logo
National chief wants senators to slow down major projects bill, as senator collapses

National chief wants senators to slow down major projects bill, as senator collapses

The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations is calling on senators to slow down Ottawa's sprint to pass Prime Minister Mark Carney 's controversial major projects bill this week.
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said Wednesday she hopes the Senate "does the right thing this week" and allows more time to study the legislation and bring forward amendments — a call that went largely unanswered when she issued it to MPs.
The legislation was introduced in the upper chamber on Wednesday and the Senate completed second reading, after the bill was fast-tracked through the House of Commons and went through a rare pre-study by the Senate.
A programming motion adopted by the chamber fixes the bill to a tight schedule, with a final vote that must take place by the end of Friday.
The politically charged legislation has angered Indigenous and environmental groups who criticize the government for rushing to grant itself sweeping new powers to fast-track project permits.
But Carney has said Canada is facing an economic crisis due to the trade war with the United States and the country urgently needs to approve new "nation-building" projects.
Senate debate on the bill was suspended for roughly 30 minutes by Speaker Raymonde Gagné after Sen. Patrick Brazeau collapsed sideways onto the floor after rising to speak. A Senate spokesman said the Quebec senator appears to be recovering.
Before collapsing, Brazeau questioned the value of the government holding consultations after the legislation passes with national Indigenous organizations, given they all receive funding from Ottawa. He said they are largely seen not to speak on behalf of rights-holding individuals and communities.
"They are political lobby organizations," Brazeau said. "Is that really helping the process for real First Nations in this country?"
The projects bill found broad support in the Commons, where the Conservatives voted with the Liberals to pass it at third reading. It succeeded by a margin of 306 votes to 31 on June 20, with one Liberal MP voting against it.
Sen. Paul Prosper said in an interview Tuesday night that the bill is moving too quickly through Parliament, and it needs to better reflect concerns raised by Indigenous groups who fear that accelerated project approvals will push aside their rights.
He has vowed to try to amend the bill but was not ready to say how.
'The overall objective of the bill, I'm sure a lot of people resonate with that and see the need for it," Prosper said. "But does it have to be within this prescribed and shortened timeline when you're not following the typical democratic process to consider something like this?
"There are some overarching provisions that allow the government to suspend existing laws and legislation, which is an extraordinary power in that regard. So there might be a need for some parameters to help ensure certain considerations with respect to the environment, and which are integral to ensure Indigenous issues are taken into account."
Conservative Senate Leader Leo Housakos said the bill is crucial for Canada's economic potential, but said the government has failed to provide enough details to measure the legislation's economic impact.
Meanwhile, Gagné rejected a request from Sen. Marilou McPhedran to split the bill into separate votes, which theoretically would have allowed senators to pass some parts of the legislation while rejecting others. Gagné said this did not fit Senate protocol for final votes on a bill.
Woodhouse Nepinak pointed out that the concept of "free, prior and informed consent" — a condition of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that Canada approved — is not mentioned in the bill itself, despite Carney and his ministers saying they'll consult with Indigenous Peoples.
She said she's also worried about the Indigenous Advisory Council the government wants to insert into the projects' approval process. She said the government can't use that body to claim it consulted with First Nations because that consultation wouldn't take into account the varied positions of leaders across the country.
"An advisory council appointed by the government will not be accountable to First Nations and will have no real power to ensure First Nations involvement in the project," she said.
Conservative Sen. Mary Jane McCallum of northern Manitoba argued there is no need for the bill.
"Resource extraction industries have already been granted the power to continue to do catastrophic harm to pollute and to destroy," she said. "As First Nations, we have been sacrificed for the greater good all our lives."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Carney stumbles in negotiations with Trump, how should the Conservatives respond?
As Carney stumbles in negotiations with Trump, how should the Conservatives respond?

Toronto Star

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

As Carney stumbles in negotiations with Trump, how should the Conservatives respond?

It is said that the heart wants what it wants, an axiom the federal Conservatives must quickly come to terms with. Although Prime Minister Mark Carney campaigned on a promise in March to inflict 'maximum pain' on the United States, his government unilaterally recanted tens of billions of dollars' worth of counter-tariffs against it a month later. Carney then ditched the Liberals' controversial digital services tax — despite having received zero concessions from U.S. President Donald Trump in return. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

Journalists blocked in wake of minister's ‘hot mic' comments on ASL interpreter
Journalists blocked in wake of minister's ‘hot mic' comments on ASL interpreter

Winnipeg Free Press

time5 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Journalists blocked in wake of minister's ‘hot mic' comments on ASL interpreter

