logo
Seven men face ‘lengthy' sentences for sexual abuse of teenage girls in Rochdale

Seven men face ‘lengthy' sentences for sexual abuse of teenage girls in Rochdale

Independent13-06-2025
Seven members of an Asian grooming gang are facing 'lengthy' prison sentences after they were convicted of the sexual exploitation of two white teenage schoolgirls in Rochdale.
Social services and police apologised for their past failings surrounding the victims who were abused in the town between 2001 and 2006 after a jury returned unanimous verdicts on Friday against the defendants.
Both girls were treated as 'sex slaves' from the age of 13, said prosecutors, amid 'deeply troubled home lives' as they were given drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, places to stay and people to be with.
Soon after, they were expected to have sex 'whenever and wherever' the defendants and other men wanted, in filthy flats, on rancid mattresses, in cars, car parks, alleyways and disused warehouses.
Girl A told the jury at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court that she could have been targeted by more than 200 offenders as her phone number was swapped but said 'there was that many it was hard to keep count'.
She told local children's services in 2004 that she was 'hanging around' with groups of older men, drinking and taking cannabis, the court heard.
Giving evidence, Girl B said she was living in a local children's home when she was preyed on by market traders Mohammed Zahid, 64; Mushtaq Ahmed, 67; and Kasir Bashir, 50 – all born in Pakistan – who were stallholders on the town's indoor market.
She said she presumed various agencies knew what was going on as police regularly picked her up after social workers labelled her a 'prostitute'.
Girl B told the hearing she had since read her file held by Rochdale social services which, she said, stated she had been selling herself for sex from the age of 10.
Following the verdicts, Sharon Hubber, Rochdale Borough Council's director of children's services, said: 'We know that these convictions are unlikely to erase the memories of the abuse these women were subjected to as children, but we hope they do bring some form of closure.
'We know that more could and should have been done by the people who were working here at the time, and for that we are truly sorry.'
Detective Superintendent Alan Clitherow, of Greater Manchester Police, said: 'There was information at the time that police and other agencies could, and should, have done something with and we didn't.
'The way those victims were dealt with at the time is indefensible and inexcusable.
'We have made comprehensive apologies for that. We're not perfect but we are very much improving now on how we manage these investigations.'
Assistant Chief Constable Steph Parker added: 'I know that our past failings have meant there are people who doubt the police's commitment today to putting grooming gangs behind bars where they belong.
'Let me be clear – time is no barrier to justice, and we are actively working with dozens of survivors on numerous investigations to ensure no offender gets away with this. When you are ready, we will listen.
'Our dedicated, child sexual exploitation, major investigations team has almost 100 investigators working every day to listen to victims and to bring cases to court.'
Father-of-three Zahid – known as Boss Man – gave free underwear from his lingerie stall to both complainants and also money, alcohol and food in return for the expectation of regular sex with him and his friends.
In 2016, Zahid was jailed for five years in an earlier grooming gang case after he engaged in sexual activity in 2006 with a 15-year-old girl whom he met when she visited his stall to buy tights for school.
Bashir did not attend the current trial as jurors were ordered not to speculate why but it can be revealed that he absconded while on bail before the trial got under way.
Police are actively seeking Bashir and say they are 'determined to find him no matter where he thinks he can hide'.
It can also be reported that co-defendants Mohammed Shahzad, 44; Naheem Akram, 48; and Nisar Hussain, 41; were remanded in custody with their bail revoked in January before the jury was sworn in.
Police received intelligence that the three Rochdale-born taxi drivers were planning to leave the UK and had already paid a deposit for their transport, the court heard.
All three denied the accusation but Judge Jonathan Seely said the court was not prepared to take a risk that they, too, would abscond.
A seventh defendant, Pakistani-born Roheez Khan, 39, also featured in another previous Rochdale grooming trial in 2013 when he was one of five men convicted of sexually exploiting a 'profoundly vulnerable' 15-year-old girl in 2008 and 2009.
Khan was jailed for six and a half years for engaging in sexual activity with a child and witness intimidation.
After three weeks of deliberations by the jury, Zahid, of, Station Road, Crumpsall, was convicted of raping Girl A and Girl B, who did not know each other, on multiple occasions.
Jurors also found him guilty of offences of indecency with a child and procuring a child to have sex.
Ahmed, of Corona Avenue, Oldham; and Bashir, of Napier Street East, Oldham; were convicted of multiple counts of rape and indecency with a child, in relation to Girl B.
Shahzad, of Beswicke Royds Street, Rochdale; Akram, of Manley Road, Rochdale; and Hussain, of New Field Close, Rochdale; were convicted of multiple counts of rape against Girl A.
Roheez Khan, of Athole Street, Rochdale, was found guilty of a single count of rape against Girl A.
Judge Seely told the men they all faced 'lengthy' prison sentences as he remanded them in custody ahead of sentencing on a date to be fixed.
All the perpetrators were prosecuted as part of Operation Lytton, an ongoing investigation since 2015 by Greater Manchester Police into historical child sexual exploitation in Rochdale.
A total of 37 individuals have been charged so far, with five more trials scheduled to take place from September onwards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Birmingham man used firm's Covid money for shopping and days out
Birmingham man used firm's Covid money for shopping and days out

