Trump announces Israel-Iran ceasefire
WASHINGTON (Reuters) US President Donald Trump said on Monday that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran will go into force with a view to ending the conflict between the two nations."On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.
Israel-Iran Conflict
Continue full coverage
On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both countries: #Trump
Read more: https://t.co/zYZ9pp3nPi#AletihadNewsCenter #USA #Iran #Israel #ceasefire #peace pic.twitter.com/aFdFEZ4Bk0 — Aletihad English (@AletihadEn) June 23, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
14 minutes ago
- Zawya
White House set to unveil closely watched crypto policy report
A cryptocurrency working group formed by President Donald Trump is set to release a report on Wednesday that is expected to outline the administration's stances on tokenization and market-defining crypto legislation, among other issues critically important to the digital asset industry. Shortly after taking office in January, Trump ordered the creation of a crypto working group tasked with proposing new regulations, making good on his campaign promise to overhaul U.S. crypto policy. Wednesday's report is a culmination of the task force's work so far and its first public findings. In line with Trump's January executive order, it will lay out what rules and laws should be enacted to advance the policy goals of the pro-crypto White House. Those include making sure that the Securities and Exchange Commission has a framework in place for firms to offer blockchain-based stocks and bonds, according to one person familiar with the discussions. The report is also expected to discuss the administration's wish list for legislation Congress is currently debating to create broad regulatory guidelines for cryptocurrency, according to a second person familiar with the report. The working group led by Trump official Bo Hines is composed of several administration officials including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, SEC Chair Paul Atkins and Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought. The White House, Treasury Department and the SEC did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the report. "While there have been regulatory regimes in place that have maybe been piecemeal or have allowed the industry to grow in certain ways, the recommendations that we expect to see in the report will be a good roadmap for how to build out crypto as a continued important part of the economy going forward," said Rebecca Rettig, chief legal officer at crypto firm Jito Labs. On the campaign trail, Trump courted crypto cash by pledging to be a "crypto president" and promote the adoption of digital assets. That is in stark contrast to former President Joe Biden's regulators which, in a bid to protect Americans from fraud and money laundering, cracked down on the industry. The Biden administration sued exchanges Coinbase, Binance and dozens more, alleging they were flouting U.S. laws. Trump's SEC has since dropped those cases. TOKENIZATION, STABLECOINS, MARKET STRUCTURE Industry participants will be looking closely at what the report says about tokenization, the process of turning financial assets - such as bank deposits, stocks, bonds, funds and even real estate - into crypto assets. Crypto firms and others have been increasingly discussing the prospect of tokenizing securities as a new way to facilitate trading. Coinbase recently told Reuters it was seeking a U.S. green light from the SEC to offer blockchain-based stocks. The SEC has yet to weigh in publicly on that request. Wednesday's report is expected to recognize the need for the SEC to develop a framework for tokenization, according to a source familiar with the discussions, but the details of the language were not immediately clear. The report will also lay out what the White House would like to see from market structure legislation working its way through Congress, according to a separate person with knowledge of the report. The House of Representatives passed a bill called the Clarity Act earlier this month that would create a formal regulatory regime for crypto, and the U.S. Senate is considering its own version of the measure. Earlier this month, Trump signed into law a bill to create federal rules for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar. That move was hailed as a major win for the digital asset industry, and the White House has said it wants Congress to pass market structure legislation next, which would have far wider repercussions for the industry. The crypto sector has for years argued that existing U.S. regulations are inappropriate for cryptocurrencies and has called for Congress and regulators to write new ones that clarify when a crypto token is a security, commodity or falls into another category, like stablecoins. The president's support for the crypto industry has sparked conflict-of-interest concerns, which at times have threatened to derail congressional crypto legislation. Trump's family has launched cryptocurrency meme coins, and the president also holds a stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform. The White House has denied that any conflicts of interest are present. (Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Pete Schroeder and Matthew Lewis)
