New law triggers adult site shutdowns in Georgia
Why it matters: Georgia joins roughly 20 states — primarily in the South and Mountain West — requiring users to submit identifying information to access adult content.
Driving the news: On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Texas law mandating age verification on adult sites does not violate the First Amendment, clearing the way for Georgia's similar law to take effect Tuesday.
How it works: Georgia's law compels adult websites to verify users' ages, typically through government-issued IDs, including digital driver's licenses.
The other side: Industry groups and free speech advocates say the law jeopardizes adults' privacy and fails to protect children, Axios' Philip Wang reports.
Critics argue the law's broad definition of sexually explicit material could affect streaming services and online bookstores while excluding social media platforms and search engines, where minors are more likely to encounter explicit content.
Between the lines: Some adult sites now block access in Georgia rather than comply with verification laws, prompting users to seek workarounds such as virtual private networks (VPNs).
Zoom in: People with a Georgia IP address visiting Pornhub or YouPorn are now met with statements explaining the companies' opposition to the law and announcing site shutdowns in the state.
What they're saying: "While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, giving your ID card every time you want to visit an adult platform is not the most effective solution for protecting our users, and in fact, will put children and your privacy at risk," a statement from the companies reads.
"Until a real solution is offered, we have made the difficult decision to completely disable access to our website in Georgia."
What's next: Alison Boden, executive director of the Free Speech Coalition, said in a statement that her group is "working with our legal team to understand the current legal landscape and determine what recourse may exist."
The intrigue: Shortly before the Supreme Court decision, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg blocked enforcement of a provision requiring social media platforms to obtain parental approval before minors can create an account.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
California rolls back environmental law to expedite housing
California is rolling back environmental regulations for some construction projects after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law this week ending strict review for many new developments. Why it matters: The move could cut down planning and zoning timelines in cities that desperately need more housing. Catch up quick: An extension of a national policy, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) allows individuals and groups to file lawsuits to challenge projects, which can delay building by years and rack up litigation costs. It was enacted in 1970 to prevent environmental damage and requires developers to mitigate potential impacts through a public review process. Attempts to reform it have escalated over the last decade amid California's housing shortage. Driving the news: The new law exempts urban "infill" housing projects, which are built in and around existing development, from CEQA if they are less than 20 acres and located outside hazardous zones. Certain infrastructure projects, such as water system improvements, day care centers and advanced manufacturing facilities will also be excluded from CEQA. What they're saying: These exemptions are "almost certainly the most significant rollback of CEQA for housing since it passed" and "will unambiguously reduce the time frame" for development, Ben Metcalf, managing director of UC Berkeley's Terner Center for Housing Innovation, told Axios. Under CEQA, projects usually must undergo review by city staff and a public body like a planning commission. The threat of litigation gives some groups, such as unions, leverage to negotiate project labor agreements, Metcalf said. Market-rate housing projects "will get in the ground faster as a result of this change," he added. The other side: Opponents say the rollback axes essential protections for wildlife, biodiversity and California's most vulnerable communities. It forces "blind exemptions for massive industrial projects" and could enable projects handling "highly explosive and hazardous materials" without scrutiny, a coalition of over 100 organizations wrote in a letter to Newsom last week. Between the lines: The legislation states that a "special statute is necessary" for San Francisco due to its "unique construction of housing projects."
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Paramount to pay Trump $16 million to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit
The deal is the clearest sign yet that Trump's ability to intimidate major American institutions extends to the media industry. Many lawyers had dismissed Trump's lawsuit as baseless and believed CBS would have ultimately prevailed in court, in part because the network did not report anything factually inaccurate, and the First Amendment gives publishers wide leeway to determine how to present information. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But Shari Redstone, the chair and controlling shareholder of Paramount, told her board that she favored exploring a settlement with Trump. Some executives at the company viewed the president's lawsuit as a potential hurdle to completing a multibillion-dollar sale of the company to the Hollywood studio Skydance, which requires the Trump administration's approval. Advertisement After weeks of negotiations with a mediator, lawyers for Paramount and Trump worked through the weekend to reach a deal before a court deadline that would have required both sides to begin producing internal documents for discovery, according to two people familiar with the negotiations. Another deadline loomed: Paramount was planning to make changes to its board of directors this week that could have complicated the settlement negotiations. Advertisement A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement that the settlement was 'another win for the American people' delivered by the president, who was holding 'the fake news media accountable.' 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle,' the spokesperson said. The size of the settlement, $16 million, is the same sum that ABC News agreed to pay in December to settle a defamation case filed by Trump against the network and one of its anchors, George Stephanopoulos. Paramount's board was concerned that paying a higher amount to settle the case could increase the company's exposure to potential legal actions from shareholders accusing it of bribery. The sale of Paramount would end the Redstone family's decades-long control of CBS News and Paramount Pictures and put it in the hands of David Ellison, the son of Larry Ellison, a tech billionaire who has backed Trump. Brendan Carr, the chair of the Federal Communications Commission, has said that the president's lawsuit against Paramount was not linked to the FCC's review of the company's merger with Skydance. Paramount has also said that the two issues were unrelated. Trump sued Paramount for $10 billion last year, claiming that '60 Minutes' deceptively edited an interview with former vice president Kamala Harris in order to interfere with the election. The transcript of the interview showed that Harris gave a lengthy answer to a question about Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister. About 21 seconds of that answer aired in a preview of the interview on 'Face the Nation,' another CBS News show. A different seven-second part of the answer aired the next day in a prime-time episode of '60 Minutes.' Advertisement Trump said in his lawsuit that CBS's actions amounted