logo
Reader critiques: The Post's ‘pope slot machine' was deeply offensive

Reader critiques: The Post's ‘pope slot machine' was deeply offensive

Washington Post16-05-2025
Every week, The Post runs a collection of letters of readers' grievances — pointing out grammatical mistakes, missing coverage and inconsistencies. These letters tell us what we did wrong and, occasionally, offer praise. Here, we present this week's Free for All letters.
To associate the election of a pope with pulling the lever on a slot machine is one step above crap-shooting with Christianity. 'The world's holiest wager,' read the headline on a May 8 Style article. 'Instead of betting on college sports, try your luck on the College of Cardinals,' a secondary headline suggested. Gambling on election outcomes is an age-old pastime, but promoting it in the case of this ceremony is ludicrous.
I guess the artist could have made the illustration wider and the operating lever longer, to symbolize the cardinals 'pulling the lever' again and again with each vote. Alternately, the artist could replace the miters on the reels with Bibles. Then use a small miter for the top of the lever. Keep your thumb on God.
John Hebbe, Fairfax Station
Michael Ramirez hit a new low with his May 9 editorial cartoon, 'An American pope,' depicting the newly elected pope garbed in stars and stripes.
Did Ramirez intend to celebrate with American Catholics? Does he understand how offensive his cartoon is to non-Catholic Christians struggling against Christian nationalism? Does he recognize what his cartoon signals to millions of Americans who do not happen to be Christian and who depend on the separation of church and state to protect their rights?
Clara M. Lovett, Chevy Chase
The misuse of the word 'America' seems to have spread from the White House, misnaming the Gulf of Mexico, to coverage of Pope Leo XIV. Contra the May 9 front-page headline 'First American pope is chosen,' he is not the first American pope. That honor belongs to his predecessor. Why? Because Francis was born in Argentina and was therefore South American. Hence, Leo should be identified as the first North American pope.
Jay Levy, Takoma Park
Thank you for putting the May 11 article 'Japanese American GIs are feted as 'saviors' 80 years on' on the front page. As the world is becoming more divided, it is important to remember those who have fought and sacrificed for democracy and the just treatment of all people. Through everything they endured in the United States, Japanese American soldiers gave the 442nd Regimental Combat Team the reputation as 'the most decorated unit for its size and length of combat service in the history of the U.S. military.'
America's strength is realized only when we all support one another despite our backgrounds. I believe the majority of legal immigrants come here to become model citizens and to support this country. If you don't like what America stands for, then don't come; no one is forcing you to be here. But we should remember that what makes our country strong and unified is the people. Fortunately, as shown in this little-known piece of history, in times of crisis, people step up and do the right thing to help others. I can only hope that our politicians will follow in their path: Wake up, do your jobs and start working together.
Adrian Fremont, Alexandria
The May 7 Metro obituary 'Soulful novelist had a mordant wit' memorialized a writer of remarkably poignant humor, Jane Gardam of England, who elevated my continuous amazement at how we are enriched by books. One evening some time ago, my all-male book club in Baltimore was discussing 'Old Filth' and my wife sneaked down to the landing to eavesdrop. Our conversation ended on a question about Edward Feathers, the 'Old Filth' of the title: British colonial, empire lover, lawyer, judge, betrayed husband, wit and bit of a twit, tragicomically thrashing through having lost his wife, Betty, as she gardened. Our book club's question: Did Feathers avoid intimacy, or was he incapable of it? My friends left, and my wife, Betsey, had one comment on what she'd overheard: 'I didn't think men could think like that.'
Thanks, Jane Gardam.
Stan Heuisler, Baltimore
Oh, come on! There were three men in the photo accompanying the May 7 Metro article 'NFL commissioner is working all angles to get stadium deal completed,' but you ID'd only two. That would have been bad enough on its own, but you left out the good-looking one!
Leonora Weimer, Bowie
Barbara Vuk's April 26 Free for All letter, 'Telling it like it will be,' argued that 'old age stinks' and 'someone needs to say it without sugarcoating.' Vuk highlighted something that's been bugging me for a long time, especially in those 'Good news!' newsletters: the fetishizing of older adults ('Awww! They got married! Ain't it cute?'), including the hero-making of exceptions to the rule ('Awww! This old person lifted more weight than 95 percent of adults in the world! And so can you!' Hint: No, you can't.).
Gag me. I'm with Vuk. The media highlights this stuff at the expense of the reality of how aging works for most of us, regardless of what we might do to keep healthy. It's as though the culture is so frantic about the possibility of not 'aging well,' whatever that means, that we must not only focus on the exceptional but also drive ourselves toward it.
The thud that hits everyone lucky enough to live long enough to discover that they will not perpetually feel 35, no matter what they do, too often comes as shock. And yet, that's the picture that confronts the majority.
Denise Showers, Janesville, Wisconsin
I noted the patrilineal histories of the Kentucky Derby entrants in the May 3 Sports section ['Before they Run for the Roses, get to know them']. Probably there is merit and even some quantitative data on the predictive power of such lineages. But perhaps consideration should include the mares as well. Mitochondria, the energy sources in cells, are inherited solely via the female ancestral line. A deep look at how the efficiency of their mitochondria affects the performance of horses and other athletes would yield some valuable information on the physiology of competition.
George Hoskin, Burtonsville
The May 9 Metro article 'He can't speak aloud, but his artwork says it all,' on a nonverbal local painter, was inspiring. Not only an artist but also a poet, Charles Lenny Lunn proves that sheer will, brilliance and empowerment by a devoted parent, with the help of doctors, therapists and teachers, can move mountains — in eloquent contradiction of the ignorant, defeatist comments of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Jan H. Kalicki, Alexandria
I'm wondering whether I missed an executive order declaring May 4 as OCD Sunday, because the top five tiles on my Post app were all about cleaning, or faking cleaning, or not being messy, or some such, and yet another farther down was on the same theme. Seriously? Not a word about Israel, Gaza, Ukraine, tariffs, economic news. Is this the new 'we're all about the markets' Washington Post? I consume as many Procter & Gamble products as the next guy, but this is ridiculous.
