logo
Wealth tax will penalise savers, Labour warned

Wealth tax will penalise savers, Labour warned

Telegraph10 hours ago
A wealth tax would punish savers and hit the middle class, the Government has been warned by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Introducing a levy on the assets of the rich would not be 'sensible', the IFS said, in a rebuff to Labour backbenchers.
Taxing the same wealth each year would 'penalise' people for saving and making investments, leaving the country poorer in the long run. It would also likely hit the middle classes once property and pension wealth are factored in, the think tank warned.
'It is difficult to make the case that an annual tax on wealth would be a sensible part of the tax system even in principle,' said Stuart Adam, a senior economist at IFS.
No 10 repeatedly refused to rule out introducing a new levy on wealthy taxpayers on Monday after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' the idea.
Some of Labour's biggest union paymasters have also called for the Government to introduce a 2pc tax on people's assets above £10m.
A YouGov poll published on Tuesday found 75pc of the public supported the idea of a tax of 2pc on wealth above £10m.
But the IFS cautioned that a range of countries had previously introduced a wealth tax but ultimately abandoned the policy, including Sweden, Finland and Luxembourg.
'International experience of annual wealth taxes is not encouraging,' Mr Adam said.
'There are strong reasons to radically reform how we currently tax the sources and uses of wealth; this includes reforming capital income taxes in order to properly tax high returns. An annual wealth tax would be a poor substitute for doing that.'
'Less attractive place to live'
In a 2021 paper, the IFS concluded there were 'economically superior' ways of targeting the assets of the wealthy, including reforming capital gains tax.
A new wealth levy would lead to a raid on Britain's middle class, the IFS warned. Mr Adam said: 'An annual wealth tax would need to apply broadly to all assets to ensure that it was not easy to avoid. Such a tax could raise significant revenue if it applied to the bulk of the UK's wealth – that would include the homes and pensions of the middle class.'
The influential think tank also cautioned that trying to raise large amounts of revenue from only the very wealthy would make the country 'a less attractive place for those people to live'.
The comments add to warnings from business chiefs that a new levy would drive people abroad and trigger a fresh exodus of the rich from Britain.
Many wealthy residents are already moving abroad after Rachel Reeves scrapped non-dom status and introduced inheritance tax on overseas trusts earlier this year.
Hotelier Sir Rocco Forte told The Telegraph earlier this week: 'Labour has already seen a huge exodus of wealthy people which is ongoing, with many more due to leave before the Budget. A wealth tax will further exacerbate the problem.'
Growing Labour unrest
Pressure to consider a wealth tax has been mounting after a series of costly U-turns by the Government that have left the Chancellor scrambling to find billions of pounds.
Cabinet ministers have been told that the Chancellor will have to raise taxes in her autumn Budget.
Last week's rebellion over the welfare cuts package has forced the Treasury to find new savings and emboldened hard-Left Labour backbenchers to push for more policy changes.
A Treasury spokesman said: 'Tax decisions are taken at the Budget and, as you would expect, we are not going to comment on tax speculation.
'We have made our manifesto promises to protect working people and we took the decision last autumn to deliver the change the British people voted for.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump news at a glance: president complains about Putin's ‘bullshit'
Trump news at a glance: president complains about Putin's ‘bullshit'

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump news at a glance: president complains about Putin's ‘bullshit'

