Democrats stoke the flames of MAGA world's Epstein saga: From the Politics Desk
In today's edition, Ben Kamisar explores how Democrats have changed their tune on the Jeffrey Epstein files as they try to exploit a divide between President Donald Trump and his base. Plus, Alexandra Marquez and Alex Tabet preview tomorrow's special House primary in Arizona, which is serving as a test for young progressives.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Adam Wollner
Democrats are echoing criticism from the right of how President Donald Trump and his administration have handled case files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
It's a stark reversal for a party that swiftly condemned Trump's unfounded claims about the investigation into the financier and his death nearly six years ago.
Democrats have now spent days poking the bear after an administration memo knocked down conspiracy theories related to Epstein's past activities and his suicide in 2019. Democratic lawmakers are demanding that the Trump administration release more documents related to the investigation into Epstein, accusing the president and his allies of either a cover-up or a cynical ploy to exploit conspiracy theories about Epstein for political gain.
And Democratic candidates and committees have been fanning the flames as some of Trump's most prominent right-wing supporters threaten a revolt over the issue.
With MAGA world seething, key members of his administration at odds and Trump himself on the defense, Democrats are embracing the raw politics of the situation, despite their previous scolding.
On social media: The DNC launched a new account on X that posts daily messages reminding its followers that Trump has 'not released the Epstein files.' The account has also reposted Trump-focused, Epstein-related criticism from key social media influencers.
On Capitol Hill: Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, announced he would introduce a resolution 'demanding the Trump administration release all files related to the Epstein case.'
On the campaign trail: Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., who is running for re-election in a state that went red in last year's presidential election, criticized Trump on the issue while invoking the sexual misconduct and abuse allegations against the president and his past social relationship with Epstein. (Trump has denied allegations of sexual misconduct and has denied any impropriety related to Epstein's crimes.)
Red more from Ben →
Related: Tucker Carlson leads MAGA's worried warriors in questioning Trump, by Allan Smith
It's hot election summer — at least according to Democrats who are organizing behind youthful and progressive candidates in a series of off-year primaries.
First was Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old state legislator who won New York's Democratic mayoral primary over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. (More on that race below.) Now, a special election for a vacant congressional seat in southern Arizona is grabbing attention in part because of a young Democrat's campaign.
After Rep. Raúl Grijalva died in March at 77, Deja Foxx, 25, is gaining ground ahead of Tuesday's special Democratic primary in Arizona's 7th District, running on a message of generational change and hoping to leverage support from her almost 400,000 TikTok followers and 240,000 Instagram followers. But she doesn't have a clear path against former Pima County Supervisor Adelita Grijalva, the late congressman's daughter and former state Rep. Daniel Hernandez.
Grijalva, 54, with endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., doesn't give Foxx the same ideological opening that Mamdani exploited in New York. Not only did Grijalva's father serve the district in Congress for over 20 years, but Hernandez also has siblings who serve in the state House.
Still, the race has become part of a broader nationwide conversation among Democrats about the ages of their party's elected leaders and the desire for generational change.
In a recent interview, Foxx acknowledged that her age has played a role in her campaign messaging and the support she has drawn from young people across the country.
'We have lost ground with young people as a party for the first time in decades ... and it's not enough to just put our members of Congress on TikTok, right, or brief them on the trends or put mini-mics in their face. We need to give young people real leadership,' Foxx said.
Whoever wins the Democratic primary is likely to win September's general special election to represent a stretch from Tucson to the U.S.-Mexico border.
Read more from Alexandra and Alex →
🇺🇦 Tough talk: Trump said the U.S. will send weapons to Ukraine through NATO, which will pay for and distribute them, and threatened secondary tariffs targeting Russia if a ceasefire deal isn't reached. Read more →
⚖️ SCOTUS watch: The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to move ahead with plans to carry out mass layoffs at the Department of Education that were blocked by a federal judge. Read more →
🗽 Only in New York: Andrew Cuomo announced that he will run for New York City mayor as a third-party candidate after losing to Zohran Mamdani in last month's Democratic primary. Read more →
➡️ Mass deportation fallout: Immigrants in overfilled ICE centers are complaining of hunger, food shortages and spoiled food, detainees and immigration advocates say. Read more →
🪙 Crypto surge: Bitcoin hit a new record price amid bullishness about developments on Capitol Hill and concerns about inflation and the U.S. dollar's declining value. Read more →
👑 Royal visit: Trump will make an unprecedented second state trip to the United Kingdom in September along with first lady Melania Trump. Read more →
👀 2028 watch: Kentucky Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear said on 'Meet the Press' that he will 'take a look' at running for president. Read more →
📺 More from MTP: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that Trump wants the Federal Emergency Management Association 'remade' rather than dismantled entirely. Read more →
Follow live politics updates →
That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.com
And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOJ urges Supreme Court to turn away Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal
The Department of Justice on Monday urged the Supreme Court to turn away an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the former associate of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with and aiding Epstein in his sexual abuse of underage girls. Maxwell, 63, had urged the court earlier this year to review her case, arguing that an unusual co-conspirator's clause in Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida barred her subsequent prosecution in New York. A district court and a federal appeals court previously rejected that argument, and the DOJ today urged the high court to do the same. "That contention is incorrect, and petitioner does not show that it would succeed in any court of appeals," wrote U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer. At the core of Maxwell's petition for SCOTUS review is her contention that the language of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) specifically limited his protection to the Southern District of Florida, whereas the language of the co-conspirator clause should have been read to prohibit her prosecution in any federal district. The co-conspirator clause stated that if "Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to" four of Epstein's assistants. Maxwell was not among the four women named. MORE: Timeline: Jeffrey Epstein memo causes controversy among MAGA base "Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein," her attorneys wrote in their petition to SCOTUS in April. The DOJ, however, argues in their response that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Florida -- then led by R. Alexander Acosta -- did not intend to bind other federal districts and had no authority to do so without the approval of those districts or the Criminal Division of the DOJ. "And there is no indication here that anyone involved in negotiating Epstein's NPA obtained the necessary approval for binding other USAOs or thought it was necessary," the DOJ's brief states. The DOJ also contends that – even if the co-conspirators clause could be read to apply nationwide as Maxwell claims - there is no evidence that the parties who negotiated the NPA intended for the co-conspirators clause to benefit Maxwell, who the government describes as "at most, an incidental third-party beneficiary of the agreement." "The government was not even aware of [Maxwell's] role in Epstein's scheme at that time," Sauer wrote, and urged the justices to deny Maxwell's petition for certiorari. In a statement Monday, an attorney for Maxwell hinted at the swirling controversy surrounding the Trump administration's decision not to release any further records related to investigations of Epstein. "I'd be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal. He's the ultimate dealmaker—and I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it. With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the government made and broke," wrote David Oscar Markus. MORE: Trump supporters angry over Justice Department's Epstein memo Sigrid McCawley, an