Public defenders roll out 12-month plan to tackle Oregon shortage
At Gov. Tina Kotek's request, the plan ramps things up with more lawyers, bigger caseloads for top attorneys, and fast-tracked court dockets.
Ex-military father at large after 3 daughters found dead in central Washington
The state says the number of people in custody without a lawyer is already down 30% since January, but nearly 4,400 others are still facing charges without a lawyer.
For years, Oregon has struggled with a public defender shortage, which experts say is a root cause for issues like delayed trials and overcrowded jails.
Incident at Battle Ground home leaves two dead, one critically injured
The proposal outlines ways to increase the public defense system's capacity by hiring newly graduated lawyers, strengthening contracts, collaborating with public safety partners, and compensating attorneys for voluntarily taking cases beyond their contract.
'This plan reflects the urgency with which OPDC is working to ensure that every eligible individual has access to timely and adequate legal representation,' Executive Director Ken Sanchagrin said. 'As champions of the Sixth Amendment, we are committed to protecting the constitutional rights of all Oregonians.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
I was a bar advocate for 27 years. Here's why I had to quit.
This hourly rate barely covers the necessary expenses of the job: office rent (required by the Commonwealth), legal research subscriptions, administrative help, printing costs, and malpractice insurance. On top of these expenses, I often need to buy clothes for clients to wear at trial and personally pay for transportation costs to drug treatment facilities. Advertisement I write personal checks to fund my clients' constitutional rights, draining my savings so poor defendants can compete against well-funded prosecutors. Seventeen years ago, I carried $20,000 in IRS debt — money borrowed from my future to fund support for my clients. My husband has since paid that debt so I could continue the calling that was destroying me financially. I eventually stopped taking District Court cases because I was losing money on each case. Superior Court cases paid more, but the stress was much higher. These weren't simple matters — they were complex felonies involving thousands of pages of discovery, expert witnesses, and lengthy investigations. The higher pay barely covered the massive increase in work needed for a proper defense. After nearly three decades in the industry, I walked away from my three-year contract in February with Suffolk Lawyers for Justice because the work had become financially impossible. A recent work stoppage by defense attorney has forced the dismissal of numerous criminal cases, undermining public safety and the administration of justice. Advertisement The financial burden is only part of the story. The work itself is gutting and causes a psychological toll. Bar advocates visit prisons several days a week, often meeting with allegedly dangerous and mentally ill clients. For example, I once sat in a large cell at MCI- Cedar Junction Walpole's Disciplinary Unit interviewing a client chained to the floor, his body so restricted by restraints he could barely move. I remember him struggling to adjust his eyeglasses while wrestling with all the chains around his body. Correctional officers flanked each side of the room, their presence a constant reminder of the power imbalance that defines every aspect of the criminal justice system. Massachusetts, the second highest cost-of-living state, according to Forbes, pays court-appointed defense attorneys $65 an hour. New Hampshire, which isn't in the top 10 most expensive places to live, pays its attorneys $125 an hour. Maine pays its attorneys $150 an hour. Why is there such a big difference? This isn't just about wanting more money. It's also about whether Massachusetts is serious about equal justice. When defense attorneys are forced to choose between paying their bills and properly defending their clients, the constitutional foundation of our justice system crumbles. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel becomes an empty promise. The Massachusetts Legislature can address this crisis by amending the proposed compensation language in the bar advocate compensation bill filed by Representative Christopher Markey of Dartmouth: raise rates for homicide cases to $155 an hour, Superior Court non-homicide cases to $120 an hour, and District Court cases to $100 an hour. This increase would help the state retain experienced attorneys and ensure constitutional rights remain more than empty promises. Advertisement After 27 years as a bar advocate, I can say with certainty: Justice isn't just blind — it's also broken. Until Massachusetts pays what constitutional rights actually cost, the state will continue watching experienced defense attorneys abandon poor clients, leaving our most vulnerable citizens with lawyers who can't properly defend them. The choice is simple: Fund real justice or accept that equal justice is just empty courthouse decoration.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Kotek calls for special legislative session amid ODOT layoffs, transportation crisis
