logo
Australia is failing families affected by child sexual abuse. We must listen to the intervention and prevention experts

Australia is failing families affected by child sexual abuse. We must listen to the intervention and prevention experts

The Guardian5 days ago

Child sexual abuse is a global public health crisis that directly or indirectly affects every single human being on the planet and costs taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Its lasting harms are wide-ranging, complex, amorphous, generational.
In Australia, one in five boys and one in three girls are sexually abused before the age of 18. One in 10 men have a history of offending against children, online or offline. The most common adult perpetrator is a caregiver in the home. Child sexual abuse accounts for at least half of prosecuted sexual offences in this country. If you aren't a victim-survivor, perpetrator or both, the chances are you love someone who is.
Eight years ago, the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse made a gamut of recommendations to address the problem from every angle. Among them was provision of national support services for non-offending family members of child sexual abuse offenders, who are typically left devastated and traumatised once the offending is revealed, as well as an early intervention service for people concerned about their sexual interest or behaviour towards children. Both measures feature in the 2021 National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse and its corresponding national action plan, overseen by the National Office for Child Safety (NOCS) – which falls within the Attorney-General's Department.
These services are designed to fill major gaps in the Australian response to child sexual abuse. And although tenders for these services were supposed to go to market in 2022, they weren't opened until a year later. They closed in February 2024. As of today, no contract has been signed for the delivery of these vital services. The process has been so protracted, unethical and mishandled that it warranted an independent audit conducted by the Australian National Audit Office (Anao).
The Anao report, released last week, found that the Attorney-General's Department is failing in its duty to deliver essential services to prevent sexual abuse before it occurs and support affected families. The procurement process was found to be flawed in multiple ways. Perhaps most alarmingly, the highest scoring tender for family support services was inexplicably struck out in favour of the second ranked tender. Out of 11 tenderers, seven failed to comply with one or more of the assessment criteria. In sourcing consultants for the procurement process, the department was found to have engaged in non-competitive practices, contravening its own commonwealth procurement rules.
Despite these shortcomings, the Attorney-General's Department is insisting that the audit will not change the outcome of the tenders. While the department's excuse for the delays is that these are 'complex' services, it is demonstrably unfair to apportion blame to the sector. The problem isn't an absence of services or experts able to manage complexity, it's government incompetence and insufficient funding.
More to the point, regardless of the reason, the dire consequences of the delays extend far beyond the service providers and traumatised consumers in need. There is an unknown but guaranteed number of children who have suffered otherwise preventable sexual abuse as a result.
In any other area of national crisis and priority, the contracting and delivery of critical services is unlikely to be so drawn out and poorly handled. How could something so widespread and urgent be treated with such blatant disregard? Because child sexual abuse is ugly, uncomfortable and impossible to sanitise for the mainstream.
The bleak reality of child sexual abuse is that it cannot be easily communicated in glossy advertising campaigns or public education programs. The fact is, people with a sexual interest in children need options to stop them before they offend, because the moment they take that step, they leave behind a trail of destruction that includes not just their victims and their families, but their own devastated partners and children.
The need for robust, specialised child sexual abuse intervention and prevention services could not be more apparent. Australia has had no national support for non-offending family members of child sexual abuse perpetrators for more than two years. After a police raid removes every device from a family home, who supports the mother? What does she do with her trauma? How does she care for her children? Who do the children of parents who've offended call?
The service models that Australia needs already exist. They've been built by experts, refined over years, and proven to work. Hope lies there, and with the stalwart frontline workers and advocates across the country who will keep fighting for funding because we believe that preventing child sexual abuse is a worthy and achievable goal that benefits all of us.
In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. If you or someone you know is affected by sexual assault, family or domestic violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit www.1800RESPECT.org.au. In an emergency, call 000. International helplines can be found via www.befrienders.org. The Stop It Now! helpline is 1800 011 800.
Grace Tame was the 2021 Australian of the Year, and is director of the Grace Tame Foundation
This article has been co-signed by: Prof Michael Salter, director of the Childlight East Asia and Pacific Hub at UNSW; Prof Jon Rouse APM, Childlight East Asia and Pacific Hub at UNSW and AiLECs Lab Monash University; Hetty Johnston AM; Rosie Batty AO; Rachel Green, CEO of SANE; Natalie Walker, PartnerSPEAK founder

