Shein's and Temu's prices will get hit even harder by the new de minimis rule
Trump eliminated the so-called 'de minimis exemption,' which had admitted duty-free shipments of goods worth US$800 or less into the United States. Giant e-commerce sites used the loophole when shipping hundreds of millions of packages to US consumers.
The administration did away with the exemption for goods coming out of China and Hong Kong in May amid the US-China trade war. This latest move extends that to every country around the world.
Trump said in an executive order issued on Wednesday that 'many shippers go to great lengths to evade law enforcement and hide illicit substances in imports that go through international commerce' and the risk of 'evasion, deception, and illicit-drug importation are particularly high for low-value articles that have been eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.'
This is more bad news for Chinese retailers and their customers because it shuts down the option of re-routing small shipments duty-free through countries like Vietnam, which is facing a tariff rate of 20%. The executive order also demands that the origin of the package must be declared to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Temu and Shein had already started stockpiling goods and bulk-shipping to US warehouses to lower shipping times.
Hours after the de minimis exemption expired for China in early May, Temu announced it was overhauling its shipping model. It said it would send out all American orders via US-based distributors, adding that its 'pricing for US consumers remains unchanged.' But some of Temu's American buyers subsequently complained of higher prices and items were quickly out of stock.
Companies also will eventually need to restock their warehouses, and 'by imposing (the suspension of de minimis) for the whole world, there is no other workaround,' Chris Tang, a professor of global supply chain management at the University of California, Los Angeles, told CNN.
Companies will now have to pay a hefty import tax even if they ship in bulk, which means customers may eventually have to pay more.
The suspension of de minimis will also affect the millions of sellers on Amazon Haul, a discount competitor to Temu and TikTok Shop that ships directly from China.
An Amazon spokesperson told CNN that the company 'consistently offers the lowest prices across the widest selection of products' and that it will 'continue to meet or beat prices versus other retailers across the vast selection of products.'
Temu did not responded to CNN's request for comment.
Overhauling how Americans shop
Last week's repeal will affect a massive amount of packages that Americans are accustomed to receiving duty-free, the sheer amount of which has grown exponentially over the past decade.
CBP previously told CNN it processes 'nearly 4 million duty-free de minimis shipments a day.' Research indicates that a majority of those shipments come from China and Hong Kong. In total, over the last fiscal year, CBP said 1.36 billion packages came to the United States under the de minimis exemption.
When Trump's executive order goes into effect on August 29, most goods shipped internationally will be subject to the tariffs of the country of origin. Those duties will be about $80 per item for a country with a tariff rate less than 16%, $160 per item for a country of a tariff rate between 16% and 25%, $200 per item for a country with a tariff rate above 25%. Some of that cost could be passed down to consumers.
Lower-income households will suffer the most from higher prices on Chinese e-commerce sites. About 48% of de minimis packages were shipped to America's poorest zip codes, while 22% were delivered to the richest ones, according to research in February from UCLA and Yale economists.
The Trump administration had first slashed the de minimis exemption on China in May, but then cut the tariff on those cheap packages from 120% to 54%. There is also a $100 flat-fee option for those goods.
A federal trade court this week declined to block Trump's elimination of the de minimis exemption on goods from China because the issue is already covered in a broader case challenging Trump's tariff policies.
