
After Spain's blackout, questions about renewable energy return
As people wait for answers about what caused the historic power cut, which abruptly disrupted tens of millions of lives, some are questioning the wisdom of decommissioning nuclear reactors that provide a stable, if controversial, form of energy compared to renewables, whose output can be intermittent.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has rejected such criticism, asking for patience while the government investigates what caused the grid's disconnection. He said that his government would not 'deviate a single millimeter' from its energy transition plans.
Here's what to know about the energy debate:
What is nuclear power and why is it controversial?
Nuclear power is a zero-carbon energy source formed from nuclear fission, when the nuclei of atoms are split into two or several parts, releasing energy.
It accounts for about 10% of electricity generation worldwide, according to the International Energy Association.
Many countries consider nuclear power critical to reaching their net-zero goals. But while nuclear reactors do not emit planet-warming greenhouse gases like gas- or coal-fired power plants, they produce radioactive waste that even advanced economies have struggled to dispose.
Why does Spain want to decommission its nuclear reactors?
Spain generated nearly 57% of its electricity in 2024 from renewable energy sources like wind, hydropower and solar, according to Red Eléctrica, the country's grid operator. About 20% came from nuclear power plants.
In 2019, Sánchez's government approved a plan to decommission the country's remaining nuclear reactors between 2027 and 2035 as it expands its share of renewable energy even further. The country aims to generate 81% of its electricity by 2030 from renewable sources.
Sánchez on Wednesday said that the four nuclear facilities that were online the day of the blackout did not help re-power the grid.
Batteries and other methods help regulate changes in electricity supply from wind and solar.
Why is Spain's renewables push being questioned now?
While the cause of the sudden outage on April 28 is still unknown, the event has raised questions about the technical challenges facing electricity grids running on high levels of solar and wind.
Solar and wind provided roughly 70% of the electricity on the grid moments before Spain lost 15 gigawatts of electricity — about 60% of its supply — in just five seconds.
Electricity grids were designed for a different era, according to Gilles Thonet, deputy secretary general of the International Electrotechnical Commission, an industry group.
'Traditionally, power flowed in one direction: from large coal, gas or nuclear plants to homes and businesses," Thonet said. 'These plants provided not only electricity, but also stability. Their spinning turbines acted like shock absorbers, smoothing out fluctuations in supply and demand.'
In the days following the blackout, Google searches in Spain for 'nuclear' spiked, according to data from Google Trends.
Spain's nuclear lobby group Foro Nuclear said this week that the government should rethink its plan to decommission its nuclear reactors after the outage. Ignacio Araluce, its president, said the nuclear plants online before the outage 'provide firmness and stability.'
Would more nuclear power have prevented a blackout?
Others say it is too soon to draw conclusions about what role nuclear energy should play.
'We do not know the cause of the oscillations,' said Pedro Fresco, director general of Avaesen, an association of renewable energy and clean technology firms in Valencia. 'Therefore, we do not know what would have allowed them to be controlled.'
Spain's grid operator last week narrowed down the source of the outage to two separate incidents in which substations in southwestern Spain failed.
Environment Minister Sara Aagesen said earlier this week that the grid had initially withstood another power generation outage in southern Spain 19 seconds before the blackout.
Sánchez in his speech to Parliament said there was "no empirical evidence' to show that more nuclear power on the grid could have prevented a blackout or allowed the country to get back online faster. In fact, the four nuclear facilities online on April 28 before the blackout were taken offline after the outage as part of emergency protocol to avoid overheating.
He said that nuclear energy "has not been shown to be an effective solution in situations like what we experienced on April 28," and called the debate surrounding his government's nuclear phase-out plan 'a gigantic manipulation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
a day ago
- Montreal Gazette
Projet Montréal distances itself from councillor's ‘unacceptable' comments about Indigenous people
Montreal Politics A Montreal borough councillor has resigned from Projet Montréal after making a disparaging comment about Indigenous people on social media. Enrique Machado, a Venezuelan-born councillor representing Verdun's Champlain–Île-des-Sœurs district, came under fire after replying to a video posted on TikTok by Venezuelan influencer Sofia Saavedra, which showcased a new 3D advertisement screen in Caracas. Machado wrote, in Spanish: 'Seriously? Are you surprised by this? Hahaha. Venezuelans are like Indigenous people, give them mirrors and little shiny things and they'll be amazed.' The remark was widely condemned online, including by Saavedra herself. She posted a follow-up video on TikTok saying she has formally complained against Machado to the city council. Machado has reportedly apologized on social media, but his Facebook account has since been deactivated. In a statement to The Gazette, Projet Montréal spokesperson Arianne Beaupré called the remarks 'unacceptable' and said it did not reflect the party's values. 'The values of inclusion, respect and the need to actively contribute to reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples are at the heart of the principles that guide Projet Montréal's mission,' Beaupré said. 'Mr. Machado's comment contradicts the values of our party, our leader and the mayor.' Machado was then summoned by the party, she said, after they became aware of the situation. He later chose to resign from the caucus and end his political career with Projet Montréal. 'We believe this is the right decision under the circumstances,' she said. He will now sit as an independent for the remainder of his term.


Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Is the U.S. involved in plot to remove Colombia's Petro?
Opinion The South American country of Colombia has had a long history of political violence, attempted and successful political assassinations and deeply embedded corruption. At one time, the country was known pejoratively as the 'cocaine capital of the world,' and the illicit white powder still remains a critical sector of the Colombian economy. It has also been labelled the 'murder capital of the world,' though both guerrilla and murderous paramilitary activities have subsided in recent years. Still, deadly drug cartels, a powerful military and an influential business community have all played significant roles in shaping Colombian democratic politics in the last few decades. One should also not forget the willingness of official Washington to interfere in Colombian political, economic and security affairs. Columbia's Gustavo Petro, left, celebrates with former Bogota's Mayor Antanas Mockus after winning a runoff presidential election in Bogota, Colombia, in 2022. There are questions about U.S. involvement in a recent coup attempt against Petro. So, I'm not shocked to hear about the latest episode on Colombia's precarious political situation — that is, the attempted coup d'état (supposedly involving drug cartels and armed criminal syndicates) against the country's leftist president, and former guerrilla member, Gustavo Petro. What we don't know, though, is the precise nature of the role, if there was any, of U.S. President Donald Trump's involvement in the scheme to remove Petro. According to the respected Spanish newspaper El País, it was former Colombian foreign minister Álvaro Leyva who actually plotted the overthrow of the Petro government. Evidently, audio recordings of Leyva reveal that he had sought support from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio to somehow use 'international pressure' to get Petro to step aside. There are also references on the recordings that Leyva spoke with U.S. Republican Party politicians (including members of Congress from Florida) and political operatives. How close any of these individuals are to Trump's inner circle is anyone's guess — though Trump's team is in complete denial mode. It is no secret that Trump wouldn't be saddened by the abrupt removal of the left-leaning Petro. Recall that it was Petro who initially refused to accept Colombian deportees from the U.S. back in January. Of course, he quickly had a change of heart when Trump threatened to impose stiff tariffs on Colombian imports and visa restrictions on its citizens. In addition to its ideological aversion to Petro, the Trump White House has also differed sharply with the Colombian government on a wide array of policy matters (such as China, migration and Israel). But it has mostly parted company with Petro on how best to combat the drug trade in Colombia (a key supplier of cocaine to the U.S.). As for the Leyva coup plan itself, it was intended to unfold rapidly so as to replace Petro with Vice-President Francia Márquez. However, she has been quick to deny any involvement in the plot. Still, her relationship with Petro is no doubt dysfunctional (and has been for months) and thus her days in office are likely numbered. In an interview with El País, Petro said that 'Leyva has betrayed me in the worst way.' He subsequently told reporters in Spain the following: 'The scheme proposed by Álvaro Leyva is nothing but a conspiracy with drug trafficking and the far-right, apparently Colombian and American, to overthrow the President of change in Colombia.' It is important to note that Leyva was fired as Petro's foreign minister in 2024 over allegations of misconduct over a contract involving government passports. Leyva has since disparaged Petro as a polarizing figure (who refused to hire his son) and said that he had evidence that Petro had participated in erratic governmental decision-making, sought to do an end-run around the Colombian Congress and even alleged that he has a serious drug addiction. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. It is worth remembering that Colombia is slated to hold presidential elections in May 2026, which Petro is certain to seek re-election. Incidentally, all of the opposition presidential candidates have rallied around Petro and called for Leyva to come clean with his involvement in the sordid scheme. This is not the first time, though, that Petro has raised the issue of coup-plotters and his unlawful removal from power. He has been saying it from the moment that he was inaugurated in August 2022 — even claiming that he had a huge target on his back. There needs to be more light shed on what, if any, discussions took place between Leyva and members of the Trump administration. Call me a cynic, but this would not be the first time that the U.S. tried to insert itself covertly into the politics of governmental destabilization in Latin America. And it won't be the last. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.


Toronto Star
3 days ago
- Toronto Star
Spain's PM announces anti-graft measures as corruption inquiries ensnare his party
MADRID (AP) — Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez presented anti-corruption measures in response to the mounting corruption cases involving his Socialist Party, and again said he would not step down from office. Speaking in parliament Wednesday at an extraordinary session about a corruption probe involving a former Socialist Party official, the Spanish leader took responsibility for his poor judgement but repeatedly said he would not step down, calling himself 'an honest politician' with 'the pride of leading an exemplary party.'