George R.R. Martin Is Not Happy With ‘Winds Of Winter' Fans, Not Happy At All
Fans, of course, remain baffled and angry and depressed over the lack of any visible progress on Martin's sixth A Song Of Ice And Fire novel, The Winds Of Winter. It's been fourteen years since the publication of A Dance With Dragons, so being a little upset about the lack of book in hand makes sense.
I wrote a post back in 2022 trying to mathematically predict when – if ever – Winds might finally be published. At the time, and assuming Martin would continue writing at about the same pace he'd been writing (just averaging out pages written per year) I came up with somewhere between 3.8 years and 5.18 years. Of course, that was back in December of 2022 and I don't think we've had a single update of substance from Martin since then.
If Martin continues to average around 3.625 days per page when he gets around to A Dream Of Spring, I predicted that it would take another 15 years after the 2027 publication date of Winds Of Winter. I'd be 61-years-old by then. Martin would be 95. And frankly, all of these mathematical predictions feel wildly optimistic at this point. Hell, in 2018 – seven years ago! – I wrote a post arguing that it's time we all just accept that Martin will never finish the book, let alone the series. 'Recall the five stages of grief," I wrote at the time, "denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. It's time to finally read the writing (or lack thereof) on the wall and accept that this series may never be finished. Abandon hope and anger and leave your expectations in the dirt. One of the fantasy genre's very best series may also become its most crushing disappointment.'
That was seven years ago. It's been fourteen years since the last book came out.
All of which is just my way of explaining why fans, who love these stories, might be distraught and might see all the success Martin has had thanks to his unfinished work and the support of his fans, as frustrating. Which brings us back to Martin's blog post.
In a lengthy aside, the author writes:
This is an awfully bitter and resentful thing to write about the fans who made Martin rich and famous, whose adoration of his work led to several major TV deals with HBO and paved the way for all these other projects. It's a bit of a humble-brag with a dash of self-pity thrown in, listing off all these other achievements and pointing out how Thrones fans don't like them.
Of course, Martin follows this by pointing out that fans are also wrong. 'Thing is, I do care about them,' he writes. 'And I care about Westeros and WINDS as well. The Starks and Lannisters and Targaryens, Tyrion and Asha, Dany and Daenerys, the dragons and the direwolves, I care about them all. More than you can ever imagine.'
I would argue that most fans absolutely know this and most fans don't hate everything else that Martin has done. The reason so many of us are frustrated by all of Martin's various announcements and projects is because we know they distract him from work on the one thing most of his fans are truly passionate and excited about.
If you go to your favorite restaurant expecting a great meal, and the chef comes out and starts showing you pictures of his gardening project and the old truck in his garage he's been working on, and the haikus he's busy penning back in the kitchen, and a bunch of other stuff that's cool, sure, glad you have hobbies, chef – well, after enough of this you might get a little annoyed at having to wait for your meal. It's not that you don't want the chef to have a life outside of cooking, but you've been coming to this restaurant for years and it's a successful business because of the patronage of people like you, and now you're sitting around going through photo albums of the guy's grandkids while your stomach is growling.
And now the chef is ranting about how ungrateful you are, how you don't like his grandkids, how you think his food is going to suck once he's done making it, blah blah blah. We're here for the steak, not pressed flowers and your thoughts on the NFL. The restaurant is here because we like the food, not stories about your trip to Istanbul.
Forgive the extended metaphor, but this is a toxic dynamic. Fans can absolutely be the biggest pricks in the universe and I certainly have empathy for Martin, who has gone from towering literary figure and beloved author of one of fantasy's most successful series, to The Guy Who Will Never Finish His Book, but frankly that's on Martin, not fans. He's loaded up his itinerary with projects, from editing his Wild Cards books to writing the lore for the video game Elden Ring (great game, obviously, but still) to Dark Winds and dozens of other distractions. One can't help but wonder if he's just completely, impossibly stuck. I'm sure he cares. Maybe some people think he doesn't, but I think he does. He's just not in a position where caring equates to devoting himself fully to the cause.
This is one problem with success. A struggling author who relies on his popular series to put bread on the table would have no problem finishing. A successful author who already sold the rights to his series, and has seen it made into a brilliant TV show that ended in disaster, has a lot less fire under his feet. There are no bees in his bonnet.
