Here's how you can volunteer to support a wounded Special Forces veteran
A national nonprofit is asking for community volunteers to help landscape an adaptive home for a Special Forces veteran who was wounded in Afghanistan.
Check-in for the volunteer day is 9:30 a.m. May 10 at the First Baptist Church of Pinehurst, 7373 N.C. 211 in West End. Volunteers will be shuttled to the new home for retired Sgt. 1st Class Jacob Green, according to an April 30 news release from Homes For Our Troops.
According to the release, enlisted in the Army after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and served with the 3rd and 7th Special Forces groups, deploying six times — once to Peru and Colombia supporting the Global War on Terror and four times to Afghanistan, the news release states.
'I felt it was my duty to serve this wonderful country, and while I was in, the love of country is always there, but I think it's always second behind my teammates to the left and right of me,' he said in a video posted on the nonprofit's website.
In the video, Green said he first injured his ankle during a firefight while at Firebase Anaconda in Afghanistan, where he served from 2009 to 2010
'I felt the ankle pop. I felt the burn,' he said.
In the middle of the gunfight, he said, he ignored the pain.
He later wrapped his ankle and thought he was OK, until he deployed to South America, and a surgeon told him he'd severed most of the tendons and ligaments in his ankle.
Green deployed to Afghanistan again between 2013 to 2014 and fell off the back of a truck during another gunfight.
He said he's also suffered spinal and neck injuries and a traumatic brain injury during his deployments.
After the 2014 deployment, Green said, he went to Walter Reed Medical Center and has his first surgery Oct. 7, 2015.
His leg was amputated below the knee, but he required several more surgeries for three years because of 'so much damage.'
Green's wife, Kelly, said her husband never stops or gives up.
'He will always give his all, and he has given his all, knowing that life is much more valuable than a limb,' she said in the video.
Green, who lives in Pinehurst, said he's the type of person who doesn't like accepting help and has coped with scraping his knuckles on doorways while maneuvering in a wheelchair. He and his wife said a representative from Homes for Our Troops reached out multiple times before they accepted the offer for the organization to provide an adaptive home.
Green, who uses both a prosthetic leg and wheelchair depending on his needs, said that in the new, adaptive home, he won't have to worry about tripping or falling out of his wheelchair when reaching for something.
Not only will the home Greene receives be specially adapted, but it will also be mortgage-free.
'Knowing that financial freedom, I don't have a mortgage payment, is huge,' Green said.
Homes For Our Troops said volunteers are needed Saturday, May 10, to lay sod and plant trees and flowers in preparation for the upcoming ceremony when Green will receive the keys to the home, which has more than 40 adaptations including lower countertops and roll under sinks.
Volunteers are asked to bring gardening gloves and will receive a Homes For Our Troops T-shirt and lunch, according to the organization.
Staff writer Rachael Riley can be reached at rriley@fayobserver.com or 910-486-3528.
This article originally appeared on The Fayetteville Observer: Nonprofit to provide adaptive home for wounded Special Forces veteran
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
New Army Shaving Policy Will Allow Soldiers with Skin Condition that Affects Mostly Black Men to Be Kicked Out
The Army is preparing to roll out a new policy that could lead to soldiers diagnosed with a chronic skin condition that causes painful razor bumps and scarring to be kicked out of the service -- an issue that disproportionately affects Black men. The new guidance, expected to take effect in the coming weeks, would bar permanent shaving waivers and require medical personnel to craft formal treatment plans for affected troops, according to multiple service officials and internal documents reviewed by Soldiers in need of prolonged waivers may be directed to get laser treatments. Those who need shaving exemptions for more than 12 months over a two-year period could be kicked out of the Army. Units across the force will also be mandated to rebrief personnel on grooming standards within 90 days of the policy's rollout. Read Next: Military Domestic Violence Conviction Skyrocketed After Commanders Were Removed from Process Most shaving waivers are for soldiers diagnosed