Japan court awards asylum seekers damages over prolonged detention
A Japanese district court has ordered the state to pay a total of 1.2 million yen ($8,260) in compensation to two asylum seekers, ruling that in some cases their repeated detentions by the country's immigration agency did not take account of their physical and mental conditions.
Deniz, a Kurdish man in his 40s with Turkish nationality, and Heydar Safari Diman, an Iranian national in his 50s, sought about 30 million yen in damages, after they were detained and released several times over the space of more than a decade. They filed the lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court in 2022 focusing on their treatment from 2016.
The ruling handed down on Tuesday said that on some occasions, they were detained despite deteriorating health conditions, such as a diagnosis of depression.
"We cannot say the necessity of detention overrode their physical and mental disadvantages," the court said, ruling that some of their detentions violated the International Covenants on Human Rights and amounted to unjust physical restraint prohibited by Japan's immigration law.
The plaintiffs also questioned the immigration law itself, which allows detention without going through a review process such as trials, saying that it infringes the human rights covenants.
But the court dismissed their claim on the grounds that their rights to a trial are guaranteed through a lawsuit seeking release.
Masako Suzuki, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, underscored the significance of the ruling, telling a press conference that it "clearly acknowledges that there was a violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights in the detention."
The Immigration Services Agency has said it will respond "appropriately" after reviewing details of the ruling, since some of its claims were not upheld.
According to the complaint, Deniz, who declined to give his surname for fear of retaliation against his family in Turkey, and Safari Diman had both overstayed their visas and were subsequently repeatedly detained by the Immigration Services Agency.
From 2016 to 2020, they were detained several times for a total of more than three and a half years each, the complaint said. They have been on provisional releases since the spring of 2020, according to their supporters.
Seeking help from the international community, the two had notified a U.N. expert panel on arbitrary detention of their cases, leading the panel to release an opinion in 2020 that found their deprivation of liberty was "arbitrary" and contravened human rights covenants.
Related coverage:
FEATURE: Hate speech bringing unwanted focus on Japan's Kurdish community
FOCUS: Female Afghan refugees facing legal limbo, deportation in Pakistan
No. of foreign residents in Japan hits record high for 3rd year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
9 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Newly elected legislator LaSalle Ishii arrives at upper house with school backpack
TOKYO -- An extraordinary session of the Diet was convened Aug. 1, with newly elected House of Councillors members arriving at the Diet building for the first time since the July 20 election, including LaSalle Ishii of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), who turned up with a small school backpack. Explaining his reason for sporting the "randoseru" backpack, commonly used by elementary school students in Japan, the 69-year-old Ishii said, "It's because I'm a brand new first year student." He was presented with a bouquet of flowers by party leader Mizuho Fukushima. Surrounded by reporters, he remarked, "There are more cameras than ever before. I keenly feel that this is a heavy responsibility." Ishii has a past career as an actor. Regarding his activities as a lawmaker, he expressed enthusiasm, saying, "People say 'the SDP's claims are just nice words,' but I want to advance politics with the mindset, 'What's wrong with having idealistic dreams?'" (Japanese original by Tohru Shirakawa, Tokyo Bureau)
The Mainichi
10 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Japan must pass relief bill for WWII civilian air raid victims on 80th anniv.
The Japanese government has yet to provide relief to people who suffered damage from air raids and other atrocities across the country during the Pacific War, and the Diet once again failed to act on this issue during the ordinary session that closed in late June. These people are victims of a war initiated by the state. Nevertheless, the government has done nothing to compensate them. Such absurdities can no longer be left unaddressed. A cross-party group of lawmakers drew up a bill over the issue. It includes a uniform lump-sum payment of 500,000 yen (approx. $3,300) to those who suffered physical and psychological wounds and disabilities. The bill also incorporates a fact-finding survey by the government over the damage wrought by air raids. Due to stalled coordination within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, where some lawmakers have strong reservations, the multiparty parliamentary group was unable to submit the bill to the Diet. The victims of aerial bombings and other damage were significantly disappointed, as they had hoped for legislation this year, the 80th anniversary of the war's end. The Japanese government has paid pension and other benefits to former military personnel and civilian military employees, as well as their bereaved families. However, it has not compensated other civilians except for survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rhetoric employed to justify this was the "doctrine of endurance obligation" -- that members of the public must equally endure sacrifices and damage from the war. The Supreme Court in 1987 tapped this doctrine to dismiss a lawsuit over the great Nagoya air raids of late World War II, and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba recently stated in response to a Diet question that this precedent cannot be contravened. There have, however, been changes in the judiciary's line of thought. In lawsuits filed in 2007 and 2008 by victims of the 1945 Great Tokyo Air Raids, the court did not cite the endurance doctrine as a reason for ruling against the plaintiffs, and urged a solution through legislation. Regardless, the government has been slow to act. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has emphasized a 2005 agreement by the government and ruling parties that all postwar settlement measures would end with a project to provide consolation gifts to former Siberian labor camp internees. Yet a system to pay special benefits to former Siberian internees was later established. The agreement cannot serve as a basis for denying any new postwar compensation programs. The government's stance seems to betray its true concern: That providing relief to strategic bombing victims could expand the scope of compensation. The cross-party bill does not cover bereaved families and war orphans, because it prioritizes Diet passage over truly sufficient provisions -- a painful decision by the victims of air raids and other wartime damage. While those entitled to the lump-sum payments was expected to be around 4,600 people five years ago when the bill's outline was drafted, the number has now dwindled to about 3,200. As the victims age, we have no time to lose. The relief bill must be passed swiftly into law.
Asahi Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Technical intern trainee tells of low pay at wage council meeting
A woman from Myanmar speaks to reporters after the Regional Minimum Wages Council meeting in Fukuoka on July 31. (Satoru Eguchi) A Myanmar woman working in a technical intern training program in Japan called for a 'significant increase in the minimum wage' at a Regional Minimum Wages Council meeting held in Fukuoka on July 31. According to the labor ministry, this was the first time that a technical intern trainee has testified at a Minimum Wages Council meeting. The woman highlighted the wage disparity between foreign technical trainees and Japanese nationals performing the same work. She spoke at the meeting at the encouragement of Union Kita-Kyushu, a regional labor union. The union recommended that she explain the situation facing technical intern trainees, who don't have the freedom to change jobs and can be forced to work for low wages. The 24-year-old woman from Myanmar works at a nursing home in Kita-Kyushu. In the council meeting, she explained that she has to repay around 1 million yen ($6,640) in debt to the dispatch company acting as a broker in Myanmar, and she also has to send money to her family back home. She said she works for the minimum wage in the prefecture, which allows her to send between 100,000 and 150,000 yen to her family each month, and lives on the remaining 50,000 yen per month. 'None of my Japanese coworkers work for just the minimum wage,' she said, pointing out the current situation that runs contrary to the equal pay for equal work concept. She added, 'If the minimum wage increased to 1,500 yen, I would have 100,000 yen a month after sending money to my country. I could use it for my personal needs or to study for my future.' According to this woman, she was forced to drop out of her university after studying for three years because of the military coup in Myanmar and her father losing his job. She had to start working. She has been a fan of Japanese anime since high school. She also studied Japanese, so she came to Japan in the spring of 2023 as a technical intern trainee. After the council meeting, she told reporters that, 'I was really nervous, but it was good to offer opinions on behalf of those in the same situation.'