Middle East Eye
19 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: Spain and Ireland to join more than 30 states to declare ‘concrete measures' against Israel
More than 30 countries are convening in Bogota next week to declare 'concrete measures against Israel's violations of international law', diplomats told Middle East Eye. The 'emergency summit' is due to be held on 15-16 July, co-hosted by the governments of Colombia and South Africa as co-chairs of The Hague Group, to coordinate diplomatic and legal action to counter what they describe as 'a climate of impunity' enabled by Israel and its powerful allies. The Hague Group is a bloc of currently eight states, launched on 31 January in the eponymous Dutch city with the stated goal of holding Israel accountable under international law. 'The Hague Group's formation in January marked a turning point in the global response to exceptionalism and the broader erosion of international law,' Roland Lamola, South Africa's minister of international relations and cooperation, told Middle East Eye. 'That same spirit will animate this Bogota conference, where the assembled states will send a clear message: no nation is above the law, and no crime will go unanswered,' he added. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'Together, we will work to introduce concrete legal, diplomatic and economic measures that can urgently halt Israel's destruction of the Palestinians.' 'The assembled states will not only reaffirm our commitment to resist the genocide, but devise a series of specific measures to move from words to collective action' - Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir, Colombia's vice-minister of multilateral affairs Israel's war on Gaza, increasingly condemned by experts and governments as a genocide, has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians and displaced almost the entire population since October 2023. The onslaught has left the Palestinian enclave barely habitable and left two million people starving. 'The Palestinian genocide threatens our entire multilateral system,' Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir, Colombia's vice-minister of multilateral affairs, told MEE. 'Colombia cannot be indifferent in the face of apartheid and ethnic cleansing. "In Bogota, the assembled states will not only reaffirm our commitment to resist the genocide, but devise a series of specific measures to move from words to collective action.' The founding members of the group included Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa. UN urged to take legal action at ICJ to uphold Francesca Albanese's immunity Read More » In addition to Colombia and South Africa as co-chairs, states due to take part in the summit include Algeria, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Djibouti, Honduras, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Mexico, Namibia, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Portugal, Spain, Qatar, Turkey, Slovenia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Officials attending include UN special rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese; the head of the UN's agency for Palestinian refugees Philippe Lazzarini; UN special rapporteur on the right to health, Tlaleng Mofokeng; the chair of the UN working group on discrimination against women and girls, Laura Nyirinkindi; and Andres Macias Tolosa, UN working group on mercenaries mandate holder. Speaking to Middle East Eye ahead of the summit, Albanese, who was sanctioned on Wednesday by the US for her work documenting human rights abuses in Palestine, welcomed the summit as "the most important thing that we can do right now politically." "We need to focus on the emergency measures, how to break the blockade, and how to create the conditions to disable the system that is strangling the Palestinians." 'The Bogotá conference will go down as the moment in history that states finally stood up to do the right thing,' she said. Concrete steps Members of The Hague Group have already taken major steps over the past 20 months to defend and enforce international law. Holding Israel accountable: What is The Hague Group? Read More » South Africa, for example, brought a landmark case against Israel at the International Court of Justice for alleged violations of the Genocide Convention in Gaza. Several states in the coalition later joined South Africa's case at the ICJ, including Bolivia, Colombia and Namibia. Additionally, Namibia and Malaysia blocked ships carrying arms to Israel from docking at their ports, while Colombia has cut diplomatic ties with the Israeli government. Since these efforts have been taken independently, The Hague Group aims to coordinate action amongst its member states and supporters for a stronger impact. According to the group's coordinator Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla, the group has been formed in part as a reaction to the non-compliance of states with binding international legal obligations. This is a reference to the pushback by a number of western states against the International Criminal Court's arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024, and Israel's failure to comply with multiple orders by the ICJ to ensure the Genocide Convention is not violated in Gaza.
