
General YouTube: Germany's newest military chief is a warlord of his own Ukraine-cheering fantasyland
But this time is different: Recent changes at the German Ministry of Defense matter, if in a disturbing way. Berlin's energetic, ambitious, popular, and resolutely narrow-minded minister of defense Boris Pistorius has just made some high-level personnel moves.
By far the single most politically significant of Pistorius' new appointments is that of Major-General Christian Freuding as the new 'Heeresinspekteur,' the head the land forces (in German: Heer), that is, the army in the strict sense of the term. This is a position of major influence because of the structure of Germany's military and current rearmament plans, both with a key role for the army. Formally, Freuding has not (yet) scored the highest possible military rank. That would be the 'Generalinspekteur der Bundeswehr,' responsible for all four current service branches (army, navy, air force, and the new cyber and information units).
But, in reality, Freuding may well already have more political influence than any other German officer. This is due to two factors: Freuding clearly is a favorite of Pistorius. Indeed, his predecessor, General Alfons Mais, was not. Ironically, Mais was no less Russophobic than the worst of them. His bizarre, simplistic, and stereotyped views of Russia as a country that doesn't care about its casualties are now most welcome in Germany (again). But Mais also could be 'inconvenient': Instead of meekly waiting for the politicians to get debt-driven rearmament into economy-draining overdrive, this soldier had a habit of complaining about the wait and making demands.
That is one reason Mais is out and Freuding is in. Freuding is a driven as well as rapidly advancing careerist who already served as adjutant to Ursula von der Leyen in those good old days when she was still only devastating the German political landscape. He clearly knows how not to antagonize but please his superiors.
One way in which Freuding pleases Pistorius – and virtually the whole German political and mainstream media establishment – is that he is a perfect hardliner with respect to Russia in general and, in particular, when it comes to the West's proxy war against the latter via Ukraine. That has also made him a perfect fit to lead both a new, centralized Defense Ministry planning and coordination body established in 2023 and, at the same time, a special office busy, in essence, with pumping arms into Ukraine.
Yet Freuding is not just any die-hard bellicist. He also serves as a dis/information warrior in a class of his own. That's why German mainstream media call him a 'social-media star' and 'the YouTube General' who went 'viral.' Apart from Freuding's presence on traditional TV, there are his frequent appearances on the German military's YouTube channel which score hundreds of thousands of views, occasionally even a million.
What seems to have made the often wide-eyed – quite literally – general so popular is a combination of overly optimistic (polite expression) assessments of the Ukrainian and Western position in the Ukraine War, a certain boyish (also polite expression) but – it seems – infectious enthusiasm for arrows and tactical signs on maps, and, last but not least, a relentless insistence to fight this war, in effect, through to the last Ukrainian. And who knows, maybe even beyond that.
In the fall of 2022, after Ukraine recaptured some territories at unsustainable cost to men and materiel, Freuding went wild, enthusing about 'incredible successes' and 'euphoria.' Euphoria indeed.
Last summer, when Ukraine started its predictably self-devastating offensive into Russia's Kursk Region, Freuding replicated every single daft Kiev propaganda point, including the alleged 'psychological effect' of invading 'core Russian territory.' Incidentally, the excitable general seems to have a traditional German blind spot for just how big Russia is: In reality, the area temporarily seized by Kiev's forces was miniscule – never more than one hundredth of a percent of Russian territory.
Freuding also touted this minuscule and doomed incursion as a great 'Mutmacher' (untranslatable, roughly: motivation boost) for the Ukrainian home front. We all know how that Kamikaze operation actually ended. By now, Kiev even finds it financially and politically difficult to accept the corpses of its fallen soldiers when delivered back from Russia: Every single one should trigger major compensation to their families and is testimony to a reckless and lost gamble.
When, a month ago, Ukraine launched its criminal (as in the war crime of perfidy) Spiderweb attack on Russian nuclear bombers from within Russia, Freuding detected 'impressive success,' most likely simply following – deliberately or not – initial Ukrainian exaggerations. In reality, the attack did far less military harm than Kiev claimed at first, as even Western mainstream outlets have admitted. Politically, of course, it was devastating – but for Ukraine, whose leadership scored a fleeting PR stunt but provoked a massive Russian response.
Freuding has been prolific. Examples of his bizarrely wrongheaded analyses and flatly failed predictions could be multiplied ad infinitum. But you get the gist: One thing his promotion shows is that Germany is once again a country where realism won't get you far in a military career. But wishful thinking wrapped in tactical jargon and scrawled on big maps will. As a German and a historian, I wished I had not seen that pattern before.