The really sad thing is that if Martin just finished Winds and Dream by now, fans would probably care a lot more about his other projects. We'd be excited to learn all about them, eager for more, hopeful that he'd go on to finish Fire & Blood and write more Dunk & Egg novellas and whatever else he did even outside of Westeros. But how are we actually supposed to care about any of the rest of this stuff when we still recall A Dance With Dragons ending with about a dozen cliffhangers? And it's not just Martin's mortality that we start to take into account in our calculus: We could die before these books are finished, too!
And that, dear readers, is my annual Winds Of Winter rant. I think I publish one of these just about every year, usually after an update from Martin. How many pages are finished now, do you suppose? Have we moved beyond 1100 to 1200? Maybe we're closing in on 1300 by now. All I know is that my stomach is still rumbling, though I wish I could make it stop.
Hopefully Martin realizes that all of this anger and discontent isn't motivated by hate. 'The haters' are really just lovers. If fans have started to resent him, it's not because we hate GRRM, it's just that we love his books more. I'm not sure if an author owes his fans a complete saga (he sure owed HBO one, when he signed that deal) but shouldn't he want to fulfill this unspoken contract with readers? Shouldn't he want to do right by the people who bought his books, shared them with friends, spread the good word, fell in love with his world and its characters? These stories are as much ours as Martin's now. We're not entitled to anything, fine, but it sure would be great if he proved us all wrong. That sure would show us, wouldn't it? I can't think of a better way to stick it to fans than to finish the series and get the last laugh.
P.S. I think it's worth pointing out that it's quite something, quite remarkable and good, that people still care this passionately about books. The publishing industry is always in crisis. Nobody reads as much as they ought to anymore. Kids these days have attention spans crushed under the terrible weight of TikTok and Instgram. We're all distracted endlessly by phones and an onslaught of other media. That people remain passionate about books, even books we may never get to read, is something we should celebrate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did Hayley Williams just leak a 17-track new album on her website? Here's what we know
Rock 'n' roll songstress Hayley Williams shocked fans on July 28 by leaking 17 new tracks to her website. The Paramore singer, who is a Nashvillian, has kept her followers on the edge of their seats over the past week. On July 23, she debuted her new tune "Mirtazapine" on Nashville Public Radio WNXP. Days later, Paramore released a deluxe version of their 2005 debut album "All We Know Is Falling" with an archival EP from 2006. Now, Williams has inconspicuously released an album's worth of music on accessible with a code. "Submit the exclusive Good Dye Young 16-digit access code that was sent to your inbox," a pop-up on the website says, prompting fans to enter digits sent to them by Williams' hair product line. "Check your inbox for an email from Good Dye Young, if you don't have an email with a code, maybe ask a friend for theirs," it says. From there, fans can access an old-school desktop with MP3 files of Williams' tunes and click play on an audio player. The website also features a "misc" folder. Its contents include a video of the band performing in 2017, some lyrics scrawled in a coloring book, a photo of a 'Hayley Williams is my favorite band' t-shirt and an audio clip of a child saying 'I'm sorry that you're going through something hard.' What is the code to access Hayley Williams' new record? The code is available to customers who have purchased the new Good Dye Young shade Ego, according to Instagram comments. Williams' fans have also shared the code on a Reddit page and various social media posts. What new songs are on Hayley Williams' website? Kill Me True Believer Blood Bros Negative Self Talk EDAABP Mirtazapine Ice in My OJ Brotherly Hate Zissou Dream Girl In Shibuya Discover Channel Love Me Different Hard Whim Glum Disappearing Man I Won't Quit on You Audrey Gibbs is a music journalist with The Tennessean. You can reach her at agibbs@ This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Hayley Williams leaks 17 songs to her website. What we know Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-EU's $250 billion-per-year spending on US energy is unrealistic
