logo
Tariff lifeline for ArcelorMittal means higher prices for customers

Tariff lifeline for ArcelorMittal means higher prices for customers

The Citizen08-05-2025
'Safeguard' duties of 13% were imposed at the start of May to shield Amsa's hot-rolled steel products from international competition.
Itac and the IDC both fall under the dtic. In setting steel tariffs, Itac is accused of cossetting its own portfolio. Picture: Supplied
The International Trade Administration Commission of SA (Itac) has announced temporary 'safeguard' duties on some hot-rolled steel products produced by ArcelorMittal SA (Amsa).
The 13% safeguard duties kicked off on 2 May for a year, reducing to 11% and 9% over the subsequent two years, and then to zero.
The safeguard duty is on top of the 10% customs duty already in place, bringing the import protection to 23% in the first year. The total duties on hot-rolled products fall to 21% from May 2026 and 19% from May 2027.
The safeguard duties were gazetted last week and are seen as a lifeline for embattled steel producer Amsa, which has been undercut by low-cost imports from China.
'There's nothing worse than a temporary tariff,' comments Neels van Niekerk, executive chair of International Steel Fabricators.
Hot-rolled steel is used in construction, manufacturing, and engineering and is a key input in mining equipment, water tanks, gas cylinders, and truck trailers.
ALSO READ: IDC saves ArcelorMittal days before furnaces switched off
'Necessary, not punitive' – Itac
'Safeguard measures are designed to address unforeseen surges in imports that threaten or cause serious injury to a domestic industry,' says Itac. 'While these measures are not punitive, they are necessary to ensure fair trade conditions and protect local industries from being overwhelmed by excessive foreign competition.'
Imports now account for about a third of local steel consumption, with Amsa's net realised prices falling to levels last seen in 2015.
This, and Amsa's galloping transport and electricity bill – up 14% to R3.2 billion in 2024 – contributed to its decision to wind down its long steel mills in Newcastle and Vereeniging.
ALSO READ: Government still talking to ArcelorMittal while Seifsa identifies challenges
Perspective
'Effectively, what this means is that customers can expect to pay 13% more for hot-rolled steel products,' says Gerhard Papenfus, CEO of the National Employers Association of SA (Neasa).
'Amsa asked for additional protection and they got it. What South Africa needs right now is steel of the best possible quality, wherever we can get it.
'If we have to import, then so be it. We cannot continue to support industries that cannot compete without more and more protection.'
The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) provided R1 billion in short-term lending to Amsa, alongside another R380 million loan and an additional R1.68 billion shareholders loan in the hopes of extending the life of its longs business.
However, that may not be enough to rescue Amsa.
'For Amsa Newcastle to survive, it will require a lot more than money,' says Donald MacKay, CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors.
'If the problems they identified are not addressed, they will burn through the money from the IDC and we will be back here [for more money].'
ALSO READ: Concern about SA steel industry: Trump's tariffs and ArcelorMittal closure looming
Market distortion
The steel market is further distorted by the IDC's R14 billion exposure to mini-mills, which use scrap metal as feedstock and compete with Amsa in certain products.
These mills enjoy a substantial pricing advantage through the Preferential Pricing System (PPS), which allows them to secure scrap at 30-50% discounts to market prices.
This means scrap can only be exported after being offered to local mills at a 30% discount.
This is in effect a ban on scrap exports and a R8.5 billion annual subsidy to mini mills – resulting in an estimated 50 000 scrap collectors in SA being forced out of business.
Scrap dealers tell Moneyweb that removing the PPS would allow the 300 000 scrap collectors in SA to earn a decent living rather than transferring this benefit to the mills.
This benefit comes on top of a 20% export duty on scrap.
Mark Fine, head of the Scrap Recycling Coalition, an informal grouping of 48 scrap metal dealers, says these mills produce billets, which are little more than scrap 2.0 and a way to circumvent export restrictions on scrap.
ALSO READ: Did government policy kill SA's steel industry?
Mini-mills say even with the PPS in place, there remains a shortage of scrap in SA, though Fine says this is disproven by the fact that these mills exported more than 400 000 tons of recycled scrap in billet form in the first few months of 2025.
Itac's steel tariff policy has been criticised as self-serving, given the IDC's massive exposure to these mini-mills, some of which are in business rescue.
Itac and the IDC both fall under the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic). In setting steel tariffs, Itac is accused of cossetting its own portfolio.
'If government demand increases, it will be met by product from the mini mills, because the subsidies give them an ability to keep their prices low. Amsa on the other hand, has to pay back the IDC loan, which will be burnt through even quicker this time, given the steep discount they are providing on long products to simply stay in the game.
ALSO READ: Steel producers slam ArcelorMittal's call to end scrap export tax
PPS 'a massive scam'
Fine says the PPS is a legacy of former trade and industry minister Ebrahim Patel and has been fatal for the industry.
'These mini-mills are mostly foreign-owned and they add very little value in the steel chain. Yet they receive this massive transfer of wealth each year, claiming that without the PPS South Africa would face a shortage of scrap.
'That's an absolute lie. These mini mills produce what I call scrap 2.0 which they can then export and make nice profits for themselves because the export restrictions don't apply. This is a massive scam.'
Nampak is reckoned to be losing R115 million a year due to its inability to earn fair market value on its ferrous scrap.
ALSO READ: Cheap IDC funding 'placing the complete steel market at risk'
And Transnet – the country's largest generator of scrap – is reckoned to lose R40-R50 million a month due to the PPS.
That does not count scrap from automotive producers such as VW and Toyota.
Tami Didiza, manager for stakeholder management and communications at Amsa, says a number of these companies have been unable to operate successfully and could have closed had the current dtic policies of scrap intervention through the PPS, Scrap Export Tax and an export ban (which lapsed in 2023) not saved them over the last five years.
'The government intervention to allow a deferral of the wind down of the Amsa longs business provides an opportunity for the fundamental structural issues facing the steel industry to be addressed, and to place it on a sustainable path by removing the market distortions that have been created,' says Didiza.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eskom faces R1 billion penalty in high-stakes Koeberg steam generator dispute
Eskom faces R1 billion penalty in high-stakes Koeberg steam generator dispute

