Traders reject abrupt implementation of digital invoicing system
PESHAWAR: Traders and manufacturers rejected imposition of heavy penalties and declaring defaulters under section 25-A of the SRO-709 and abrupt implementation of digital invoicing system to integrate small and large scale businesses and industries in one go.
Business community raised voices against the government and FBR for its unilateral policy and initiatives, especially the aforementioned new system through three different resolutions that were adopted unanimously during an awareness session on Digital Invoicing organised by Sarhad Chamber of Commerce and Industry in collaboration with Federal Board of Revenue /PRAL (Pakistan Revenue Automation Private Limited) here in the chamber.
The session was chaired by SCCI president Fazal Moqeem Khan. Senior vice president of the chamber Abdul Jalil Jan, member of the SCCI executive committee Adnan Nasir, Aftab Iqbal, Ashfaq Ahmad, Muhammad Nadeem Rauf, Sajjad Zaheer, former senior vice president Imran Khan Mohmand, carpet exporters Mazhar ul Haq, Atif Rasheed Khawaja, Afshan Khan, Sadder, Fazal e Wahid, Secretary General SCCI Muqtasid Ahsan, representatives, managers of various industries, business and importers and exporters were in attendance in a large number.
The resolutions strongly denounced the imposition of Rs2Million to Rs3 Million penalties and declaring the business community defaulters over violation of not digitizing in digital invoicing system and imposing heavy penalties under the Section 25-A, and called it an attempt to discourage the business and industries and demanded immediate abolishment of the afore-stated section forthwith.
Another resolution against S.R.O.709(I)/2025, stating that businesses and industries are unprepared technically and physically to adopt this new system abruptly, therefore, it is strongly called to give an extension into implementation of the new system for an indefinite period.
In the third resolution, the business community suggested phase-wise and sector wise implementation of the new digital invoicing system, right from large-scale manufacturing industries to small businesses and traders.
Traders and manufactures opposed the section 25-A that has made mandatory to electronically integrate their hardware and software with FBR's computerized system through a license integrator or PRAL and to issue invoices, which unable for them to adopt abruptly while keeping in inadequate digital infrastructure, particularly in underdeveloped and remote industrial zones, insufficient technical readiness among enterprises, especially SMEs, limited digital literacy and capacity, both at user and support levels. They viewed that FBR is not itself fully digitized. Business community furthermore pointed out that frequent downtime of FBR's IRIS services couldn't enable them to generate invoices in wake of inaccessibility of the system.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PBA refutes reports on remittance subsidies to banks
The Pakistan Banks Association (PBA) rejected on Monday what it called 'misleading assertions' in recent press coverage suggesting that government subsidies to banks under remittance incentive schemes serve no economic purpose. 'Such narratives dangerously undermine public confidence at a time when Pakistan's financial stability depends on robust formal remittance flows,' PBA statement read. It further said when the Pakistan Remittance Initiative (PRI) was conceptualised in 2008, formal remittances stood at only $6.5 billion, while an estimated $20 billion flowed through undocumented hawala/hundi channels, exacerbating balance of payments pressures. 'The PRI, launched in 2009, was a homegrown solution to shift flows to formal banking channels, offering an initial incentive of SAR 20 per transaction, approximately 2.25% of the average $500 transaction, which was far more viable than foreign borrowings carrying interest rates above 3.5% plus long-term repayment obligations and exchange rate risks. In contrast, PRI incentives are one-time PKR payments with no repayment liability, making them a strategic win-win for Pakistan's economy.' The PBA was of the view that banks do not profit from the incentives. 'In reality, they bear enormous costs to remain competitive, offering higher rebates and FX premiums to Money Transfer Operators (MTOs) and remitters abroad. These costs are only partially offset by government incentives, with the remainder absorbed by banks to maintain essential liquidity for import payments and economic stability.' For example, it added, banks often pay Rs3-5 per USD premium over interbank rates to attract flows that would otherwise revert to hawala, incurring direct losses in the national interest. 'Contrary to claims, banks invest heavily in compliance systems, international correspondent banking relationships, technology platforms, and customer outreach to process remittances securely and efficiently,' the PBA said. Approximately 90% of rebates before FY25 and over 100% under FY25 schemes were passed directly to international partners, leaving no direct profit for banks, according to the association. 'Furthermore, banks pay their partners upfront while government reimbursements are delayed by months, imposing significant working capital costs. 'Banks submit monthly data of PRI remittances to SBP, duly reviewed and certified by Internal Audits of the Banks. SBP also conducts review of this certified data before making payment of incentive under the scheme.' Allegations that banks manipulate remittance data, launder undeclared funds, or facilitate tax evasion 'are baseless', the PBA said. It further said banks operate under strict SBP regulations, AML/CFT frameworks, and independent audits. The classification of freelancer and IT exporter earnings as remittances is a policy classification issue needing regulatory clarity, not bank misconduct, the press release stated. 'It is telling that such narratives are often promoted by vested interests seeking to dismantle the formal banking remittance ecosystem to divert flows back into their networks. These banking-led initiatives have been instrumental in ensuring Pakistan's compliance with global AML/CFT standards, preventing potential blacklisting that would cripple the economy. 'Pakistan's banks continue to offer competitive FX rates despite incurring losses, solely to preserve formal flows. Without these incentives, remittances would revert to undocumented channels, undermining fiscal sustainability and increasing dependence on costly foreign borrowing.' According to the PBA, the suggestion that banks are subsidised 'ignores the economic reality that these incentives ensure secure, documented, and traceable remittance flows critical for Pakistan's economy'. 'Banks remain among the country's largest taxpayers and employers, paying over Rs850 billion in taxes annually, while financing every facet of national economic activity. 'Mischaracterising their role only weakens public trust at a time when economic unity and realism are paramount.' The PBA said while modalities could be improved over time, PRI remained a strategic success story. 'The PBA remains committed to working with policymakers to strengthen Pakistan's economy, maintain global compliance, and safeguard financial stability, but rejects in the strongest terms any narrative driven by vested interests that undermines the banking sector's contributions and national economic security. 'PRI is an essential driver striving for Pakistan's financial independence and diversion from reliance on international debt and forex assistance,' the press release read.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PBA refutes misleading claims on remittance subsidies
Listen to article The Pakistan Banks Association (PBA) rejected on Monday misleading assertions in recent press coverage suggesting that government subsidies to banks under remittance incentive schemes serve no economic purpose. In a detailed statement, the PBA cautioned that such narratives risk undermining public confidence in formal remittance channels at a time when financial stability relies on documented foreign inflows. "When the Pakistan Remittance Initiative (PRI) was conceptualised in 2008, formal remittances stood at only $6.5 billion, while an estimated $20b flowed through undocumented hawala/hundi channels, exacerbating balance of payments pressures," read the statement. The PRI, launched in 2009, was a homegrown solution to shift flows to formal banking channels, offering an initial incentive of SAR 20 per transaction, approximately 2.25% of the average $500 transaction, which was far more viable than foreign borrowings carrying interest rates above 3.5% plus long-term repayment obligations and exchange rate risks, it added. "In contrast, PRI incentives are one-time PKR payments with no repayment liability, making them a strategic win-win for Pakistan's economy. Banks do not profit from these incentives." In reality, they bear enormous costs to remain competitive, offering higher rebates and FX premiums to Money Transfer Operators (MTOs) and remitters abroad, according to the statement. These costs are only partially offset by government incentives, with the remainder absorbed by banks to maintain essential liquidity for import payments and economic stability. "For example, banks often pay Rs3-5 per USD premium over interbank rates to attract flows that would otherwise revert to hawala, incurring direct losses in the national interest," explained PBA. "Contrary to claims, banks invest heavily in compliance systems, international correspondent banking relationships, technology platforms, and customer outreach to process remittances securely and efficiently," it added. Approximately 90% of rebates before FY25 and over 100% under FY25 schemes are passed directly to international partners, leaving no direct profit for banks, according to PBA. Furthermore, banks pay their partners upfront while government reimbursements are delayed by months, imposing significant working capital costs. Banks submit monthly data of PRI remittances to SBP, duly reviewed and certified by Internal Audits of the Banks. SBP also conducts review of this certified data before making payment of incentive under the scheme. Allegations that banks manipulate remittance data, launder undeclared funds, or facilitate tax evasion are baseless, read the statement. Banks operate under strict SBP regulations, AML/CFT frameworks, and independent audits. The classification of freelancer and IT exporter earnings as remittances is a policy classification issue needing regulatory clarity, not bank misconduct. It is telling that such narratives are often promoted by vested interests seeking to dismantle the formal banking remittance ecosystem to divert flows back into their networks, maintained PBA. "These banking-led initiatives have been instrumental in ensuring Pakistan's compliance with global AML/CFT standards, preventing potential blacklisting that would cripple the economy. Pakistan's banks continue to offer competitive FX rates despite incurring losses, solely to preserve formal flows. Without these incentives, remittances would revert to undocumented channels, undermining fiscal sustainability and increasing dependence on costly foreign borrowing. The suggestion that banks are subsidised ignores the economic reality that these incentives ensure secure, documented, and traceable remittance flows critical for Pakistan's economy." Banks remain among the country's largest taxpayers and employers, paying over Rs 850b in taxes annually, while financing every facet of national economic activity. Mischaracterising their role only weakens public trust at a time when economic unity and realism are paramount, according to PBA. While modalities can be improved over time, PRI remains a strategic success story. "The PBA remains committed to working with policymakers to strengthen Pakistan's economy, maintain global compliance, and safeguard financial stability, but rejects in the strongest terms any narrative driven by vested interests that undermines the banking sector's contributions and national economic security," read the statement. PRI is an essential driver striving for Pakistan's financial independence and diversion from reliance on international debt and forex assistance.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan Business Council complains against FBR member
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) has lodged a strong protest with Chairman Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Rashid Mahmood Langrial against alleged rude behaviour of FBR Member Inland Revenue (Policy) during meetings of the Anomalies Committees. Ehsan Malik, Chairman Anomalies Committee (Business) in a letter to FBR Chairman said that despite repeated requests the meetings of the Anomalies Committees were not called early enough to allow changes in the fiscal bill, nor was the Member IR (Policy) available to start the meeting on time or to attend it for more than ten minutes. 'We were informed that he had urgent matters to attend to. Members of the Anomalies Committee were kept waiting from 2 pm to 2.45 pm on June 24th and then after a ten-minute presence, the Member IR (Policy) was called out, leaving no one from the FBR in the room. Members of the Committee waited for another 45 minutes before starting the discussion. Member IR (Policy) did not join the meeting till its conclusion. 'The Anomalies Committee (Business) was established by you and was composed of the Presidents and CEOs of eleven leading Chambers and business bodies of Pakistan. Besides their own businesses, the members have important matters concerning their constituents to take care of. Their time is valuable. Keeping them waiting was rude and disrespectful. Only taxpayers can have anomalies in budget proposals, and they must be heard. At my request, the members abstained from resigning and walking out of the meeting. 'I am attaching the minutes of the meeting that we had to conduct without the Member IR (Policy). You will note many anomalies that need to be addressed. Kindly let us know how you intend to deal with these, now that the Finance Bill has been passed. Finally, we appreciate the way the Customs meeting was held.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