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Nearly one month after Oregon's legislative session ended, Gov. Tina Kotek is calling on lawmakers to reconvene in Salem amid a shortfall in transportation funding, leading to historic layoffs in the state. On Tuesday, the governor called for a special session on Aug. 29, asking lawmakers to restore funds for basic road maintenance operations at the Oregon Department of Transportation along with other funding needs for local governments and transit districts. The call from the governor comes after Oregon's legislative session ended with the death of House Bill 3402 on the House floor, which aimed to bridge ODOT's $350 million funding shortfall and aimed to avert layoffs at the agency. CNBC ranks Oregon among most expensive states. Here's why 'In the weeks since the adjournment of the legislative session, my team and I have worked every day with legislators, local partners, and key stakeholders to zero in on a solution and a timeline for the legislature to come back together and address the state's most immediate transportation needs. Oregonians rely on these basic services, from brush clearing to prevent wildfires to snow plowing in winter weather, and they are counting on their elected representatives to deliver adequate and stable funding,' Kotek said in a statement on Tuesday. 'At the same time, ODOT acted prudently in the absence of this funding, initiating a first wave of layoffs on July 7 while also working to reduce the impact to basic services as much as possible. Subsequently, with the agreement of legislative leadership and with a plan for a special session now in place, I have directed ODOT to postpone the start date of layoffs for an additional 45 days, allowing impacted staff more time to make contingency plans for their livelihoods and their families,' the governor added. Kotek concluded 'I am confident that lawmakers will step up next month to avert these layoffs by approving the necessary funding for the state's transportation needs. I appreciate their partnership and am eager to be on the other side of this crisis.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The governor is aiming to bring more funding to the state highway trust fund for the 2025-27 biennium along with funds for the Statewide Transportation Fund. Kotek argues that funding ODOT will stop pending layoffs while also allowing the agency to maintain operations at facilities scheduled for closure. 'The special session will be focused on critical near-term solutions to stabilize basic functions at ODOT and local governments,' Kotek continued. 'This is just the first step of many that must be taken to meet our state's long-term transportation needs.' Portland-area residents flock from Washington, California ODOT has laid off over 480 employees out of an estimated 600-700 total layoffs, according to the governor's office, previously stating this marks the largest government layoffs in state history. Without action from state lawmakers – and depending on unpredictable winter weather – a second round of layoffs is expected in early 2026, the governor's office said. In response to the governor convening a special session, House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby) said, 'This could have been prevented if Democrats had come to the table and considered House Republicans' alternative plan to fund ODOT by refocusing existing revenue instead of adding billions of dollars in new taxes on struggling Oregonians.' VIDEO: ClackCo deputies punched mentally disabled inmate 7 times, lawsuit claims The Republican leader added, 'This could still be prevented today, without a special session, if Democrats made the decision to use existing revenue from the emergency board. We can still protect these jobs without raising taxes — and we should. Republicans have represented the voices of the people and fought hard to find solutions that don't add new taxes. It's now time for Democrats to do the same. We invite Democrats to join us in funding essential services without raising taxes, to stand with Oregonians who cannot afford to shoulder more costs.' Senate Republican Leader Daniel Bonham (R-The Dalles) furthered, ' 'Just weeks after the Legislature rejected the largest tax increase in Oregon history, the Governor is calling us back to Salem to try again, this time with less notice and less transparency. Republicans offered a common-sense plan to get ODOT focused back on its core mission, protect critical maintenance jobs, restore accountability, and avoid raising costs on hardworking Oregonians. Democrats didn't even give it a glance.' 3 Portland spots included in Yelp Elite's roundup of the nation's best fried chicken Bonham added, 'If Governor Kotek were serious about fixing our transportation system, she would start by repealing her executive order on project labor agreements. That one decision alone adds 20 to 30 percent to the cost of every project. Her concern over budget shortfalls rings completely hollow when she's knowingly forcing taxpayers to overpay by millions. Instead, she's playing politics with frontline workers to pressure lawmakers into voting for higher taxes.' The Senate Republican leader concluded, 'For decades, Governor Kotek and her party have prioritized spending on programs that line the pockets of special interests, such as costly housing initiatives that haven't delivered real results, while neglecting critical infrastructure needs. This mismanagement has directly contributed to the crisis we face today. Oregonians deserve roads that work, bridges that last, and a government that puts them first, not more status quo policies and backroom deals to reward special interests.' While discussing an amendment for HB 3402 — which included a bump to registration and titling fees with a 3-cent increase to the gas tax, allowing that money to go to ODOT — House Republicans argued that working Oregonians don't want more taxes. Meanwhile, Kotek said during the amendment's public hearing that not passing it would be catastrophic for Oregonians, noting possible ODOT job cuts could include roles for incident response teams and maintenance crews, which would be 'unacceptable' for Oregonians. House Minority Leader Drazan echoed the sentiments of her Republican colleagues, previously stating, 'It's really, really simple for us. Oregonians themselves have said our number one issue is affordability, and this is tone-deaf. It flies in the face of what Oregonians are telling us as policymakers that they need right now.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
