logo
Jensen Huang, AI visionary in a leather jacket

Jensen Huang, AI visionary in a leather jacket

Mint7 days ago
Unknown to the general public just three years ago, Jensen Huang is now one of the most powerful entrepreneurs in the world as head of chip giant Nvidia.
The unassuming 62-year-old draws stadium crowds of more than 10,000 people as his company's products push the boundaries of artificial intelligence.
Chips designed by Nvidia, known as graphics cards or GPUs (Graphics Processing Units), are essential in developing the generative artificial intelligence powering technology like ChatGPT.
Big tech's insatiable appetite for Nvidia's GPUs, which sell for tens of thousands of dollars each, has catapulted the California chipmaker beyond $4 trillion in market valuation, the first company ever to surpass that mark.
Nvidia's meteoric rise has boosted Huang's personal fortune to $150 billion -- making him one of the world's richest people -- thanks to the roughly 3.5 percent stake he holds in the company he founded three decades ago with two friends in a Silicon Valley diner.
In a clear demonstration of his clout, he recently convinced President Donald Trump to lift restrictions on certain GPU exports to China, despite the fact that China is locked in a battle with the United States for AI supremacy.
"That was brilliantly done," said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a governance professor at Yale University.
Huang was able to explain to Trump that "having the world using a US tech platform as the core protocol is definitely in the interest of this country" and won't help the Chinese military, Sonnenfeld said.
Born in Taipei in 1963, Jensen Huang (originally named Jen-Hsun) embodies the American success story. At nine years old, he was sent away with his brother to boarding school in small-town Kentucky.
His uncle recommended the school to his Taiwanese parents believing it to be a prestigious institution, when it was actually a school for troubled youth.
Too young to be a student, Huang boarded there but attended a nearby public school alongside the children of tobacco farmers. With his poor English, he was bullied and forced to clean toilets -- a two-year ordeal that transformed him.
"We worked really hard, we studied really hard, and the kids were really tough," he recounted in an interview with US broadcaster NPR.
But "the ending of the story is I loved the time I was there," Huang said.
Brought home by his parents, who had by then settled in the northwestern US state of Oregon, he graduated from university at just 20 and joined AMD, then LSI Logic, to design chips -- his passion.
But he wanted to go further and founded Nvidia in 1993 to "solve problems that normal computers can't," using semiconductors powerful enough to handle 3D graphics, as he explained on the "No Priors" podcast.
Nvidia created the first GPU in 1999, riding the intersection of video games, data centers, cloud computing, and now, generative AI.
Always dressed in a black T-shirt and leather jacket, Huang sports a Nvidia logo tattoo and has a taste for sports cars.
But it's his relentless optimism, low-key personality and lack of political alignment that sets him apart from the likes of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.
Unlike them, Huang was notably absent from Trump's inauguration ceremony.
"He backpedals his own aura and has the star be the technology rather than himself," observed Sonnenfeld, who believes Huang may be "the most respected of all today's tech titans."
One former high-ranking Nvidia employee described him to AFP as "the most driven person" he'd ever met.
On visits to his native Taiwan, Huang is treated like a megastar, with fans crowding him for autographs and selfies as journalists follow him to the barber shop and his favorite night market.
"He has created the phenomena because of his personal charm," noted Wayne Lin of Witology Market Trend Research Institute.
"A person like him must be very busy and his schedule should be full every day meeting big bosses. But he remembers to eat street food when he comes to Taiwan," he said, calling Huang "unusually friendly."
Nvidia is a tight ship and takes great care to project a drama-free image of Huang.
But the former high-ranking employee painted a more nuanced picture, describing a "very paradoxical" individual who is fiercely protective of his employees but also capable, within Nvidia's executive circle, of "ripping people to shreds" over major mistakes or poor choices.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big setback for Donald Trump as Federal Court strikes down birthright citizenship order across US; how will it affect Indians?
Big setback for Donald Trump as Federal Court strikes down birthright citizenship order across US; how will it affect Indians?

India.com

time20 minutes ago

  • India.com

Big setback for Donald Trump as Federal Court strikes down birthright citizenship order across US; how will it affect Indians?