By Kate Abnett and Arathy Somasekhar BRUSSELS/HOUSTON (Reuters) -The European Union's pledge to buy $250 billion of U.S. energy supplies per year is unrealistic because it would require the redirection of most U.S. energy exports towards Europe and the EU has little control over the energy its companies import. The U.S. and EU struck a framework trade deal on Sunday, which will impose 15% U.S. tariffs on most EU goods. The deal included a pledge for the EU to spend $250 billion annually on U.S. energy - imports of oil, liquefied natural gas and nuclear technology - for the next three years. Total U.S. energy exports to all buyers worldwide in 2024 amounted to $318 billion, U.S. Energy Information Administration data showed. Of that, the EU imported a combined $76 billion of U.S. petroleum, LNG and solid fuels such as coal in 2024, according to Reuters' calculations based on Eurostat data. More than tripling those imports was unrealistic, analysts said. Arturo Regalado, senior LNG analyst at Kpler, said the scope of the energy trade envisioned in the deal "exceeds market realities." "U.S. oil flows would need to fully redirect towards the EU to reach the target, or the value of LNG imports from the US would need to increase sixfold," Regalado said. There is strong competition for U.S. energy exports as other countries need the supplies - and have themselves pledged to buy more in trade deals. Japan agreed to a "major expansion of U.S. energy exports" in its U.S. trade deal last week, the White House said in a statement. South Korea has also indicated interest in investing and purchasing fuel from an Alaskan LNG project as it seeks a trade deal. Competition for U.S. energy could drive up benchmark U.S. oil and gas prices and encourage U.S. producers to favour exports over domestic supply. That could make fuel and power costs more expensive, which would be a political and economic headache for U.S. and EU leaders. Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal - or whether it covered items such as energy services or parts for power grids and plants. The EU estimates its member countries' plans to expand nuclear energy would require hundreds of billions of euros in investments by 2050. Its nuclear reactor-related imports, however, totalled just 53.3 billion euros in 2024, trade data shows. The energy pledge reflected the EU's analysis of how much U.S. energy supply it could accommodate, a senior EU official said, but that would depend on investments in U.S. oil and LNG infrastructure, European import infrastructure, and shipping capacity. "These figures, again, are not taken out of thin air. So yes, they require investments," said the senior official, who declined to be named. "Yes, it will vary according to the energy sources. But these are figures which are reachable." There was no public commitment to the delivery, the official added, because the EU would not buy the energy - its companies would. Private companies import most of Europe's oil, while a mix of private and state-run companies import gas. The European Commission can aggregate demand for LNG to negotiate better terms, but cannot force companies to buy fuel. That is a commercial decision. "It's just unrealistic," ICIS analysts Andreas Schröder and Ajay Parmar said in written comments to Reuters. "Either Europe pays a super high non-market reflective price for U.S. LNG or it takes way too much LNG volumes, more than it can cope with." U.S. PRODUCTION The United States is already the EU's top supplier of LNG and oil, shipping 44% of EU LNG needs and 15.4% of its oil in 2024, according to EU data. Raising imports to the target would require a U.S. LNG expansion way beyond what is planned through 2030, said Jacob Mandel, research lead at Aurora Energy Research. "You can add on capacity," Mandel said. "But if you're talking about the scale that would be necessary to meet these targets, the $250 billion, then it's not really feasible." Europe could buy $50 billion more of U.S. LNG annually as supply increases, he said. REPLACING RUSSIA The EU has said it could import more U.S. energy as its plan advances to end Russian oil and gas imports by 2028. The EU imported around 94 million barrels of Russian oil last year - 3% of the bloc's crude purchases - and 52 billion cubic metres (bcm) of Russian LNG and gas, according to EU data. For comparison, the EU imported 45 bcm of U.S. LNG last year. Higher EU fuel purchases would, however, run counter to forecasts for EU demand to decline as it shifts to clean energy, analysts said. "There is no major need for the EU to import more oil from the U.S., in fact, its oil demand peaked a number of years ago," Schröder and Parmar said. ($1 = 0.8571 euro) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's trade deals could push the average new car price well above $50,000
Markets have cheered President Trump's trade deals with Japan and the European Union. New 15% tariffs on most imported products from those countries are lower than many analysts expected, and they finally bring some predictability to Trump's chaotic on-and-off-and-on-again tariff policy. But import taxes are still going up, and past experience tells us that American consumers will ultimately bear most of the cost. Some of the most important imports from Europe and Japan are cars and car parts, and the higher taxes are sure to make all facets of owning a car costlier, just as drivers were hoping for a break from soaring prices. Trump is still working on trade deals with Canada, Mexico, and South Korea, other major sources of auto imports, and those outcomes will likely hike prices further. The average new car costs nearly $49,000, according to Kelley Blue Book. Trump's tariffs could raise costs by $3,000 or more once fully priced in, with costs rising less for cheaper models and more for luxury makes. It could take several months for those import taxes to work through supply chains, but unless there's a recession that ravages demand, car prices seem certain to hit new record highs during Trump's second presidential term. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Ten years ago, the average car price was just $30,000. Several factors have pushed prices higher. Americans increasingly buy big pickups and SUVs, which cost more. Manufacturers struggle to make money on small economy cars and have been pulling them from their lineups. An explosion of digital gizmos adds to the cost, as does new automaker investments in electrification, which still isn't profitable industrywide. The COVID pandemic turbocharged auto inflation due to supply chain disruptions, parts shortages, stronger demand for non-urban transportation, and other factors. Costlier new cars increased demand for used cars, fueling inflation there, as well. More expensive parts and higher repair costs caused a surge in insurance premiums, which have doubled during the last 10 years. The charts below show the trends. Auto inflation has stabilized — but prices aren't coming down. They're basically stuck at new, higher levels. The only real break for drivers has been gasoline prices, down about 10% during the last year, to a national average of about $3.15 per have been first-line victims of Trump's tariffs. That means their customers will feel the pain too. General Motors (GM) and Jeep-parent Stellantis (STLA) both said tariffs harmed profitability in the second quarter. Ford (F) will probably echo that theme when it reports earnings on July 30. Automakers aren't just suffering from tariffs on imported parts, but also from Trump's new 50% tariff on most imported steel and aluminum, which are major components in cars. Most car prices haven't risen yet. The all-in cost of buying a car has actually dropped from peak levels of 2022, when the average cost of a new car equated to 42 weeks of work for the typical buyer, according to the Cox Automotive/Moody's Analytics affordability index, which accounts for prices, incomes, and interest rates. That's now down to about 37 weeks of work. But overall costs are still about 10% higher in real terms than they were from 2012 through 2021. And it's only a matter of time before automakers start passing higher tariff costs onto buyers. Some of the most popular cars in the US market are imports. The Subaru Impreza, Toyota (TM) Prius, and Mazda (7261.T) Miata come from Japan, as a few examples. Many Audis, BMWs ( and Mercedes ( come from Europe, along with the Volkswagen (VWAGY) Golf. Those imports will all come with the new 15% tax. Korean imports include the Hyundai ( Elantra, Kia Soul, and many other models from the two Korean manufacturers. They seem likely to face the same 15% import tax, since that is becoming the standard for Trump's trade deals. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Mexico is the biggest source of automotive imports, supplying about 40% of all imported components, plus finished vehicles such as the Ford Maverick, Chevy Blazer, Mazda 3, and Nissan (NSANY) Sentra. Canada is another major source of vehicles such as the Chrysler Pacifica, Lexus RX 350, and many Honda (HMC) Civics. New Trump trade deals with Mexico and Canada seem further off, but in the meantime, he imposed a 25% tax on imported products from those countries that don't satisfy complex domestic-content requirements. All told, about 46% of the 16 million cars sold in the United States each year are imports, and almost all of the cheapest economy cars on the market are imports because carmakers generally can't afford to make them in America. Virtually all of those products will cost more because of the Trump tariffs. Earlier this year, when Trump was threatening 25% taxes on all imported cars, the Yale Budget Lab estimated such an across-the-board tariff would raise the cost of an average car by $6,400. That applied to all cars, whether imported or domestic, because price hikes in one major sector allow competitors to raise their prices too. If the across-the-board tariff is 15% instead of 25%, price hikes would obviously be less. Manufacturers might make adjustments and 'eat' some of the cost by accepting lower profits. But they can't eat all of the additional cost. Shareholders won't accept it, and with costs rising throughout the industry, all automakers will have pricing power, allowing them to charge more. Even if prices rise by less than under some other scenario, car buyers still have reason to expect lower prices from Trump, not higher ones. Trump ran for president last year, vowing to 'bring prices way down,' after three years of excessive inflation. Voters who went for Trump in 2024 said that was one of the main reasons they picked him. Yet earlier this year, Trump said he 'couldn't care less' if automakers raised prices to offset the cost of his tariffs. They're going to. Maybe it won't be by as much as analysts thought before, but that won't comfort buyers facing sticker shock anew at the dealership, service center, auto parts store, and insurance agency. Those Trump trade deals won't look so rosy once people start to pay for them. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