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elderly patient allegedly punches female paramedic who was trying to help him
Elderly patient allegedly punches female paramedic who was trying to help him

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Elderly patient allegedly punches female paramedic who was trying to help him

An elderly man has been detained after allegedly punching a female paramedic in the back of an ambulance after she tried to offer him help. Police were called to the intersection of Bunnerong Road and Daunt Avenue in Matraville, in Sydney 's east, about 3.50pm on Friday following reports of a concern for welfare. Officers asked for help from NSW Ambulance to treat an allegedly intoxicated 66-year-old man. Paramedics assessed the man at the scene and began transporting him to Prince of Wales Hospital in Randwick when the alleged assault occurred. Police allege the man threatened a 24-year-old female paramedic while inside the ambulance before he began to punch her in the torso and arms. 'Police immediately attended and assisted paramedics taking the man to hospital under police guard,' NSW Police said in a statement. 'The 24-year-old paramedic did not require treatment.' Police then made inquiries before the elderly man was released from hospital and taken to Mascot Police Station. He was charged with assault frontline health worker no actual bodily harm. The man was refused bail to appear before Parramatta Local Court on Saturday.

Australian reality TV star charged with decapitating boyfriend
Australian reality TV star charged with decapitating boyfriend

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Australian reality TV star charged with decapitating boyfriend

Police are seeking the head of an alleged murder victim after a former reality television star was accused of murdering and decapitating her boyfriend. Officers discovered the burnt and dismembered remains of Julian Story, 39, on the bathroom floor of an apartment in the coastal city of Port Lincoln last Tuesday when responding to reports of a small fire. Tamika Sueann-Rose Chesser, a 34-year-old former contestant on Beauty and the Geek Australia, was arrested two days later and charged with murder. Police found Ms Chesser sitting in the back garden of the property 'in a catatonic and unresponsive state,' according to court documents. Ms Chesser, a model and actress, is also charged with disposing of human remains to pervert the course of justice and assaulting a police officer. Detectives have issued an appeal to the public to find Mr Story's missing head which they said was removed after his alleged murder on June 17 at approximately midnight. Detective Superintendent Darren Fielke, in a press conference on Friday, said: 'While I won't provide any further detail about that at this time, I can tragically say that we have not recovered the head of Julian Story.' 'I can only imagine, and I want you to imagine, the grief this news is causing Julian's family. 'Recovering Julian's head to return it to his family so they can have a peaceful outcome, have a funeral and lay him to rest is a really important aspect for us.' Detective Superintendent Fielke said there was no obvious motive at this stage and Ms Chesser was compliant at the time of the arrest. Police have released CCTV footage and still images to the public of a woman alleged to be Ms Chesser walking through Port Lincoln with her dogs after the alleged murder in the hope of determining where the head may have been hidden. The woman can be seen dressed in full body black dress and a black head covering, and walking down the pavement with three dogs. 'I'm appealing to local residents to review CCTV or dash cam footage which they may have, which may assist the investigation,' Superintendent Fielke said. A court order anonymising the identity of Ms Chesser was lifted on Friday in Adelaide Magistrates Court by Magistrate Ben Sale. The suppression order, which had also prevented the publication of the alleged circumstances of his death and the investigation. Ms Chesser, who appeared in court via video link on Friday, was refused bail when she first appeared last week and is being held under a mental health detention order. She will next appear for a committal hearing in December. The bereaved family of Mr Story has thanked police, emergency workers, family, friends and the community for their support. 'We are navigating an unimaginable loss, and your care has brought comfort amid the chaos,' the family said in a statement. Kiya-May Chesser, the defendant's sister, said her family has been left reeling from reports their loved one had been charged with her murder. Speaking to Daily Mail Australia, she said: 'Please report how my sister is in a mental psychosis... This is not her... She would never do these things.' She added that her sister had experienced a 'life of trauma and abuse, and now this – it has fried her brain'. Ian Parrott, the South Australia Police assistant commissioner, said there were a lot of unanswered questions in the investigation and it was a complex crime scene 'so it will take some time to understand the exact nature of what's occurred'.

