New wave of homophobic attacks targets users of gay dating apps like Grindr
"Am I going to make it out of here alive?" he remembered thinking. "What's going to happen?"
He managed to get up but stumbled a few times after receiving blows to his head.
The men were laughing at him. One of them was filming.
"They were calling me a paedophile," Josh, whose name has been changed to protect his identity, told 7.30.
Josh was so badly beaten he almost ended up in intensive care.
"Apparently I had lost so much blood that my blood pressure had dropped so low they were considering taking me to ICU."
It was spring 2024 in Melbourne's bayside suburbs. Josh's Saturday night had turned into the early hours of Sunday morning. Like many men on the hook-up app Grindr, he'd been "looking".
Josh, now in his 30s, has used Grindr since he was 18.
He started chatting to a user whose profile had three face pics, unlike the others, and "filled out" details.
"In the past I've usually been pretty good at picking up on red flags, sort of going, 'Nah, I don't know about this person.' But this profile was very well set up, very well articulated," he said.
"It looked very legitimate. I didn't see it coming at all."
After a few messages the user asked Josh to meet him at a nearby park, where Josh found the man crouching behind a bush.
"At the corner of my eye I could see another person moving towards me, also holding something metal in their hands, and I just turned and ran out of the park."
His assailants though managed to catch him.
Josh's case is part of a new wave of homophobic attacks around Australia, with dating and hook-up app users lured by fake profiles and then assaulted and robbed by groups of men or boys, some as young as 13.
Last month, five teenage boys were jailed over "planned and premeditated" attacks in Western Australia.
During their trial, the Perth Children's Court heard that one of the targets was stripped naked, threatened with drowning and chased into a swamp after being punched in the face and tasered, losing teeth in the process.
In Victoria police have arrested 35 alleged offenders.
Jeremy Oliver, Victoria Police's LGBTIQA+ Communities Portfolio Manager, said alleged incidents involved "posting and boasting" in which victims were filmed and the video posted on social media.
The video is sometimes used in a "shaming process" with threats to out victims for their sexuality.
"Part of it is a rise in anti-LGBTIQA+ sentiment or rhetoric that's happening around the world," Mr Oliver told 7.30.
"There's a real decline in social cohesion and young men are being influenced to inflict violence against minority communities."
Mr Oliver said the offenders in the groups were known to each other and attacked men in a localised area, but it's not known whether the groups were acting together in a coordinated way.
"We find it incredibly disturbing and distressing that these crimes are being committed by people at such a young age," he said.
In New South Wales, police have pressed 39 charges in 44 incidents reported to them since January 2024.
The attacks have been located in regional and metropolitan areas, from the Central Coast and the Northern Beaches to Western Sydney and Campbelltown.
The victims were robbed, assaulted or extorted after meeting up with the offenders, while others were lured by offenders "purporting to be underage", according to NSW Police.
"The intent we have seen is the perception that they are a vigilante to do good, and by their own bias against the LGBTQIA+ community," NSW Police Assistant Commissioner, Leanne McCusker told 7.30.
Assistant Commissioner McCusker believed the offenders were exploiting any fear or shame around sexuality to prey on victims.
Contact 7.30's Jason Om at om.jason@abc.net.au.
NSW Police said such crimes were going unreported because some victims believed their sexuality would come to light by doing so.
Others might be embarrassed to share such personal details with police.
A victim in another state told 7.30 he was cautious about potentially having to provide his phone contents to police for fear of "being led into the unknown".
Late last year the man was lured by a fake profile which turned out to be two men who verbally attacked him.
They chased him into a busy intersection where they continued to harass and film him.
"I really didn't know how it was going to end."
The men continued to yell abuse near his home, forcing the man to hide from them for nearly an hour.
While the man believed in the importance of police investigations, he wanted his privacy protected.
"What's the evidence that police can hone right in and not look at any other private messages?"
He was also deterred by the prospect of a lengthy court process and potentially lenient sentencing for the offenders.
Both NSW and Victoria police stressed that victims would need to consent to giving evidence, and that screenshots of interactions, such as profile shots or text messages, would help their inquiries.
"We do not need the entire content of that victim's phone," Assistant Commissioner McCusker said.
"We need the evidence that is relevant to the offence they are reporting."
Victoria Police Senior Constable Shaun Kelly told 7.30 police can request information from dating apps to assist in solving investigations and can also "conduct a criminal investigation even where one party has blocked or deleted someone from the app".
"We want victims to know it is never too late to make a report, so when you're ready, please speak to us," he said.
The victim in Melbourne, Josh, said police did not look through his phone.
"I can imagine the embarrassment though, you've got nudes of yourself," he said.
"I would say to other victims, don't be scared to come forward because we want to hold those accountable for what they've done."
It is about 50 years since the dark days of routine gay bashings and targeted murders on the streets of Sydney in the 1970s and 1980s.