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Birmingham man used firm's Covid money for shopping and days out

A fitness company owner who spent Covid loans for his company at a safari park, restaurants and paying off credit cards has been given a suspended jail Dar, 34, from Birmingham, dishonestly obtained £45,500 in three Covid Bounce Back Loans for his company JDARPT Ltd, when businesses were only entitled to one, the Insolvency Service from the loans was only supposed to be used for the economic benefit of the business. Dar, from Stratford Road, who used some of the funds for legitimate purposes, was sentenced to 20 months in prison suspended for 18 months at Wolverhampton Crown Court, after pleading guilty. He was also ordered to complete 20 days of rehabilitation activity and 180 hours of unpaid work and pay costs of £2, were made to Amazon and Argos, along with spending at restaurants and meat stores, the Insolvency Service spending was identified at West Midlands Safari Park and making credit card payments, alongside genuine business expenditure. 'Significant sums' Dar deliberately made false representations to fraudulently receive three loans, chief investigator at the Insolvency Service David Snasdell added: "Instead of using this money to support his fitness business through the pandemic as intended, he diverted significant sums for personal spending."Dar made fraudulent applications to three banks for Bounce Back Loans during 2020 for his fitness company, the Insolvency Service first fraudulent application was for a £13,000 loan in May 2020 and in it he claimed the turnover of JDAPRT, which went into liquidation in July 2021, was £55, days later, Dar made a second application to a different bank for £15,000, saying his company's turnover was now £60, third fraudulent application in September was for a loan of £17,500, when he claimed turnover was £70,000. Insolvency Service analysis revealed the company's turnover was closer to £61, admitted three charges of dishonestly making false representation to make gain for self/another or cause loss to another/expose other to Snasdell said: "The Insolvency Service will not tolerate abuse of the public purse and will continue to pursue fraudsters who exploited schemes designed to help legitimate businesses during a national crisis." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Joey Barton to pay £200,000 of Jeremy Vine's legal costs in libel battle
Joey Barton to pay £200,000 of Jeremy Vine's legal costs in libel battle

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Joey Barton to pay £200,000 of Jeremy Vine's legal costs in libel battle