The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
Europe faces deep divisions as it finally takes action against Israel
In the first major move by western powers signalling discontent over Israel's conduct in Gaza, the European Commission is seeking to partially suspend Israel's participation in the bloc's flagship research programme. Though the proposal is not a sanction, it is viewed by Israel as a serious rebuke. It could lead to more consequential measures previously floated in response to Israel's breach of a human rights clause embedded in EU-Israel relations. Among the options discussed was the suspension of preferential trade relations – an alarming prospect for Israel, given that the EU is its biggest trading partner. The relationship, however, is not reciprocal, as Israel ranks only 31st among the EU's export markets. Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign affairs and security chief, has warned more measures could follow, if the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate. Trade or ban? The EU Commission on Monday proposed banning certain Israeli companies from participating in an EU-funded programme called the EIC Accelerator. The move targets firms involved in so-called dual use technology – meaning they can also be used for military purposes – such as cybersecurity, drones and artificial intelligence. The EIC Accelerator is a funding programme that gives lump sum grants in equity investment. Since the launch of the Horizon research programme in 2021, Israeli entities have received about €900 million ($1.03) in EU funding, including €200 million through the EIC Accelerator, a senior EU official said. The proposed suspension would not affect existing contracts but would bar Israeli companies from participation in the accelerator. Based on the EIC's track record in Israel, "one can presume that the effect of this suspension would be very real", the official said, speaking under condition of anonymity. To be adopted, the proposal requires the backing of 15 of the bloc's 27 member countries representing at least 65 per cent of the bloc's population. EU ambassadors in Brussels discussed the proposal on Tuesday, but a number of them said they were still analysing the proposal. A decision is expected in the coming weeks. Four countries – the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria and Austria – said they would oppose it. But, importantly, Germany and Italy did not express outright rejection. "There was a clear shift in tone from the Commission, which said that dialogue had not worked," an EU diplomat told The National. Germany is Israel's closest ally within the EU and its second most important weapons provider. Chancellor Friedrich Merz this week signalled a shift in position, saying he "reserved the right" to support proposals to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Italy, under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, has deepened ties with Israel and the US. Yet Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof has already expressed support for the proposal, triggering a sharp rebuke by Israeli President Isaac Herzog. The commission believes it is putting forward "appropriate and proportionate measures" in accordance with article 79 of the Euro-Mediterranean agreement. It states that if either party believes the other has failed to fulfil the agreement, "priority shall be given to [measures] that least disturb the functioning of the agreement". The proposal has been described as "the absolute minimum" by close observer Martin Konecny, director of the European Middle East Project think tank in Brussels. Blocking non-EU countries' participation to Horizon Europe has been done in the past for political reasons, as in the case of the UK and Switzerland. "Horizon Europe has been used as political leverage in cases of bilateral disputes with close partners," Mr Konecny told The National. "The EU Commission chose to not use it in the case of Israel despite serious violations of international law." The EU Commission insists comparisons are not appropriate because neither country was fully integrated into Horizon Europe when negotiations began. "There is no precedence of suspending in part or in full an Association Agreement to Horizon Europe," the senior EU official said. Why now? The proposal comes after the EU's foreign affairs services conducted an internal review that found Israel had breached a human rights clause, article 2, enshrined in the treaty governing EU-Israel relations called the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The open-sourced review was based on findings by international bodies such as the International Court of Justice and the UN. At their last meeting in Brussels before a summer break, the EU's 27 foreign ministers had decided to not act on any of the 10 proposals put forward by Ms Kallas. They instead said they would wait to assess how Ms Kallas's announcement on July 10 of a deal with Israel to allow more aid flow into Gaza would be implemented. Nearly three weeks later, it appears to have had little effect. The EU's humanitarian affairs department, DG Echo, is unable monitor the situation on the ground and bases itself on reports from partner UN organisations. In