NTU upholds zero grade for student penalised for academic misconduct; panel found 14 false citations or data

Straits Times

2 days ago

Find out what's new on ST website and app.
The essay was part of a course on health, disease outbreaks and politics at NTU's School of Social Sciences.
SINGAPORE - Nanyang Technological University (NTU) has upheld the zero mark given to a student penalised earlier for academic misconduct, following an appeal made by the student.
In a statement on July 18, the university said the panel, which reviewed the student's appeal, found 14 instances of false citations or data in her essay, noting that these were not mere 'typos' or typographical errors. One example was the citing of non-existent sources.
'The panel stipulated that citing non-existent sources is a serious form of academic misconduct as the accurate citation of sources is the foundation of academic research and writing,' NTU said.
'Citing non-existent sources constitutes a serious form of academic misconduct.'
The university added that such errors are commonly associated with factual inaccuracies generated by generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools.
The assignment in question was part of a course on health, disease outbreaks and politics at NTU's School of Social Sciences.
Three students enrolled in the module had earlier in Apri
l received a zero grade for the same essay after their submissions were flagged for containing non-existent academic references and statistics, or broken web links.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Critical infrastructure in S'pore under attack by cyber espionage group: Shanmugam
Singapore Who is UNC3886, the group that attacked S'pore's critical information infrastructure?
Singapore HSA looking to get anti-vape cyber surveillance tool with AI capabilities
Singapore Alleged Kpod peddler filmed trying to flee raid in Bishan charged with 6 offences
Singapore 30% of aviation jobs could be redesigned due to AI, automation; $200m fund to support workers: CAAS
Singapore Former NUH male nurse faces charges after he allegedly molested man at hospital
Singapore Character counts as much as grades, Desmond Lee tells students
The case has drawn attention to the growing use of AI in education, and sparked discussion about its impact on academic integrity and critical thinking.
It came to light after a Reddit post by one of the students on June 19 went viral. In the post, she claimed she was accused of using AI in a final essay for a module because she had made errors in her citations and used a reference organiser.
NTU had earlier confirmed that the use of Gen AI tools had been explicitly prohibited by the course instructor throughout the semester, with students warned that any AI-generated content would result in a zero grade. The assignment was worth 45 per cent of the final grade.
The student whose appeal case was heard by the panel had said earlier that she had used only a reference organiser and had submitted updated citations to rectify her earlier mistakes.
On the panel's decision to keep the zero mark, she told The Straits Times when contacted on July 18 that while she does not agree fully with its reasoning and conclusion, she was ready to move on.
'I respect NTU's decision and treat it as a case of bad luck on my end,' she said.
Meanwhile, a request for an appeal by the second student, who was also penalised, was earlier rejected. The third student did not submit an appeal.
All cases of academic misconduct are documented in the internal records of the students, NTU said on July 18.
'The outcome of the appeal panel is final,' said NTU. 'We urge everyone to respect the integrity of the appeals process and refrain from making personal attacks against any individual involved.'
'The university is committed to safeguarding the well-being of the university's faculty, staff and students.'