SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk for Tirumala rituals
A bench comprising Justices M M Sundaresh and N Kotiswar Singh, while hearing the matter, guided the petitioner to approach the respective High Court instead. 'A cow is a cow,' remarked Justice Sundaresh, underlining that distinctions based on cow breeds, languages, or regions are human constructs. 'God belongs to everyone. Can we then claim that God prefers only local cow milk?' he said, cautioning against injecting divisive interpretations into religious practices.
The petitioner's counsel had argued that the Agama Shastras prescribe the use of milk from native Indian breeds in temple rituals and pointed out that TTD itself had previously passed a resolution supporting such practices. The plea, the lawyer insisted, was aimed at enforcing TTD's own stated commitment.
However, the bench queried whether there was any binding legal framework backing such a demand. Upon being referred to prior constitutional judgments, the court was not convinced to admit the case and declined to interfere.
'Shall we also then ask whether Tirupati laddus should be made exclusively from indigenous ingredients?' Justice Sundaresh remarked in a lighter vein, before allowing the petitioner to withdraw the plea with the liberty to move the High Court.
Justice Sundaresh said that devotion must manifest through compassion for all life forms rather than by creating artificial divides. 'Many pressing issues demand the court's attention. My observations were made with utmost respect to religious sentiments', he added.
Meanwhile, it was learnt that the temple's cattle shelters house over 3,000 indigenous cows of breeds like Ongole, Gir, and Sahiwal. These cows already supply milk for rituals such as the sacred Abhishekam performed for the deity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
International Tiger Day 2025: History, theme, significance, and more
International Tiger Day, celebrated annually on July 29, serves as a crucial reminder of our responsibility to protect tigers. Due to concerns including poaching, habitat destruction, and human conflict, the tigers, which were formerly widely distributed throughout Asia, now only exist in a small number of reserves. In addition to being charismatic creatures, tigers are keystone species whose existence is essential to preserving a thriving ecosystem. Unfortunately, their population has decreased by more than 95% in the past century. Thirteen tiger-range nations collaborate annually to increase awareness and put conservation measures in place in an effort to buck this worrying trend. History of International Tiger Day During the 2010 Saint Petersburg Tiger Summit in Russia, International Tiger Day was established. Only roughly 3,000 wild tigers remain in the wild, a critically low number that prompted the summit. Thirteen tiger-range nations, including Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Malaysia, India, and Russia, participated in the conference. Under the "Tx2" target, the primary objective was to double the tiger population by 2022 through international collaboration and conservation initiatives. Since then, the day has grown to represent concerted global efforts to protect tigers. Theme of International Tiger Day 2025 Global Tiger Day has a unique theme and message each year. The Global Tiger Forum will announce the theme for 2025. Previous slogans have included "Save Tigers, Save Forests, Save Life" and "Roar for Tigers." Outreach initiatives and school events are shaped by these messages. Students are urged to take up the role of young environmental guardians. The ecology of tigers can be taught to everyone through wildlife documentaries. Tree-planting campaigns or awareness may be held at certain schools. Participation raises awareness of the protection of species and the health of forests. Through the course materials, students can also investigate tiger-related topics. Education and action are connected through courses like "Conservation of Plants and Animals." Why are Tigers important to the Environment? As top predators, tigers play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of forest ecosystems. They maintain plants and fauna by managing the population. Their existence is a sign of a robust ecosystem and abundant biodiversity. Additionally, tiger-supported forests offer water security and serve as carbon sinks. Indian pride, mythology, and culture are all heavily reliant on tigers. India's national animal is the Royal Bengal Tiger. Its survival is a national duty as well as a wildlife problem. 2025's Global Tiger Day is more than just a date. It serves as a reminder of the wonders of nature and the necessity of protecting it. Young brains have the power to save lives via knowledge and action. Let us ensure that the next generation hears the shout rather than the silence.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
When protecting a species means preserving a complex ecosystem