its report covering the mid-July period, DG Echo said: "Despite recent agreement with Israel to increase aid delivery to Gaza, there is still no tangible increase, with important stocks of relief items stuck and piling up at the borders." A big deal? After 21 months of war, and with no ceasefire in sight amid rising reports of mass starvation in Gaza, Israel appears to be suddenly under significant international pressure. US President Donald Trump said "real famine" was unfolding. Meanwhile, Israeli NGOs have accused their government of genocide for the first time. Last week, 27 countries, including the UK, France, Italy and Japan called on Israel to immediately end the war in Gaza and condemned what it described as the "drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians". On Tuesday, the death toll in Gaza surpassed 60,000. Israel continues to deny reports of starvation, labelling them a fabrication, and accuses Hamas of stealing aid despite mounting evidence of the contrary. Suspending trade preferences under the EU-Israel Agreement was one of the 10 options put forward by Ms Kallas. As in Monday's proposal, it must first be tabled by the EU Commission. However, it needs unanimous backing within the EU council to be adopted. This remains unlikely, considering strong support within the EU for Israel from countries such as Hungary and the Czech Republic, in addition to Germany. A full suspension of the agreement would also require unanimity. Up to now, the EU's decision to do nothing was largely due to German opposition. Increasingly frustrated smaller nations such as Slovenia have taken symbolic measures, including a visa ban against two extremist Israeli ministers announced on July 17. The Netherlands took a similar measure on Monday. This has exposed the EU's weakness as a foreign policy player: "We see a coalition of smaller states that are not powerful enough to solve the problem on their own," said Ana Bojinovic Fenko, chairwoman of international relations at the University of Ljubljana. The EU is stuck in a state of "non-decision", she told The National. Most EU countries preferred to do nothing to avoid acting alone. What can EU countries do? One reason it has been so hard to make a decision regarding the EU-Israel Association Agreement is that the path forward is murky, even for diplomats in Brussels. The EU has suspended association agreements with 25 countries but nearly always in the context of an African country after a coup d'etat, starting with Niger in 1996. The capacity of EU nations to impose sanctions at national level is quite restrained, said Clara Portela Sais, an EU foreign policy expert at the University of Valencia. That is because individual countries cannot make decisions that may affect the harmonised regulations of the EU's common market. They allow for the free circulation of people and goods across the bloc. For this reason, visa bans announced by EU countries against Israeli ministers do not include frozen assets. The UK, which is no longer part of the EU, issued both a visa ban and an asset freeze against Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on June 10. "The common market also includes financial flows," Ms Portela Sais told The National. "This is more of a grey area, so this is actually not something that member states do individually. Actually, most of them refrain from doing so." A simple visa ban is the easiest way to express symbolic discontent because it has no impact on the common market. "Irrespective of legal aspects, the reason why the member states have a preference for acting through the EU is because the political message is much stronger," Ms Portela Sais said. Implementing an arms embargo on Israel is another largely symbolic measure that has been adopted by a number of countries, including Spain. However, even that is complicated by the fact that dual use items are part of the common market, Ms Portela Sais said. "Only purely exclusively military items are excluded from the common market but nowadays, there are very few arms embargoes that only cover military items," she added. For EU countries to make decisions at EU level, there needs to be political will – meaning a large enough coalition of countries moving together. In February 2024 – at a time when nearly 30,000 Gazans had been killed – Ireland and Spain wrote to the EU Commission asking to review the human rights clause of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. At the time, no other country followed and the request was dropped. Now, the number of Gazans killed by Israel has doubled. That is why rights groups accuse the EU of lacking political will. If more countries had joined Spain and Ireland at the time, the EU could have wielded its leverage to influence the course of the war. Other initiatives have been ignored. In June, nine countries including Belgium, Poland and Sweden, asked the commission asking it to examine the legal implications on the common market of a July 2024 International Court of Justice decision to bar states from trading with the occupied Palestinian territories. So far, the decision, despite being legally binding, has not been followed by EU countries, except by Ireland. The ICJ has no way to enforce its decisions.