In the 2020s, such violence has predominantly taken a different form embraced by a new generation of offenders.
Grindr's launch in 2009 was a sexual revolution, changing the way gay men, and others, hooked up through a location-based app, leading the way for other companies like the straight-skewing Tinder.
The ability for users on Grindr to be anonymous was appealing for some, including those not wanting to express their sexuality publicly, or in countries where users were at risk of persecution because homosexuality was criminalised.
Sixteen years later that anonymity, through fake profiles, is being used to harm.
"Anonymity gives [offenders] something to hide behind," criminology PhD candidate Hannah Robertson, from the Australian National University, told 7.30.
She said some forms of violence on dating apps, more broadly, had become normalised.
"An Australian Institute of Criminology study in 2022 found that three quarters of users of dating apps in Australia reported experiences of some form of violence, abuse, aggression or harassment," she said.
Ms Robertson's PhD is examining sexualised violence through dating apps and how tech companies have responded.
She said some apps had taken a positive step to sign up to the Australian government's dating app code, which came into effect in October last year.
The code requires signatories "to implement reporting mechanisms and systems that detect potential incidents of online-enabled harm and take necessary action to address these incidents".
Ms Robertson said the code was voluntary and did not specifically include hate crimes.
Grindr is a signatory to the code but did not to respond to an interview request by 7.30.
Victoria Police said Grindr had been cooperative with its investigations, including by providing alerts in the app to warn users of incidents.
It said other apps, such as Scruff, SnapChat and Daddyhunt weren't as responsive.
Ms Robertson believed there were deeper questions about the offenders' motivations.
"That [hate] ideology is not something that exists in this context only, and what we risk in terms of putting too much emphasis on the responsibility of the technology is that the underlying motivation is still going to drive the perpetrators," she said.
"They're not going to stop committing these harms and violence, they're just going to do it elsewhere by other means."
Melbourne victim Josh said the apps probably could do more to keep users safe.
"They have somewhat of a responsibility, but at the same time when you agree to those terms and conditions you probably should know that there's a possibility [of harm] ... it could happen," he said.
"A lot of it, I think, is the whole 'toxic masculinity' [issue].
"It's really sad because there was such a movement towards acceptance for the LGBT community and now it's taking a step backwards."
Josh has recovered from his injuries but still has problems with his jaw.
He's wary of who he meets now.
"They could still be looking at my profile and know who I am, but I have no idea who they are," he said.
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Australian
34 minutes ago
- The Australian
Toorak thieves allegedly steal $75k of jewellery and WWII medals
In a pair of brazen robberies in Melbourne's leafy eastern suburbs an alleged thief stole a $25,000 engagement ring alongside war medals and a further $50,000 worth of jewellery. The two burglaries occurred about 6.30pm on Friday June 27 at two neighbouring Toorak homes. Police are now urging anyone with information to come forward. The alleged thief is currently unidentified, with police releasing a new image to help identify him. The alleged thief was caught on CCTV. Picture: Supplied / VIC Police From the first property he allegedly stole a 2-carat diamond engagement ring, before forcing his way into the next-door home and taking a safe filled with approximately $50k worth of jewellery and four WWII army medals. War medals belonging to one of the victim's mothers were also stolen. Picture: Supplied / Victoria Police No residents were home at the time of the thefts. Detective Senior Constable Daniel Wall said the significance of the stolen items has made it 'particularly distressing' for the victims. 'An engagement ring carries profound sentimental worth and it would extremely upsetting to have this taken away from you,' Detective Wall said. 'The war medals belonged to the victim's mother who has now sadly passed away, so you can understand how heartbreaking it must be for this family. A further $50k worth of jewellery was also stolen. Picture: Supplied / VIC Police 'We're asking residents in the area to check their CCTV, and we're particularly keen to hear from anyone who noticed suspicious activity in the area at the time. You can do so anonymously via Crime Stoppers.' Police have released images of the stolen jewellery, which include a cupid charm, a love-heart bracelet, and a star-shaped brooch. Brendan Kearns Cadet Journalist Brendan Kearns is a cadet journalist with News Corp Australia. He has written for The Australian, the Herald Sun, the Geelong Advertiser, CHOICE, Cosmos, and The Citizen. He won Democracy's Watchdogs' Student Award for Investigative Journalism 2024 and hosted the third season of award-winning podcast Uncurated. He studied as Master of Journalism at The University of Melbourne, before that he worked as a video producer and disability worker. @brendandkearns Brendan Kearns

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Erin Patterson: Key question remaining after mushroom trial
