introduce reforms in the fall that would stifle 'the longest ballot scam.' In a statement to the Star, MacKinnon's office said the government shares Poilievre's concerns and was 'examining' the issue. But for those who believe the gargantuan ballots make an inexcusable mockery of Canada's electoral system, well, that's kind of the whole point. 'I get emails, I get Facebook messages saying, 'Why is a person from Ontario running in an Alberta riding?' And this is exactly why I do want to see a residency requirement. I don't think somebody from Ontario should be able to run in Alberta,' said Dillon Anderson, the 22-year-old university student from Callander, Ont. 'I'm hoping that this is the last time we'll do the longest ballot and that we get some changes, some actual meaningful changes, that don't restrict Canadians' rights to run, but gives us more of a local-focused approach,' said Anderson, who is one of several protest candidates who believe other rules, like residency requirements, ought to be changed. For Nicola Zoghbi, the Montreal teacher, the initiative is 'one of the most efficient ways' to point out flaws in Canada's electoral system, which he says include its use of the first-past-the-post system, where the candidate with the most votes wins — even if most voters actually voted for other contenders. What's unique about this byelection, said Zoghbi, whose campaign platform is almost entirely about dinosaurs , is how Poilievre is able to take advantage of some rules while trying to ban others. 'There's this loophole that Poilievre and other politicians are using, so regular people like me could use it, too,' he said of the residency requirement, which politicians have historically used to run in ridings far away from where they actually live. Jason Buzzell, the Nebraska IT expert, joined the movement in part because of his personal ties to the riding. Buzzell was raised in Battle River—Crowfoot, and started his family there before work took him across the border. He wonders if a proportional voting system would have seen Poilievre re-elected in Carleton last spring. 'If we had had electoral reform … we wouldn't even have to do this byelection,' Buzzell suggested. The question election experts are now wrestling with is whether the whole scheme is fair game, or whether the integrity of races is being compromised. There are indications that the latter has not occurred, said Dennis Pilon, a professor and chair of the politics department at York University. One is a lack of reports that electors have felt too confused by affected ballots to vote properly. Another is no indication that the number of spoiled ballots has unduly increased. A third is that voters ultimately still have the agency to choose the candidate who they want to represent them. But if the strategy isn't harming voters, could it harm candidates from established parties? 'Maybe it ends up denying one of the candidates the win. That's the whole point of the protest,' said Pilon. So far, all ridings targeted by the movement have been won by a Liberal, Conservative or Bloc Québécois candidate. But ' everything that's happening is legal, and it's allowed to be done,' said Laura Stephenson, a professor and chair of the department of political science at the University of Western Ontario. Poilievre has asked the government to consider three changes: to require that candidates have more than the current minimum of 100 voter signatures needed to get on the ballot; that those signatures be exclusive to each candidate; and that each candidate needs their own official agent (the person who manages campaign finances). The Longest Ballot Committee has the same official agent for each of its candidates, and goes to the same voters to obtain physical signatures for nomination packages. Stephenson said some of the proposals could, in theory, 'tighten things up while still maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.' 'The key is that this shouldn't be seen as a political step. If these kinds of rules were being brought forward by Elections Canada … it doesn't have any political tint to it,' she said of the timing of Poilievre's demands. The one issue on which everyone seems to agree is that the protest has sidelined independent candidates not tied to the movement who are running serious campaigns. Bonnie Critchley, an independent candidate in Battle River—Crowfoot, has been frustrated by the protest drawing voter attention away from her campaign. 'This is a little bit sad for them. I'm very sorry for that,' said Sébastien CoRhino, one of the Longest Ballot Committee's organizers. 'But at the same time, it is impossible with the current political system to have independent candidates win an election,' he said. Michael MacKenzie, the Jarislowsky Chair in Trust and Political Leadership at Vancouver Island University, says opposing the protest runs counter to Poilievre's stated focus on ensuring political elites have no say in the decisions of Canadians. But he questions whether the original purpose of the movement — to reopen a national discussion about electoral reform that the Liberals have abandoned — is being lost in all the noise. 'It's not generating a lot of focused discussion on the complexities of electoral reform,' MacKenzie said. 'Most discussions are about the disruptions and the difficulties and confusions associated with this initiative, and there's been very little discussion about the benefits or drawbacks of the electoral reform itself.'
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
MAGA-affiliated musician takes stage east of Ottawa after NCC pulls permit
A Christian rocker affiliated with U.S. President Donald Trump played to more than 100 people in Alfred and Plantagenet, Ont., on Saturday afternoon after he was prevented from holding a free concert in Gatineau, Que. The National Capital Commission (NCC) had refused to issue a permit for Sean Feucht to play in Jacques-Cartier Park, which is managed by the Crown corporation. Feucht, who unsuccessfully ran for U.S. Congress as a Republican in 2020, is also a missionary and an author who has spoken out against the 2SLGBTQ+ community, abortion rights and critical race theory. He has called for government policy in the United States to be based on traditional Christian values in the midst of a "spiritual war" in that country. The NCC said Wednesday evening it had consulted with the Gatineau Police Service and would not allow Feucht to play in the riverside park, citing "concerns about public safety and security." The refusal to issue the permit echoed similar decisions made by other Canadian municipalities, including Quebec City, Moncton and Charlottetown. Alfred and Plantagenet Mayor Yves Laviolette said he was unaware of the concert until he was alerted by the media and then later by Ontario Provincial Police. "We're just trying to be prepared for whatever consequences are going to happen," Laviolette told Radio-Canada before the concert. "Hopefully it's going to be very docile." After the concert, Feucht spoke briefly with reporters. "We worshipped. We took communion. People were baptized. People got saved and set free," he said. "And then we handed out bibles. It was a great night." Feucht added that he'd heard about "resistance" to his shows and welcomed anyone who was curious to attend. "We're just grateful to be here right now," he said.

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump signals stalled US-Canada trade talks as tariff deadline looms
-- As the clock ticks toward a critical August 1 deadline, U.S.-Canada trade negotiations show few signs of progress, with officials on both sides signaling a hardening of positions. U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that talks with Ottawa have been largely unsuccessful, raising the possibility that tariffs may be the administration's primary course of action. 'We will have most of our deals finished, if not all. We haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada,' Trump told reporters. 'I think Canada could be one where they just pay tariffs. It's not really a negotiation.' Washington's immediate focus has turned toward the European Union, while Canada remains on the periphery of the White House trade agenda. 'We're working very diligently with Europe, the EU, which covers a lot of territory... That's the big one right now... We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump added. Without a new trade pact in place, existing tariffs on certain Canadian exports are scheduled to rise to 35% from 25%, particularly on non-CUSMA goods. Canadian Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Dominic LeBlanc concluded talks in Washington this week, meeting briefly with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. 'We've made progress, but we have a lot of work in front of us,' LeBlanc said following the meetings. Prime Minister Mark Carney has tempered expectations for any breakthrough, reiterating the government's commitment to national interest over expediency. "The Government of Canada will not accept a bad deal,' Carney stated, adding that Ottawa would proceed only 'in the best interest of Canadians.' Analysts from BofA Securities have cited tariff exemptions for CUSMA goods as leaving Canada and Mexico as the best-positioned countries currently subject to U.S. levies. The exemptions afford Canada some leeway, aligning with Trump's comments that the government may potentially foot the tariff bill, all in hopes of a better deal. Related articles Trump signals stalled US-Canada trade talks as tariff deadline looms These Under-the-Radar Stocks Offer Better Risk-Reward Ratio Than Nvidia Risks Rising? Smart Money Dodged 46%+ Drawdowns on These High-Flying Names Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos