
Strategic Mediator: Barzani steps up in Syria's Kurdish conundrum
Kurdistan President Nechirvan Barzani is playing a pivotal role in brokering a middle ground for Syria's Kurds amid intensifying diplomatic efforts between key regional and international actors.
According to a report by Al-Monitor, Barzani has emerged as a key mediator between Turkiye and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), navigating fraught relations to reduce hostilities and pave the way for political dialogue.
The report details Barzani's behind-the-scenes diplomacy, particularly his engagement with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and SDF commander Mazloum Abdi. His efforts have reportedly contributed to a temporary halt in Turkish military operations against the SDF since January. The diplomacy comes at a moment of regional volatility, particularly following sectarian violence in Syria's Suwayda province, which has reshaped the Kurdish bargaining position in ongoing negotiations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Rudaw Net
44 minutes ago
- Rudaw Net
DEM Party rebukes call by Erdogan's ally to dissolve
Also in Turkey Erdogan commends Ocalan's support for peace process Erdogan will not seek Turkey-Iraq oil export deal renewal: Gazette PKK says no more disarmament until Ankara enacts reforms Turkish parties discuss forming PKK peace commission in parliament A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Turkey's pro-Kurdish Peoples' Equality and Democracy Party (DEM Party) on Tuesday condemned a call from an ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan urging the party to dissolve itself over alleged ties to Kurdish rebel groups. The DEM Party firmly rejected the demand, stating it has no intention of disbanding. The DEM Party is mediating peace talks between Ankara and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The latter has decided to dissolve itself and lay down arms after decades of a devastating war with the Turkish state. A first group of PKK fighters burned their weapons earlier this month. Mustafa Destici, leader of the Great Unity Party (BBP), on Monday called on all alleged offshoots of the PKK to dissolve themselves, mentioning the DEM Party too. 'Even this DEM Party in Turkey will do so. Because it is also the PKK's party. It will dissolve itself, condemn terrorism, and establish a new party,' he told reporters. The BBP is part of the ruling People's Alliance, which includes Erdogan's Justice and Development Party (AKP). The DEM Party rebuked the Turkish politician for his remarks late Tuesday. 'DEM Party is the name of the struggle for equality, freedom, democracy, justice, and peace of the peoples. It is the will of millions. It is not a mere signboard, nor is it temporary. It has reached this point by paying great costs and through an uninterrupted struggle,' stated the pro-Kurdish party. 'The purpose of the DEM Party is clear: to ensure peace and build democracy for 86 million people.' The party refused to dissolve itself. 'We are not dissolving our party. We are right where we stand, and our march continues with determination. We will never step back,' the party said, advising the BBP leader to be 'the voice of people and democracy, not of Kurdish hostility.' On May 12, the PKK announced its dissolution and intention to disarm after being urged to do so by its founder Abdullah Ocalan who said it was time to take the struggle for Kurdish rights into the political sphere. The PKK has declared a unilateral ceasefire and on July 11 held a disarmament ceremony had a ceremonial disarmament where 30 fighters, including commanders, burned their weapons. Erdogan on Monday praised Ocalan for his continued support for peace talks between the PKK and Ankara. 'We are determined to build a terrorism-free future. We are clear about what we will do to reach our goal, how we will achieve it, and where we will ultimately end up,' Erdogan told journalists. Erdogan also said that they are following the PKK disarmament process, adding that the negotiations to form a parliamentary commission to address the peace process, or what Ankara calls terror-free Turkey, have 'reached the final stage. You will soon see progress at the parliamentary level.' The peace process will be guided by the parliamentary commission. Representatives of the parliamentary bloc of Turkey's political parties met with the parliament speaker on Friday and the commission is set to be formed within days. The commission has broad political support, except from the ultranationalist Good Party (IYI). Sezai Temelli, a DEM Party lawmaker, told Rudaw on Tuesday that the parliamentary commission will consist of 35 members and may hold its first meeting in the coming days. 'There may be a meeting on Friday. Even if it is not Friday, it will definitely convene within the next week. Even if parliament goes on recess, the commission will continue its work and fulfill its legal preparation duty until October 1,' he said. He added that the commission's main task will be to ensure 'legal and political guarantees for the disarmament process.' Some PKK fighters based in Duhok province told Rudaw earlier this month that they fear reprisals if they return to Turkey, with many opting to remain in the mountains instead. "In the first phase, regulations will be made regarding the legal and political rights of those who lay down arms. After this stage is completed, new steps can be taken for the continuation of the process,' Temelli noted, adding that the DEM Party delegation, which has held several meetings with Ocalan in jail, will visit him again following the commission meeting. Ibrahim Kalin, Turkish intelligence chief, has held meetings with several Turkish political parties over the peace talks, including the DEM Party. Temelli said their meeting with Kalin was positive. "It was a sincere and important meeting. We won't make statements about its content, but it went positively. The resumption of dialogues is important for the democratic solution of the Kurdish issue,' the lawmaker said.


Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
US lowers tariffs on Japanese exports
Shafaq News – Washington The United States and Japan have reached an agreement to reduce tariffs on Japanese exports, scaling back a steeper increase previously threatened by President Donald Trump. Under the deal, tariffs on Japanese goods entering the US will be set at 15%, a cut from the originally proposed 25%. Japanese vehicles—accounting for more than a quarter of Japan's exports to the US—will also benefit from the revised rate, with existing tariffs lowered from 25% to 15%. Trump, posting on Truth Social, described the agreement as 'the biggest trade deal in history with Japan,' highlighting its role in maintaining strong bilateral ties. In turn, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, under increased pressure following a major electoral defeat on Sunday, welcomed the outcome, characterizing the revised tariff rate as the lowest among trade-surplus nations dealing with the US. The announcement triggered a rally in Japanese markets. The Nikkei index climbed to a one-year high, while government bond prices slipped. US media outlets also highlighted the deal, calling it 'the most significant' among several trade arrangements concluded by the White House ahead of the August 1 deadline for wider tariff actions.


Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's top judge warns treaty chaos after Khor Abdullah ruling
Shafaq News – Baghdad Iraq's top judicial authority warned on Wednesday that the Federal Supreme Court's decision to invalidate a 2013 law endorsing the maritime border agreement with Kuwait could unravel hundreds of international treaties ratified over the past two decades. Chief Justice Faiq Zidan, head of the Supreme Judicial Council, issued a sharply worded article titled 'The Waves of Khor Abdullah Between Two Contradictory Rulings,' criticizing the Federal Court's reversal of its 2014 ruling on the Khor Abdullah agreement. In September 2023, the Federal Court ruled the law ratifying the agreement unconstitutional, citing the need for a two-thirds parliamentary majority—an interpretation that differs from its earlier stance requiring only a simple majority. That shift, Zidan warned, could retroactively invalidate more than 400 international treaties approved under the previous standard. 'If the two-thirds requirement is adopted as a precedent, then every treaty ratified by a simple majority becomes null, dismantling Iraq's entire international legal framework built over the past 20 years,' Zidan wrote. The chief justice stressed that the ruling jeopardizes Iraq's legal credibility, particularly as the Khor Abdullah agreement is already lodged with the United Nations. 'The decision undermines the legal stability of international commitments and could expose Iraq to potential liabilities,' he warned. Zidan also questioned the Federal Court's authority to reverse its own final ruling. He noted that while Iraq's legal system allows for 'judicial reversals' in rare cases, these are strictly limited to abstract legal principles—not binding judgments—and must follow rigorous procedures handled only by the General Assembly of the Federal Court of Cassation. 'The Federal Court granted itself an extraordinary power through Article 45 of its internal bylaw, allowing it to reverse previous principles if public interest demands. However, internal regulations cannot override constitutional or legislative authority,' he argued. Moreover, Zidan said the court misapplied that internal rule by revoking an entire ruling—rather than a legal principle—as its 2023 decision invalidated the 2014 judgment that had recognized the agreement's constitutionality. 'This is a legal overreach,' Zidan wrote. 'By annulling a final decision, the court violated the doctrine of res judicata and generated a legislative vacuum and diplomatic confusion.' The Khor Abdullah dispute has already strained Iraq-Kuwait relations. But Zidan's article expands the scope of concern. 'The 2014 ruling was aligned with constitutional provisions and international law, providing legal certainty both domestically and globally,' Zidan concluded. 'In contrast, the 2023 ruling lacks a constitutional basis and poses significant legal and diplomatic consequences.'