Taiwan to simulate Chinese invasion in major drill
The annual Han Kuang exercises starting on July 9 will last for 10 days and mobilize more than 22,000 reservists — both unprecedented in length and scale. Taiwan is facing ramped-up military pressure by China, which considers the separately governed island its own despite Taiwan's strong rejection.
Addressing soldiers in a video ahead of Han Kuang, Lai said in recent years Taiwan has been constantly preparing for a 'war without gun smoke' such as Chinese infiltration and disinformation attacks.
'However, there is no need to worry because the democratic, free, and prosperous Taiwan of today is the result of the Taiwanese people's courage, conviction, and action in fighting their way through various challenges, and the unity and resilience of the Taiwanese people has been demonstrated.'
Tung Chih-hsing, head of the defense ministry's joint combat planning department, said drill scenarios included 'joint fire attack and the sea ferry of the landing group by the Communist Army,' and Taiwan's armed forces will practice building up a 'chain of strikes' with naval and air precision attacks.
'We are demonstrating our determination and ability to defend ourselves with practical actions,' Tung told a press briefing in Taipei, adding the armed forces will upgrade its combat readiness level if China launches 'targeted drills' in response.
Civil defense drills will be held alongside Han Kuang, including issuing missile alerts and evacuation drills that will temporarily shut business and suspend traffic in major cities including the capital Taipei.
China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Lai has since June given three speeches in what will be a series of 10 on 'uniting the country' ahead of a July 26 recall vote for around one quarter of parliament's lawmakers — all from the main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party.
Beijing has angrily rebuked some of Lai's recent remarks as the two capitals clashed over their competing interpretations of history in an escalating war of words over what Beijing views as provocations from Taiwan's government.
Civil groups involved in the recall campaign have framed the election as a no-confidence vote against what they see as Beijing-friendly lawmakers who are working to undermine Taiwan's democracy — a position strongly rejected by the KMT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Justice Department says 2 Chinese nationals charged with spying inside the US for Beijing
Two Chinese nationals have been charged with spying inside the US on behalf of Beijing, including by taking photographs of a naval base, coordinating a cash dead-drop, and by participating in efforts to recruit members of the military who they thought might be open to working for Chinese intelligence. The case, filed in federal court in San Francisco and unsealed Monday, is the latest Justice Department prosecution to target what officials say are active efforts by the Chinese government to secretly collect intelligence about American military capabilities – a practice laid bare in startling fashion two years ago with China's launching of a surveillance balloon that US officials ultimately shot down over the coast of South Carolina. 'This case underscores the Chinese government's sustained and aggressive effort to infiltrate our military and undermine our national security from within,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement announcing the case. 'The Justice Department will not stand by while hostile nations embed spies in our country – we will expose foreign operatives, hold their agents to account, and protect the American people from covert threats to our national security.' Officials identified the defendants as Yuance Chen, 38, who arrived in the US on a visa in 2015 and later became a lawful permanent resident, and Liren Ryan Lai, 39, who prosecutors say lives in China but came to Texas this past spring as part of an effort to supervise clandestine espionage operations on behalf of China's Ministry of State Security, or MSS. The two were arrested on charges of secretly doing China's bidding without registering as foreign agents with the Justice Department, as required by law. It was not immediately clear if they had lawyers. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday. According to an FBI affidavit filed in connection with the case, investigators believe Lai had been developing Chen to be a Chinese intelligence asset since at least mid-2021. Their activities, the FBI says, included coordinating on a dead-drop of at least $10,000 in cash to another person operating at the direction of the MSS. They also conducted surveillance of a Navy recruiting station in California and Navy base in Washington state, including through photographs and videos that investigators believe were sent to Chinese intelligence. Authorities say Lai and Chen also discussed recruiting Navy employees to work for China, with Chen obtaining, during a tour of a Navy installation, photographs of names and hometowns of recent recruits. Many listed China as their hometown, and investigators believe the information was sent to China, the FBI affidavit says. The case is one in a series of prosecutions concerning Chinese intelligence-gathering, including concerning the military. Last year, for instance, the Justice Department charged five Chinese nationals with lying and trying to cover their tracks more than a year after they were confronted in the dark near a remote Michigan military site where thousands of people had gathered for summer drills. And in 2023, two Navy sailors were charged with providing sensitive military information to China, including details on wartime exercises, naval operations, and critical technical material.
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan PM visits Iranian embassy, assures continued support following Israeli attacks
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday visited the Iranian embassy in Islamabad and assured Tehran of Islamabad's continued support, following last month's Israeli attacks on Iran. The 12-day war between Iran and Israel, which began on June 13 Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military leadership, raised alarms in a region that was already on edge since the start of Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023. Pakistan remained engaged in talks with regional partners like Saudi Arabia, Iran, China and Qatar to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East after Iran conducted retaliatory strikes on Israel and a US base in Qatar, raising fears the conflict could draw in other regional states. During his visit to the Iranian embassy, Sharif signed a condolence book opened by the Iranian mission to honor the Iranians who were killed and injured during the Israeli attacks against Iran, according to the Pakistan PM's office. 'He expressed his deepest condolences to the people and Government of Iran, while reaffirming Pakistan's sympathy and solidarity with Iran during this difficult time,' Sharif's office said. 'While assuring the Iranian side of Pakistan's consistent and continued support, the Prime Minister also conveyed his good wishes and respects for Iranian Supreme Leader His Eminence Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, as well as for President Dr. Massoud Pezeshkian.' On Monday, Iranian judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir offered a sharply increased, government-issued death toll from the war, saying that the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens,' including 38 children and 102 women. The Israeli strikes came at a time when Iranian officials were engaged in nuclear negotiations with the US and the conflict worsened after the US struck three Iranian nuclear sites on June 22. President Donald Trump claimed the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program by years. Iran is assessing the damage and lashing out over the American and Israeli airstrikes on its nuclear sites, though Tehran kept open the possibility Tuesday of resuming talks with Washington over its atomic program, AP news agency reported. The comments by government spokesperson Fatemeh MoHajjerani also included another acknowledgment that Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, key sites within Iran's nuclear program, had been 'seriously damaged' by the American strikes. 'No date (for US talks) is announced, and it's not probably very soon, but a decision hasn't been made in this field,' the state-run IRNA news agency quoted MoHajjerani as saying at a briefing for journalists. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also kept open the possibility of talks with the US.
