High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban
On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027.
Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend.
At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'.
He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'.
Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'.
Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court.
Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton.
Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'.
He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'.
At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Mike Lynch's estate faces bankruptcy over £700m court order
Mike Lynch's estate looks likely to be wiped out after a High Court judge ordered it to pay more than £700 million in damages to Hewlett Packard Enterprise in one of the UK's biggest corporate fraud cases. Mr Justice Hildyard ruled in 2022 that Lynch had defrauded Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) over the US tech giant's $11.7 billion (£8.7 billion) acquisition of his business software company, Autonomy, in 2011. On Tuesday morning, almost a year since the technology entrepreneur's superyacht sank off the coast of Sicily while he was celebrating his acquittal in a US criminal trial, Hildyard announced he had awarded HPE damages totalling about £730 million. The final figure could end up being substantially higher once interest is factored in after a final hearing scheduled for November. Lynch's family indicated they would consider appealing against the ruling. Hildyard concluded that had Autonomy's accounts been properly stated, HP and Autonomy would have probably struck a deal that valued each Autonomy share at £23 rather than the £25.50 that it paid. The Silicon Valley company had demanded $4 billion, far more than the $516 million that Lynch, who was 59 when he died last August, was estimated to have earned from the takeover. Hildyard said that HPE's claim 'was always substantially exaggerated'. In a statement written by Lynch before his death, the tech tycoon said the ruling confirmed that HPE's original claim was 'not just a wild overstatement . . . but it was off the mark by 80 per cent'. He added: 'Today's judgment is a view that Autonomy's actual value was not even 10 per cent below the price HP paid. This result exposes HP's failure and makes clear that the immense damage to Autonomy was down to HP's own errors and actions.' A spokesman for HPE said: 'We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute. We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined.' The damages will be paid for out of Lynch's estate. In the latest Sunday Times Rich List, the Lynch family's assets were valued at £473 million. Many assets are in the name of Angela Bacares, his widow, including Loudham Hall, their Suffolk estate, and shares in the cybersecurity business Lynch backed called Darktrace, which were sold for more than $300 million last year. If HP can prove these assets were really his, they could be targeted. HPE bought Autonomy, a pioneer in 'big data' analytics founded by Lynch in 1996, in 2011. Within months of the deal's completion, HPE claimed that Lynch and his finance chief, Sushovan Hussain, had used accounting tricks to make Autonomy appear far bigger, and financially healthier, than it was. The sale sparked more than a decade of costly litigation and investigations. In 2018, Hussain was convicted of fraud in the US and sentenced to five years in prison. He was released in January 2024 and settled with HPE in this case for an undisclosed sum earlier this year. In 2021, the Financial Reporting Council, the UK's accounting watchdog, fined Deloitte £15 million for 'serious failures' over its audit of Autonomy's accounts. After a long extradition battle, Lynch was sent to the US in 2023 to face a jury in California, but he was acquitted, along with Stephen Chamberlain, Autonomy's vice-president of finance, last June, shortly before the yacht accident in August. According to an interim report from British marine investigators, at about 4am on August 19 last year while the Bayesian was anchored off the town of Porticello, the 56m (184ft) boat was violently knocked sideways by a sudden 80mph gust. Water suddenly started cascading in and Bacares was pulled out of the vessel by a crew member. Others however, including Lynch and their 18-year-old daughter, Hannah, never made it out of the boat as it sank 45m to the sea bed. The conclusion of the UK legal proceedings has been in limbo since the maritime tragedy. Although HPE wanted $4 billion, few thought it would get that much. Hildyard said in his original findings that the US company was unlikely to get the sum it was after, because HP may well have bought Autonomy, regardless of the fraud.
Glasgow Times
7 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Police update on Palestine Action protest during Trump visit
Police are preparing for protests at locations where the US President visits and in city centres, including Glasgow. Protests against Israel's offensive in Gaza are likely given the US support for Israel. (Image: AP) READ NEXT:Trump visit will be biggest police operation since Queen's funeral A number of people have been arrested in the last week for showing support for the group Palestine Action, which is proscribed under the Terrorism Act. Last Friday in Glasgow, activist Sean Clerkin was arrested under the act after he displayed a sign stating Genocide in Palestine Time for Action with the words Palestine and action in larger letters. He has been bailed under the condition he doesn't enter the city centre until his court date. Police preparing for the President's visit said the law will be applied to anyone showing support for the group. READ NEXT:Police prepared for Glasgow protests during Donald Trumps visit to Scotland Assistant Chief Constable, Emma Bond, Gold Commander for the police operation during the President's visit said assessments will be made by officers. (Image: Colin Mearns) She said: 'We will make decisions. Any support for Palestine Action, be that in terms of clothes worn, be that in terms of banners held, is now an offence under the Terrorism Act and people are liable to arrest for those offences. 'There is a requirement create that link in terms of showing support, so we will arrest at that stage to enable the further gathering of evidence to enable a case to be put forward to the Crown Office but I couldn't be specifically prescriptive. 'It is down to what we assess on the ground and not everything is as clear cut as it necessarily might be in some circumstances. 'We have had some cases where individuals have worn a t-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action'. 'Those things are far clearer than we might face in other circumstances, so I couldn't be prescriptive but again, the responsibility will be on us to show the actions demonstrate support for Palestine action if there are arrests made.'
North Wales Chronicle
9 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Mass protest planned by 500 Palestine Action supporters in bid to get ban lifted
The action planned for August 9 in central London will see protesters holding signs that say: 'I Oppose Genocide, I Support Palestine Action' with 'non violent composure' for an hour or until they are arrested. A planning document has been posted online that says: 'Five hundred is more than double the total number of people arrested under the Terrorism Act in 2024. 'It would be practically and politically difficult for the state to respond to an action on this scale. 'Even assuming it had the physical capacity to arrest so many people on the same day, the political fallout from such an operation would be incalculable, causing irreparable damage to the reputation of the government and the police. We demand that you lift the ban on Palestine Action. Our government is actively involved in a genocide. The UK government is using anti-terror laws to silence people who are taking action against this genocide. Sign up at for a mass-action on August 9th. — Defend our Juries (@DefendourJuries) July 20, 2025 'Our assessment is that an action on this scale could be enough for the ban to be lifted. 'Charging and prosecuting at least 500 more people, in addition to the 200 people already arrested, is likely to be beyond the capacity of the state, given the current situation in the criminal justice system.' Palestine Action has been banned by the Government under terrorism laws, after it claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. A legal bid to challenge the ban at the High Court by the group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, is ongoing.
