logo
Green, But Not Golden: Why Beauty's Sustainability Moment Still Isn't Secure

Green, But Not Golden: Why Beauty's Sustainability Moment Still Isn't Secure

Forbes22-04-2025
For all its shimmer and shine, the beauty industry still hasn't managed to polish its conscience. Earth Day arrives once more with a familiar mix of ambition and ambiguity. And while the language of sustainability is now fluent across beauty marketing—from refills to recyclables to 'clean'—the industry is yet to move from movement to maturity.
The market is talking a greener game. But the execution? Still patchy. Still performative. Still, too often, surface-deep.
Let's be clear: the appetite is there. Today's consumers are engaged, informed and deeply motivated by values. They are asking the right questions, even when the answers remain elusive.
And yet, green beauty still accounts for a modest slice of the overall market. Why?
Because there are still barriers—of price, of education, of optics. Packaging that lacks shelf appeal in a hyper-aesthetic social media age. Products that don't quite live up to their own promise. And, all too often, brands that assume intent alone will close the deal.
Many consumers want to do the right thing—but they're tired of feeling tricked by murky labels, or penalised at the checkout for choosing better. We don't need more awareness campaigns. We need more action, and a little less artifice.
Before the term 'sustainable' was commercially viable—let alone fashionable—there was Anita Roddick, founding The Body Shop on a platform of ethics, activism and enterprise. Her belief that business should be a force for good wasn't marketing—it was muscle.
I was fortunate to see her work up close in the early days of my career. She had an uncanny blend of commercial clarity and deep conviction. She built systems, not slogans. And decades on, her influence endures.
Neal's Yard Remedies, founded in 1981 in a modest Covent Garden corner, continues to stand as one of the original green champions. Before algorithms told us to care, they were bottling plant-based remedies, sourcing organic ingredients, and operating with a quiet confidence that still holds today. Their aesthetic may be apothecary, but their supply chain is one of the most forward-thinking in the sector.
Some newer brands are not reinventing the green beauty wheel—they're just rolling it forward, with poise and purpose.
Take Living Libations—a brand born not in a lab, but in a forest. Founded by Nadine Artemis, its roots lie in botanical intimacy and ingredient reverence. Their cult favourite Best Skin Ever isn't trend-chasing—it's a return to ritual. With formulations that read like poetry and sourcing practices that would impress any sustainability auditor, this is a brand built on quiet brilliance, not buzzwords.
Then there's Pott Candles—a brand offering a solution so simple it's genius. Hand-thrown ceramic pots, endlessly refillable with natural wax blends. Beautiful, tactile, low-waste—and more emotionally resonant than another glass jar destined for landfill. Their packaging doesn't shout; it invites.
And platforms like Naturisimo have stepped into the gap where trust and curation meet. They do the vetting, so consumers don't have to. Their edit is not only clean—it's considered. Similarly, My Night Show adds a theatrical layer to sustainability: indulgent but intentional, with storytelling that appeals to the emotionally intelligent shopper.
The good news? Consumers are ready. The younger generation in particular—steeped in climate anxiety and digital literacy—are embracing refillables, questioning provenance, and rewarding transparency.
Brands who layer elegance with ethics are cutting through. Those who create covetable aesthetics and back them with data, integrity and genuine circularity are building loyalty—not just likes.
But we're still seeing stumbling blocks:
To move from movement to mainstream, green beauty has to become more than seasonal sentiment. It must embed itself into every layer of business—from design to distribution.
That means rethinking how beauty is made, marketed, and measured. Design must lead, with sustainable products that earn their place on the shelf and feel at home in a curated, social-first world. Pricing has to shift too—ethical shouldn't mean elite. Sustainability needs to feel normal, not niche.
We need clear, simplified labelling that cuts through confusion and empowers consumers at point of sale. No more smoke and mirrors—just data, integrity, and accessible language. And retailers must take more responsibility—not simply chasing conversions but curating with conscience, and elevating brands that combine efficacy with ethics.
For consumers, it's about returning to the basics: choosing fewer products, choosing with purpose, and finding satisfaction in simplicity. Real sustainability isn't about sacrifice—it's about smarter decisions, made repeatable.
Sustainable beauty must be more than a feeling. It must be a structure—a set of behaviours, practices and decisions embedded deep within the brand, not dressed up for Earth Day. We don't need more products. We need better ones. Designed to last, designed to refill, designed to do their job without demanding the planet pays the price.
Because true beauty has always been about more than what we see—it's about what we stand for.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One Big Beautiful Bill – The Cost Of Climate Inaction
One Big Beautiful Bill – The Cost Of Climate Inaction