Found guilty this week of murdering her husband's parents and aunt, one key question remains unanswered in Erin Patterson's poisoning trial; why? Patterson's motivation for poisoning four in-laws with deadly mushrooms was only briefly addressed as her blockbuster trial played out in Victoria's southwest this year. Prosecutors said they would not be putting forward a motive, explaining sometimes a killer's reasons remain only known to them, while her defence argued she had 'anti-motive', or reasons to want her victims alive. The 50-year-old was on Monday found guilty of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder by a jury after seven days of deliberations. She had pleaded not guilty, with her defence arguing the case was a tragic accident. In his final remarks to the jury, Justice Christopher Beale said the prosecution does not need to prove a motive to make out the charges of murder and attempted murder. 'For some murders there may be evidence of motive, but some murders occur for no apparent reason,' he said. 'The motives for such murders may only ever be known to the offenders.' He told the jury the prosecution had agreed there was no known reason why Patterson did what she was ultimately found guilty of. 'It's the allegations of murder and attempted murder the prosecution has to prove, nothing else,' the judge said. 'But that does not mean that the absence of the evidence of a motive to kill is irrelevant. It is a relevant consideration, which you must take into account in the accused's favour when weighing all the evidence in this case.' Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC touched on motive in her closing address, saying while the prosecution was not putting one forward; 'you don't have to know why a person does something in order to know they did it'. Dr Rogers said the evidence in the trial shows the relationship between Patterson and her in-laws was 'not always a harmonious one'. The prosecutor pointed to Simon's account of tension in their relationship in late 2022 over the issue of child support, with Don and Gail 'dragged unwillingly' into the conflict. She said child protection practitioner Katrina Cripps had given evidence Patterson described Simon as 'nasty' after that conflict and their son's evidence the relationship was 'very negative'. Dr Rogers suggested Patterson was leading a 'duplicitous life', presenting a positive face to the Patterson family while sharing her real feelings to her online friends, several of whom gave evidence. ' … the evidence shows, you might think, that the divide between the accused and her in-laws was deeper than they ever knew,' Dr Rogers said. 'She expressed her real feelings about them and the broader Patterson family to her online friends.' Dr Rogers turned to a series of messages in December 2022 from Patterson to her online friends, where she called them a 'lost cause', mocked their religious beliefs and wrote; 'this family I swear to God'. Patterson's barrister, Colin Mandy SC, questioned why the prosecution had focused so much on a brief period of tension in 2022 when they weren't putting forward a motive. 'They spent so much time in this trial scratching around to try and find some suggestion of … animosity in the family dynamics,' he said. 'There's no anger or aggression. There's not hatred or anything remotely approaching that. 'Not even between Simon and Erin and certainly not between Erin and Simon's parents.' Turning to the messages Patterson sent to her online friends, Mr Mandy labelled it an 'aberration' in her relationship with the Patterson family that only spanned a few days. 'Erin made a handful of comments in the context of being hurt and frustrated about these responses she was getting from Don and Gail, in the context of her issues with Simon, and that's it,' he said. 'And you might think that venting in that way is a pretty healthy thing to do.' The defence barrister said the prosecution's case had ignored the years of love and support shown by the family to Patterson. 'Erin Patterson had a motive to keep these people in her world so that they could keep supporting her and her children, especially her children,' he said. 'Why would she take wonderful, active, loving grandparents away from her own children?' He further questioned why she would kill Ian and Heather, who she 'hardly knew' aside from the church community. Mr Mandy said the evidence in the trial showed his client was a person of good character; a devoted mother of two with no prior convictions and close relationships with her in-laws, particularly Don and Gail. He agreed motive was not one of the four elements of murder the prosecution had to provide beyond reasonable doubt, but suggested it was an important consideration on the issue of his client's intention. 'Our argument to you is that motive is very important to the proof of intention and usually fundamental to it,' he said. 'Without a motive, you're left guessing about the most important element of the offence in this trial and that's intention.' Patterson will return to court at a later date.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Police seek information about $25k engagement ring stolen from Toorak home
In a pair of brazen robberies in Melbourne's leafy eastern suburbs an alleged thief stole a $25,000 engagement ring alongside war medals and a further $50,000 worth of jewellery. The two burglaries occurred about 6.30pm on Friday June 27 at two neighbouring Toorak homes. Police are now urging anyone with information to come forward. The alleged thief is currently unidentified, with police releasing a new image to help identify him. From the first property he allegedly stole a 2-carat diamond engagement ring, before forcing his way into the next-door home and taking a safe filled with approximately $50k worth of jewellery and four WWII army medals. No residents were home at the time of the thefts. Detective Senior Constable Daniel Wall said the significance of the stolen items has made it 'particularly distressing' for the victims. 'An engagement ring carries profound sentimental worth and it would extremely upsetting to have this taken away from you,' Detective Wall said. 'The war medals belonged to the victim's mother who has now sadly passed away, so you can understand how heartbreaking it must be for this family. 'We're asking residents in the area to check their CCTV, and we're particularly keen to hear from anyone who noticed suspicious activity in the area at the time. You can do so anonymously via Crime Stoppers.' Police have released images of the stolen jewellery, which include a cupid charm, a love-heart bracelet, and a star-shaped brooch.