
Good night — and good luck
First, a disclaimer: the following remarks do not apply to MSNBC TV journalists Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell, or to contemporary independent commentators Heather Cox Richardson or Robert Reich, or to the online political guerrilla site Fear and Loathing: Closer to the Edge. They are all yelling as loudly as they possibly can.
Everyone else in the American media? It's well past time for you to slap yourselves upside the head and try to remember one essential aspect of competent journalism: context is everything.
An average Grade 2 student could accurately connect the dots on the map that is U.S. President Donald Trump's now-detailed sketch of the American police state that is no longer just on the horizon. It's here. It marched into Los Angeles, garbed in military camouflage costumes, on a restive weekend filled with protests over ICE gestapo raiding, of all places, a Home Depot, looking for people with the wrong skin colour (if they're brown, they must be illegals).
What to make of Trump's magnificent June 14 military parade, the one purportedly celebrating the American military's 250th anniversary, but which we all know is his big, beautiful birthday gift to himself? The one he so obviously modelled after all those tawdry spectacles in countries led by dictators he has so publicly admired— both the dictators and their pretty masses of toy soldiers and tanks?
Icing on the cake he's already baked.
On a weary Monday morning, one CNN anchor raised, during her interview with Los Angeles's mayor, the latest poll showing 54 per cent of Americans approve of Trump's immigration policy. The mayor pushed back, suggesting the anchor might look more deeply into that poll. The anchor clumsily conceded that more Americans are uncomfortable with the details of how that policy is being carried out — and hastily concluded the interview. She did not cut to a commercial break; she just didn't want to go there any further with the mayor.
Less than an hour later, another CNN anchor gushed about the network's Saturday night simulcast of the Broadway play Good Night and Good Luck, cooing about how Edward R. Murrow's journalistically, stubbornly ethical stand (the play is about the infamous McCarthy era in the U.S., for those too young to remember), and remarking 'that is something we journalists all aspire to.'
Is it? Is it really?
Fascinating that the simulcast effectively displaced any live breaking news coverage of the Saturday night protests in Los Angeles.
Let's examine all the dots to see the picture they create. Commentator Robert Reich recently noted the defining characteristics of a police state:
• Declaring an emergency, citing rebellion, insurrection, or invasion as the cause. Done;
• Using that to justify the use of force by federal agents (ICE, the FBI, DEA, and national guard… and the Marines and American military are positioned to join the fray at some point). Done;
• Ordering those agents to make 'dragnet' arrests and abductions with no due process. Done; and
• Building more prison space and detention camps for the prisoners rounded up. That's happening now.
He listed one more point — the next one. The shoe that's about to drop: using the inevitable escalation of public pushback, driven by fury over the enactment of the first four, as the excuse to declare martial law.
With the notable exception of that small group I cited at the beginning of this piece, the American media (and the vast bulk of the Canadian media, too — don't think for a minute you folks are handling this mess any better) has completely failed to connect the dots. They're too busy examining each individual dot, turning each one over and over, to step back and look at the context. It is worth noting that, fixated on each little dot, they failed to examine the comment Trump threw out in an off-the-cuff newser over that tipping point of a weekend for American democracy.
Having said he would order in the Marines if the protests went over the line, he was asked by an unusually perceptive reporter where that line is.
Weekday Evenings
Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening.
His reply: 'It is where I say it is.'
Pair that with his remark to a rally of ultra-right white Christians during the election campaign: 'Vote for me, and you'll never have to vote again.'
How much more obvious does this have to get before the media starts to perform the role for which it is intended in a democracy?
America, your police state has arrived. Just remember: once they have come for everyone else, they will be coming for you. MAGA hat or not.