Forbes

time4 days ago

  • Forbes

One Big Beautiful Bill – The Cost Of Climate Inaction

Storm cloud The One Big Beautiful Bill, signed into law in early July, directly rolls back several core provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, widely regarded as the most ambitious U.S. climate policy to date. According to Rhodium Group, the bill could cut the build-out of new clean power capacity by 53–59% between 2025 and 2035 and put over $500 billion in clean energy and transportation investments at risk. As the rollback of U.S. climate provisions accelerate, we may one day look back and ask: what was the true price of that decision? Not politically. Not ideologically. But economically. While the scale of the required investments might be daunting, the alternative – climate inaction – would unleash economic and societal damage on a far larger scale. Some of which we are already seeing now. The Price Tag Of Transition: High, But Necessary There's no denying that the global energy transition will require unprecedented levels of investment. According to the IEA, annual investment in renewables must double, and investment in energy efficiency and electrification needs to almost triple within five years, in order to meet global climate targets and support the clean energy tripling goal by 2030 agreed at COP28. Reaching net zero by 2050 will require annual global clean energy investments to rise to $4.5 trillion by the end of this decade. These numbers may seem overwhelming, however much of the spending replaces existing investment needs. Energy systems, transport networks, buildings, and industrial facilities all need ongoing reinvestment – whether it's for clean systems or fossil-based ones. In fact, in 2025 alone, $1.1 trillion is still expected to flow into oil, gas, and coal globally. So, the question isn't whether we invest, but where we direct those investments. TOPSHOT - Electric energy generating wind turbines are seen on a wind farm in the San Gorgonio Pass ... More area on Earth Day, April 22, 2016, near Palm Springs, California. - San Gorgonio Pass is one of the largest wind farm areas in the United States. (Photo by David McNew / AFP) (Photo credit should read DAVID MCNEW/AFP via Getty Images) Each $1 In Climate Action Can Save Up To $14 In Future Damages More importantly, the upfront cost of climate action must be weighed against the immense losses it can avert. According to joint modelling by the University of Cambridge and Boston Consulting Group, investments in mitigation and adaptation of 1-2% of cumulative global GDP from 2025 to 2100 could avoid economic damages worth between 11-27% of cumulative global GDP over the same period. In other words, each dollar spent on climate action could prevent up to 14 dollars in future damages. Failure to act could mean losing up to 25% of future global GDP – three times the total health spending worldwide this century. Even achieving a trajectory below 2°C would not eliminate damage altogether. However, this would limit losses to 2–4% of global GDP, which is much less than the 15–34% expected if temperatures were to rise by 3°C. That represents a permanent drag on global growth, magnified over time by compounding shocks and growing volatility. These losses are not limited to immediate effects from extreme weather events but also include the knock-on effects of climate disruption: lower labor productivity due to heat stress, water scarcity undermining food and energy systems, rising sea levels and droughts forcing mass migration, higher mortality and disease burdens straining healthcare systems, destabilized trade routes, and mounting costs for governments, businesses and customers alike. Iceberg - Hidden Danger And Global Warming Concept - 3d Illustration Climate Change Is Already Here – And Expensive For some, it may be tempting to see these economic impacts as hypothetical – problems for future generations to solve. But that framing is outdated: the losses are already real and increasing. Since the beginning of the century, climate-related disasters have caused over $3.6 trillion in damage globally. And the pace is accelerating. The