attorney who has represented hundreds of alleged Epstein victims, including one of the trial's key witnesses against Maxwell, told ABC News in a statement that Maxwell should stay behind bars. "After two-plus decades of recruiting and abusing young girls trapped in Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking enterprise, Ghislaine Maxwell has again attempted to escape accountability by trying to hide behind the non-prosecution agreement. Maxwell does not deserve any protection, and she should remain in prison for the horrific crimes she committed," wrote McCawley, a managing partner at Boies Schiller Flexner. Maxwell -- who pleaded not guilty to all the criminal charges against her -- was convicted by a jury in 2021 on five of six counts, including conspiracy, sex trafficking of a minor, and transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. Prosecutors alleged that Maxwell played a "key role" in a multi-state sex trafficking scheme in which she allegedly "befriended" and later "enticed and groomed multiple minor girls to engage in sex acts with Epstein" and was also, at times, "present for and involved" in the abuse herself. "A unanimous jury has found Ghislaine Maxwell guilty of one of the worst crimes imaginable -- facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of children," then-U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in a statement following the verdict.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DC Council partially funds ranked choice voting, falls short of full implementation
The Brief D.C. council voted to partially fund a ranked choice voting measure, supported by 73% of D.C. residents. The initiative has not passed yet; however, the Council is headed towards approving it ahead of the 2026 election season. The council is expected to meet again in August to further discuss implementation options. WASHINGTON - The D.C. council voted to partially fund Initiative 83, which includes ranked choice voting, but fell short of fully implementing it on Monday afternoon. What we know In ranked choice voting, voters can rank candidates in order of preference, rather than choose one. If passed, the initiative would take effect in time for the 2026 election, so voters can rank mayoral candidates regardless of party affiliation, and rank their preferred candidate at number one. Why you should care D.C. is a diverse city with a not-so-diverse voting population. In a 2024 poll, 92% of registered voters were Democrats, and 6% were Republicans. With ranked choice voting, voters can rank Democrats rather than just pick one. What they're saying DC Shadow Representative, Oye Owolewa, says he appreciates the council for "hearing the voices of the people" and for the initial funding of ranked choice voting. "As someone who fights for DC's full democracy on the national stage, I'm encouraged to see progress at home," Owolewa says. The Source Information in this story comes from U.S. Representative Oye Owolewa's press release.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Albanese Walks Fine Line Between Xi, Trump in China
00:00 HAIDI: THE AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER IS SET TO MEET WITH HAIDI: THE AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER IS SET TO MEET WITH CHINESE PRESIDENT XI JINPING LATER TODAY IN BEIJING. IT COMES AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S TARIFFS THREATS. ALBANESE WOULD NEED TO WALK A FINE LINE BETWEEN AUSTRALIA'S BIGGEST TRADING PARTNER AND MOST IMPORTANT LONG-TERM SECURITY ALLY. THE THING ABOUT CHINA AND AUSTRALIA IS SO IMPORTANT IS WE BUILD PEOPLE TO PEOPLE RELATIONS. WE DO THAT THROUGH THE PARTICIPATION OF AUSTRALIANS HERE. I HAVE BROUGHT WITH ME A WHOLE RANGE OF BUSINESS PEOPLE FROM THE RESOURCES SECTOR, THE TOURISM SECTOR AND THE EDUCATION SECTOR. LET'S GET IT MORE WHEN IT COMES TO THE EXPECTATIONS FROM THE PRIME MINISTER'S VISIT FROM CHINA. GOOD TO HAVE YOU WITH US. WE HAVE SEEN RELATIONS IMPROVE MARKEDLY COMPARED TO JUST A FEW YEARS AGO. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE DEMANDS WHEN IT COMES TO DIPLOMATIC FINESSE AND BALANCE ARE MORE CHALLENGING THAN EVER. HOW FINE IS THE LINE THAT THE PRIME MINISTER HAS TO TREAD ON THIS VISIT GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF DIPLOMATIC DEPTH REQUIRED? IT'S A VERY FINE LINE BUT AT THE SAME TIME THIS VISIT IS HAPPENING IN A CONTEXT WHERE BOTH SIDES WANT A SUCCESSFUL VISIT. THE CHAOS OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS GIVING BEIJING AN OPPORTUNITY TO PLAY THE CON LEADER AND WELCOME AUSTRALIA AFTER A FEW YEARS OF RELATIONSHIP TURMOIL. THE EMPHASIS IS ON ECONOMICS AND JOBS. THE AGENDA IS VERY MUCH ENABLED BY A STRONG TRADING RELATIONSHIP WITH CHINA. SO I THINK BOTH SIDES WANT TO ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE ALBEIT IN THE CONTEXT OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES ON OTHER ISSUES. HOW THORNY ARE SOME OF THE REGIONAL GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES BE AT ANY SORT OF CLARIFICATION ON CANBERRA'S POSITIONING ON TAIWAN, WHICH THE PRIME MINISTER DID GIVE, BUT ALSO CONCERNS OVER WHAT WAS VIEWED AS BEIJING'S OVERREACH IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA , THE PACIFIC AND SOME OF THE ISLANDS. AS YOU SAY, THERE ARE A RANGE OF ISSUES. WE HAVE SEEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PUT PRESSURE ON AUSTRALIA TO CLARIFY ITS POSITION ON TAIWAN AND THE PRIME MINISTER AND OTHER POLITICAL LEADERS HAVE DONE A GOOD JOB OF BATTING THAT ONE AWAY AND REITERATING THE POSITION THAT IT SUPPORTS THE STATUS QUO AND WILL NOT ENTERTAIN HYPOTHETICALS THAT IS A REASONABLE POSITION EVERYONE WOULD EXPECT. ON BROADER GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES, BOTH SIDES HAVE THEIR POSITIONS. THEY ARE WELL UNDERSTOOD AND WILL BE RAISED BUT I DON'T EXPECT THEY WILL BE A MAJOR SOURCE OF IRRITATION. MORE LIKELY IS THAT SPECIFIC BILATERAL DISPUTES THE COUNTRIES HAVE, LIKE THE DARWIN PORT LEASE, WHICH THE PRIME MINISTER PROMISED TO CANCEL MY CAUSE MORE IRRITATION WHEN THE LEADERS MEET. WHAT YOU SEE IN A SHIFTING IN POSITION? IT SEEMS UNLIKELY THAT BOTH WANT TO HAVE A POSITIVE TRIP AS WELL. BOTH SIDES UNDERSTAND THEY ARE REQUIRED TO VENTILATE THEIR GRIEVANCES. THERE'S AN EXPECTATION AMONG THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA THAT WE WILL RAISE SOME OF OUR DISPUTES. THE PLIGHT OF A DEMOCRACY ACTIVIST WHO IS IN JAIL IN CHINA, OUR CONCERN ABOUT CHINA'S MILITARY BUILDUP AND THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY. SO THESE THINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SAID. BUT IS THERE AN EXPECTATION THAT AUSTRALIA CAN MOVE CHINA ON THESE ISSUES? PROBABLY NOT. AND SO BOTH SIDES WILL GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS ON THESE DISPUTES BUT TRY TO SHIFT THINGS TO A POSITIVE AGENDA AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. ONE THING THAT WILL ALSO COME UP IS ON THE ECONOMIC SIDE. WE HAVE SEEN SOME MOU'S ORDEALS BEING SIGNED BUT THERE IS THE KEY STICKING POINT OF CHINA WANTING MORE ACCESS TO THE AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY THAT MAY CANBERRA IS ALSO NOT WILLING TO HAND OVER. THIS IS A REALLY INTERESTING EVOLUTION IN THE ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE FOR A LONG TIME AUSTRALIA WAS ABLE TO ENJOY WHAT I WOULD CALL ARM'S-LENGTH TRADE WITH CHINA. WE CAN SELL RESOURCES AND FOOD. BUT THESE TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT VERY INTIMATE. THEY DON'T INVOLVE AN ONGOING RELATIONSHIP. WHAT CHINA WANTS IS MORE DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN THE AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY. WE HAVE ALSO SEEN CHINA'S AMBASSADOR TO AUSTRALIA SAY THAT PERHAPS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BEING LOOTED IN THE FREE TRADE -- BEING INCLUDED IN THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT. THIS BRINGS BACK MEMORIES OF CHUCK -- OF US TRULY BEING THE FIRST COMPANY TO BAN HUAWEI. WE ARE NOT VERY TRUSTING OF CHINA'S TECHNOLOGY AND PREFER TO KEEP SENSITIVE INVESTMENTS IN MINERALS OUT OF CHINESE CONTROL AS WELL FOR A WHOLE HOST OF REASONS AND I THINK THAT IS THE REAL STICKING POINT, THAT DESIRE FOR A MORE INTIMATE ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP AND A TIGHTER EMBRACE FROM BEIJING THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY LEAD TO MORE INFLUENCE DOWN THE TRACK. WE HAVE SEEN COMMENTS ABOUT THIS. DO YOU THINK THE STRATEGIC ISSUE OF RARE EARTHS, AUSTRALIA'S OPPORTUNITY AND THE STRANGLEHOLD IS LIKELY TO BECOME A CONTENTIOUS BILATERAL ISSUE? IT IS HARD TO SAY WITH CERTAINTY. AUSTRALIA HAS GOT SIGNIFICANT INTEREST IN DEVELOPING PROCESSING CAPACITY AND SEES A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE FRIEND-SHORING INITIATIVE OF THE U.S. AND OTHER PARTNERS. AT THE SAME TIME WE DO NEED U.S. TECHNOLOGY AND THEY REMAIN THE WORLD LEADER. SO THERE ARE BOTH OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS IN THIS SECTOR. I DON'T EXPECT THIS TO PLAY A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THIS PARTICULAR MEETING BUT IT WILL BE AN ONGOING IRRITANT AND ALSO SOURCE OF POTENTIAL GROWTH INTO THE FUTURE. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US. THAT WAS DARREN, A SENIOR LECTURER IN THE SCHOOL OF POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AT AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. WE WILL HAVE MORE ON AUSTRALIA AHEAD EVERY TUESDAY AT 10:40 A.M. IN SYDNEY, 8:40 A.M. IN HONG KONG. YOU CAN TUNE INTO THE BLOOMBERG AUSTRALIA PODCAST, WHICH TELLS INTO THE BIGGEST STORIES.