to 'news distortion' that was aimed at tipping the scales in favor of the Democratic Party. Paramount disputed that characterization. Even before its resolution, Trump's lawsuit — and Redstone's apparent willingness to entertain a settlement — had engulfed CBS News in turmoil. Tensions within the network over how to handle the president's legal attacks contributed to the resignation of the '60 Minutes' executive producer, Bill Owens; the CBS News president, Wendy McMahon, was later forced out. Watching the case with Trump unfold, many CBS journalists believed the long-term credibility of '60 Minutes' was at stake. Scott Pelley, the veteran '60 Minutes' correspondent, said last month that any settlement would be 'very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies.' Executives at CBS and Paramount applied more scrutiny than usual to segments on '60 Minutes' that could be construed as critical of the Trump administration. CBS News has not killed a story because of the pressure, but Owens, when he resigned in April, said he 'would not be allowed' to make independent journalistic decisions. McMahon said when she left that it had 'become clear the company and I do not agree on the path forward.' Redstone told the board she was recusing herself from its discussions of how to handle the Trump suit, given that her financial stake in the pending Skydance deal is so much greater than the stakes of other shareholders, whose interests the directors are expected to represent. This spring, she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and has recently been receiving treatment. Advertisement Even before her diagnosis, though, she told board members that she wanted the company to explore a settlement with Trump. Redstone has said she wants to avoid a protracted legal war with the president that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars and jeopardize other divisions that have business with the government. Redstone has also told confidants that she harbors concerns about the editorial judgment of CBS News. She has acknowledged being troubled by some of her network's news coverage and on occasion has raised those concerns publicly and spoken to corporate leadership. Senators, such as Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, have warned that any payment by Paramount to Trump could be construed as a bribe, and stated that they would consider holding a congressional hearing on the matter. This article originally appeared in
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Bernie Sanders blasts Paramount, says lawsuit settlement will further embolden Trump to attack media
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., blasted Paramount Global on Wednesday for settling President Donald Trump's 'election interference' lawsuit against CBS over the network's handling of a '60 Minutes' interview last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Sanders previously urged Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone not to settle the lawsuit he called an 'attack on the First Amendment' but to no avail. The company agreed to an eight-figure payment and changes to its editorial policy on Tuesday night in what media critics called a shameful capitulation. 'The decision by the Redstone family, the major owners of Paramount, to settle a bogus lawsuit with President Trump over a 60 Minutes report he did not like is an extremely dangerous precedent in terms of both the First Amendment and government extortion,' Sanders said to begin his scathing statement. 5 Bernie Sanders (I-VT) visits 'Special Report with Bret Baier' at FOX News D.C. Bureau on May 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images 'Paramount's decision will only embolden Trump to continue attacking, suing and intimidating the media which he has labeled 'the enemy of the people.' It is a dark day for independent journalism and freedom of the press — an essential part of our democracy,' Sanders continued. 'It is a victory for a president who is attempting to stifle dissent and undermine American democracy. Trump will receive $16 million upfront. This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his future presidential library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump's discretion. There is an anticipation that there will be another allocation in the mid-eight figures set aside for advertisements, public service announcements, or other similar transmissions, in support of conservative causes by the network in the future, Fox News Digital has learned. Current Paramount management disputes the additional allocation, but a long-planned merger with Skydance Media is set to put new leadership in place. 5 A general view of a Paramount sign at the Paramount offices located at 1515 Broadway or One Astor Plaza in New York, NY as seen on June 13, 2025. Christopher Sadowski 'It's pretty obvious why Paramount chose to surrender to Trump. The Redstone family is in line to receive $2.4 billion from the sale of Paramount to Skydance, but they can only receive this money if the Trump administration approves this deal. In other words, the Redstone family diminished the freedom of the press today in exchange for a $2.4 billion payday,' Sanders added. 'Make no mistake about it. Trump is undermining our democracy and rapidly moving us towards authoritarianism and the billionaires who care more about their stock portfolios than our democracy are helping him do it,' Sanders added. 'That is beyond unacceptable.' A source familiar with Paramount's current leadership told Fox News Digital that only the initial $16 million was sanctioned by the official mediator, and they had no knowledge of any deal Trump may have made with incoming ownership. 5 President Donald Trump speaks to the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the briefing room of the White House in Washington. AP Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., also took to X to accuse Paramount of taking a 'bribe' and threatened future federal charges. 'Paramount just paid Trump a bribe for merger approval. When Democrats retake power, I'll be first in line calling for federal charges. In the meantime, state prosecutors should make the corporate execs who sold out our democracy answer in court, today,' Wyden posted. Paramount insisted it was business as usual when asked about statements made by Sanders and Wyden. 5 U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during a stop in the Fighting the Oligarchy tour at the McAllen Performing Arts Center on Friday, June, 20, 2025, in McAllen, Texas. AP 'Companies often settle litigation to avoid the high and somewhat unpredictable costs of legal defense, the risk of an adverse judgment that could result in significant financial or reputational damage, and the disruption to business operations that prolonged legal battles can cause. Settlement offers a negotiated resolution that allows companies to focus on their core objectives rather than being mired in uncertainty and distraction,' a Paramount spokesperson told Fox News Digital. A source close to Trump mocked the liberal lawmakers. 'The socialists of the Democrat Party, like Sanders and Wyden, have rarely seen a business transaction where they didn't want a full government intervention. President Trump is running circles around them and all they do is cry,' the source told Fox News Digital. 5 President Donald Trump meets with Congo's Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, and Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington. AP Trump's legal team took a victory lap after the settlement was announced. 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit. CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. 'President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again,' a spokesperson for Trump's legal team told Fox News Digital.
