logo
The signs of cancer you should be checking for every three weeks

The signs of cancer you should be checking for every three weeks

Telegraph17-06-2025

Assessing your body for lumps, unusual moles or unexplained bruising every three weeks might seem a little over zealous, but that's what we should all be doing to spot cancer at its earliest and most treatable stage – and, crucially, to save lives.
According to a new NHS survey of 2,000 people, only 39 per cent of Brits examine our bodies regularly, with many of us far more likely to check our bank balance, the weather forecast and what's coming up on TV during the same timeframe.
But complacency can lead to deadly consequences: Dr Richard Lee, a champion for early cancer diagnosis at The Royal Marsden Hospital, says delays in people mentioning concerns to their GP are one of the primary causes for early-stage cancers getting missed. 'Many cancers do present with symptoms,' he says. 'The earlier that a cancer is diagnosed, treatments are easier [to tolerate] and treatment success is more likely.'
While the NHS offers national screening programmes for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and is in the process of expanding lung-cancer screening, such programmes only cover a proportion of cancers, making self-checking vitally important, especially as more cancers are being diagnosed under the age of 50.
According to the American Cancer Society, one general feature of many cancers is sudden or unexplained weight loss – for example, losing 5 per cent of your body weight over six to 12 months when you're not intentionally trying to lose weight.
'Cancer can be associated with reduced appetite and weight loss, essentially due to the metabolic effects of the cancer on the body,' says Dr Lee. 'It's partly because there's something there that's growing and it's also a feature of cancer which makes muscles weak while the metabolism is increasing; you've got this inflammation and all these things combined make it hard to keep your weight steady.'
Of course, this doesn't always occur, but certain cancers can be picked up through regular self-checking. Here are some of the most notable symptoms to look out for.
Testicular cancer
Warning signs: Lump or swelling
Testicular cancer usually presents through a testicular lump or swelling or sudden pain in the testicles. There could be a perfectly benign cause for lumps and swelling, but if you're experiencing these symptoms, Dr Robert Stevenson, Consultant Clinical Oncologist at The Harborne Hospital, says it's critical to be examined by a doctor quickly.
'A lump can be a cyst at the back of the testicle, or a varicocele, which is a collection of [enlarged] veins,' he says. 'Incidentally, this can also be an early sign of kidney cancer and that would be looked into too.'
If caught early, the cure rates for testicular cancer are very high, while patients will also avoid more debilitating treatments such as multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 'If it's stage one – so, still confined to the testicle – you may just need the testicle removed, maybe a bit of chemotherapy, and that's it,' says Dr Stevenson.
What to do?
If you feel any sort of lump, swelling or unusual pain in the testicle region, this should prompt a visit to the doctor. An ultrasound scan will be required to diagnose whether it's cause for alarm or benign.
Survival rate if caught early: 99 per cent.
Leukaemia
Warning signs: Unexplained bleeding or bruising
In adults, leukaemia can be one of the more aggressive and difficult to treat cancers, but, when detected early, oncologists say that there are far more options, from chemotherapy to newer immunotherapies and stem-cell transplants.
With leukaemia being a blood cancer, Dr Premini Mahendra, Consultant Haemato-Oncologist at The Harborne Hospital, says that a major warning sign is unexplained bleeding or bruising on the body.
'Patients also sometimes feel unusually fatigued, they're getting recurrent infections, or they have unexplained shortness of breath,' she says.
What to do?
Consult your GP. To rule out leukaemia, Dr Mahendra says you will be given a simple blood test. 'There are lots of other possible explanations, but a full blood cell count, which is one of the cheapest tests to do, will indicate if leukaemia could be responsible or not,' she adds.
