Carroll trial Day 2: DCI explains investigation into $1.7 million
5 witnesses testify as DSS embezzlement trial begins
DCI supervisory special agent Matt Glenn said a search of a Pierre storage unit rented by Carroll was packed with containers of clothes as well as boxes of receipts and personal bank statements that indicated she was 'spending way more than she was making from her state job' as a financial program assistant in the Division of Child Protection that paid $21.09 per hour.
Glenn told the jury that the receipts showed purchases costing hundreds of dollars were paid in round amounts of cash.
Another witness, intelligence analyst April Pontrelli, presented a report looking at Carroll's deposits and spending from 2010 through March 2023 when Carroll retired. Pontrelli said Carroll's deposits substantially increased beyond her annual salary during that period, as did her spending.
A special report prepared by the Department of Legislative Audit covering March 2017 through December 2022 found that Carroll requested more than $930,000 of special purchases for accounts of children who had been in the department's care and then authorized those requests to be paid.
Kelly Mikkelsen testified about the Legislative Audit report. Carroll's defense attorney Timothy Whalen said that was a lot of money rolling through a handful of those children's accounts. He asked Mikkelsen, 'Something that should have raised an eyebrow?' Mikkelsen answered, 'Possibly, yes.'
Whalen then asked whether Child Protection Services director Pam Bennett should have been responsible for catching Carroll's actions. 'Yes,' Mikkelsen said.
Next Whalen asked whether others in the office should have been responsible. 'Everybody's responsible,' Mikkelsen said.
Whalen asked Mikkelsen if he had any personal knowledge that Carroll circumvented policies and procedures. 'Through our special review, I think she did,' Mikkelsen said.
He told Whalen that Carroll shouldn't have had authority to make requests and then approve them.
He added that the person approving requests shouldn't be allowed to deposit the check, as Carroll did.
Prosecutor Nolan Welker then followed up on Mikkelsen's statement that everyone was responsible for following the rules. 'Did that include Lonna Carroll?' Welker asked. 'Yes,' Mikkelsen said.
Carroll's trial resumed Wednesday afternoon and is scheduled to continue through Friday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
11-07-2025
- UPI
Court strikes down Trump's appeal in Carroll sexual abuse case
US President Donald Trump during a meeting with African leaders at the White House, Washington, DC, on Wednesday, July 9, 2025. On Thursday, an appeals court ruled against his challenge to a jury's unanimous decision that he sexually abused a writer in the 1990s. Photo by Will Oliver/UPI | License Photo July 11 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court has sided with the jury that found President Donald Trump liable of sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and of lying about the assault. The three-judge Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued its mandate Thursday, affirming the May 2023 Manhattan jury's unanimous decision that Trump had sexually abused Carroll in a Bergdorf Goodman department stor in 1996 and awarded her $5 million in compensatory damages. "So long, Old Man!" Carroll celebrated on X. "The United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, bids thee farewell." Trump maintains he didn't sexually abuse her, and filed an appeal. He argued the Manhattan district court had erred when it allowed testimony from two other women who alleged Trump had sexually assaulted them in the past and a notorious 2005 recording in which the president is heard on a hot mic telling another man how he forcibly kissed and grabbed women by their genitals. In its ruling rejecting Trump's appeal, the court found the district court did not err by including both women's testimonies as well as the so-called Access Hollywood tape as evidence of the president's alleged history of committing such acts. "We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings," it said. "Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial." In January 2024, another civil jury found Trump liable for defamatory statements and ordered him to pay the writer $83.3 million in damages. After Carroll went public with her accusations against Trump in 2019, Trump claimed to have never met her and accused her of making up the allegation to sell books.
The Hill
11-07-2025
- The Hill
Judges rule against Trump appeal in E. Jean Carroll case
A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled to uphold a jury verdict that determined President Trump was guilty of sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. The three-judge panel issued a mandate to affirm the previous district court ruling despite the president's attempts to appeal the ruling that sided with Carroll, who claimed that he sexually abused her at a New York City department store in the mid-1990s. 'Thursday, July 10th, 2025 So long, Old Man! The United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, bids thee farewell,' Carroll wrote in a post celebrating the ruling on X. However, Trump may attempt to submit another appeal to be considered for review before the Supreme Court. He has 90 days to submit a request to the high court. A White House spokesperson described Carroll's case as 'liberal lawfare' in a statement sent to CNBC. 'The American People are supporting President Trump in historic numbers, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoaxes, the defense of which the Attorney General has determined is legally required to be taken over by the Department of Justice because Carroll based her false claims on the President's official acts, including statements from the White House,' the spokesperson told the outlet. The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.
Yahoo
27-06-2025
- Yahoo
World Series of Poker investigating after winner and runner-up at event accused of 'chip dumping'
Attendees pass by signage for the World Series of Poker on Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at Paris Las Vegas. (Chase Stevens/Las Vegas Review-Journal) @csstevensphoto The World Series of Poker is investigating after the winner and runner-up of a Millionaire Maker event have been accused of collusion. The announcement came after the completion of a $1,500 buy-in no-limit Hold'em tournament at the Horseshoe in Las Vegas, which finished on Wednesday night. At the final table of the event, which began on June 21, James Carroll held a 9-to-1 chip lead over Jesse Yaginuma. But Yaginuma pulled off a comeback to win the event, earning the first-place prize of $1.26 million. Carroll earned $1 million as the runner-up. Advertisement However, in the wake of the matchup, Yaginuma and Carroll have been accused of engaging in "chip dumping," with viewers speculating that Carroll was intentionally losing hands to increase Yaginuma's stack as part of a prearranged agreement. Throughout the comeback, Yaginuma often won hands by raising or re-raising without Carroll contesting, per ESPN. On Thursday, WSOP released a statement saying that it had opened an investigation. "Last night, we were made aware of a potential breach of the official WSOP Tournament Rules during heads up play in Event 53," the organization wrote. "At this time, 1st and 2nd place have not been confirmed and neither the prize money nor the bracelet have been officially awarded." In other poker tournaments, side deals between players are allowed. But WSOP official rules state that chip-dumping is a form of "collusion," and is considered an "illegal or unethical act." Under WSOP, collusion can result in forfeiture of prize money, ejection from an event, and exclusion from future WSOP events. Advertisement Chip-dumping is usually done with the intention of splitting prize money. Though the difference between Yaginuma and Carroll's prize money was less significant, there was an additional $1 million on the line as a result of an independent promotion run by online poker service ClubWPT Gold. Yaginuma was eligible for the promotion as a result of a previous win; Carroll was not. Yaginuma, speaking with denied that he and Carroll had colluded. If WSOP upholds the win, Yaginuma will be the second person to cash in on the ClubWPT Gold promotion, after Michael Lavin won a similar contest earlier in June. While WSOP has scrubbed posts congratulating Yaginuma's win on social media, ClubWPT Gold's congratulatory post is still up.