Forest dwellers across India's Western Ghats worship the tiger in various forms. In a sub-tropical country like India, where the tiger is the apex predator, it is likely that tigers became objects of worship because past generations recognised the need to conserve this big cat for its role in the ecosystem. As the top predator, tigers play a crucial role in controlling herbivore populations, thereby maintaining the balance of flora and fauna in the forest. Ecologists have long emphasised that tiger reserves not only protect the big cats but also maintain ecosystem equilibrium, balance other animal populations, and help preserve forests and their water sources. In Goa, the proposed tiger reserve area serves as the catchment basin for the Mandovi, Zuari, Talpona, and Galgibaga rivers, in addition to several streams. 'It is essential to take every possible measure for the conservation of the tiger, the most majestic animal of the Indian wilderness. As the apex predator in the food chain, the extinction of the tiger will inevitably impact all other components of the ecosystem. The forest provides shelter to the tiger, and in return, the tiger protects the forest — in essence, it safeguards the biodiversity within it,' said naturalist Ramesh Zarmekar. A tiger spotted in Tillari valley forest in Maharashtra's Dodamarg corridor which opens into the Mhadei sanctuary forests in Goa The proposed tiger reserve area in Goa comprises semi-evergreen dense forests with steep slopes. The region is a mosaic of woodlands and grasslands and is already known to be a habitat for leopards, Indian Gaur or bison, sloth bears, barking deer, chital, wild dogs, king cobras, and other mammals and reptiles, besides tigers. 'If all coordinates living with the tiger are protected, only then will the ecology be protected. Once you make a tiger reserve, central govt gives more funds for its protection and this will help in protection of the entire 757sq km all Goa's protected areas,' said former range forest officer Prakash Salelkar. According to the Karapurkar Committee appointed by Goa govt, all the proposed tiger reserve areas are among the richest reservoirs of biodiversity in the world. The forest areas are part of regions identified as the second best in India and the eighth best in the world as the finest tiger habitats. More recently, the role of tiger landscapes to mitigate climate change has also been identified. 'They store more carbon than any other forest type,' said a forest official.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian woman compares domestic workers in Delhi and Chennai, triggers backlash: 'Too much to expect respect?'
An Indian woman has divided social media after she compared the "work ethic and mindset" of domestic workers in the national capital as compared to those working in Chennai, after she lived in the southern city for four years and then moved to Delhi. She claimed that her observations led her to the conclusion that the difference was in the "mindset and ambition" of domestic workers.(Representational) A former news professional took to LinkedIn to share her observations on the "stark difference" she experienced in domestic workers in North and South India. "In Chennai, whether it was professionals or household help, I saw sincerity. My maid started her day at 6.30 AM, worked in 5–6 houses till 1 PM, and then joined an MNC from 2 PM to 9 PM for cleaning. On weekends, she'd take up extra work — tailoring, garland-making-to earn more and give her children a better life," she wrote. She also praised the domestic worker for her honesty after she asked her employer to deduct her salary if she did not show up to work for a period beyond her fixed leave. "No drama — just accountability. Once, when I wasted some food unintentionally, she gently said, 'Akka, if you can't finish something, give it to us. Don't throw it away.' That respect for food and values stayed with me," she added. However, when she moved to Delhi, the situation was quite different. She claimed that within a year, she employed six maids, and all of them constantly took leave without informing herfirst. "When questioned, I got excuses — 'someone died,' 'I fainted,' 'a relative is in hospital.' It became routine. Forget saying 'cut salary' — here, even suggesting it offends them. Boundaries turn you into the villain. Even accepting leftover food was an issue, often rejected with ego. That's when I started wondering: What's really different?," she wrote. She claimed that her observations led her to the conclusion that the difference was in the "mindset and ambition". "In the South, many domestic workers — even without education — speak broken but confident English, value time, and dream of a better future. In contrast, in the North, some seem unwilling to rise above the 'garibi rekha.' With free rations like ₹1 rice and dal, survival is covered, but dreams are sidelined. Education is often a means to midday meals, not growth," she said. The woman claimed that government aid has replaced ambition, hampered growth. "This is not about North vs. South. It's about how values, systems, and the environment shape people. Where work is respected, people thrive. Where support replaces ambition, growth stops," she concluded. However, her post failed to resonate with many users, who labelled it "shortsighted" and "privileged". "Framing the 'good' domestic worker as someone who agrees to salary cuts for extra leave or gratefully accepts leftover food just trivialises the profession altogether. Why is it too much to expect self-respect across all professions?" remarked one user. Another added, "Domestic work is still work - it deserves dignity, fair boundaries, and wages that aren't subject to casual penalties. Comparing two regions by reducing their workers to who is more 'compliant' is problematic," added another. "Maids rejecting the leftover food is an assertion of their self-respect. You should appreciate it rather than expecting them to be submissive," wrote a third user.