(Image: Reuters) New Delhi: A federal court in America has again stayed President Donald Trump's order which said that if a child's parents are living illegally in America, then that child will not get American citizenship. This is the third time that the court has stopped Trump's order from being implemented. The court also said that the final decision on this matter will be taken by the Supreme Court, but until any order comes from there, this rule of Trump will not be implemented. When was the order passed? Trump had banned Birthright Citizenship by signing an executive order on January 20, the day of his swearing-in. A few days after this, the US Federal Court had stayed President Donald Trump's decision to end the right to birthright citizenship for 14 days. Earlier on June 28, the US Supreme Court had given a decision in favour of President Trump. The Supreme Court had said that the judges of the lower courts cannot stop Trump's birthright citizenship order across the country. They should reconsider their order. What did the US Supreme Court say? The Supreme Court had said with a majority of 6-3 that a federal judge alone cannot decide to stop policies across the country. Now if a case like Trump's order has to be stopped, then many people will have to sue together, not just one state or person. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the decision, had said – the job of federal courts is not to monitor government orders. Their job is to resolve matters according to the powers given by Parliament. However, the court did not give any immediate decision on Trump's order and also ordered not to allow Trump's order to be implemented for 30 days i.e. till July 28. This means that for now, children born in America will continue to get citizenship, as they used to get earlier. Under which 3 situations citizenship is not granted by Trump's order? The executive order by which Trump abolished the birthright citizenship law is named 'Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship'. This order refuses to grant American citizenship in 3 situations. If the mother of a child born in America is living there illegally. At the time of the child's birth, the mother is a legal but temporary resident of America. The father should not be a US citizen or a legal permanent resident at the time of the child's birth. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution gives the right to birthright citizenship. Through this, children of immigrants living in the US also get the right to citizenship. What will be the effect on Indians? According to the data of the US Census Bureau till 2024, about 54 lakh Indians live in America. This is about one and a half percent of the US population. Two-thirds of these people are first generation immigrants. That is, they went to America first in the family, but the rest are citizens born in America. If the Supreme Court gives an order in favour of Trump's bill, then it will become difficult for first generation immigrants to get American citizenship. However, if it gives an order against it, then citizenship will remain as before.

‘Buying Chinese products is indirectly funding enemy'
‘Buying Chinese products is indirectly funding enemy'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

‘Buying Chinese products is indirectly funding enemy'

Nagpur: The 26th Kargil Vijay Diwas was held by Bhonsala Military School on Saturday. Deputy Commandant of the Army's Uttar Maharashtra and Gujarat (UMANG) sub-area, Brigadier Abhijit Valimbe, was the chief guest. Member of RSS' all India executive body (publicity wing), Mukul Kanitkar, was the keynote speaker. Addressing a gathering of over 400 students, Kanitkar said Indians who buy Chinese mobile phones are actually indirectly funding the enemy to procure the weapons that they used to martyr Indian soldiers in Doklam. "At Doklam, the Chinese troops hit the unarmed Indian soldiers with sticks wrapped with barbed wire. When I saw those images, I thought that such sticks could easily be procured for Rs 300 to 500 by them. The money to buy the sticks that were used to take the lives of Indian soldiers went from Indians' pockets. Even today, those who use Chinese brands are indirectly funding the enemy," he said. The items from toothpaste with which the day begins to the mosquito repellent coils that are burnt in the night should be completely Indian. Not only the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) has to be taken back but even the areas like Tibet and Ladakh have to be freed from China. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Easy Trick to Protect Your Kids From Mosquitoes (They Can't Stand This) Squito Stickers Undo When the British left the country, international boundaries were drawn merely on paper, and Indians were forced to accept it," said Kanitkar. He criticised the Shimla Pact between India and Pakistan that followed the 1971 war, calling it to be a disgrace. "I went to deliver a lecture at the Institute of Advanced Studies, the place where the Shimla Pact was signed. The hosts insisted I visit the room where the agreement was signed but I refused." Kanitkar also expressed concern about people becoming ignorant about national heroes. He said once, he went to Prayagraj and wanted to see the place where freedom fighter Chandrashekar Azad laid down his life. The place is still popularly known as Company Garden rather than Chandrashekhar Azad Park, though it has been named after him.

No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid: Israeli military officials
No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid: Israeli military officials

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid: Israeli military officials

JERUSALEM: For nearly two years, Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid provided by the United Nations and other international organisations. The govt has used that claim as its main rationale for restricting food from entering the Gaza Strip. But the Israeli military never found proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations, the biggest supplier of emergency assistance to Gaza for most of the war, according to two senior Israeli military officials and two other Israelis involved in the matter. In fact, the Israeli military officials said, the UN aid delivery system was largely effective in providing food to Gaza's hungry population. Now, with hunger at crisis levels in the territory, Israel is coming under increased international pressure over its conduct of the war in Gaza and the humanitarian suffering it has brought. Israel has largely brushed off the criticism. David Mencer, a govt spokesperson, said this past week that there was "no famine caused by Israel." Instead, he blamed Hamas and poor coordination by the United Nations for any food shortages. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Shop Sale Libas Undo Israel moved in May toward replacing the UN-led aid system, opting instead to back a private, American-run operation guarded by armed US contractors in areas controlled by Israeli military forces. Some aid still comes into Gaza through the UN and other organisations. The new system has proved to be much deadlier for Palestinians. According to the Gaza health ministry, almost 1,100 people have been killed by gunfire on their way to get food handouts under the new system, in many cases by Israeli soldiers who opened fire on hungry crowds. In the latest such incident, three people were killed by Israeli gunfire while waiting for aid in three separate incidents in northern, central and southern Gaza, said the civil defence agency on Saturday. In total, at least 25 people were killed, reports AFP. The military officials who spoke to The New York Times said that the original UN aid operation was relatively reliable and less vulnerable to Hamas interference than the operations of many of the other groups bringing aid into Gaza. Hamas did steal from some of the smaller organisations that donated aid, according to the senior Israeli officials and others involved in the matter. But, they say, there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole from the UN, which provided the largest chunk of the aid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store