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Ensuring the Middle East becomes a WMD-free zone
There are quite a few lessons to be learned from the 12 days of war between Iran and Israel last month, especially from their mutual readiness to inflict severe pain on one another. One is the need to embark on urgent discussions with full commitment to ensure the Middle East becomes a weapons of mass destruction-free zone. The entire Cold War-era nuclear doctrine — and, with it, many other weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological — was based on an understanding that these weapons were not to be used, but rather to deter the other side from using them. No rational actor in international relations would dare to use them if it would also mean a devastating retaliation — in other words, mutual assured destruction. There is a real danger that a nuclear arms race in the Middle East would be more likely to bring nuclear madness than mutual assured destruction. It is still too early to assess the damage caused to the Iranian nuclear program and whether its piles of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity, which had brought the country closer to developing nuclear military capability, were destroyed or were safely hidden away. After the fatal exchange of blows between Iran and Israel that caused widespread death and destruction must come a period of reflection on the dangers of the presence of WMDs in the region and the need to eliminate them. The working assumption is that there is only one country in the region that is in possession of nuclear military capabilities — Israel — while others, including Iran, Iraq and Libya, have chemical weapons. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, it is estimated that Israel has about 80 nuclear weapons, although the country's official policy is one of nuclear ambiguity, claiming that it will not be the first country to 'introduce' nuclear weapons to the Middle East. Yet, one of its Cabinet ministers proposed, at the beginning of the war on Gaza, to nuke the place — and it is hardly plausible that he would make such a threat unless Israel was in possession of nuclear weapons. There must be a period of reflection on the dangers of the presence of WMDs in the region and the need to eliminate them Yossi Mekelberg The 19th-century Russian playwright Anton Chekhov once wrote that, 'if in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise, don't put it there.' Thus far, nuclear weapons have been used 'only' twice, toward the end of the Second World War. But this tells us very little about what might happen if the Middle East were to embark on a nuclear arms race. Just imagine that both Iran and Israel were armed with nuclear weapons and, at a certain point, each felt that their country's very existence was in danger. Could we completely exclude the possibility of them employing this doomsday weapon? Not a scenario that anyone would like to find themselves in. Israel's ambiguity has, in a roundabout way, contributed to preventing a nuclear arms race in the region. By not announcing it publicly, it has not forced others to compete with it in this arena. Moreover, prior to becoming a major regional military power and signing peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan — and, more recently, the Abraham Accords to normalize relations with the UAE, Morocco and Bahrain — Israel's nuclear capability was regarded as one of last resort. It was there in case it faced a cataclysmic scenario of being on the verge of military defeat, in addition to assuming it was being governed by a more rational government than the current one. It is hardly facing an existential threat anymore and the rationality of its current government is at best questionable. What also makes a Middle East WMD-free zone a matter of urgency is the inherent political instability and volatility of some parts of the region, let alone their appalling lack of respect for international law. The idea of a WMD-free zone is not new. It was first introduced by Egypt in 1990, as an extension of a nuclear weapon-free zone in the Middle East, and later as part of a series of decisions derived from the extension of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which 191 states have so far joined, but not India, Israel, Pakistan or North Korea. Israel is hardly facing an existential threat anymore and the rationality of its current government is at best questionable Yossi Mekelberg The 1995 NPT review conference called for 'the establishment of an effectively verifiable Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear, chemical and biological, and their delivery systems.' Regrettably, hardly any progress has been made toward a negotiated elimination of WMDs, including nuclear, despite five international summits being held on the issue, the last of them in November 2024. The risks caused by the presence of WMDs in areas where conflict is ever-present, where enmities are usually defined in absolute terms and where threats are seen as existential are too dangerous to allow. They are made worse where there is asymmetry in terms of conventional military capabilities, as is the case in the Middle East. In the event of a side facing defeat, while in possession of nuclear weapons, there might be the temptation to use them either as a tool to change the course of the war or as some sort of Samson-like option of bringing the roof down on everyone. If the dreadful consequences of using nuclear or other WMDs is one aspect of the need to ensure that countries do not pursue this route, there is also the futility of investing endless resources in developing and acquiring such lethal weapons. Such programs are expensive, meaning there are other more urgent and fundamental social and economic needs that are deprived of resources. And in the case of nuclear, it is in many cases a vanity project; or worse, as we just witnessed in the case of Iran, one that leads to needless wars. Last year, I participated in a nuclear disarmament workshop in Hiroshima, where we met with survivors of the nuclear bomb dropped by the US on the city 80 years ago next month. They told us of the horrific experience suffered by themselves, their families and their city, as could also be seen in photographic evidence in the local museum. Their message was very clear: there is no place in our civilization for such weapons. This should be a lesson for anyone who is contemplating developing or possessing nuclear weapons, whether in the Middle East or anywhere else.