How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder
How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder

No-one has disputed that death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington that killed three people and left another in a coma for week after a fateful lunch on a July Saturday in 2023. But the key question in the Australian murder trial of Erin Patterson was how those deadly mushrooms got there. The mother-of-two has been charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and charged with the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. The trial is due to conclude next week, with the jury expected to retire to consider its verdict. Over two months the court has heard in great detail about what happened but questions about why still linger. In her own words, Patterson was a big fan of mushrooms. 'They taste good and are very healthy,' she told the regional Victorian court. 'I'd buy all the different types that Woolies would sell.' She got so into mushrooms that she began foraging for wild ones during Covid lockdowns, Patterson said, but admitted that identifying safe varieties was sometimes difficult. She testified that she couldn't remember, but it was possible she had searched online for death cap mushrooms. All the while, the accused agreed during her two weeks on the witness stand that her relationship with her estranged husband Simon Patterson had become strained. The Pattersons had separated several times after the birth of their son in 2009, and separated in 2015 but maintained a friendly relationship, as both told the court. Mr Patterson told the court that the issue seemed to begin when he had listed himself as separated on a tax return. 'She wasn't happy with that,' he said, explaining that the change would affect their family tax benefit, and they mutually agreed she would pursue child support payments. In the months before the fatal lunch she had tried to involve her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, in their dispute over school fees. She acknowledged in court that was unfair. 'They were doing nothing but trying to support us,' she said. 'I was asking them to agree with me that I was right and Simon was wrong, and that wasn't fair.' She revealed that, in private messages to friends, she had vented frustration by calling the Patterson family a 'lost cause' and saying, 'so f*** 'em.' Growing visibly emotional in court, she told the jury she 'needed to vent'. 'The choice was either go into the paddock and tell the sheep or vent to these women,' she said, adding that she had probably 'played up the emotion' to get support from her online friends. 'I wish I'd never said it. I feel ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn't have to hear that I said that,' she told the court. 'They didn't deserve it.' Patterson had been a 'fundamentalist atheist' when she met her future husband, a Christian, in 2004, while working at a Melbourne council. But she told the court she had a 'spiritual experience' at the Korumburra Baptist Church, led by Mr Patterson's uncle and the only surviving lunch victim, Mr Wilkinson. The court heard Patterson inherited $2 million (£950,000) from her grandmother two years later, and she used the money to buy properties and loan money to her husband's siblings. She also admitted to having low self-esteem, and to struggling with her weight. Patterson lied to her lunch guests about having cancer because she felt ashamed that she was really having bariatric surgery for weight loss, she told the court. Her estranged husband had also been invited, but he turned the invitation down the day before, the jury heard, and in messages shown to the court she expressed disappointment at his decision. 'That's really disappointing, I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow,' Patterson allegedly responded. 'It's important for me that you're all there… I hope you change your mind.' In closing arguments, prosecutors in Patterson's triple-murder trial outlined four calculated deceptions at the heart of their case: a fake cancer diagnosis to lure her guests, the deliberate death cap mushroom poisoning, lies that she too had fallen ill and an ongoing cover-up to hide the alleged truth. 'She had complete control over the ingredients that went into the lunch,' chief prosecutor Nanette Rogers said. Two of the lunch guests had also noted that Patterson's lunch meal was served on a different coloured plate to that of her guests, the court heard. Afterwards, the prosecution said Patterson gave inconsistent and vague accounts about where she got the mushrooms from, and was slow to respond to the Department of Health which was trying to get to the bottom of the source of the deadly fungi. The prosecution also told the jury Patterson had pretended to be sick to family and to medical workers to suggest she had also eaten the same meal as her guests, in an attempt 'to disguise her crime'. But Patterson denied these allegations. At the end of her cross examination, three accusations were put to her: that she deliberately got death cap mushrooms, that she knowingly put them in the beef wellingtons and that she intended to kill her lunch guests. To each accusation, she said: 'disagree'. Her defence said she panicked after learning her lunch may have poisoned her guests, and she had not been prepared for the intense reaction she received when first arriving at hospital with symptoms of loose stools following the meal. Summarising the trial, Chief Justice Christopher Beale told the jury that her defence said 'she found it difficult to accept she may have suffered death cap mushroom poisoning. She had not come prepared to be admitted overnight. She needed to make arrangements for the children and the animals … and was intending to return to hospital.' From Monday afternoon, the jury will have to weigh the nine weeks of testimony to decide whether the prosecution has proven beyond reasonable doubt that Patterson committed murder.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store