Joey Barton, the former footballer, will pay more than £200,000 of Jeremy Vine 's legal costs after their High Court libel battle, a court has heard. Vine sued Barton for libel and harassment over several online posts, including one in which he falsely called the BBC Radio 2 presenter a 'big bike nonce' and a 'pedo defender' on X, formerly Twitter. The pair settled the claim last year after Barton posted two apologies on the same social media platform and paid a total of £110,000 in damages to Vine, as well as his legal costs. In an agreed statement read out at the High Court in October 2024, barrister Gervase de Wilde, for Vine, said that the broadcaster 'was deeply alarmed, distressed and upset' by Barton's actions, which included a 'persistent and highly damaging campaign of defamation, harassment and misuse of private information'. On Tuesday, a specialist costs court heard that Barton had agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine's costs from the main legal action. Costs Judge Colum Leonard also ordered Barton to pay a further £43,172.30 arising from the negotiation of the £160,000 figure, meaning he will pay a total of £203,172.30 of Vine's fees. Lawyers for Vine told the High Court in May last year that Barton's posts amounted to a 'calculated and sustained attack'. Barton, who played for teams including Manchester City, Newcastle United, Rangers, and French side Marseille during his career, also began using '#bikenonce' on X, which led to it trending on the platform. After Mrs Justice Steyn ruled that some of the posts could defame Vine, Barton apologised to the journalist in June last year, stating that the allegations he made were 'untrue'. He said that he would pay Vine £75,000 in damages, but solicitors for Vine later said Barton would pay a further £35,000 as part of a 'separate settlement' for claims published after legal action began. Mr De Wilde told the October hearing that Barton made four undertakings as part of the settlement, including not to harass Vine or encourage others to do so. Vine said following the hearing that the former footballer 'needs to find himself a different hobby'. 'Excessive and disproportionate' The court on Tuesday was told that Barton agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine's legal costs earlier this month, and that Vine was claiming around £60,000 in costs for negotiating that figure. Suzanne Holmes, for Barton, said this was 'excessive' and 'disproportionate', and should be reduced. Kevin Latham, representing Vine, said Barton had 'repeatedly failed to engage in proper negotiation' throughout proceedings and 'has to bear the consequences of that approach'. Neither Barton nor Vine attended the hearing in London.

Labour-run council to reinstate fines for swearing
Labour-run council to reinstate fines for swearing

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Labour-run council to reinstate fines for swearing

A labour-run council intends to reintroduce plans that will allow officers to hand out £100 fines for swearing. Thanet district council said it intended to bring back the ban because police officers had said they struggled to manage antisocial behaviour (ASB) without it. The public space protection order (PSPO) was proposed in July last year, but plans were scrapped after the Free Speech Union threatened legal action against the 'draconian measure'. However, council papers for a meeting on Tuesday revealed that the authority would revisit the controversial scheme that would fine people for 'using foul or abusive language in such a manner that is loud and can be heard by others and cause either alarm or distress'. The plans said: 'There is an ongoing issue of ASB in the Margate, Broadstairs and Ramsgate areas. 'The PSPO is recognised by all of those working with such behaviour as being one of the effective tools for dealing with this. 'Since [last summer] police report experiencing increased difficulties in managing some of the identified forms of ASB.' Chief Insp Ian Swallow, from Kent Police, wrote a letter of support for the PSPO. He wrote: 'I can confirm that Kent Police support the implementation of a PSPO for the Thanet district and agree with the proposed prohibitions and requirements. '[It] is a necessary measure to reduce crime, disorder, and ASB in the Thanet District, and to provide officers and staff suitable powers to deal with such behaviour.' Among the issues at hand, he highlighted 'swearing and threatening behaviour', 'abusive and foul language' and 'multiple reports from businesses and councillors of street drinkers and young people abusing shopkeepers'. 'Restricting liberties' The Free Speech Union last year said Thanet Council's plan was 'the worst' example they had seen of the misuse of PSPOs. They said at the time: 'It effectively imposes a strict liability speech offence, with none of the safeguards which Parliament and the courts have deemed necessary when restricting people's fundamental rights and liberties.' The penalty for breaking the PSPO is £100 paid within 28 days, or £60 if paid within 14 days. The order also bans anti-social groups, misuse of public space, urinating, defecating or spitting, legal psychoactive substances (such as nitrous oxide), humiliating others and consuming alcohol. The report acknowledges a lot of criticism of the order, including the vague nature of the term 'foul language' and fears of disruption to peaceful protests. It added that there are a 'number of protections' in place to reassure residents that include the defence of 'reasonable excuse' as well as rights to freedom of expression. Cllr Heather Keen, s cabinet member for neighbourhoods at Thanet district council, said: 'We've sadly seen situations in our public spaces recently which have escalated and we know that local people, visitors and businesses want more to be done to tackle this. 'The proposed PSPO aims to reduce antisocial behaviour and provide the vital tools, which are needed to intervene. Without this, the ability of the police to respond to crime and disorder is impacted and crime, in the form of antisocial behaviour, increases. She added: 'The restriction around language is not aimed at preventing free speech or swearing, but foul language that is such to cause fear, distress or alarm.' Council members are expected to discuss the revisited order in the council chamber on July 24. If approved, the PSPO will be in place for three years. The Thanet district council and the FSU have been approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store