Victoria keeps its AA credit rating despite warnings over project costs
S&P Global said on Wednesday that it had reaffirmed Victoria's AA rating as it expected the state's infrastructure spending to peak this financial year and large deficits to narrow over the next two to three years.
S&P's outlook remained stable, meaning it believes the rating is more likely to stay at this position than to worsen.
'We expect Victoria to realise small operating surpluses over the next three years,' it said in a statement.
The ratings agency said the Allan government was taking steps to saves costs and would benefit from increased GST revenue and tax receipts. S&P also said the state would receive extra funding through its rebranded fire services levy and expanded congestion charge, which was 'supporting an improving operating position from a very weak base'.
'We expect the government to show fiscal restraint ahead of the 2026 election, which should keep its operating balance in surplus,' it said. 'Victoria's economy is wealthy, well-diversified, and fundamentally sound.'
Net debt in Victoria is forecast to hit $194 billion in four years' time.
S&P said Victoria's commitment to control costs and slow debt growth was important to rebuild the financial protections that had been lost during the COVID-19 pandemic. But it noted that doing this had previously been difficult for the government.
'The state tends to spend all unexpected revenue gains that it receives and has struggled to implement previous savings targets including workforce reductions,' the agency said. 'We believe strong governance and the quality of Victoria's major investment decisions are important for the government's fiscal credentials and our credit rating on the state.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform
Well, you can forget about Treasurer Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable discussions leading to any improvement in the economy's productivity and growth, let alone getting the budget back under control. Late last week, the Business Council of Australia (BCA) persuaded all of Canberra's many other business lobby groups to join it in rejecting out of hand the Productivity Commission's proposal for reform of the company tax system which, the commission argued, would increase businesses' incentive to invest more in productivity-enhancing plant and equipment, without any net reduction in company tax collections. The proposal is for the rate of company tax to be cut for all but our biggest 500 companies, while introducing a 5 per cent tax on the net cash flow of all companies. The join statement by 24 business lobby groups says that 'while some businesses may benefit under the proposal, it risks all Australian consumers and businesses paying more for the things they buy every day – groceries, fuel and other daily essentials'. Get it? This is the lobbyists' oldest trick: 'We're not concerned about what the tax change would do to our profits, dear reader, we're just worried about what it would do you and your pocket. It's not us we worry about, it's our customers.' Loading Suddenly, their professed concern about the lack of productivity improvement and slow growth is out the window, and now it's the cost of living they're deeply worried about. They've been urging governments to increase the GST for years, but now they don't want higher prices. Yeah, sure. Bet you didn't know there are as many as 24 different business lobby groups in the capital. Their role is to advance the narrowly defined interests of their paying clients back in the rest of Oz by means fair or foul. They're not paid to help the government reach a deal we can all live with, nor to suggest that their clients worry about anything other than their own immediate interests. Canberra calls this lobbying. Economists call it rent-seeking. You press the government for special deals at the expense of someone else, while ensuring you contribute as little as possible. This, apparently, is the way democracy is meant to work.
The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform
Well, you can forget about Treasurer Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable discussions leading to any improvement in the economy's productivity and growth, let alone getting the budget back under control. Late last week, the Business Council of Australia (BCA) persuaded all of Canberra's many other business lobby groups to join it in rejecting out of hand the Productivity Commission's proposal for reform of the company tax system which, the commission argued, would increase businesses' incentive to invest more in productivity-enhancing plant and equipment, without any net reduction in company tax collections. The proposal is for the rate of company tax to be cut for all but our biggest 500 companies, while introducing a 5 per cent tax on the net cash flow of all companies. The join statement by 24 business lobby groups says that 'while some businesses may benefit under the proposal, it risks all Australian consumers and businesses paying more for the things they buy every day – groceries, fuel and other daily essentials'. Get it? This is the lobbyists' oldest trick: 'We're not concerned about what the tax change would do to our profits, dear reader, we're just worried about what it would do you and your pocket. It's not us we worry about, it's our customers.' Loading Suddenly, their professed concern about the lack of productivity improvement and slow growth is out the window, and now it's the cost of living they're deeply worried about. They've been urging governments to increase the GST for years, but now they don't want higher prices. Yeah, sure. Bet you didn't know there are as many as 24 different business lobby groups in the capital. Their role is to advance the narrowly defined interests of their paying clients back in the rest of Oz by means fair or foul. They're not paid to help the government reach a deal we can all live with, nor to suggest that their clients worry about anything other than their own immediate interests. Canberra calls this lobbying. Economists call it rent-seeking. You press the government for special deals at the expense of someone else, while ensuring you contribute as little as possible. This, apparently, is the way democracy is meant to work.
West Australian
10 hours ago
- West Australian
Omar Khorshid : Former AMA WA president honoured alongside Tony Bartone for leadership in COVID crisis
Omar Khorshid : Former AMA WA president honoured alongside Tony Bartone for leadership in COVID crisis
