
Prosecution alleges failures by judge in acquitting pair linked to LTA bribery case, seeks review
Mr Pay Teow Heng, 57, director of Tiong Seng Contractors, and Mr Pek Lian Guan, 60, chief executive and chairman of listed company Tiong Seng Holdings, were acquitted last October of graft charges linked to former LTA deputy group director Henry Foo Yung Thye.
Foo was given five-and-a-half years' jail in September 2021 for taking S$1.24 million in bribes.
Mr Pay was accused of giving S$350,000 (US$267,000) to Foo over two occasions in 2017 and 2018 to advance Tiong Seng's business interests with LTA, while Mr Pek was accused of abetting Mr Pay.
The lower court judge, District Judge Soh Tze Bian, had acquitted the two men after finding lapses in the statement-taking process by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).
He said the investigating officer who took a statement from Mr Pay admitted approaching the interview with a "preconceived notion" that Mr Pay had committed some form of offence.
Another investigating officer had used a "cut-and-paste method" to compile a statement he took from Mr Pek.
Judge Soh found that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the two men beyond a reasonable doubt.
On Tuesday, a team of prosecutors led by Deputy Public Prosecutor Alan Loh urged Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon to undertake a "de novo" review of the case.
This is a Latin term meaning "anew", and refers to a court considering and reviewing the evidence on record afresh, while giving no deference to the impugned judgment of the court below.
It is different from a retrial. In a "de novo" review, the appellate court assumes the role of the first-instance judge at the stage of closing trial submissions, before reaching its own conclusions.
MULTITUDE OF FAILURES: PROSECUTION
Mr Loh argued that, "given the multitude of failures by the district judge", a de novo review is "not merely warranted but necessary to correct the course of justice".
In a hearing lasting more than three hours, Mr Loh submitted, "with respect and with some reluctance", that Judge Soh had failed to discharge his judicial duty.
He alleged that Judge Soh had failed to consider material issues or to refer to conflicting evidence about the two men's CPIB statements.
Judge Soh had also adopted the defence's written submissions as his own findings, claimed Mr Loh.
The grounds of decision by Judge Soh acquitting the men "substantially" adopted the defence's arguments as his own findings, preserving their structure, flow and even choice of words and phrases, said Mr Loh.
Mr Loh characterised the way the judge rejected the prosecution's case as doing so with "a sweeping statement".
Chief Justice Menon said it was not wrong in and of itself for a judge to adopt the defence's arguments.
"A judge may agree with submissions put forth by one side or the other. I myself have come across cases where one side's arguments were bereft of value, and so I agreed with what the other side (said)," he said.
However, the prosecution said their complaint was that the lower court judge had adopted the defence submissions without engaging with the prosecution's points.
"He copied," said Mr Loh. "He did not refer to our points. He did not even refer to the evidence."
He meant that the judge may have relied on defence arguments, but he did not then look at the evidence to satisfy himself that what the defence argued was correct and was actually justified based on the evidence.
Mr Pay was represented by lawyers from WongPartnership led by Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng, while Mr Pek was defended by a team from Drew and Napier led by Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull.
Mr Bull pointed to the prosecution's submissions and said they left out lines to show that the judge did apply his mind to the case.
Mr Tan said it was not wrong for the judge not to quote the prosecution when "the prosecution submissions (are) bereft of arguments".
He said that his client was told he was the victim and that the statement he was giving was to prosecute Foo.
"He wasn't even told or aware that he was under investigation, but he was told after his first statement was recorded that his first statement was not good enough," said Mr Tan.
He said his client was brought in at 6am and finished recording his statement at 11pm that same day, but was not allowed to go home. Instead, he stayed over at CPIB's premises that night and gave a second statement the next day.
Mr Tan said the lower court judge could be seen to be forming his own view in his judgment.
"He did not copy," said the lawyer, adding that it "may not be an A grade judgment".
Chief Justice Menon said that copying, while in and of itself a "deplorable practice", would not in and of itself satisfy setting aside the judgment.
He reserved judgment, saying he needed time and may require another hearing due to the volume of material before him.
