Alabama Senate bill requiring display of Ten Commandments draws support, opposition
A bill that would require Alabama's public schools — including colleges and universities — to display the Ten Commandments drew supporters and opponents to the Senate Education Policy Committee on Wednesday.
SB 166, sponsored by Sen. Keith Kelley, R-Anniston, would require a text of the Ten Commandments to be displayed in a common area of the school. The legislation does not list any sanctions for schools that do not comply.
The senator said the bill was 'not promoting any religion.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'I understand those that are opposed are trying to make it a religious issue,' Kelley said in an interview. 'It's not. It's a historical issue. It's affected our civilization.'
Critics said the version of the Ten Commandments in the bill combines multiple versions of the text and is not historical. Rev. Julie Conrady, a minister with the Unitarian Universalist Church of Birmingham, said there are three distinct versions of the Ten Commandments and combining them degrades the value and misrepresents the history of the Hebrew words.
'This bill is a violation of the First Amendment and imposes a certain religious understanding of a certain text that has been hodged-podged together and linguistically abused and has no place in our public schools,' Conrady said.
Kelley also said he did not know who would not want their children to learn 'thou shall not murder.'
'It's just some of the comments that were made were basically saying these principles are not really applicable in the school,' Kelley said. 'But especially in the day and time we have school shootings and everything that we have, it's applicable.'
Supporters of Kelley's bill said the text is the foundation of Western civilization and the framework of the United States' laws.
'The commandments are the cornerstone of Western civilization and American law,' said Becky Gerritson, executive director of Eagle Forum, a conservative organization. 'These fundamental principles benefit society by reminding us of basic moral values such as respecting life property and truthfulness, which are essential for a well functioning community and regardless of your religious affiliation.'
Jim Lowe, a Baptist minister from Birmingham, said the Ten Commandments would serve as a 'timeless' moral compass in classrooms.
'Let's be clear, display and Ten Commandments in public schools is not about promoting a specific religion, but about reinforcing the fundamental universal values that were a part of our nation's greatness,' Lowe said.
Steve Silverman, a rabbi from Mobile, said teachers are not equipped to answer questions students may have about the Hebrew-derived text.
'Displaying the 10 Jewish words unfairly sidelines Alabamians who may have diverse views of religious traditions,' he said. 'Members of county boards of education, local principals and teachers across our state are not necessarily well trained to explain this program.
Louisiana passed similar legislation in 2024, but a Louisiana federal district court ruled it unconstitutional in November, citing the separation of church and state. Louisiana's law, unlike Kelley's proposal, required the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every classroom.
The committee did not vote on the legislation on Wednesday.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Which countries could Trump hit with 100% tariffs over ties with Russia?
More than a dozen countries from Asia to the Middle East and South America are potentially in President Trump's crosshairs if he goes ahead with his threat to impose 100% tariffs on goods exported to the United States over their economic ties with Russia. "We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100%," Mr. Trump said Monday at the White House, laying out a new ultimatum and deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire to end its war in Ukraine. The levies, he said, would be applied as "secondary tariffs" — not targeting Russia directly, but designed to increase Moscow's economic pain by pressuring its trade partners to stop buying or selling products in the energy, agriculture and weapons sectors with Russia. China and India became the world's first and second biggest importers of Russian oil in 2023 after Western sanctions were imposed against Moscow in response to its invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The top post had previously been held by the 27-nation European Union. China and India, Asia's two biggest economies, now collectively import an estimated 85% to 90% of the seaborne crude oil sold by Russia's state-managed energy companies, which make up the bulk of its total exports. After launching its full-scale invasion in February 2022, the Kremlin renegotiated prices with its trade partners, offering steep discounts on Russian oil compared to U.S. and European crude. NATO member Turkey is another major importer of Russian oil and natural gas. In the Middle East, the United Arab Emirates — while not a major energy importer itself — serves as a financial hub for the international trade in Russian oil. Dubai is also a safe haven for Russian capital and oligarchs. In South America, agricultural powerhouse Brazil is the biggest purchaser of Russian fertilizer products, crucial to supporting its soybean, sugar and coffee exports. Vietnam and Thailand, both of which try to maintain diplomatic non-alignment in the Russia-Ukraine war — leaving them stuck in a delicate balancing act between their Eastern and Western trade partners — do have oil, natural gas, defense and tourism interests with Russia. Senior Russian officials were quick to downplay the threat of secondary sanctions against its trading partners, and to reject Mr. Trump's ultimatum as "unacceptable." The president's remarks didn't cause any immediately apparent unease for Russian investors, either, possibly as Mr. Trump left a window of 50 days for some new agreement to take shape, and as he has a recent history of stepping back from previous tariff threats. After Mr. Trump warned of the possible 100% secondary tariffs, Russia's stock market rose 2.7%, and the value of the Russian rouble actually strengthened relative to the dollar. Trump pushes senators to make $9.4 trillion in spending cuts Congressman scolds protester at college antisemitism hearing: "Shut up and get out of here" Mike Waltz questioned about Signal chat scandal during confirmation hearing