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Eskom faces R1 billion penalty in high-stakes Koeberg steam generator dispute

Eskom has been ordered to pay French company Framatome almost R1 billion by the Western Cape High Court in a contractual dispute over the replacement of steam generators at the Koeberg Power Station. Image: Supplied Power utility Eskom must pay French nuclear power company Framatome nearly R1 billion in a contractual dispute over the replacement of steam generators at the Koeberg Power Station. Eskom hauled the company formerly known as Areva to the Western Cape High Court to challenge adjudicator Peter Ramsden's decisions on the merits and the quantum delivered in December 2022 and March 2023, respectively. The entity's contention was that both decisions were beyond his jurisdiction and failed to apply the rules of natural justice. On the merits, Eskom complained that Ramsden failed to take into account its submissions, issue a reasoned decision and decide the issues that he was required to decide. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In addition, Eskom also stated that the adjudicator failed to receive and take into account its response to Framatome's amended claim as well as its submissions when determining the quantum. Eskom was also unhappy that the adjudicator accepted the amounts in the company's amended claim without having enquired into the supporting documents or the details of the claim, failed to issue a reasoned decision and/or follow the procedure he laid down by himself. The dispute dates back to 2014 when the parties concluded an agreement to replace the steam generators at Koeberg. In terms of the contract, Framatome work included the supply and installation of two sets of three replacement steam generators, with one set to be installed in each of the reactor buildings at units one and two at Koeberg during their separate planned outages. The work of replacing the steam generators can only be performed during maintenance and refuelling outages when the power station is offline and the outages are planned in advance and around Eskom's operational requirements. Eskom had scheduled the outage dates and planned to replace the steam generators but then twice postponed for a later date. The power utility then informed Framatome that it would not be continuing with the steam generator replacement work during one of the outages. However, the company notified Eskom of an event which required it to notify the power supplier of such an event and that it required compensation after the postponement. This was acknowledged by the project manager. Eskom then unsuccessfully approached the adjudicator, claiming that both decisions were unenforceable as contractual obligations and need not be complied with as he exceeded his powers. It later filed an application for several declarators, which acting Judge Renata Williams dismissed with costs on Thursday. Framatome succeeded in its counter-application and Eskom was ordered to pay the company €35,288,582 (about R729 million) exclusive of value-added tax (VAT) and subject to the price adjustment for inflation pursuant to secondary option clause of the contract. Payment is also pursuant to certain clauses of the contract, interest thereon calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate applicable at the time for amounts due in other currencies Additionally, Eskom must pay Framatome more than R256.6m exclusive of VAT and subject to the price adjustment for inflation pursuant to secondary option clause of the contract and pursuant to certain clauses including interest. The power utility was also ordered to pay the costs of Framatome's counter application including the costs of the company's France-based attorneys. 'There is no basis to set aside the decisions of the adjudicator which are valid and binding. In terms of the parties' contract Eskom was obliged to comply therewith,' acting Judge Williams ruled. Eskom spokesperson Daphney Mokwena did not respond to requests for comment on Saturday.

SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers
SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers

The South African

time2 days ago

  • The South African

SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has hailed a significant milestone in its digital transformation drive, confirming that 5.8 million taxpayers were issued auto assessments this year – an increase from 5 million in 2024. According to SARS Commissioner Edward Kieswetter, 99.6% of these assessments remained unchanged by taxpayers, underscoring the growing accuracy and public trust in the automated system. So far, R10.6 billion in refunds have been paid to qualifying taxpayers – within 72 hours of assessment. That's an average refund of R1 828. 'Auto assessment has truly been a game changer,' Kieswetter said. 'We are delivering faster, more efficient services that remove the need for in-person visits, making it easier for taxpayers to comply.' SARS auto assessment is a system where SARS pre-fills tax returns using third-party data, such as salary, medical aid, and retirement contributions. For most taxpayers, no action is required, unless they need to add missing information via eFiling or the SARS MobiApp. The auto assessment period ran from 7 to 20 July 2025, ahead of the manual filing season opening on 21 July. SARS also reported a dramatic increase in the use of digital platforms: 10.2 million unique logins to SARS platforms since 4 July 2.1 million digital queries processed 1.1 million handled via the SARS Online Query System (SOQS) 707 000 via WhatsApp 290 000 through the Lwazi Chat Bot 'Ultimately, our aim is to make the best service to be no service at all,' Kieswetter said, reiterating SARS's vision to make tax compliance seamless and digital-first. Auto-assessments : 7–20 July 2025 : 7–20 July 2025 Individual Taxpayers : 21 July – 20 October 2025 : 21 July – 20 October 2025 Provisional Taxpayers and Trusts: 21 July 2025 – 19 January 2026 Most online submissions now receive an assessment outcome in under 5 seconds, supported by AI-driven risk detection tools that help block fraudulent or impermissible refunds. With the growing use of online services, SARS is also warning taxpayers to remain alert for scams. They stressed that SARS will never send clickable links via email or SMS. Phishing attempts should be reported to phishing@ SARS reminded those who owe tax to make payment arrangements promptly to avoid penalties and interest. Only refunds over R100 will be automatically paid into taxpayer accounts. As the 2025 filing season officially begins, SARS is encouraging all taxpayers to use digital channels rather than visiting physical service centres. 'There is no need to queue. Use our digital tools to get assessed and stay compliant,' Kieswetter concluded. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters
Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters

The eThekwini Municipality's procurement of water meters has come under scrutiny Image: Supplied The eThekwini Municipality finds itself under scrutiny once more, amidst concerning allegations of wasteful expenditure following a recent procurement of electricity smart meters. Officials opted to purchase these devices from the highest bidders rather than the lowest quote suppliers, triggering concern among residents and stakeholders alike regarding potential misconduct and improper financial practices. Sources indicate that this decision suggests an attempt to bypass a qualified supplier that provided the lowest bid — a move that raises various questions. In what many perceive to be an alarming indicator of corruption, it has been alleged that officials may seek kickbacks from these more expensive suppliers. In May 2024, the National Treasury approved the RT29 national transversal contract for smart metering, identifying seven companies for the municipality to choose from for their needs. However, documents acquired by Independent Media reveal a shocking deviation from standard procurement practices. The eThekwini Municipality ordered 2,000 smart meters priced at R2,591 per unit from one supplier, while another supplier quoted a mere R1,645 per unit. The total cost indicated that the city spent R5.9 million for these overpriced devices. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading This instance of poor financial decision-making apparently didn't stop there. The municipality additionally procured non-smart meters at R1,996 per unit, accumulating a further cost of R4.5 million. With the distinction between smart and non-smart meters being that the former can be remotely disconnected by officials, while the latter necessitates physical travel for disconnection, questions loom large over why non-smart versions were even necessary. A source privy to the procurement process has expressed concern, stating, 'This is another instance of wasteful expenditure incurred by the city. There was no valid reason why the officials chose to purchase the same product with the same quality from different suppliers with varying prices. Surely, there is something fishy.' Attempts to obtain clarity from the municipality's communications team went unanswered as of Wednesday, leaving many to speculate on the motivations behind these decisions. This incident comes in the wake of previous controversies linked to the municipality's financial management. Just recently, the city faced a harsh financial penalty, having to pay over R20 million to a supplier, an amount accumulated from interest on a court appeal that the municipality lost. While the initial amount claimed was R30 million, the city disputed the claims but ultimately lost their case. DAILY NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store