Judge Soh retired earlier this year. He had been chided by Chief Justice Menon in September 2023 for his "unsatisfactory" judicial practice by lifting large chunks of the prosecution's submissions for his grounds of decision.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
21-year-old arrested and charged for molesting 12-year-old on board MRT train
Depositphotos/LyazaTretyakova A 21-year-old man was charged in court today (July 23) in a case of outrage of modesty involving a minor, after he was arrested earlier this week. The police said in a statement that they received a call for assistance early on Monday morning (July 21), around 6.45 am. The police were informed that a man had molested a 12-year-old girl on board an MRT train. Officers from the Public Transport Security Command managed to identify the suspect through CCTV footage and follow-up probes. The suspect was arrested within 13 hours of the initial report. If found guilty of outrage of modesty against a person below 14 years of age. the man faces a jail term of up to five years, a fine, caning, or any combination of such penalties. The Singapore Police Force stressed that they have zero tolerance for sexual offenders and will take firm action against those who threaten the personal safety of the community. Members of the public are also urged to stay vigilant and report any incidents of molestation immediately. See also Man caught hanging non-foldable bicycle on MRT rails () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });


Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
Doctor fends off robber, thinking he is holding a fake gun — until it goes off as robber flees
MALAYSIA: A robbery attempt at a clinic in Johor Bahru took place last Saturday evening (19 July), when a man wielding what appeared to be a firearm was confronted by the clinic's doctor who believed the weapon was fake. The struggle that ensued ended with the robber accidentally discharging the gun while fleeing the scene. No one was injured. The incident unfolded at around 7 pm at a private clinic in the city. According to reports from the Malaysian press, a man entered the clinic wearing a motorcycle helmet. Upon spotting a female doctor on duty, he pulled a pistol from his bag, claimed he needed her 'help,' and demanded money. The woman's husband, who is also a doctor at the clinic, confronted the man. Believing the gun was not real, he fought the robber while the female doctor escaped to a nearby shop to seek help. The store owner called the police and asked the female doctor to stay in the shop until help arrived. The pair then heard the sound of the gun going off. The gunshot was later found to have been accidental. CCTV footage recorded by the shop owner showed that the robber tripped and fell while running away, causing the gun to go off. No one was struck by the bullet. The robbery was unsuccessful while the male doctor sustained minor injuries. In his escape, the suspect left behind a backpack containing identification documents, which were recovered by police. Shell casings and a bullet were also found at the scene. The incident has left neighbouring business owners shaken. Many expressed concern over safety in the area and are calling for increased police patrols. Investigations are ongoing. () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
'I want to sleep': Fight erupts on AirAsia X flight after passengers keep talking despite dimmed cabin lights
SINGAPORE: A fight broke out between passengers on an AirAsia X flight on Monday (Jul 21) evening after three of them allegedly refused to lower their voices while the cabin lights were dimmed. In response to CNA's query, AirAsia confirmed that the altercation took place on board flight number D7326, which was heading to Chengdu, China from Kuala Lumpur. A man seated behind a group of women who were chatting reportedly asked them to quiet down so he could rest. This occurred shortly after the plane took off from Kuala Lumpur International Airport, according to the New York Post and Malaysian news outlet the Malay Mail. The trio reportedly refused and carried on chatting, triggering a heated exchange between both parties. The male passenger allegedly called the group "stupid", asked them to "shut up" and said, "I want to sleep". While a fellow passenger told the New York Post that the three women were "chatting too loudly", she noted that the man's tone was also "quite aggressive". The incident went viral on social media, with footage showing one woman pulling on what appeared to be a lanyard the man was wearing, while screams can be heard in the background. Cabin crew then step in to separate her and another woman, who was dressed in a green top and a baseball cap, from the man. In another video posted online, the woman in the green top can be seen leaning over her seat before repeatedly punching the man, who tried to shield himself behind his tray table, while shouts to "sit down" ✈️ কুয়ালালামপুর থেকে চেংদু—মাত্র কয়েক ঘণ্টার ফ্লাইট হলেও কেবিন ক্রুর গুরুত্ব অপরিসীম। তারা কেবল খাবার দেয় না, বিপদের... Posted by Seen & Real on Monday, July 21, 2025 AirAsia X told CNA that the cabin crew had "acted swiftly and professionally to manage the situation in line with established safety protocols". "The (local) authorities were notified and they met the aircraft upon landing to ensure appropriate action was taken," it added. "The incident did not impact the return flight schedules or disrupt operations." The South China Morning Post said on Wednesday that a total of five Chinese passengers got involved in the dispute, with airport police arresting three of them and fining the other two. On unruly passenger behaviour, AirAsia X said it "would like to remind all guests to be respectful throughout their journey". "The airline maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward any behaviour that may affect the comfort, safety, or experience of others onboard." The US Federal Aviation Administration noted in August 2024 that airlines had reported more than 1,240 unruly passenger cases that year. Some airlines like Ryanair have opted to tackle disruptive behaviour by imposing fines. Ryanair, Europe's biggest airline by passenger numbers, said in a statement on Jun 12 that "disruptive passengers whose unruly behaviour" result in their removal from aircraft would be fined £500 (US$677).