economic cost of climate-related disasters has more than doubled since the early 2000s: from around $450 billion between 2000 and 2004 to over $1 trillion between 2020 and 2024. In 2023, global insured losses from climate-related events exceeded $100 billion for the fifth consecutive year. In Europe, recent years have brought a series of record-breaking climate events. In Spain for example, this summer has already brought extreme heat, with temperatures exceeding 46°C. The prolonged heatwave triggered wildfires, power outages, hospital surges, and significant agricultural losses – with economic damages in Spain alone estimated at 1.4% of GDP. The United States has had to cope with similar impacts. Estimates for Hurricane Helene, which devastated southeastern U.S. states in September 2024, suggest that this single event could be responsible for over $100 billion in damages, making it one of the costliest hurricanes in U.S. history. These are not one-off events. They are early signals of what's to come. As global temperatures continue to rise, the frequency and intensity of such disasters is projected to increase dramatically. You don't have to be an economist to grasp where this is heading – and what it will cost. 24 August 2023, Spain, Vinuela: Vegetation makes its way through the drought-ridden earth on the ... More shores of the Viñuela reservoir. The reservoir feeds the tropical crops of Axarquía, such as mangoes and avocados. It is in a phase of desiccation, with no water inflow, but consumption that has led the municipalities of Málaga to impose restrictions on the consumption of drinking water. Photo: Felipe Passolas/dpa (Photo by Felipe Passolas/picture alliance via Getty Images) Climate Action Could Create 85 Million New Jobs by 2030 Yet the argument for climate action extends well beyond cost avoidance. Investments in clean energy yield returns through lower utility costs, increased efficiency, and greater energy independence. The cost of key low-carbon technologies has fallen significantly over the past decade –especially solar power, wind, and batteries – and are expected to decline even further, while the margins that can be made with these technologies on energy markets are promising. Additionally, climate resilience investments tend to generate strong economic returns. According to the World Economic Forum, companies that assess their climate risks and act on them report paybacks of $2 to $19 for every dollar invested, depending on the sector. From flood defenses to water-saving systems, climate adaptation investments regularly deliver returns that outweigh their initial costs. The employment gains are equally compelling. The International Renewable Energy Agency estimated that 85 million new jobs could be created by 2030 in the clean energy transition. This exceeds the 12 million jobs expected to be lost in fossil fuel industries. In a nutshell, investing in cleantech has economic potential. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 21: Workers install solar panels during the completion phase of a ... More 4-acre solar rooftop atop AltaSea's research and development facility at the Port of Los Angeles, in the San Pedro neighborhood, on April 21, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. The installation will supply enough energy to power AltaSea's 35-acre campus, the country's biggest 'blue economy' tech hub, which is focused on clean oceans, climate resiliency, and clean energy. (Photo by) Inaction Is Not An Option Unmitigated climate change threatens the very pillars of economic stability. It would reduce productivity, increase poverty, and push fragile systems past their limits. The investment case for climate action is clear: it is a fraction of the cost of inaction, it unlocks long-term savings, and it creates new jobs and industries. The missing ingredient is no longer data or models, but political will, courageous companies and financial mobilization at scale. We face a choice: invest now in a cleaner, resilient future – or spend endlessly on the fallout of inaction.

AI-Driven SoilDrops Puts the 'I' in Irrigation
AI-Driven SoilDrops Puts the 'I' in Irrigation

