
US right-wingers fear Superman's woke ideology. Trust me, guys, you'll be grand
, former senior counsellor to
Donald Trump
, was recently on Fox News objecting to the supposed wokeness of James Gunn's
Superman
. 'We don't go to the movie theatre to be lectured to and have somebody throw their ideology on to us,' she bellowed.
Trust me, Kellyanne, you will be grand. You can attend the big stupid superhero flick with no fears of encountering spittle-flecked agitprop. Few will confuse it with a social-realist rebuke in the style of
Ken Loach
or with Maoist propaganda of the Jean-Luc Godard school.
Not since the McCarthyite witch hunts have right-wing commentators worked so hard to find subversive material in Hollywood pabulum. The stakes are now much lower, but the noise is much louder. There are so many more platforms from which to shout. The paranoiacs have so many more deranged friends at the head of government.
[
Superman review: Utterly charmless. And as funny as toothache
Opens in new window
]
Another of this week's film stories (we'll keep you in suspense for now) puts the silliness in perspective. There is a sense that the current spat is a playground game – one in which Gunn seems happy to participate. 'Superman is the story of America,' he told the Times. 'An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country.'
READ MORE
There should not be anything controversial in that. The notion of Superman, refugee from the planet Krypton, being an immigrant, is far from a new one. In a recent article for the Hollywood Reporter, Andrew Slack and Jose Antonio Vargas recalled a campaign they launched in 2013 that asked Americans to reveal their immigration stories while declaring 'Superman is an immigrant'. Batman was the borderline fascist vigilante; Superman was the do-gooder who identified with the huddled masses.
Back in 1987, Christopher Reeve only donned the cape for a fourth time on the condition he have some creative control. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, an anti-nuclear parable, ended up as the wokest ever superhero flick – nothing comes close – some 30 years before the w-word colonised dunderhead right-wing discourse. Evil millionaires take over the Daily Planet. Superman piously addresses the United Nations. The villain really is called Nuclearman. We can forgive the younger Kellyanne Conway for missing that one. The film was so atrocious it banished the franchise to the Fortress of Solitude for close to 20 years.
Never forget that Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the creators of Superman, were second-generation Jewish immigrants and that the character emerged as the Nazis were taking over Germany. On the very first page of Action Comics, the publication that launched the man of steel, he is described as 'champion of the oppressed!'
[
From the archive: Superman flies into right-wingers' wrath
Opens in new window
]
None of this dissuaded Dean Cain, who played Superman on the TV show Lois & Clark, from getting his tights in a twist. 'I think that was a mistake by James Gunn to say it's an immigrant thing, and I think it's going to hurt the numbers on the movie,' he said, apparently forgetting that, in season four of Lois & Clark, an antagonist (satirically, one assumes) calls the immigration cops on the man in blue and red.
Might Cain be proven correct? What about continuing complaints from right-wingers that – denied by Gunn – the global conflict at the film's centre is modelled on the current Middle Eastern conflict? Might Superman, to parrot an unavoidable saw of the era, go broke by going woke? Not a bit of it. Gunn's film landed with a $217 million opening weekend. That is the third-biggest debut of the year to date. By one measure this is the best-ever opening for a solo Superman picture.
The message here is not, alas, that audiences are on the search for politically charged mainstream entertainment. But nor are they, like Ms Conway, terrified that the superhero will begin lecturing them on agrarian reform or dialectical materialism. Ninety-five per cent of the audience pays absolutely no attention to the disputes that so inflame the attention of social media. The supposedly wokearific Snow White failed because it looked like a dud. The allegedly radical Superman (which I thought ghastly) succeeded because folks were hungry for the title character.
Meanwhile, another gloomier corner of cinematic discourse was reminded that one of their saints really did have views worth abhorring. Stellan Skarsgård wasn't saying anything we didn't know about Ingmar Bergman, but
his confirmation was stark and direct
. 'Bergman was manipulative,' he told us earlier in the month. 'He was a Nazi during the war and the only person I know who cried when Hitler died.'