Judy Waytiuk is a grey-haired, wrinkled old Winnipeg journalist who remembers when she was proud her profession ranked among the most trusted by the public. These days, she's ashamed to admit she was one.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Hong Kong cancels passports, bans financial support for wanted overseas activists
The activists were among 19 people who were targeted with arrest warrants in July for alleged roles in Hong Kong Parliament, a pro-democracy group the police called a subversive organization abroad. The organization is not the region's official legislature and its influence is limited. Three of the original 19 activists were already targeted by similar measures last year. Secretary for Security Chris Tang banned providing funds or economic resources to the 16 activists, including Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai, Australian academic Chongyi Feng and U.S. citizen Gong Sasha, the Hong Kong government said in a statement. Travel documents were cancelled for 12 of the 16 who hold Hong Kong passports. WATCH | Arrest warrants for 19 overseas activists issued by Hong Kong police: The government also prohibited properties from being leased to the people on the list or forming joint ventures with them. Anyone violating the orders risks a penalty of up to seven years in prison. The 16 activists are hiding in the U.K., the United States, Canada (new window) , Germany, Australia, Thailand and Taiwan, among other regions, the government said, accusing them of continuing to engage in activities endangering national security. The notice also accused them of intending to incite hatred against Beijing and Hong Kong through smear and slander. We therefore have taken such measures to make a significant impact, the statement said. WATCH | 'We all live in fear,' democracy advocate says following Hong Kong arrest warrants: Beijing imposed a national security law on the territory in 2020 that has effectively wiped out most public dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019. Many activists were arrested, silenced or forced into self-exile. The measures announced on Monday were issued under the powers granted by Hong Kong's homegrown national security law enacted last year. The arrest warrants issued in July have drawn criticism from foreign governments, including the U.S., the U.K. and the European Union. Police offered rewards ranging from 200,000 Hong Kong dollars ($35,114 Cdn) to one million Hong Kong dollars ($175,574 Cdn) for information leading to their arrests. WATCH | Hong Kong law cracking down on dissent comes into effect: In a July statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the moves. The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression, he said. We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil. The Hong Kong office of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry responded by opposing criticism from foreign politicians, insisting the actions were legitimate. The governments in Beijing and Hong Kong said the security laws were necessary for the region's stability.


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Modi and Trump once called each other good friends. Now the US-India relationship is getting bumpy
NEW DELHI (AP) — They men shared bear hugs, showered praise on each other and made appearances side by side at stadium rallies — a big optics boost for two populist leaders with ideological similarities. Each called the other a good friend. In India, the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump was seen as a relationship like no other. That is, until a series of events gummed up the works. From Trump's tariffs and India's purchase of oil from Russia to a U.S. tilt towards Pakistan, friction between New Delhi and Washington has been hard to miss. And much of it has happened far from the corridors of power and, unsurprisingly, through Trump's posts on social media. It has left policy experts wondering whether the camaraderie the two leaders shared may be a thing of the past, even though Trump has stopped short of referring to Modi directly on social media. The dip in rapport, some say, puts a strategic bilateral relationship built over decades at risk. 'This is a testing time for the relationship,' said Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. Simmering tensions over trade and tariffs The latest hiccup between India and the U.S. emerged last week when Trump announced that he was slapping 25% tariffs on India as well as an unspecified penalty because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. For New Delhi, such a move from its largest trading partner is expected to be felt across sectors, but it also led to a sense of unease in India — even more so when Trump, on social media, called India's economy 'dead.' Trump's recent statements reflect his frustration with the pace of trade talks with India, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal administration thinking. The Republican president has not been pursuing any strategic realignment with Pakistan, according to the official, but is instead trying to play hardball in negotiations. Trump doubled down on the pressure Monday with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of oil from Russia and then 'selling it on the Open Market for big profits.' 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said. The messaging appears to have stung Modi's administration, which has been hard-selling negotiations with Trump's team over a trade deal by balancing between India's protectionist system while also opening up the country's market to more American goods. Many expected India to react strongly considering Modi's carefully crafted reputation of strength. Instead, the announcement prompted a rather careful response from India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who said the two countries are working towards a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement.' India's Foreign Ministry also played down suggestions of any strain. However, experts in New Delhi wonder. 