Donald Trump has voiced his irritation with Vladimir Putin, telling a cabinet meeting he was getting increasingly frustrated with the Russian leader. The US president told the televised meeting of top officials: 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' Asked if he wanted to see further sanctions against Russia, Trump replied: 'I'm looking at it.' He refused to give further details but said any action would come as 'a little surprise'. Here's more on that and other key US politics stories of the day: As well as voicing his frustration with Putin, Trump promised to send 10 Patriot missiles to Ukraine, according to an official familiar with the matter. Trump had announced on Monday that US weapons deliveries would resume, just a few days after they were halted by the Pentagon. On Monday, the president said he was 'disappointed' with Russia's president and would send 'more weapons' to Ukraine. 'We're gonna send some more weapons we have to them. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now,' Trump said, alongside a US and Israeli delegation. Read the full story The United States only has about 25% of the Patriot missile interceptors it needs for all of the Pentagon's military plans after burning through stockpiles in the Middle East in recent months, an alarming depletion that led to the Trump administration freezing the latest transfer of munitions to Ukraine, according to sources in the government. Read the full story Trump vowed to further escalate his trade wars on Tuesday, threatening US tariffs of up to 200% on foreign drugs and 50% on copper, amid widespread confusion around his shifting plans. Hours after saying his latest deadline for a new wave of steep duties was 'not 100% firm', the US president declared that 'no extensions will be granted' beyond 1 August. 'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change,' Trump wrote on social media, a day after signing an executive order that changed the date from 9 July. Read the full story The US supreme court has cleared the way for Trump's administration to resume plans for mass firings of federal workers that critics warn could threaten crucial government services. Extending a winning streak for the US president, the justices on Tuesday lifted a lower court order that had frozen sweeping federal layoffs known as 'reductions in force' while litigation in the case proceeds. The decision could result in hundreds of thousands of job losses at the departments of agriculture, commerce, health and human services, state, treasury, veterans affairs and other agencies. Read the full story A new study of defense department spending previewed exclusively to the Guardian shows that most of the Pentagon's discretionary spending from 2020 to 2024 has gone to outside military contractors, providing a $2.4tn boon in public funds to private firms in what was described as a 'continuing and massive transfer of wealth from taxpayers to fund war and weapons manufacturing'. The report, from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and Costs of War, said that the Trump administration's new Pentagon budget will push annual US military spending past the $1tn mark. Read the full story The deadly Texas floods could signal a new norm in the US, as Trump and his allies dismantle critical federal agencies that help states prepare and respond to extreme weather and other hazards, experts warn. Read the full story An unknown fraudster has used artificial intelligence to impersonate the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, contacting at least five senior officials. According to a state department cable first seen by the Washington Post and confirmed by the Guardian, the impostor sent fake voice messages and texts that mimicked Rubio's voice and writing style to those targets, including three foreign ministers, a US governor and a member of Congress. Read the full story A Houston pediatrician is 'no longer employed' after a posting on social media that the 'Maga' voters in Texas 'get what they voted for' amid deadly flash flooding. A federal judge has ruled against five non-profit organizations that sued the Trump administration over the rescinding of hundreds of millions of dollars meant to prevent and respond to issues such as gun violence, substance abuse and hate crimes. Fifa's relationship with Trump now has a physically tangible marker, with soccer's world governing body announcing it has opened an office in Trump Tower in New York City. Catching up? Here's what happened on 7 July 2025.

Talks to finalise US steel tariff exemption ongoing as deadline due to pass
Talks to finalise US steel tariff exemption ongoing as deadline due to pass

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Talks to finalise US steel tariff exemption ongoing as deadline due to pass

Government talks to finalise the deal to spare the UK from US steel tariffs are ongoing, Downing Street has said, as the deadline for the levies to come into force is due to pass and the steel industry called for a 'swift' resolution. President Donald Trump has said he plans to start implementing tariffs on the US's trade partners on July 9. The UK has already managed to negotiate a deal with the US which eliminates the threat of tariffs for British car and aeroplane manufacturers. But a reprieve for the steel industry is yet to be finalised, leaving open the threat that the current 25% tariff rate could rise to 50% after the deadline. Mr Trump is reportedly stepping up pressure on countries who could soon be subject to the tariffs, urging them to negotiate trade deals with the US. But amid signs of confusion within the US administration, trade secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested America's trade partners will see the levies begin on August 9, after receiving a letter outlining them on July 9. Mr Trump told his cabinet that negotiating trade deals was 'too time-consuming' so he was sending out letters to countries detailing tariff rates. In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday night, he said letters to 'a minimum of 7 Countries' would be released on Wednesday morning with more in the afternoon, although he gave no indication of which countries would be receiving the letters. Gareth Stace, director general at industry body UK Steel, said: 'A swift and positive resolution is needed to safeguard jobs, unlock growth, and restore confidence in the UK steel sector.' Downing Street said on Tuesday that discussions are ongoing between UK and US officials to secure 0% tariffs on core steel imports to the US. A Number 10 spokesman said: 'As we've said before, this is something that we continue to discuss with the US, just as we did with aero and auto, and those discussions will continue.' Asked if the Government understands the frustration of British steel workers, he said they want to see the deal in force 'as soon as possible'. The spokesman added: 'We obviously want to see this deal in force as soon as possible. That remains our priority. 'But as we've said before and set out, the Government remains relentlessly focused on making sure British businesses can feel the benefits of the deal as soon as possible.'

Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request
Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request

A fired employee has sparked a humorous debate after exposing a shameless request from his former boss. The text message seemed genuine and polite, however it has transpired that this particular manager was asking the man to come back and train his own replacement just days after being let go. In a now-viral TikTok video, British career expert Ben Askins shared the shocking text message exchange that left thousands of viewers gobsmacked, with many dubbing the boss's request 'delusional' and 'ridiculous.' The clip, which has amassed more than 175,000 views, shows the boss pleading with the sacked staffer to return and train the new hire on the company's ticketing system. Outrageously, he was offering nothing more than a coffee in exchange. 'This boss was really pushing his luck!' Ben captioned the video. 'Situations like this can be easily avoided,' after he too seemed shocked by the lack of regard the boss had for the ex-worker. 'Hey, I know this probably isn't the best time to ask, but we're struggling with the new ticketing process. Is there any chance you could come in and run the new guy through it?' the employer messaged over text. To which the disgruntled ex-employee clapped back: 'Are you having a laugh? You fired me last week?' Lacking any regard for their feelings the employee replied: 'I know, but I wouldn't ask if it wasn't important. It shouldn't take you long. I know this is awkward, I promise you will get a coffee for the favour.' In the video, Ben chimed in adding his own opinion on the matter, joking that a mere coffee for his time was 'quite alright, then,' as he laughed. Surprisingly, the ex-employee replied with an olive branch to help, but felt remuneration was only fair for his time: 'I will do it. But I want it to be a remote tutorial, and I will charge you for half a day.' 'Remote is fine, but half a day's pay? This will only take a few minutes?' the employer replied, clearly surprised at the request. 'That is the deal.' Begrudgingly his terms were met, but not without a small dig at his audaciousness of actually being remunerated for his time and effort: 'Fine, but I am disappointed this is the way you are playing this,' the boss replied. Ben, who frequently posts career advice and work-related scenarios, was stunned by the entitlement on display. 'Firstly, let's be very clear,' he said. He does not have to do this favour. So the fact that he's charging is completely okay. 'He's giving up his time. He really doesn't have to do it, so the idea that this boss doesn't think he should pay is absolutely ridiculous.' He continued by saying that the text exchanges was 'a good example of why companies need proper training guides and onboarding processes - so you don't end up in situations like this.' Hundreds of Ben's viewers weighed in on the text exchange too, and they didn't hold back. The comments under the video lit up with support for the ex-employee, with many saying he should've asked for far more than just half a day's pay. 'Half a day? I'd charge them my consultancy fee and it would be astronomical,' one user wrote. 'I wouldn't even answer the message,' said another. 'At this point he's not under contract, he's a consultant. He can charge what he wants.' 'I'd reply two words and the second word would be 'off,' joked one. 'Half a days pay? He doesn't work there no more so his days pay is zero and half of 0 is 0.' While some users said they would've hung up or blocked the boss altogether, others applauded the ex-employee's cool-headed professionalism, particularly for negotiating remote work and payment. The viral saga has become a cautionary tale for workers everywhere, especially in industries where employees are often expected to go above and beyond, even after being let go, it seems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store