Survival rate if caught early: 67 per cent.
Breast cancer
Warning sign: Lumps
According to the NHS, visible signs of breast cancer typically present as hard, irregular, painless lumps that feel slightly different from the surrounding breast tissue, sometimes accompanied by the formation of dimples or changes in the nipple's appearance.
While the disease is most common in women over the age of 50, it can occur in younger women and, as a result, the charity Breast Cancer Ireland has long promoted self-checking as crucial. 'It's important to check yourself regularly so you know what your baseline is, which helps you spot any unusual changes,' says Aisling Hurley, the charity's CEO.
What to do?
While women aged 50-70 are offered mammograms as part of the NHS screening service, you can get a free mammogram earlier if you detect a lump or a concerning sign. Newer, more effective screening tools are also in the pipeline, with Cancer Research UK-funded researchers developing an enhanced mammogram to detect cancer in women with extra-dense breasts (which can make it more difficult to spot the signs of cancer in the first place).
Survival rate if caught early: 95 per cent.
Lymphoma
Warning sign: Swelling
As a cancer that affects the lymphatic system (the complex network of vessels and glands that represent a vital part of the immune system), early signs of lymphoma typically present as painless swellings that form around the body's lymph nodes.
'You can get these swellings which people feel most commonly in the neck, the armpit and the groin,' says Dr Mahendra. 'You can also get swollen glands after a viral infection, but those tend to be tender and painful, while it could be lymphoma if it's painless and it has persisted for more than two weeks.'
What to do?
There isn't a blood test for lymphoma, but, if concerned, specialists will carry out a biopsy of the swollen lymph gland to come to a definitive diagnosis.
Again, the key is to seek medical attention as soon as possible. 'You'd be surprised at how many people sometimes just ignore an unexplained swelling, and only present [themselves] at a much later stage with significant weight loss and enlarged lymph glands, as an emergency patient,' adds Dr Mahendra.
Survival rate if caught early: 84-95 per cent.
Bladder cancer
Warning sign: blood in the urine
Blood in urine is known to be a potential sign of prostate cancer (symptoms of which present mainly in late-stage cancer), but it could also indicate the presence of a bladder tumour. According to Dr Stevenson, this is because the vast majority of bladder cancers arise from cells in the lining of the bladder.
'Bleeding, a more frequent need to urinate, pain when urinating and recurrent infections are signs of bladder cancer,' he says.
What to do?
If bladder cancer can be detected before it has penetrated the bladder muscle layer, it is far easier to treat and send into remission. Doctors will likely recommend a flexible cystoscopy – a test in which a fibre-optic tube is used to directly examine the bladder lining.
Survival rate if caught early: 80 per cent.
6. Skin cancer
Warning sign: Irregular, unhealing moles
Knowing whether a new spot or discolouration on the skin is just a standard mole or something more sinister is a common challenge and, to assist, skin cancer experts commonly refer to the so-called ABCD rule – where A stands for Asymmetry, B for Border Irregularity, C for Colour and D for Diameter.
'Essentially, you're looking for anything that's changing; which doesn't really look as it did previously,' says Dr Lee. 'So, either a new mole, an existing mole which is now bleeding or looking more lumpy than before, or looking more irregular. Or a sore that isn't healing, is very painful or seems to be spreading.'
Because skin cancers can sometimes emerge in parts of the body where it isn't so easy to examine, such as the back, shoulders or backs of legs, Dr Lee advises asking for help from a partner or family member in self-checking.
What to do?
If concerned, consult your GP or a dermatologist. Skin cancers will be diagnosed through a combination of visual inspection, examination using a magnifying tool and, finally, a biopsy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putting cancer warnings on alcohol would help me drink less
Putting cancer warnings on alcohol would help me drink less