21-07-2025
- Yahoo
Washington judge issues order halting ‘absurd' deportation of Portland family with 4 kids
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A judge in Washington granted an emergency order on Monday to stop the deportation of a Portland family, including four children who were detained 'without cause,' according to an Oregon congresswoman. The case stems from June 28, when Kenia Jackeline Merlos, her nine-year-old triplets and seven-year-old son were traveling from their home in Portland to Peace Arch State Park at the U.S.-Canada border to see relatives, according to Merlos' lawyer and family friends. Because Merlos had pending immigration documents that were not finalized by the government, federal agents took the family into custody at a Customs and Border Patrol facility north of Bellingham, where they were unable to seek legal counsel, according to Congresswoman Maxine Dexter (OR-03) who attempted to visit the family earlier this month. DON'T MISS: 'Our client is now home': Lawyers successfully petition release of man detained by ICE On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Tana Lin in Seattle granted an emergency temporary restraining order preventing U.S. Customs and Border Protection from moving the Merlos family from the court's jurisdiction, while also allowing the family access to legal counsel. The order comes after Dexter and Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security and CBP, giving the agencies a July 14 deadline to grant the family access to an attorney and condemning the detention of U.S. citizen children in facilities 'that are not equipped or intended for the long-term custody of anyone.' 'Our constituents, including four U.S. citizen children, were detained without due process by their own government. This case is as urgent as it is egregious. This emergency ruling is a legal lifeline to provide critical protection to the Merlos family,' the lawmakers said in a joint statement Tuesday. Pearl District residents opposed to homeless shelter 'We are gratified with this temporary win as a necessary step toward justice. In the coming days, we will be watching with unwavering attention to make certain due process is followed and this family is treated with the dignity every Oregon family deserves,' Dexter, Wyden and Merkley continued. 'This fight is every single Oregonian's fight. If we allow this—citizen children detention, neighbors disappeared, due process ignored—we surrender not just our country but our conscience. That is an outcome we refuse to accept,' the lawmakers concluded. According to the order, 'There is no indication that there is a final removal order for Petitioner (Merlos), nor is there any indication that Petitioner has been convicted of any crime. Although Petitioner has purportedly accepted a voluntary return to her country of origin, Petitioner has expressed doubt that the voluntary return 'was signed and whether i[t] was in fact voluntary.'' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Dexter previously noted that after learning the family was detained, her team worked to determine their whereabouts — claiming her team found the family in Bellingham after CBP 'initially misled' them. Judge Lin's order also provided a timeline of the family's detention. 'On July 5, 2025, Petitioner retained counsel. Petitioner has been unable to communicate with Counsel, however, and Petitioner's counsel has been unable to obtain concrete or reliable information about Petitioner's whereabouts,' the order says, noting, that on July 10, Dexter told Merlos' attorney that she was located at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office inTukwila, Washington. Man faces criminal charges for allegedly using stolen excavator in Clackamas County ATM heist 'Counsel was then advised that Petitioner was in United States Customs and Border Protection ('CBP') custody in Bellingham, Washington. Counsel was then advised that Petitioner and Petitioner's children were located at a CBP facility in Ferndale, Washington. But on July 11, 2025, when Counsel visited the CBP facility in Ferndale to speak to Petitioner, Counsel was advised that Petitioner was not there and was instead en route to a facility in Seattle, Washington,' the order states. Intel layoffs ripple across Oregon economy While granting the emergency order, Judge Lin noted it is unclear why Merlos was 'serially re-located and denied contact with Counsel.' Earlier this month, Dexter traveled to the Bellingham Border Patrol station where the family was detained, however, the congresswoman said CBP refused to allow her to speak with the family or connect them with counsel. 'It is absurd that she has four citizen children with her, has an attorney, and has no access to legal counsel,' Dexter said, noting the family was detained 'without cause.' Portland named among 'cities on the rise' as Oregon falls in state business rankings 'They have provided as humane as a possible situation in a small cell with a cement floor and there's some mats that are probably four inches thick for the family,' Dexter said. Merlos' husband Carlos was also detained days after his family's detention and held at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center in Tacoma, according to Dexter. In a statement to KOIN 6 News, a CBP spokesperson said, 'Merlos was arrested by Border Patrol agents in Peace Arch Park attempting to smuggle illegal aliens into the U.S. on June 28. Removal proceedings have been initiated and she is now in ICE custody.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