Los Angeles Times

time20-07-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

AI-Driven SoilDrops Puts the 'I' in Irrigation

L.A.-based SoilDrops, a forward-thinking startup dedicated to sustainable and effortless irrigation, recently announced the launch of its Smart Irrigation Starter Kit. Debuting on Earth Day, the SoilDrops system combines precise soil moisture tracking, proactive lead detection and tailored plant care guidance to simplify landscaping while significantly reducing water use and waste. 'Water scarcity isn't an abstract future issue. It's here now and people need practical solutions,' said Daniel Zhao, founder and CEO of SoilDrops. 'We built SoilDrops for anyone who values efficiency and sustainability but doesn't want the hassle of complicated setups. Watering smarter should be simple and accessible for everyone.' Unlike traditional irrigation solutions relying on fixed schedules or weather predictions, SoilDrops dynamically adjusts watering based on real-time moisture levels, preventing both underwatering and overwatering. Additional standout features include a built-in, smart leak detection capability that instantly alerts homeowners to potential issues, avoiding costly damage and wasted water. Homeowners can also leverage SoilDrops' extensive plant database via its mobile app, receiving personalized watering recommendations tailored to their landscape's unique needs. SoilDrops addresses critical, nationwide water conservation challenges intensified by increasing drought conditions, allowing for healthy landscapes without wasteful watering practices.

Potomac Edison Employee Volunteers Plant 2,000+ Donated Trees in Maryland and West Virginia
Potomac Edison Employee Volunteers Plant 2,000+ Donated Trees in Maryland and West Virginia

Yahoo

time17-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Potomac Edison Employee Volunteers Plant 2,000+ Donated Trees in Maryland and West Virginia

Total helps put FirstEnergy on pace to exceed 2025 tree donation goal WILLIAMSPORT, Md., June 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Employee volunteers from Potomac Edison, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE: FE), have planted more than 2,000 company-donated trees across the company's Maryland and West Virginia service territory in 2025 as part of its commitment to the environment and sustainability. Michele Dellinger, Advanced Forestry Specialist and Lead of Potomac Edison's Green Team: "Local tree plantings are an important way to demonstrate our commitment to the environment while also helping to enhance community green spaces across our service territory." Potomac Edison's Green Team is a group of employees who volunteer their time and talents to support a wide variety of environmental initiatives. The Green Team volunteers planted trees and pollinator gardens in several areas this spring while also participating in multiple tree giveaways. The plantings and giveaways included: Emmitsburg, Maryland: Volunteers partnered with Stream Link Education and the town of Emmitsburg to plant 200 trees near Toms Creek that will improve storm water runoff and creek water quality. Grantsville, Maryland: Green Team members, park staff and other volunteers planted more than 1,000 bare-root evergreens at New Germany State Park. Middletown, Maryland: Volunteers planted 50 trees in celebration of Arbor Day. Mount Savage, Maryland: Volunteers planted 100 saplings at Evergreen Heritage Center, a historic property on 130 acres that provides hands-on enrichment programs that benefit Western Maryland. Martinsburg, West Virginia: Volunteers gave away approximately 200 flowering dogwood trees at the Martinsburg VA Medical Center as part of an Earth Day event. Approximately 22,000 trees have already been planted at parks and nature reserves throughout FirstEnergy's six-state service territory so far this year. Tree plantings and giveaways support FirstEnergy's efforts to reduce its carbon footprint, promote the responsible use of natural resources and further the advancement of sustainable practices. FirstEnergy's 10 Green Teams consist of employees from Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland and West Virginia. The groups partner with state park systems, watershed and recycling groups, garden clubs, schools and other environmentally focused organizations to support FirstEnergy's commitment to building a brighter and more sustainable future. To arrange a tree planting with Potomac Edison's Green Team, please contact Michele Dellinger at mdellinger@ For more information about FirstEnergy's commitment to environmental initiatives, visit Potomac Edison serves about 285,000 customers in seven counties in Maryland and about 155,000 customers in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia. Follow Potomac Edison at on X @PotomacEdison, and on Facebook at FirstEnergy is dedicated to integrity, safety, reliability and operational excellence. Its electric distribution companies form one of the nation's largest investor-owned electric systems, serving more than six million customers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West Virginia, Maryland and New York. The company's transmission subsidiaries operate approximately 24,000 miles of transmission lines that connect the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions. Follow FirstEnergy online at and on X @FirstEnergyCorp. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE FirstEnergy Corp. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store