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Putting cancer warnings on alcohol would help me drink less

Back in the early noughties, the indoor smoking ban led to an outcry over 'the nanny state'. The same happened when cigarette advertising was banned, and when manufacturers were required to plaster packs with images of diseased lungs. Yet over the past 40 years, according to Cancer Research, lung cancer rates in men have dropped by around 60 per cent. We may think we crave the rugged freedoms of the Marlboro Man, but given the facts, it turns out we don't actually want to die. And yet when it comes to alcohol, one of the world's biggest killers, a key driver of cancers, heart disease, strokes and obesity, there are no images of rotting livers on the chilled Sauvignon. The presentation of booze in the supermarket aisles is as benign as kitchen roll and chicken pie. It's described on restaurant menus with biblical reverence, it's advertised on TV in a hazy, golden-hour glow, and every other greetings card carries a hilarious reference to the booze-addled nature of the recipient. It is both normalised and celebrated, despite being the fifth greatest risk factor for death in the UK. Now, a group of major medical and health organisations have signed a letter to the Prime Minister calling for alcohol to carry explicit warnings that its consumption can cause cancer. The World Cancer Research Fund, which spearheaded the letter, cited 'shockingly low' public awareness that alcohol raises the risk of seven types of cancer – these being breast, bowel, stomach, head, neck, liver and mouth – and insisted that 'bold and unambiguous labelling' is urgently need to help save lives. Token efforts have long been made by the industry to toe a wavering line of responsibility – the number of units a bottle of wine contains written in a font the size of a gnat's IKEA instructions, or a glancing mention that pregnant women shouldn't drink. According to the Advertising Standards Authority, 'Lively, but responsible, social interaction or party scenes with alcohol present are allowed but…no behaviour may be adolescent or childish.' If only that diktat held true in real-life 'party scenes.' Initially, like much of Gen X and our wine-necking Boomer parents, I was resistant to the idea of cancer warnings. If I wanted to slowly kill myself in a responsible and socially acceptable manner, I felt it should be my choice to do so. But after another night of drinking slightly too much with friends, waking bathed in shame and a light prosecco sweat, I reconsidered. Women, particularly, are at risk of harm from alcohol, simply because we're smaller. If every time I picked up the wine bottle to top up my glass – over a healthy dinner! So civilised! – it reminded me that I was increasing my risk of cancer, I suspect I might put it back down. Humans like to ignore the dangers when it's something we want to do until it becomes impossible to turn a blind eye. But this time, it's not so much the consumers resisting warnings as the enormously powerful drinks industry. It's already up against Gen Z's wellbeing crusade, with a tsunami of kumbucha and kefir washing away the old-school shots and spirits from nights out. The risk of drinkers murmuring, 'Actually, I don't think I do want seven types of cancer' and switching the kettle on instead is a step too far. A spokesperson for the Portman Group, which oversees UK alcohol labelling in the UK, says: 'Whilst we do not dispute the link between alcohol and certain cancers… blanket cancer warning labels…can create unnecessary anxiety, eroding trust in health advice and alienating the very people who require support.' As an argument, this is weaker than a sixth-form debating point scribbled on the bus. Imagine the motor industry saying, 'Road signs create unnecessary anxiety. Let's not warn people that they might crash, lest we alienate drivers.' The spokesperson added that most alcohol products already include advice to limit drinking to 14 units a week, and claimed that 'most people drink within guidelines.' According to NHS Digital, however, 24 per cent of Brits drink more than this, while the charity Drinkaware has found that 32 per cent of men and 15 per cent of women regularly sink more than the recommended limit – and it is a limit, not a target. Doctors repeatedly warn that there is no safe level of alcohol consumption, and in April, the World Health Organisation advised that women should drink no alcohol at all to avoid a heightened risk of breast cancer. I'm aware that even reading this is annoying. I share the general British resentment over finger-wagging admonishments from the Fun Police. I want to say, 'You'll prise my Picpoul from my cold, dead hand.' The only thing is, I'd rather not be cold and dead – and I'm increasingly convinced that warning labels can only be a good thing. Although, of course, we must be careful how we approach this new regime. After all, we wouldn't want to alienate anybody.