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
How Trump Can Turn Ukraine Around
Donald Trump seems poised to change his approach to the Russia-Ukraine war. The United States, he told the press after his meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte yesterday, will sell weapons—including Patriot air-defense systems and missiles—to NATO, which will then transfer them to Ukraine. He also promised to impose so-called secondary tariffs of 100 percent on Russia if Vladimir Putin did not agree to a cease-fire within 50 days. Trump didn't offer many more details, and the Department of Defense seems still to be working up options for arms sales. The secondary tariffs appear to mean penalties on India, China, Brazil, and other countries that trade with Russia. How these levies will fit in with Trump's trade talks with those countries is an open question. Trump is unlikely to allow India's policy toward Ukraine to determine the future of a U.S.-India deal or a thaw in trade tensions, for example, and likewise with China. Still, Trump's announcement appears to mark a major shift in strategy on Ukraine, or at least in his intent. The shift needs to be real and lasting—and not just a symbol that the U.S. president took some action after Putin repeatedly spurned his efforts to bring the war to an end. That means Trump needs to change the dynamics on the battlefield so Putin can't win. Doing that will require him to overcome his administration's internal resistance by setting up a mechanism that can be laser-focused on getting this done, has real muscle, and functions with the president's blessing. It's important to remember how we got to this point. Trump proposed a peace deal heavily tilted in Russia's favor—one that included freezing the battlefield lines, recognizing some of Russia's gains, lifting all sanctions, and ending U.S. support for Ukraine. But even that was not enough for Putin. Jonathan Lemire: How Putin humiliated Trump The Russian president will not accept a sovereign, free, and independent Ukraine. He wants a neutered Ukraine with strict limits on its military capabilities and a pliant government in Kyiv. In recent months, Russian officials have demanded that Ukraine give up territory that it currently controls, and Putin reiterated his belief that Ukraine is part of the Russian nation. Ukrainians understand themselves to be facing an existential threat, with no option but to continue to fight. Putin may well anticipate that if Western support diminishes, ultimately Ukraine will break. Perhaps Russia will finally gain air superiority over Ukraine, or maybe Ukrainian forces on the front will dissolve, allowing for more rapid Russian territorial gains. Russian forces may pay a tremendous price—their casualties have now surpassed 1 million —but Putin is not fazed by that. The Trump administration has surely understood these dynamics since late spring, but it hadn't chosen a course of action. The president kept saying that he was assessing Putin's moves and would respond in two weeks if Russia did not change course. The two-week deadline kept rolling over. In the meantime, the Department of Defense pursued its own foreign policy, halting deliveries of weapons to Ukraine that the Biden administration had already paid for and set in motion. This caught Trump unaware and forced him to decide what to do next. If he fell in line with the Department of Defense, he would increase the chance of a Russian victory in the war and be blamed for it. Europe would do its best to help Ukraine, but it lacks certain weapons that Ukraine desperately needs, including air defense systems, mid-range rockets, and air-delivered weapons. Selling Europe weapons to give to Kyiv helps keep Ukraine in the fight, but it needs to be part of a broader strategy to compel Russia to accept a sovereign Ukraine and bring the war to an end. The only plausible way to do this is to convince Putin that he cannot make any meaningful gains on the battlefield, that Russia is being weakened by its losses there, and that the war will continue as long as Putin sticks to his maximalist goals. Neither new arms sales, mainly of air defenses, nor sanctions will suffice to convince Putin of this. Conditions on the battlefield have to make such a conclusion unavoidable. That will require a concerted effort. Trump has made clear that he does not want to own this war, but he will own Ukraine's defeat if his inaction allows Russia to win a protracted fight. He can present his policy as one of creating the battlefield conditions necessary to facilitate a peace deal. To do that, he should empower a small team in the White House expressly dedicated to helping Ukraine improve its position in the war. I was part of the effort to help Ukraine during the Biden administration, and I saw how important the White House's day-to-day engagement was in generating options and solving problems. In January 2023, when I was serving on the National Security Council, the administration estimated that for a major counteroffensive, Ukraine would need about 750,000 rounds of 155-millimeter artillery. The problem was that the United States did not have anything close to that. The U.S. was producing only about 14,000 rounds a month—enough for a couple of normal days in the war. The National Security Council set up a small unit to find a solution. It quickly zeroed in on South Korea, which had a robust defense industry and large stockpiles of munitions in case of conflict with North Korea. But there was a hitch. South Korean law does not allow the government to transfer these munitions to Ukraine. They would have to be given to the United States, which would then transfer them to Ukraine. The South Koreans were worried about how Russia would see their role in such a scheme. At one point Seoul told