One can only imagine how TikTok would have reacted if it had been around at the time of Bergman's The Seventh Seal or Persona. The conversation would have been exhausting, repetitive and unenlightening. But it would have been about something that actually mattered.
Almost nobody really cares if Superman is a communist or not.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Iran and Europe begin fresh nuclear talks in Turkey with questions over future UN sanctions
Iran has pushed back on suggestions of extending a UN resolution that ratifies a 2015 nuclear deal as it began the first face-to-face talks with Western powers since Israel and the US bombed it last month. Delegations from Iran, the European Union and the so-called E3 group of France, Britain and Germany, arrived for talks at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul. The European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 deal - from which the US withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. A deadline of 18 October is fast approaching when the resolution governing that deal expires. At that point, all UN sanctions on Iran will be lifted unless a "snapback" mechanism is triggered at least 30 days before. This would automatically reimpose those sanctions, which target sectors from hydrocarbons to banking and defence. To give time for this to happen, the E3 have set a deadline of the end of August to revive diplomacy. Diplomats say they want Iran to take concrete steps to convince them to extend the deadline by up to six months. Iran would need to make commitments on key issues including eventual talks with Washington, full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and accounting for 400kg (880 pounds) of near-weapons grade highly enriched uranium, whose whereabouts are unknown since last month's strikes. Minutes before the talks began, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told the state news agency IRNA that Iran considered talk of extending UN Security Council Resolution 2231 to be "meaningless and baseless". The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which US President Donald Trump said had "obliterated" a programme that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at acquiring a nuclear bomb. However, NBC News has cited current and former US officials as saying a subsequent US assessment found the strikes destroyed most of one of three targeted Iranian nuclear sites, but that the other two were not as badly damaged. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon.


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Countries who refuse US beef are 'on notice' says Trump
US President Donald Trump has said countries who refuse American beef are "on notice", after Australia announced that it would be relaxing import restrictions on the product. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for US beef, something analysts predicted would not significantly increase US shipments because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower. "We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that US Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World," Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE," the post continued. Mr Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States – a characterisation many economists dispute. "For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on US beef," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a "major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for US farmers and ranchers." Australia is not a significant importer of beef but the United States is, and a production slump is forcing it to step up purchases. Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tonnes of US product moving the other way. Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of US biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted US beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or madcow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the US but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said US cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. "We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with US President Donald Trump," shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia, which imports more from the US than it exports, faces a 10% across-the-board US tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Mr Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: "I'm not too sure." "We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement," he said. "We think that they should do that anyway."


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Diplomats to meet in Turkey to discuss Iran's nuclear programme
Iranian and European diplomats are set to meet in Istanbul on Friday to embark on the latest drive to unpick the deadlock over Tehran's nuclear programme. Representatives from the UK, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, will gather at the Iranian consulate building for the first talks since Iran's 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US bombers striking nuclear-related facilities. The talks are centred on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The return of sanctions, known as a 'snapback' mechanism, 'remains on the table', according to a European diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks. Donald Trump pulled the US out of the 2015 deal to lift sanctions on Iran (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) 'A possible delay in triggering snapback has been floated to the Iranians on the condition that there is credible diplomatic engagement by Iran, that they resume full co-operation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and that they address concerns about their highly-enriched uranium stockpile,' the diplomat said. European leaders have said sanctions will resume by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran, meanwhile, has said the US, which withdrew from the 2015 deal during President Donald Trump 's first term, needs to rebuild faith in its role in negotiations. Deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran's engagement was dependent on 'several key principles' that included 'rebuilding Iran's trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States'. In a social media post on Thursday, he also said the talks should not be used 'as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action2. Mr Gharibabadi insisted that Iran's right to enrich uranium 'in line with its legitimate needs' be respected and sanctions removed. Iran has repeatedly threatened to leave the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, which commits it to refrain from developing nuclear weapons, if sanctions return. Friday's talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The identity of the E3 representatives were not immediately clear but the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner is expected to attend.