
When Ram met Raavan in Karachi: Ramayana takes the centre-stage in Pakistan for the first time ever
In a groundbreaking moment for South Asian theatre, Ramayana —the Hindu epic—was performed for the first time in Pakistan, premiering on July 11 at the Arts Council of Pakistan in Karachi, reported TOI.
Directed by 30-year-old Yogeshwar Karera, the production featured an all-Muslim cast (except for the director), cutting-edge use of AI, and a sold-out show of around 1,000 tickets—despite ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan.
Karera, a finance graduate-turned-theatre director, launched the play under the banner of Mauj Collective, a Karachi-based theatre group he co-founded just a year ago. 'We didn't anticipate this level of enthusiasm,' Karera admitted, referring to the warm reception from audiences and the cross-border curiosity it generated. Rather than stir controversy, the show sparked admiration.According to the report, the team also promoted the play with a clever twist: a social media video featuring light-hearted, imaginative questions like 'If Ram could tweet from the forest, what would he say?' and 'If Raavan gave a TED Talk, what would its title be?' The video went viral, adding buzz in the lead-up to the premiere.
While the Hindu epic might be seen as a religiously sensitive choice in Pakistan, the cast and crew say they encountered no resistance. 'Nobody questioned our decision—not the sponsors, not the venues,' said Raana Kazmi, who co-founded Mauj Collective and played the role of Sita. 'It only came up when the media asked. People from all walks of life came to see it—students, families, seniors. A friend even shared how a parent explained each scene to their child during the show.' Karera's childhood fascination with the Ramayana began with watching Ramanand Sagar's televised version on Doordarshan, TOI further reported.'Even though I'm not from the religious community it's rooted in, the story always felt like mine. It's part of our subcontinental culture, and its values are universal,' he said. To bridge cultural and linguistic gaps, the team modified a few Sanskrit and Hindi terms to ones more familiar to Karachi audiences. Words like prakriti became kudrat . These adjustments occasionally led to on-stage hiccups, said TOI.
'In one scene, Hanuman gives me a ring, and I know the word anguthi . But one day, Jibran (who played Hanuman) said 'mundrika,' and I just froze,' Kazmi laughed, recalling the confusion. 'I had no idea what a mundrika was supposed to be.' Ashmal Lalwany, who played Ram, echoed the belief that the story felt organically theirs to tell. 'It was never about messaging or politics. We weren't trying to say anything profound—we were just telling a story that belongs to this land.'
With strong performances, modern tech, and a fearless reinterpretation of a cultural classic, Mauj Collective's Ramayana not only entertained—it made history.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Eros calls Raajhanaa's AI ending lawful reinterpretation, counters claims of financial investment by Aanand L Rai
Aanand L Rai's 2013 hit Raanjhanaa, starring Dhanush and Sonam Kapoor in lead roles, was recently re-released in theatres with an AI-altered ending. The 'happy' ending of the film, which was also re-released in Tamil as Ambikapathy, had Aanand and Dhanush openly critical of the alleged tampering of their vision. Eros International Media Limited has issued an official statement in response to the public remarks against the AI-altered ending of Raanjhanaa. They also addressed the 'appropriation' in Aanand and Dhanush's upcoming film Tere Ishk Mein. Dhanush and Sonam Kapoor in a still from Aanand L Rai's Raanjhanaa. Eros calls AI-ending lawful, creative reinterpretation Eros' statement states that the re-release of Raanjhanaa/Ambikapathy with an alternate AI-assisted ending is 'legally compliant, transparently labelled, and artistically guided creative edition intended for Tamil-speaking audiences'. They also state, 'It does not replace or alter the original Raanjhanaa, which remains untouched and widely available across all platforms. This version is part of a global and longstanding tradition in cinema of offering alternate edits, localised adaptations, and anniversary re-releases.' Eros also stated that as 'sole financier, producer and rights holder' of the film, they have control over all intellectual property, moral rights, and derivative rights under Indian Copyright Law. Countering claims of financial investment, creative control Eros also countered Dhanush's recent statement that suggested that Aanand had invested funds to secure his casting in Raanjhanaa. 'While such comments may reflect personal admiration, they are factually inaccurate and legally inconsequential. No private or independent financial investment by Mr. Rai exists within the production, financing, or IP structures of Raanjhanaa. Eros solely undertook the full financial risk of the project and has 100% ownership of the equity and IP of this film,' reads their statement. Usage of Raanjhanaa in Tere Ishk Mein Eros pointed out that Aanand and his production house, Colour Yellow Productions, have positioned the upcoming film Tere Ishk Mein as part of the 'world of Raanjhanaa', 'strongly objecting' to it and calling it an 'illegal and misleading' attempt. 