As part of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the de minimis rule was slated for repeal on all countries in July 2027. It even established a civil penalty up to $10,000 for more than one violation of the rule.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Texas Democrats refuse to go back to the state as they face threats of arrest and expulsion
Vikki Goodwin says she's not worried about the bribery allegations, daily fines and arrest warrants being levelled against her and her fellow Texas Democrats who have fled the state. Goodwin is one of dozens of House Democrats who have hunkered down in liberal states to deny Texas Republicans the quorum they need to vote on a new redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump, with the goal of bolstering Republican control of the legislature. But even as Gov. Greg Abbott is doing everything he can to compel the Democrats to return, Goodwin says she and her colleagues are gaining public support every day for their self-imposed exile. "As people are learning why we are doing this, they, too, are becoming outraged that we could have our governor bowing down to the president of the United States," Goodwin, who is in Illinois, told As It Happens guest host Rebecca Zandbergen. "The idea that we're drawing lines in order to pick more Republican representation, I think that just goes against everybody's idea of what a true democracy is." Trump demands 5 more seats Abbott has convened a special session to vote on the redistricting bill, which is expected to give the Republicans five extra seats and protect their narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections. But he can't pass a bill in the 150-member House without two-thirds of members present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the majority-Republican chamber, and at least 51 left the state, according to a Democratic aide. The lawmakers have mostly fled to the Democrat-led states of Illinois, New York and Massachusett. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census Bureau, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago. Goodwin says the process to push through a new map mid-cycle has been rushed and undemocratic. "It's simply because Trump asked for it, and Abbott is willing to do whatever Trump asks," she said. Trump, himself, has made no secret of his desire to bolster Republican dominance in Texas. "We are entitled to five more seats," he told CNBC on Tuesday. In that same interview, Trump said gerrymandering goes both ways, and accused Democrat-led legislatures of drawing electoral maps in their own favour. "They go to Illinois for safety. But that's all gerrymandered. California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress," he said. A White House official told Reuters that Trump wants Abbott to do "whatever is necessary" to get the new map passed. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the plan is more than a power grab; it's "turbocharged racism" that will further dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state. The new lines likely would make it harder for four Hispanic incumbents and two Black incumbents to retain their seats in 2026, according to The Associated Press. Texas Republicans dispute Wu's claims, noting the new map would create four new racially diverse districts, and increase the number of Hispanic-majority districts by one. 'There will be consequences' Abbott has called the Democrats who left the state "un-Texan" and is pulling out all the stops to force them back. He has threatened to remove them from their seats for absconding their duty — something legal experts say would be a lengthy process, not guaranteed to work, and would require new elections to fill vacant seats. The House has also issued civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats, and Abbott ordered state troopers to find and arrest them — something they are legally unable to do outside state boundaries. Under House rules, each representative faces a $500 US fine for every day they're absent. Abbott has said that any lawmaker who solicits funds to cover those costs could face bribery charges, and vowed to extradite any "potential out-of-state felons." "If you continue to go down this road, there will be consequences," House Speaker Rep. Dustin Burrows, a Republican, threatened from the chamber floor Monday. Asked about the bribery charge threats, Goodwin said: "Personally, I have not taken any money that has driven me to the decision to leave the state. This is purely out of the need to protect our democracy, the need to push back against Trump." As for the fines, she said: "We will find a way to cover those costs." Democrat-led states vow to fight fire with fire The state standoff has quickly become a national one. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul — all Democrats — have each threatened to re-draw their own congressional district maps if Texas moves forward with its plan. Goodwin says the tactic of waiting out Abbott's special session can only work for so long. When this one ends on Aug. 19, she says, he's likely to call a new one. But her hope, she says, is that she and her colleagues will continue to gain public support from Texans of all stripes, and Abbott will be forced to abandon the bill in order to avoid jeopardizing his re-election. "That would be my ultimate goal," she said. "Stranger things have happened."
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Apple iSports Secures up to $25 Million Capital Facility from LDA Capital Group, LLC to Propel Gaming and Entertainment Acquisitions
IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Apple iSports (OTC-QB: AAPI) (' Company ' or ' Apple iSports ' or ' AiS '), a gaming, entertainment, media and technology services company, is pleased to announce the commitment of a growth capital Facility (the ' Facility ') by LDA Capital Group, LLC (' LDA Capital '). Key Highlights LDA Capital and Apple iSports have entered into a 3-year common stock purchase Facility in an amount up to USD $25 million, with an option to increase to USD $50 million. The Facility is subject to certain draw down conditions. The Board of Directors of Apple iSports has unanimously approved entering into the Facility, which may be used for working and growth capital purposes. The Company will apply its significant management skills and industry relationships to proceed with the Company's potential uplisting. The Facility underscores the strong market confidence in Apple iSports' business strategy to grow in the gaming and entertainment sectors over the next five years. Key Strategic and Financial Rationale Funding under the facility, combined with the Company's most recent agreement to acquire LBC Enterprises Pty Ltd, underscores Apple iSports' ability to execute on its stated business strategy. The funding will underpin the Company's ambitions and excellent relationships in the gaming and entertainment communities by securing highly accretive gaming and wagering revenue streams from business enterprise (B2B) and consumers (B2C). In doing so, this will position the Company to become a highly competitive player in the U.S. online gambling services ecosystem. Messrs. Joe Martinez and Lyndon Hsu, Directors of the Company, jointly commented, 'We are delighted to have secured a funding Facility from LDA Capital, which will allow us to strengthen our balance sheet and accelerate our development and growth. ' Mr. Martinez elaborated, 'What's exciting about our relationship with LDA in conjunction with LBC is to penetrate the USA market and have an international iGaming footprint that AiS will have because of these actions. The combination will provide a competitive advantage globally by having a vertical integration of our operations and a funding partner that views the global market as key to our success.' Mr. Warren Baker, Co-Founder and Managing Partner at LDA Capital, stated, 'LDA Capital is excited to partner with Apple iSports in their quest to build out a high-quality gaming and entertainment business in prime markets such as the USA and expand to global markets. Our commitment to the Company will enhance their expansion efforts, and we look forward to supporting their ambitions. ' About Apple iSports Group, Inc. Apple iSports is a rapidly emerging gaming, entertainment, and technology services provider to B2B and B2C. The Company's core businesses include the development of gaming, entertainment, media, and wagering. The core team behind Apple iSports has over four decades of gaming and wagering experience in regulated markets such as Australia, the U.K., and Europe. The Company now brings that experience to the U.S., complemented by powerful corporate and finance capabilities. For additional information about the Apple iSports platform, please visit. About LDA Capital Group, LLC LDA Capital is a global alternative investment group with expertise in complex cross-border transactions. LDA Capital has successfully completed more than 300 financings and business partnerships with both listed and private companies in 43 countries, with a total transaction value of over USD $11 billion. LDA's real estate investment activities span Latin America, the Caribbean, and Europe, providing exposure to a diverse range of real estate asset classes within its varied portfolio. For more information about LDA Capital Group, please visit the following website: This release contains forward-looking financial information related to the Company's strategic growth initiatives. Actual results may differ due to market conditions and other factors. Apple iSports Group, Inc. assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by law.
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation
The Federal Emergency Management Agency headquarters is shown in Washington on May 5, 2025. (Gene J. Puskar / AP Photo) BOSTON — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from reallocating US$4 billion meant to help communities protect against natural disasters. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns in Boston granted a preliminary injunction sought by 20 Democrat-led states while their lawsuit over the funding moves ahead. A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The states argued FEMA lacked the authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program and redirect more than $4 billion of its funding. The program aims to harden infrastructure around the country against potential storm damage. FEMA initially announced it was ending the program, but later said in a court filing that it was evaluating it. Noting money for the program was allocated by Congress, the states' lawsuit says any attempt to redirect it would run afoul of the Constitution. A lawyer for the government, Nicole O'Connor, argued at a hearing in July that the funds can be used both for disaster recovery and disaster prevention and that FEMA should have discretion to use the money how it sees fit. In his ruling, Stearns said he was not convinced Congress had given FEMA any discretion to redirect the funds. The states had also shown that the 'balance of hardship and public interest' was in their favor. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the States from the funds being repurposed is great,' Stearns wrote. 'The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives.' The program has provided grants for a range of disaster management projects, including strengthening electrical grids, constructing levees for flood protection and relocating vulnerable water treatment facilities. Many of the projects are in rural communities. FEMA said in a news release in April that it was 'ending' the program, but the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, later said in a court filing that FEMA was merely evaluating whether to end or revise it. Stearns said it appeared FEMA had decided to end the program and was 'inching towards a fait accompli,' noting it had cancelled new funding opportunities and told stakeholders they shouldn't expect any unobligated funding. The states, including California, New York and Washington, argued that the threat of losing the funding alone had put numerous projects at risk of being cancelled, delayed or downsized. And they warned ending the program would be highly imprudent. 'By proactively fortifying our communities against disasters before they strike, rather than just responding afterward, we will reduce injuries, save lives, protect property, and, ultimately, save money that would otherwise be spent on post-disaster costs,' they wrote in the suit filed in July. FEMA said in a court filing that an injunction on its use of the funds could hamper its ability to respond to major disasters. But Stearns said the administration could come back to him to release funding should a disaster of 'unprecedented proportions' occur. Jack Brook and Michael Casey, The Associated Press