the Biden team that it would transfer the munitions to the United States, but the U.S. military would need to scratch the Korean markings off every single round—labor that would take months. Eventually the Koreans dropped that demand. Transporting the material to Ukraine also posed problems that Biden's small group was able to solve The Ukraine team, which met daily with the national security adviser, surmounted other obstacles, too. Israel agreed to donate a retired Patriot air-defense battery to Ukraine in exchange for Washington's fast-tracking the delivery to Israel of a more advanced system. A separate arrangement allowed Ukraine to jump the line of customers who had bought air defenses from the United States, with the exceptions of Taiwan and Israel. At the same time, the United States secretly helped kick-start Ukraine's production of attack drones. One problem Trump has is that his Defense Department is a conscientious objector to his new policy and will almost certainly drag its feet. His Ukraine envoy, Keith Kellogg, is based at the State Department and focuses more on diplomacy with Kyiv than on shaping the battlefield. Kellogg's team could be given this new role—but there is another option. A number of pro-Trump and pro-Ukraine 'America First' proponents remain outside the government, despite having wanted to join the administration. Factions inside the administration, led by Vice President J. D. Vance, favored a foreign policy of restraint and likely excluded these figures. Now could be a time to bring some of them in. Andrew Ryvkin: Putin isn't actually enjoying this If Trump had a small team dedicated to strengthening Ukraine's negotiating position, it could hash out an air-defense megadeal that Trump may have alluded to yesterday: Europe would agree to buy a number of Patriot systems from the United States, on the understanding that these orders would jump to the front of the line when the systems are produced. Then the Europeans would immediately give the Patriot systems they already have to Ukraine. The Trump administration could figure out which of the weapons that Ukraine most needs can be provided in sufficient volume only by the United States. Europe would reimburse Washington for sending those to Ukraine as soon as possible. Washington could strike an agreement with Kyiv, trading, say, U.S. access to the intellectual property for Ukraine's new drone technology for Ukrainian access to designs for older American weapons and air-defense systems. The U.S. and Ukraine could then co-produce the drones—including in factories in the United States. The Trump team could bring South Korea back into the mix and ask Seoul to indirectly assist Ukraine with artillery rounds in exchange for Ukrainian assistance on counter-drone technology. (The U.S. could benefit from Ukrainian counter-drone expertise, too.) The Trump administration has eased some sanctions on Russia and failed to update others in ways that keep them effective. A dedicated team could put pressure on the Treasury and Commerce Departments to properly enforce the sanctions already on the books and intensify sanctions on Russia's energy sector. It could also work closely with Europe and Ukraine to figure out how to hold Russia off for the next couple of years if necessary. Europe would be the lead partner for Ukraine, but U.S. support would be helpful. Trump is not going to get an immediate deal to end the war, but if he steps up support for Ukraine, he could still secure the peace later in his term. Putin wants what he wants in Ukraine, and he will stop only when he's fully convinced that what he wants is unattainable. The sooner Ukraine and its partners can demonstrate that to the Kremlin, the sooner this war will come to an end.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's prime minister resigns, opening the door to a broad government reshuffle
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukraine's prime minister announced his resignation Tuesday in the first formal step of what is expected to be a significant reshuffle of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's government, which could also see the country's ambassador to Washington replaced. 'I am tendering my resignation from the post of the Prime Minister of Ukraine,' Denys Shmyhal wrote in a letter posted on his Telegram page. Zelenskyy said Monday that he has offered Shmyhal's job to 39-year-old Yuliia Svyrydenko, who is currently deputy prime minister and the country's first female economy minister. Svyrydenko played a key role in negotiating a U.S.–Ukraine mineral agreement. She has frequently represented Ukraine in high-level talks with Western partners, focusing on defense cooperation, economic recovery and reconstruction. It wasn't immediately clear how the reshuffle will play out in coming days, as the Ukrainian parliament must schedule a vote on Zelenskyy's proposed changes amid the all-out war launched by Russia on Feb. 24, 2022. The reshuffle coincides with increasing pressure on the front line by Russia's bigger army and escalating assaults by drones and missiles on Ukrainian cities. U.S. President Donald Trump pledged Monday to supply more weapons for Ukraine, paid for by European countries. But Kyiv officials are keen to lock in Washington's future support amid fears that the Republican administration could walk away from the conflict. 'To us it is very important, in the context of what is happening now, to strengthen ties with the U.S.,' Zelenskyy said last week. The Ukrainian leader recently said that he thought Shmyhal would make a good defense minister — a move that would make the current defense chief, Rustem Umerov, available to take over as Ukraine's envoy to Washington, observers note. Zelenskyy had previously voiced his intention to replace U.S. Ambassador Oksana Markarova. Umerov, 43, was appointed as Ukraine's defense minister in September 2023, following a series of corruption scandals. He has sought to introduce reforms, but critics said that the Defense Ministry was plagued by mismanagement. ___ Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at Hanna Arhirova, The Associated Press