Freuding's other forte, his enthusiasm for fighting to the last Ukrainian is equally well attested. In his own misguided and euphemistic terms, Freuding is a top representative of those Western friends from hell who have pretended that feeding ever more Ukrainians into this meatgrinder of a proxy war would 'improve Kiev's negotiating position.'
Obviously and – again – utterly predictably, the opposite has happened: Ukraine's position is weaker than ever and constantly deteriorating, all at the cost of massive losses. By now, Ukrainian officials and the Western mainstream media have been compelled to admit that 'Ukraine has lost around 40% of its working-age population due to the war' and is facing a 'deep demographic crisis.' And that is an understatement. Yet Freuding sticks to his 'strategy' – if that is the word – of playing for time.
It is also important to see Freuding's implausible but apparently (for now) unstoppable rise in a broader context: Bellicist German mainstream media, such as the news magazine Spiegel, now admit that the US is gradually retreating from the proxy war it provoked, abandoning both its Ukrainian proxies and European vassals. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, meanwhile, oddly combines an obstinate and somewhat delusional urge to keep fighting Russia – for now indirectly – with the realistic, if very late, insight that Ukraine may be reaching its limits.
Wadephul's response to this self-imposed absurdity is simple: Germany must do even more for Ukraine. Never mind that the German military has already handed over, for instance, a quarter of its own 12 Patriot air defense systems. After all, there also is the option of buying new ones in the US and shipping them directly to Ukraine, at Berlin's expense, of course.
To justify such measures, the German government, with Chancellor Merz in the lead, has dialed up its already hyperventilating war scare rhetoric again. Until recently, the key dogma of the bellicist party line was the unfounded speculation, sold as virtual certainty, that Russia would be ready and willing to attack within a few years from now. Initially, the head of the German military, General Christian Breuer, had started fetishizing the year 2029 into the sum of all hysterical fears.
Yet that is no longer good – really, bad – enough. With support from Germany's trusty intelligence services – the same ones that helped the US fake a pretext to launch a devastating war of aggression against Iraq in 2003 and that can't find out who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines – Merz has updated the national panic attack: Now, he has informed his people, we must no longer fear that the Russians are coming because – drum roll – they are already here!
Merz, in short, has opined that the definition of 'war' is a major philosophical challenge, that Russia is already attacking Germany in multiple sneaky ways, and that hence, so the clear implication, the two countries are already at war. Not much to lose, then, if we escalate even further: that seems to be the message.
This is the stage on which Major-General Freuding has now been called upon to play an even larger role. He is, in a way, the right man for the job and for the moment. Only that the moment is one of officially sanctioned hysteria and delusion, and the job will consist of pretending that Ukraine can still, if not win, somehow improve its situation, while feeding more arms and money to it so that more of its people and territory can be lost.
Freuding, in sum, may be quite mad, but his whole career shows that he is a team player. His madness, at this point, is that of the whole German establishment. He is a good fit for a very bad set of ideas and policies. How ironic. And how German, too, in a way.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Von der Leyen blames Russia for no-confidence motion
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has dismissed efforts by members of the European Parliament to oust her, branding her critics 'conspiracy theorists' and accusing them of acting on behalf of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Von der Leyen is facing a parliamentary motion of no-confidence in her presidency, which is scheduled for a vote on Thursday after being tabled by Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea. Addressing the parliament during a debate on Monday, von der Leyen said those backing the proposal were following 'the oldest playbook of extremists' and were attempting to undermine public confidence in the EU with 'false claims.' 'There is no proof that they have any answers, but there is ample proof that many are supported by our enemies and by their puppet masters in Russia or elsewhere.' 'These are movements fueled by conspiracies, from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists. And you only have to look at some of the signatories of this motion to understand what I mean.' In his remarks to parliament, Piperea accused the Commission of centralizing decision-making in a non-democratic fashion and of interfering in the internal affairs of member states. Russian officials have claimed that EU leaders are using fear tactics to shield themselves from criticism. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov dubbed von der Leyen, who is German, a 'fuhrer' for her efforts to push a multi-billion euro militarization program on member states. Russia maintains that unlike Western states it does not interfere with other nations' domestic affairs. Von der Leyen urged 'all the pro-Europeans, pro-democracy forces' in the chamber to support her agenda, arguing that unity was essential to uphold the EU's foreign policy strength. Criticism of von der Leyen's leadership has centered on her handling of the EU's Covid-19 response during her first term, particularly the lack of transparency in finalizing a 2021 vaccine procurement deal with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. Earlier this year, the European Court of Justice found her office at fault for failing to retain text messages exchanged with Bourla and for refusing to release them to journalists with adequate justification. Piperea is a member of Romania's AUR party, led by George Simion, who narrowly lost a presidential runoff this year to a pro-EU candidate. The election followed a scrapped first-round vote earlier in 2024, in which outsider Calin Georgescu emerged as the frontrunner. The country's Constitutional Court annulled the results, citing government allegations of Russian interference. Critics of the EU claim the episode reflects a broader anti-democratic trend allegedly enabled by Brussels.


Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Europe's biggest seaport preparing for potential conflict with Russia
The port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands is preparing for a possible conflict between NATO and Russia by reserving space for vessels carrying weapons and making plans to host regular military drills, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday. Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, Western European politicians have frequently claimed that Russia harbors aggressive intentions against NATO countries – accusations that Moscow has dismissed as detached from reality. The port of Rotterdam, which is the largest in Europe and handles over 460 million tons of cargo annually, would have a dedicated quay for NATO supply ships in the event of a conflict with Russia, something that was not the case even at the height of the Cold War, the FT said. The harbor is currently coordinating with the neighboring port of Antwerp in Belgium on how to manage cargo flows if multiple vessels with US, British, and Canadian military hardware and supplies would have to dock in the Dutch city, according to the newspaper. 'Not every terminal is fit for handling military cargo,' Boudewijn Siemons, chief executive of the Port of Rotterdam Authority, told the FT. 'If large volumes of military goods would have to be shipped, we would look to Antwerp or other ports to take over some capacity and the other way around. We see each other less and less as competitors.' According to Siemons, one or more ships would be docked at the quay for several weeks, four or five times a year. Rotterdam will also host several amphibious military exercises annually as part of preparations for a potential conflict, he said. The report comes amid a broader militarization drive among European NATO members. In an interview with the New York Times at the weekend, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged that the bloc's recent decision to increase military spending to 5% of GDP was 'an enormous amount,' but claimed that 'if we do not [do this], we will have to learn Russian.' Russian officials have condemned the militarization push in Western European nations, urging them to support US-led peace initiatives for the Ukraine conflict instead of gearing up for war with Moscow. Earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Hungarian newspaper Magyar Nemzet that certain Western politicians are 'demonizing' Moscow and trying to portray it as 'an enemy to rally populations tired of social and economic problems.'


Russia Today
19 hours ago
- Russia Today
Hypocritical EU ‘totally complicit in Gaza genocide'
The EU has shown unwavering support for Israel's 'genocide' in Gaza while failing to uphold international law or acknowledge the scale of Palestinian suffering, Mick Wallace, a former member of the European Parliament for Ireland, has said. Speaking to RT on Monday, Wallace accused Brussels of being 'totally complicit,' adding that the word 'complicit' was probably not strong enough. 'As far as I'm concerned, the EU has enabled and supported the genocide in Gaza 100%,' he stated. He singled out European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Parliament President Roberta Metsola for granting Israel a 'blank check' in the days after the October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. 'Neither of them has said one word of criticism of Israel yet,' he said. While public opposition to the war continues across Europe, Wallace says EU leaders have aligned themselves with what he described as the 'Zionist settler-colonial project.' Asked about an EU External Action Service review suggesting Israel may have violated human rights, Wallace dismissed the prospect of any response, 'because Israel has them in their pocket.' He pointed to the staggering number of Palestinians – including tens of thousands of children – killed by Israeli forces, yet 'the EU institutions still refused to condemn Israel.' But when images of starvation surfaced, EU officials abruptly declared it was 'wrong to starve the Palestinians,' he said. 'Is it okay to bomb them morning, noon, and night, but not starve them?' Wallace accused the EU leadership of having 'no morals' and 'no interest in international law anymore.' Commenting on reports that EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas may propose a formal response to Israel's actions, Wallace scoffed: 'Come on. You wouldn't give her a job in a coffee shop... She hasn't a clue.' The EU's association agreement with Israel includes a human rights clause, but Wallace said it has no real effect. 'Not one single member state has broken business links with Israel yet,' he said. 'The hypocrisy is dripping out of the place.' Asked about Germany's role as Israel's top EU arms supplier, Wallace responded: 'I would hold every EU member state culpable… The genocide is happening because both the US and Europe have given it full support.' The conflict began with Hamas' assault on southern Israel in October 2023, in which around 1,200 people were killed and 250 were taken hostage. Of those, 50 remain in Gaza, with fewer than half still alive. Israel's military response has killed at least 57,000 people in the enclave, mostly civilians, over the past 21 months, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry.