&w=3840&q=100)
ED attaches assets worth Rs 34 crore of Kannada actor Ranya Rao in gold-smuggling case, calls it 'well-structured operation'
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) alleged on Friday that Kannada actor Ranya Rao 'orchestrated' a 'well-structured' operation with her associates for smuggling gold into India as it attached her assets worth more than Rs 34 crore as part of a money-laundering investigation.
Harshavardini Ranya alias Ranya Rao (32) was arrested by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) from Bengaluru's Kempegowda International Airport on March 3 after she landed from Dubai. DRI officials recovered 14.2 kg of gold bars worth Rs 12.56 crore from her possession.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The ED said in a statement that the 'possible' involvement of some public servants in facilitating Rao's illicit activities is under scrutiny as the actor was 'assisted' at the airport upon her arrival in India.
The federal probe agency said a provisional order was issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to attach Rao's house in Victoria Layout and a plot located in Arkavathi Layout in Bengaluru, an industrial land in Tumkur and an agricultural land in Anekal taluk.
These assets have a combined fair market value of Rs 34.12 crore, it said.
A PMLA case was filed against Rao and some others after taking cognisance of a March CBI FIR and a DRI complaint about a larger gold-smuggling racket in India.
The
CBI FIR also pertained to the interception of two foreign nationals — an Omani and a UAE citizen — at the Mumbai International Airport with 21.28 kg of smuggled foreign-origin gold valued at Rs 18.92 crore.
The actor's 'involvement' in generating, possessing and circulating proceeds of crime was further 'corroborated' by her digital footprint, including invoices, export declarations, foreign-remittance records and recorded chats, establishing her 'active role' in the smuggling syndicate, the ED claimed.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Ranya Rao, in active collusion with Tarun Konduru Raju and others, orchestrated a well-structured operation for smuggling gold into India.
'Gold was procured from suppliers based in Dubai, Uganda and other jurisdictions, and payments were made through hawala channels in cash, thereby circumventing legal financial systems,' the agency said.
It claimed that false customs declarations were filed in Dubai, fraudulently declaring the destination of gold shipments as Switzerland or the United States, while the actual travel of the gold smugglers was to India.
It was found that dual sets of travel documents were used — one for the declared export destination and the other for their actual arrival in India — to evade scrutiny and facilitate smuggling through Indian airports, the ED said.
The smuggled gold was then sold within India for cash to jewellers and other local entities, and the proceeds were subsequently laundered through 'hawala' remittances abroad to finance repeat consignments for smuggling more gold into India, the agency has found.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It said 'evidence' retrieved from seized mobile phones and a forensic extraction of digital devices has revealed 'detailed coordination' with foreign gold suppliers, 'hawala' operators and Dubai-based customs agents.
Rao, according to the agency, denied knowledge of the seized gold and other assets during the recording of her statement by the ED, but her claims were 'contradictory' when compared with the seized physical evidence, including customs documents bearing her name, travel and purchase records, and digital conversations.
The total proceeds of crime identified by the ED in the case stands at Rs 55.62 crore.
This includes about Rs 38.32 crore identified through an analysis of the evidence gathered during the course of the investigation like foreign invoices, customs declarations and hawala-linked remittances, according to the agency.
The attachment, the ED said, was carried out to prevent concealment or alienation of the tainted assets and secure the proceeds of crime even as it added that the investigation in the case is in progress, including identifying other individuals involved in the syndicate.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A search of Rao's residence, post her arrest, unearthed an 'unaccounted' amount of Rs 2.67 crore in cash and gold jewellery worth Rs 2.06 crore.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fake money laundering case: Hyderabad retired employee duped of Rs 53 lakh, fraudsters posing as Delhi Police
HYDERABAD: Cyber fraudsters, posing as Delhi police officials, duped a 77-year-old retired employee from Ameerpet of Rs 53 lakh. The fraudsters threatened the victim with arrest in a fake money-laundering case and forced him to transfer the amount for 'RBI verification'. The victim approached the Hyderabad Cyber Crimes police on Friday. In his complaint, the victim stated that he received a video call on June 18 from a man claiming to be a DCP, Delhi. "The caller appeared in police uniform and cited a bogus case number, warning that all my bank accounts would be frozen and an arrest warrant would be issued unless I proved my funds were legitimate," he said. Between June 19 and 26, the victim made four transfers - totalling Rs 53 lakh - to the bank accounts in the names of Sitaram Saveleram Nanale, Umang Mukesh Bhai Solanki, Mangesh Pundalik Raghu Vanshi, and Komal Anil Bulani. When no money was returned, the victim realised he had been cheated and lodged a complaint.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Delhi Shocker: 17-Year-Old Kills Teenage Neighbour With Broken TV Glass In Mandawali
The victim was rushed to the hospital following the crime, but he succumbed to his injuries. A 15-year-old A 17-year-old boy allegedly killed his 15-year-old neighbour during a heated argument in Delhi's Mandawali area. The accused allegedly stabbed his neighbour with a piece of glass from a broken television picture tube. The victim sustained critical injuries and was rushed to a nearby hospital, where he succumbed to his wounds. The incident came only days after a domestic helper killed his forty-two-year-old employer and her 14-year-old son 'in a fit of rage'. Identified as Mukesh, the 24-year-old was arrested on board a train at Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction. He was attempting to flee to his home in Hajipur. Mukesh allegedly attacked Ruchika and her son with a sharp weapon after being reprimanded by the woman over unpaid dues of Rs 45,000 and frequent absence from work. First Published: July 06, 2025, 12:04 IST
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Insolvency law cannot override PMLA, says NCLAT; upholds asset attachment by ED
New Delhi, Jul 6 (PTI) Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code cannot override the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), said appellate tribunal NCLAT, adding assets of an debt-ridden firm once attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and confirmed by competent authority cannot be released for its resolution. Under section 14 of IBC, a moratorium is applied on those assets for the purpose of resolution. However, if the property is alleged to be "proceeds of crime" and is already under adjudication by competent authority under a penal statute, such property cannot be deemed to be part of the freely available resolution estate, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) said. The appellate tribunal held that if there is any attachment by ED under the PMLA, which is "validly made and confirmed, it cannot be undone under IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code). Citing section 238 of IBC, which has an overriding effect over other laws, a three-member NCLAT bench said it "cannot override the PMLA in respect of proceedings involving proceeds of crime." PMLA and IBC operate in distinct spheres and there is no "irreconcilable inconsistency" exists between the two, said NCLAT adding ED does not act as a creditor, but as a public enforcement agency. "The attached assets are not to satisfy creditors, but to uphold penal objectives and international obligations under FATF and UN Conventions," said the appellate tribunal, while upholding an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). NCLAT also cited a directive issued by the Supreme Court in the Embassy Property matter, saying it "lacks jurisdiction to interfere with the PAO, which has been subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA". The appellate tribunal's 36-page-order came over a plea filed by the resolution professional of Dunar Foods, challenging an NCLT ruling, which had refused to direct the ED to release provisionally attached assets of the debt-ridden company. On December 22, 2027, the Mumbai bench of NCLT had ordered insolvency proceedings against Dunar Foods, which was engaged in processing and exporting basmati rice. The insolvency petition was filed by a consortium of banks led by public sector lender SBI for a loan repayment default of ₹ 758.73 crore. Accordingly, CIRP (corporate insolvency resolution process) was initiated against Dunar Foods with the appointment of a resolution professional. Meanwhile, the ED initiated an investigation under PMLA against PD Agroprocessors, an associate company of Dunar Foods. It traced the flow of alleged tainted funds to Dunar Foods based on scheduled offences under the Indian Penal Code and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), alleging that large export advances received by Dunar Foods from PD Agroprocessors were proceeds of crime. ED then attached Dunar Foods' several immovable and movable assets worth ₹ 177.33 crore, prompting the resolution professional (RP) of the firm to move NCLT seeking immediate de-attachment of the provisionally attached properties. However, the NCLT on May 21, 2018 dismissed the RP's application and held that the provisional attachment order issued by the ED under PMLA did not fall within the scope of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. NCLT had said that PMLA is a special penal statute and has a 'distinct adjudicatory mechanism', hence unless and until the attachment was set aside by the PMLA adjudicating authority, the NCLT has no jurisdiction to direct its release. Aggrieved by this decision, Dunar Foods' RP then approached appellate tribunal NCLAT. Meanwhile, the lenders of Dunar Foods approved the resolution plan submitted by Amit Gupta in November 2019 during the pendency of the appeal in NCLAT. The appellate tribunal said though Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) was issued by ED after the commencement of CIRP, ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) investigation commenced as far back as 2013.