'Eros strongly objects to the illegal and misleading attempt by Mr. Aanand L. Rai and Colour Yellow Productions to position the upcoming film Tere Ishq Mein as part of the 'world of Raanjhanaa', despite having no legal rights, approvals, or IP ownership to do so.' The production has now sent a cease and desist to 'all parties' involved, stating, 'Eros has formally issued a Cease & Desist notice dated July 25, 2025, demanding that all parties immediately cease unauthorised references, marketing, and creative use of any derivative elements of Raanjhanaa. The same has also been caveated to all leading OTT & Streaming Services to prevent any continued misrepresentation, as this act represents a clear violation of Eros's exclusive copyright and intellectual property.' On Artistic Collaboration and AI Innovation Eros also stated that they respect all the creators involved in making Raanjhanaa, pointing out that Aanand's dissociation from the AI-ending of Ambikapathy is his own choice. 'While Eros respects the contributions of all creators involved in Raanjhanaa, it is imperative to reinforce that under Indian law, the producer is the legal author of a film. Mr. Rai's dissociation from the Tamil alternate version is his personal choice, but his claim to ownership or moral authority over the work is neither contractually supported nor legally enforceable. The alternate ending was crafted under the direction of a human creative team using AI only as an assistive tool—not as an autonomous content generator,' they wrote. AI-altered ending not a distraction Eros also mentioned in their statement: 'We categorically reject the suggestion that this creative initiative is a 'strategic distraction' from unrelated regulatory matters, including the ongoing NCLT proceedings involving Colour Yellow Productions. These proceedings pertain to corporate governance, not artistic rights, and Eros is fully cooperating with all legal review. Conversely, we urge the public and industry stakeholders to see through the coordinated and deliberately timed campaign of misinformation being propagated by those under judicial scrutiny.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mr. Beast sparks GOAT debate with 'handicapped LeBron James' twist in viral Michael Jordan one-on-one idea
Mr Beast sparks GOAT debate with 'handicapped LeBron James' twist in viral Michael Jordan one-on-one idea A surprising idea involving two of basketball's biggest legends - LeBron James and Michael Jordan - has sparked interest online. Fans of both players have argued for years about who is the greatest of all time. Now, a new idea has brought the debate back in a fun way. But things didn't turn out the way people expected. Mr. Beast imagines LeBron James vs Michael Jordan one-on-one On August 2, YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson, also called Mr. Beast, shared a fun idea during a live video. He said, 'What if we got LeBron James and Michael Jordan to play 1-on-1, but we make it harder for LeBron somehow?' He was talking casually with fans. He compared it to a video where soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo played a fan for $1 million. The clip spread fast on social media like X and Instagram. Fans started thinking about how that match could look. Mr. Beast also said it would never really happen. He added, 'They would never do it, but imagine if we could.' — lifewclips (@lifewclips) Michael Jordan is now 62 years old. He retired in 2003 after playing with the Washington Wizards. LeBron James is 40. He just finished his 22nd season with the Los Angeles Lakers. In June 2025, he was picked for the All-NBA Second Team. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 30 Remarkable Women from 80–100 Years in the Past Undo This age gap of 22 years is likely why Mr. Beast suggested a handicap-like using only one hand or playing barefoot-for LeBron James. Michael Jordan still respected by LeBron James, despite GOAT talk LeBron James, who is preparing for the 2025-2026 NBA season, has never directly called himself the GOAT. But after winning four championships, being selected to 20 All-Star games, and leading in career scoring, many believe his resume stands above the rest. Michael Jordan's fans argue that his perfect 6–0 record in the NBA Finals makes him the true GOAT. The debate has no official answer, and both players have spoken highly of each other in public. In 2020, LeBron told ESPN, 'I grew up watching Michael. He made me love the game. I'll always respect him.' Also Read: Is Russell Westbrook rejoining the Oklahoma City Thunder? NBA icon faces uncertain future in free agency Mr. Beast's idea will probably never become a real game. But many people enjoyed thinking about a one-on-one match between the two famous players. He talked about it first on August 2 during his live video. So far, neither LeBron James nor Michael Jordan has said anything about it. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Hyundai India Couture Week review: Hits and misses from the runway
Dhanush criticizes the AI-altered climax of Raanjhanaa, where his character survives, arguing it destroys the film's soul. Fans are divided, with some supporting his stance on preserving artistic integrity, while others see no issue with the alternate ending.