logo
Are We in a New Era of Presidential Regalism?

Are We in a New Era of Presidential Regalism?

New York Times22-05-2025
By Carlos Lozada and Aaron Retica
Produced by Vishakha Darbha
Who knew what when? Two new books paint a damning portrait of the Democratic Party and what some of its members knew about President Joe Biden's deteriorating health during the 2024 campaign. On 'The Opinions,' the Times editor at large Aaron Retica is joined by the columnist Carlos Lozada to discuss 'Original Sin' by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson and 'Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House' by Jonathan Allen and Amy Parnes. Retica and Lozada explore the books' shared themes and where the beleaguered party goes from here.
(A full transcript of this audio essay will be available within 24 hours of publication in the audio player above.)
Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com.
This episode of 'The Opinions' was produced by Vishakha Darbha. It was edited by Alison Bruzek and Kaari Pitkin. Mixing by Carole Sabouraud. Original music by Pat McCusker and Carole Sabouraud. Fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The director of Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baltimore City leaders call for end of BGE's 'Operation Pipeline' program, multi-year rate hikes
Baltimore City leaders call for end of BGE's 'Operation Pipeline' program, multi-year rate hikes

CBS News

time37 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Baltimore City leaders call for end of BGE's 'Operation Pipeline' program, multi-year rate hikes

Baltimore City Council President Zeke Cohen and other city leaders are calling for a halt to Baltimore Gas and Electric's 'Operation Pipeline' program. The program aims to upgrade hundreds of miles of natural gas pipes and equipment across Maryland by replacing cast iron and bare steel pipes with new, more durable lines. In 2023, the Maryland Public Service Commission approved BGE's multi-year rate hike plan, which authorized a series of rate increases between 2024 and 2026. The plan, in part, will pay for the upgrades. But city leaders argue the program is driving up customer bills and increasing the company's profits. This isn't the first time city leaders have called for an end to the rate hikes. An analysis released by the Office of the People's Counsel in February found that spending on gas infrastructure is fueling the hikes, and projected even higher winter bills in the future if the company continues its current level of capital investment. The report says gas utilities will spend about $744 million on gas infrastructure in 2025. Shortly after the OPC's report was released, the Baltimore City Council passed a resolution calling on the PSC to stop the multi-year rate hikes, arguing that the infrastructure upgrades should not be paid for by taxpayers. Maryland sees rising utility costs BGE raised their rates on January 1, increasing the average residential gas bill by 9% and the electric bill by 7%. During the winter, Maryland households reported some of their highest gas bills ever. But BGE said that while the pipeline upgrades are a part of the cost increases, a 30% rise in natural gas prices over the past year, and increased spending on energy efficiency programs mandated by the state also play a factor.

Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging parental consent for abortion
Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging parental consent for abortion

CNN

time40 minutes ago

  • CNN

Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging parental consent for abortion

The Supreme Court declined Thursday to review a Montana law that requires people under 18 to seek parental consent before obtaining an abortion, leaving in place a state court ruling that struck the law down. Montana's law, enacted in 2013, prohibits a doctor from providing an abortion to a patient under 18 without notarized written consent from a parent. The state's highest court concluded that the law violated the Montana state constitution, which includes broader protections for abortion than the US Constitution. This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store