'Strenuous, uninterrupted and bipartisan efforts in both capitals over the past 25 years are being put at risk by not just the tariffs but by fast and loose statements and social media posts,' said Malik, who now heads the India chapter of The Asia Group, a U.S. advisory firm . Malik also said the trade deal the Indian side has offered to the U.S. is the 'most expansive in this country's history,' referring to reports that India was willing to open up to some American agricultural products. That is a politically sensitive issue for Modi, who faced a yearlong farmers' protest a few years ago. Trump appears to be tilting towards Pakistan The unraveling may have gained momentum over tariffs, but the tensions have been palpable for a while. Much of it has to do with Trump growing closer to Pakistan, India's nuclear rival in the neighborhood. In May, India and Pakistan traded a series of military strikes over a gun massacre in disputed Kashmir that New Delhi blamed Islamabad for. Pakistan denied the accusations. The four-day conflict made the possibility of a nuclear conflagration between the two sides seem real and the fighting only stopped when global powers intervened. But it was Trump's claims of mediation and an offer to work to provide a 'solution' regarding the dispute over Kashmir that made Modi's administration uneasy. Since then, Trump has repeated nearly two dozen times that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan. For Modi, that is a risky — even nervy — territory. Domestically, he has positioned himself as a leader who is tough on Pakistan. Internationally, he has made huge diplomatic efforts to isolate the country. So Trump's claims cut a deep wound, prompting a sense in India that the U.S. may no longer be its strategic partner. India insists that Kashmir is India's internal issue and had opposed any third-party intervention. Last week Modi appeared to dismiss Trump's claims after India's Opposition began demanding answers from him. Modi said that 'no country in the world stopped' the fighting between India and Pakistan, but he did not name Trump. Trump has also appeared to be warming up to Pakistan, even praising its counterterrorism efforts. Hours after levying tariffs on India, Trump announced a 'massive' oil exploration deal with Pakistan, saying that some day, India might have to buy oil from Islamabad. Earlier, he also hosted one of Pakistan's top military officials at a private lunch. Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, an expert at New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said Trump's sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has 'definitely soured' the mood in India. Chaulia said 'the best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim,' but he also warned that 'if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the U.S. and Pakistan, it will dent the U.S.-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the U.S. in Indian eyes.' India's oil purchases from Russia are an irritant The strain in relations has also to do with oil. India had faced strong pressure from the Biden administration to cut back its oil purchases from Moscow during the early months of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, India bought more, making it the second-biggest buyer of Russian oil after China. That pressure sputtered over time and the U.S. focused more on building strategic ties with India, which is seen as a bulwark against a rising China. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Trump's threat to penalize India over oil, however, brought back those issues. On Sunday, the Trump administration made its frustrations over ties between India and Russia ever more public. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House, accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, saying it was 'not acceptable.' Some experts, though, suspect Trump's remarks are mere pressure tactics. 'Given the wild fluctuations in Trump's policies,' Chaulia said, 'it may return to high fives and hugs again.' ___ Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price in Washington contributed reporting.

an hour ago
Champagne, Anand travelling to Mexico to strengthen Canada's trade ties: sources
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says he and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand will be travelling to Mexico City to look at strengthening Canada's economic partnership with Mexico. The meetings will be constructive in that respect — looking at markets, looking at diversification, looking at strengthening our partnership with our Mexican colleagues, Champagne told Radio-Canada in Trois-Rivières, Que., on Monday afternoon. The news was first reported Sunday evening by the Globe and Mail. Two senior Canadian government sources told CBC News the meetings are happening tomorrow and Wednesday. The ministers are expected to return to Canada on Thursday. The sources say the goal of the visit is to advance Canada's bilateral relationship with Mexico and strengthen trade ties. Champagne and Anand are expected to meet with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Tuesday morning. Enlarge image (new window) Sheinbaum at the inauguration of a community hospital in Vicam, Sonora state, Mexico in mid-July. On Thursday, Trump posted on social media that he and Sheinbaum had agreed extend an existing trade deal for 90 days. Photo: Reuters / Mexico Presidency Champagne said the visit is all complementary to what we've been saying — that we need to engage with strategic partners around the world. And if you look at the [U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement] as a trading bloc, that's the second-largest trading bloc in the world. So it is important for us to engage with our Mexican friends, the finance minister added. One source told CBC that the trip is all about relationship building and the two ministers' expected meeting with Sheinbaum will lay the groundwork for a future bilateral meeting between the Mexican president and Prime Minister Mark Carney. Carney and Sheinbaum have spoken at least four times since the prime minister came into office. In June, the two met at the G7 Leaders' Summit in Alberta. A press release posted on Carney's website (new window) said he and Sheinbaum agreed to deepen bilateral collaboration at the ministerial level and they looked forward to meeting again in Mexico in the coming months. Trump extends tariff deal with Mexico The Canadians' visit comes days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced he had agreed with Sheinbaum to extend an existing trade deal with Mexico for 90 days and continue talks over the period with a goal of signing a new deal. Mexico will continue to pay a 25% Fentanyl Tariff, 25% Tariff on Cars, and 50% Tariff on Steel, Aluminum and Copper, Trump said in a Truth Social post. Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many. Enlarge image (new window) Carney, Trump and Sheinbaum will renegotiate the trilateral free trade pact known as the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Agreement in 2026. Photo: Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press, Marco Ugarte/The Associated Press, Manuel Balce Ceneta/The Associated Press Canada did not get an extension. Trump signed an executive order raising tariffs on Canadian goods that are not compliant with USMCA to 35 per cent. The carve-out for USMCA-compliant goods means very few Canadian products will actually be subjected to the elevated tariff. The U.S. president criticized Canada's lack of co-operation in curbing the flow of fentanyl southward and for retaliating against his existing tariffs. On Sunday, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said he expects (new window) Carney and Trump will have a conversation with each other over the next couple of days. LeBlanc left Washington earlier this week without a trade deal, but he told host Margaret Brennan, host of CBS's Face The Nation, that he came out of discussions "with a better understanding of the American concerns in the trading relationship. So we're prepared to stick around and do the work needed, LeBlanc added. With files from Philip Ling