Update on Guildford paddling pool plagued by problems
Update on Guildford paddling pool plagued by problems

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Update on Guildford paddling pool plagued by problems

The public paddling pool in Guildford's Stoke Park is no stranger to opened a month late last year because of staff sickness and in 2022 was forced to shut just days after a £141,000 refurbishment because parents said its floor was too slippery for the pool is once again more than a month late to open as engineers try to balance the chlorine levels, and are yet to determine what is causing the asked how much the ongoing work is costing the taxpayer, the leader of Guildford Borough Council was unable to answer. So what exactly is going on at Stoke Park and what needs to happen for the pool to reopen? Respiratory problems Council leader Julia McShane told BBC Radio Surrey that the current high levels of chlorine in the water could be a public health said it would particularly affect vulnerable people and might lead to skin or eye irritation as well as stomach and breathing problems."We don't want to be causing people those issues to their health," she said. "I can reassure people that the teams are working incredibly hard with experts to try to find out what the problem is and to resolve this as quickly as possible so we can get this pool open again."But with temperatures in Guildford set to hit 32C on Monday, many families have been left feeling frustrated."It doesn't seem like they can get it right on anything really, it's a real shame that it's like that again, we had a lovely summer here last year once it was sorted," one parent told us: "We're all sad because we used it last year and it was lovely, a lot of people enjoyed being there, but unfortunately it's not open." What happens now? Ms McShane said it would not be fair to give a reopening date to the public as a timeframe for repairs is not yet clear, but she did say work would continue from next week."The team are going to empty the pool again, flush it through, fill it back up again, probably try a different chemical treatment and then test it again," she said."When we're absolutely certain that the pool is safe to use, then we'll reopen."And how much is this all costing?Ms McShane was unable to give a figure and the council did not provide us with one either when we followed it for now, families will just have to keep their fingers crossed and hope the sun is still around when the pool eventually reopens.

Parents of Orlando Davis welcome national maternity inquiry
Parents of Orlando Davis welcome national maternity inquiry

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Parents of Orlando Davis welcome national maternity inquiry

The parents of a baby who died as a result of hospital negligence have said a national inquiry into maternity services will "unravel a huge wider picture" of injury and midwife Robyn Davis and her husband Jonathan, from Steyning, West Sussex, lost their son Orlando 14 days after he was born by emergency caesarean at Worthing Hospital in September Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced an investigation into maternity failings in England, the couple said: "Unfortunately, this is happening everywhere."University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust's chief medical officer Prof Katie Urch, said it was "fully supporting this investigation to help improve maternity care". An inquest into Orlando's death found he had suffered brain damage after clinicians failed to recognise that Mrs Davis had developed hyponatremia - a lower than normal level of sodium in the bloodstream - during couple told the BBC they were told by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust that their case was "really rare".But, after speaking to other families, they discovered "this was not the case whatsoever". "We've very quickly found that, of course, there are multiple families that are not only going through baby loss, they're going through birth injuries, they're going through birth trauma," said couple said they hoped for a wider public inquiry, adding that they wanted to see real change."How many times do we find ourselves hearing of a maternity issue – children dying, mums passing or almost passing or being left with lifelong injuries," said Jonathan."[Then] it happens again."Improvements are also needed in how regulatory organisations support families looking for answers, he said, adding that the process felt like "an endurance race"."Robyn was a midwife at Worthing Hospital... so what chance does a normal member of the public have?" he said. 'Immense courage' Nicola Wise, the Care Quality Commission's director of secondary and specialist care, said: "Safe, high-quality maternity care for all should be the minimum expectation for women and babies – and is what staff working in maternity services across the country want to provide."The Nursing and Midwifery Council's interim chief executive and registrar, Paul Rees MBE, said: "It is vital that when people raise concerns with us, their experience is as positive and supportive as possible. We are working to improve both the timeliness of our investigations and the experience for everyone involved."A General Medical Council spokesperson said: "We take our responsibility extremely seriously and will investigate when there is evidence that indicates a doctor's current fitness to practise could be impaired."UH Sussex's chief medical officer, Prof Katie Urch, said bereaved families "have shown immense courage in sharing their experiences and we remain committed to listening to and learning from them".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store