Winnipeg-based Aboriginal Peoples Television Network says its journalists were blocked from Manitoba Families Minister Nahanni Fontaine's social media feed after they reported on controversial comments she made last month at a graduation event for Indigenous women. The accessibility minister later expressed remorse after being heard on an open microphone June 26 complaining about an American Sign Language interpreter at the event and swearing. Premier Wab Kinew has since defended Fontaine, saying she 'apologized and is putting in the work with the community, so it's with the greatest of humility that I want to ask folks in the deaf community to keep working with her.' This week, APTN reported its journalists were blocked from following the minister on social media. The Winnipeg-based network said news staff (some as far away as Halifax), digital media editors and a lineup producer weren't able to see Fontaine's posts. MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES Families Minister Nahanni Fontaine 'We follow a lot of people, her among them,' said APTN executive director of news and current affairs Cheryl McKenzie. APTN staff first noticed the issue July 4, nearly a week after the hot mic incident, she said. The network contacted Manitoba cabinet communications that day and, after repeated interview requests, received a statement from Fontaine on Wednesday acknowledging APTN journalists had been blocked from her social media. 'Immediately upon learning that journalists were blocked on my social media account, I directed staff to reverse this decision,' APTN reported Fontaine as saying. When asked if the minister ordered her staff to block APTN, Fontaine issued a statement late Friday saying she takes full responsibility for her office. 'I recognize the important role media plays in our democracy,' said Fontaine, the government house leader who also spearheaded an all-party committee to save local journalism. 'That is why my account remains open to the media and I remain available to respond to media questions.' One political observer said he can't imagine Fontaine, a proud First Nations person, purposely blocking APTN employees after dealing with the fallout from her hot mic comments. 'I doubt very much that she would be showing some vindictiveness, in light of her behaviour since that happened,' said University of Manitoba political studies Prof. Christopher Adams. 'Since this incident, Nahanni Fontaine has fallen on her sword numerous times. 'There's no doubt that it feeds into some of the images that people have of her as being a difficult, strong-minded political actor,' Adams said. 'It was a real political mistake, but she has shown great remorse.' Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. Progressive Conservative Leader Obby Khan disagreed, calling it 'a major red flag.' 'This move is vindictive, it's amateur, it's petty, it's irresponsible by an NDP minister to block journalists that are doing their job,' Khan said. 'She's trying to avoid accountability and responsibility for her actions.' APTN's McKenzie said it's a 'slippery slope to a very closed society … The media has a role in democracy and if elected officials are allowed to just sidestep even the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is that really the Canada that people want?' She said the network received a 'huge' response from the deaf and hard of hearing community after reporting the initial story. 'We've also heard a lot from minister Fontaine's supporters, too, saying that we need to be talking more about her accomplishments and what she's been doing.' Carol SandersLegislature reporter Carol Sanders is a reporter at the Free Press legislature bureau. The former general assignment reporter and copy editor joined the paper in 1997. Read more about Carol. Every piece of reporting Carol produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Carney's one-day meeting with chiefs too little, too late
Carney's one-day meeting with chiefs too little, too late

Winnipeg Free Press

time6 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Carney's one-day meeting with chiefs too little, too late

Opinion First Nations chiefs and leaders will convene for a one-day meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, several key ministers, and bureaucrats on Thursday to discuss the controversial One Canadian Economy Act. The meeting will take place at the Canadian Museum of History in Gatineau, Que., but it will be about the future of the country. It's the first of three 'summits' between the federal government and chiefs — rights holders when it comes to the use of land and water in Canada. Meetings with Inuit and Métis leaders have been promised for later this summer. JUSTIN TANG / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Prime Minister Mark Carney will meet with First Nations chiefs and leaders on Thursday to discuss the controversial One Canadian Economy Act. The One Canadian Economy Act passed June 26 after sailing through Parliament over 20 days with little debate or amendments. There was no consultation with Indigenous peoples, who have a legal and constitutional right to consent to any Canadian law that affects Indigenous rights. Sen. Paul Prosper, a Mi'kmaq leader and former chief, tried to amend the bill to include language that would demand adherence to Indigenous rights. While he attained the support of 28 of 105 senators, that amendment was voted down. There is perhaps no law that would affect Indigenous rights more than this one, which centralizes control of the approval of development and resource projects deemed 'of national interest' by the federal government. The One Canadian Economy Act allows for selected projects to be passed by cabinet without parliamentary discussion and without meeting the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and other environmental regulations. While Indigenous rights are mentioned in the law, the legal and constitutional requirement for Indigenous rights to be considered and protected alongside the 'free, prior, and informed consent' of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people is vague and uses weak language – leading to a lot of uncertainty about how the law will be implemented. Next week's meeting is supposed to provide the prime minister and his ministers an opportunity to alleviate the concerns of First Nations. Wait till they find out it takes a day just for 600-plus chiefs to introduce themselves. In other words, not much will be accomplished by a one-day meeting that tries to deal with a century-old problem. If there is one thing certain about the first four months of the Carney government, it is that he is repeating some alarming trends when it comes to Indigenous peoples and rights. Namely, Canada has historically tried to operate without Indigenous involvement; this cycle is rearing it's ugly head again. While hosting three First Nations leaders in his cabinet and expressing frequently that he respects Indigenous rights and peoples, an increasing amount of leaders say they feel alienated, excluded, and left behind — and not just due to the new law. Take, for example, the fact that it has already passed — with First Nations leaders invited after the fact to hear about how they can be involved (read: co-own) in projects in the 'national interest' — which the government has said will involve mines and pipelines and NOT what First Nations actually need for economic survival: schools, adequate roads, decent housing, and clean drinking water (just to name a few things). There are more insulting features about the July 17 meeting, including the late release of details (shared July 10), chiefs must only come alone, and are encouraged to submit questions 'beforehand.' Some chiefs weren't invited while others are too busy dealing with emergencies like wildfires. A few announced they wouldn't attend. Chief Wifred King of the Gull Bay First Nation in Ontario told APTN: ' A one-day meeting with potentially 600 chiefs — I don't know how that's going to go. And in addition to that, if it's going to be an invitation by Zoom as well it will be pretty chaotic for First Nations to get their voices heard. I just think it's going to be a waste of time.' There are other issues, including Carney's attention to dealing with the pressing economic and political threats of U.S. President Donald Trump. Indigenous peoples, virtually across the board, have understood the country is facing an unprecedented time. In fact, one is hard-pressed to imagine a time when Indigenous communities were more proud of Canadian sovereignty, independence, and even the flag. Wednesdays Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences. Indigenous leaders have been less on board for the Carney government's reactions to Trump's threats. Take, for example, Carney's vow to drastically cut the public service — which will result in a $5-billion cut to Indigenous Services Canada, an underserviced and under-delivering department. The problem Carney has is that fighting Trump is one thing, while governing is another. It's something the prime minister will need to show to the most important and first rights holders who hold the key to unlocking projects in the 'national interest' on July 17. Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store