with pseudofolliculitis barbae, or PFB, a condition in which hairs curl back into the skin after shaving and cause irritation. The Pentagon may cover the laser treatment, but that can cost thousands of dollars per soldier, depending on the number of sessions required. It's unclear how many soldiers would require the procedure. The American Osteopathic College of Dermatology estimates that up to 60% of Black men are affected by the condition. Laser treatments can cause scarring and changes in skin pigmentation. "Of course, this is racially motivated," one senior noncommissioned officer familiar with the plans told on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. "There's no tactical reason; you can look professional with facial hair." In March, the Marine Corps rolled out a similar program allowing troops to be separated if the genetic skin condition persists, also raising concerns of racial discrimination. The Army has been in a prolonged recruiting slump since the high-water mark of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, something it started to turn around last year. While Black Americans make up about 14% of the U.S. population, they have accounted for roughly one-quarter of the Army's new recruits in recent years, with that number steadily rising. However, the services have made deliberate efforts to reduce recruiting efforts linked to minority groups amid Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's purge of diversity initiatives during the Trump administration. In 2018, more than 44,000 new recruits identified as white, according to Army data. By 2023, that number had fallen to just over 25,000 -- a staggering 43% drop in five years. The steepest annual decline came most recently, with a 6% dip from 2022 to 2023 alone. No other demographic group has seen such a precipitous fall. Much of the recent recruiting slump was attributable to men being less qualified, or willing, to don the uniform while women have been joining the ranks at a steady rate. Medical complications tied to mandatory shaving emerged as a flashpoint during the military's bumpy road toward racial integration. In the early 1970s, then-Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Elmo Zumwalt launched an aggressive campaign to root out racism and sexism across the ranks. As part of that broader push, Zumwalt issued a now-famous directive permitting sailors to grow beards and mustaches, a move that clashed with the Navy's traditionally rigid grooming codes but aimed to ease chronic skin issues that disproportionately affected Black service members. The primary argument against allowing beards in the ranks has long centered on concerns that they could compromise the seal of a gas mask. But a 2021 study from Military Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal, found there's no conclusive evidence that a well-groomed, modest beard interferes with mask function. The publication also noted that only a small fraction of service members operate in environments where chemical attacks are a realistic threat. In Alaska, units are granted wide latitude when it comes to grooming standards, with commanders often waiving shaving requirements during the frigid winter months. Troops are frequently instructed to skip their morning shave or forgo it entirely while operating in the field -- not out of convenience but as a safety precaution. The extreme cold can make shaving a medical hazard, with exposed skin at risk of frostbite and other cold-weather injuries. The Army move to clamp down on shaving waivers follows Hegseth, who has protested shaving waivers, ordering a sweeping review of grooming standards across the services. He has claimed that standards have fallen in recent years and damaged the military. "We kicked out good soldiers for having naked women tattooed on their arms," Hegseth said in a March statement criticizing what he characterized as bad policy decisions by past administrations. "And today we are relaxing the standards on shaving, dreadlocks, man buns, and straight-up obesity. Piece by piece, the standard had to go -- because of equity." Related: Air Force Unveils New Policies on Shaving, Nail Polish, Hair Length in Leaked Memos
2 days ago
LA First Responders face growing health concerns in months after wildfires
ABC News' Matt Gutman investigates the growing health concerns for first responders who rushed to fight raging wildfires in Los Angeles, some even drawing a parallel to the medical aftermath of 9/11.
Boston Globe
3 days ago
- Boston Globe
Eric Green was the first institute director forced out of NIH. He still hasn't been told why.
Advertisement 'I do believe there were people put into the department by the White House before Kennedy arrived. I think they had their agenda for who was going to get terminated, and why and how.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Green, who spent about three decades at NIH, reflected on his experience as a precursor of the thousands of layoffs that roiled the agency in the weeks since. He insisted he had been ready and willing to work with the new leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services — though he lambasted many of the suite of changes and proposals made by the current administration. The administration used something of a bureaucratic technicality to remove Green from his position. Institute and center directors are appointed to five-year terms, which are tied to external reviews from the scientific community. But they can serve multiple terms, and no director had failed to be renewed. Advertisement The paperwork and reviews for Green to be renewed were submitted by the Biden administration in December 2024, with the expectation he would be granted another term beginning March 17. His appointment was the first to be up for renewal since Trump was inaugurated. 'I drew the short straw,' Green said. Just three days before he was supposed to begin his new term, Green asked about the renewal, and he said it quickly became clear there was no plan to keep him. 'I was in what turned out to be a very dramatic week of back and forth and attempts to save me,' he said. Memoli seemingly agreed to keep Green on as a senior adviser, and he said at least one member of Congress campaigned to keep him in his post. He declined to name that lawmaker. Ultimately 'they just chose not to reappoint me, and it was basically a convenient way to decapitate a leader at NIH. I was never told why,' Green said. In the early days of the administration, he was one of several dozen employees at the federal health agencies to be placed on a ' Green had been a vocal advocate for promoting diversity in genomic datasets as well as the research workforce. He said the issue was important for the veracity of the science coming out of his institute, and for geneticists' ability to connect with a diverse population. But, ultimately it was simply part of his duty, given the emphasis the Biden administration put on the issue. Advertisement In his career, Green served a mix of Democratic and Republican presidents — Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden. 'As a public servant, you adapt. You have to sort of lean left, you lean right. So, Biden really pushed DEI, and it was a required element in my performance plan. So I did my job,' he said. Just as he had shifted NHGRI's priorities under the Biden administration, he had already begun the process of reorienting the institute's work toward chronic disease, a focus of Kennedy's. 'That's the tragic thing,' he said. 'We were all poised to align, because that's what we do as dedicated federal workers.' Green feels a special onus to prioritize work that centers on diverse populations given genetics' fraught history with the eugenics movement, which promoted the idea that preferable genetic traits should be encouraged, and other traits should be eliminated through measures like forced sterilization or genocide. Green sees 'tinges' of the eugenics movement in the recent backlash against diversity initiatives. 'I think it's evil,' he said of the administration's vilification of diversity initiatives. While he said there is room for reasonable discussion around the best ways to promote equity, 'I think underpinning a lot of this by some people, is just overt racism and prejudices.' Serving as 'consoler in chief' In the wake of his termination, Green continued going to the NIH campus in Bethesda for several weeks, helping his former staff navigate the uncharted waters it was in. While he was no longer being paid, Green felt as if he had been forced to 'orphan' his staff. His deputy director, Vence Bonham, was made acting director — only to be Advertisement Green was at NIH on April 1, when sweeping layoffs hit the entirety of the Department of Health and Human Services. 'I was there as the consoler in chief on April 1, when all hell broke loose,' he said. 'They took out all of my communications people, all of my education people, all my policy people, all my workforce development people, which were all my staff that have offices surrounding my suite. It's like all my immediate, daily family just got decimated.' In the two months since, the administration has begun making numerous changes to the NIH, from the way external research is paid for to how it will fund foreign-based scientists collaborating with US researchers. While he believes there are ways the agency can be improved, Green took issue with some of the changes. He called proposed revisions to research funding for overhead costs, called indirect costs, that would mean slashing payments to many leading universities, 'stupid and naive.' The current system is far from perfect but, 'we should optimize it. We shouldn't weaponize it,' he said. 'Let's get smart people in a room, including from business and from economics and from government and policy. Let's think about what is the right partnership between the federal government and the academic biomedical ecosystem.' He added that funding decisions are being made by people who don't seem to appreciate the implications of the cuts on biomedical research. 'It's all political, and it's punitive, and they're not engaging the experts to know what the implications of how you're harming the ecosystem are.' Advertisement The administration has also floated a 40 percent cut to funding for the NIH along with a massive reduction in the number of institutes it has. Green is hopeful Congress won't go along with such a drastic reduction, but if it were to come to pass, he said 'it'll be decades before we recover. I think other countries will surpass us quickly. I think it'll be catastrophic.' A more pressing concern, he said, is the administration's centralization of grant reviews. In the past, the NIH has employed reviewers at each of its institutes alongside a centralized staff at the Center for Scientific Review. While the latter typically approves more grants, Green worries its staff will not see the promise in innovative research. 'You think you're stamping out waste, fraud, and abuse,' he said. 'You're also stamping out innovation and creativity and the cutting edge.' Green is looking for his next gig. He hopes to return to academia, to mentor and teach students. He said he is excited about teaching students who may not be geneticists. But, he's also on standby to help rebuild the NIH. He said he is not sure who would take up the mantle of NHGRI director at such a tumultuous time. 'The current state of the NIH is unsustainable, because there's too much functionality that's been destroyed and lost. So many of us will be [at the] ready to help, advise, or do whatever, rebuild it brick by brick,' he said. 'People keep asking me 'How long will it take to rebuild?' I don't know the answer. I don't know how much more damage is going to be done.' Advertisement