Andrew Kuhn, Bedford, New York
The May 7 front-page article 'Prison proposal gets rocky response' quoted Aaron Peskin, a former member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, as saying, 'The chances of Alcatraz becoming repurposed as a prison are about as large as landing a man on Pluto.' No doubt.
President Donald Trump said a lot of newsworthy things at his May 5 news conference besides the reiterated suggestion to reopen Alcatraz. The Post chose this one to publish front-page, center, above-the-fold, continuing to nearly three-quarters of Page A2, with coverage from two reporters and two huge photos of tourists visiting the site.
Trump's spaced-out idea deserved this much attention?
Joseph A. Capone, Oakton
Regarding the May 6 online headline 'Trump wants to reopen Alcatraz. Californians are deeply skeptical.':
Everyone should be beyond 'deeply skeptical.' The prison is a crumbling wreck that was useful more as a PR prop than as anything else and always cost tons of money to operate. No sensible person would even think to resurrect it except for show — or to distract attention from more serious things.
Gail Goldey, Santa Fe, New Mexico
Throughout history, the word 'republican' has been used to describe political systems and their advocates that radically reject kings, autocrats and tyrants. The Latin root of the word, 'res publica,' means 'the public affair,' as opposed to a private affair serving the interest of one person. By this and other measures, our 'Republicans' are no more 'republican' than King George III was an American revolutionary.
Let's call the Republican Party by its real name: the Monarchist Party.
Gerson S. Sher, Washington
It is dismaying that presumably self-described liberal readers of The Post object to any inclusion of letters defending the Trump administration ['Readers wondered why we asked for Trump voters' views. Here's why.,' May 8]. This attitude seems decidedly illiberal, and it calls to mind a decades-old quote from William F. Buckley Jr.: 'Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view.'
Larry Ciolorito, Darnestown
I request that The Post stop using the term 'conservative' to refer to right-wing politicians, including supporters of President Donald Trump. These politicians and their associated pundits are not demonstrating anything like conservatism, in the sense defined by Edmund Burke in the 18th century and probated in the United States by Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley Jr., nor in the nonpolitical sense of conserving traditions, heritage, resources and land.
Noting a politician's party affiliation is objective identification, but 'conservative' is a word with value associations, as are 'progressive' and 'liberal.' Such terms inadequately describe politicians' actions, tendencies, policies or interests. Readers rely on journalists to use words for what they mean rather than how they've been adopted, adapted and owned.
Howard Mandel, Chicago
I'm hooked on reading the print edition online. Available no matter where I am in the world at the moment. Razor-sharp visuals, including beautiful photography. Enlargeable with a pair of fingers. Nothing to toss in recycling afterward. But way too often, photos appear only in black and white.
On May 9, my temper finally blew when a photo caption accompanying the Metro article 'Trump names five board members' identified a woman in a group shot by noting she was the one 'in red pants' — in a black and white photo. Does not compute!
David Sproul, Bethesda
As someone who values informed citizenship and the media's role in shaping public discourse, I write to express my concern about how executive orders are often reported. It's disheartening and misleading to hear these orders presented as if they were laws. Executive orders are directives to enforce existing laws or manage the executive branch. They do not create new laws.
The Constitution clearly outlines that Congress makes laws and sets the budget (Article I), while the president's role is to 'faithfully execute' these laws (Article II). The Constitution vests all legislative powers in Congress, which includes passing laws, approving treaties and controlling government spending. Executive orders cannot override Congress, and The Post should not treat them as being able to.
Arthur Grau, New York
The 7 newsletter seems to be morphing into The 10 or The 12. The articles meander from one topic to another. Topics mentioned in the headline are getting buried.
Rather than trying to condense more than seven into The 7, consider changing the name to Today's Top 10.
Cheryl Nicolson, Hydesville, California
I don't like the use of 'congressman' instead of 'representative.' When I was a student at Powell Junior High School in D.C. years ago, we would get chastised for it. Senators are congressmen also. Usage changes but not always for the better.
Arnold Malhmood, Rockville
Regarding the May 13 news article 'White South Africans designated as refugees reach U.S.':
Please don't call the White people being brought from South Africa into the United States 'refugees.' They are not. Even mentioning the president's deceitful language diminishes the experiences of the hundreds of thousands of actual refugees around the world.
Susan Wallace, Washington
I and many of my wine-enjoying friends miss the weekly wine column that appeared in the Food section. Dave McIntyre, who left The Post in January, was and is an excellent writer, offering notes and descriptions of wines available in the area. Surely, The Post can find a replacement.
Robert Luskin, Bethesda
Presumably, The Post includes 'Prickly City' on its comics page to be inclusive of various political opinions. But the May 5 comic depicting an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent throwing one of the strip's characters into a van was deeply offensive.
The Trump administration has admitted to sending at least one person to El Salvador in error but seems to be doing everything in its power to resist bringing him home. The upshot is that anyone (not just those who are undocumented) is at risk of being sent to a maximum-security prison overseas without recourse. Please reconsider your inclusion of this strip in The Post.
Anne Schwartz, Washington
Readers often write in to say they find some cartoons in the Comics section not so very funny. May I suggest they also seek humor in other parts of Style — and other parts of the paper as well?
See this paragraph in the April 21 Style article 'Who's the woman set to change the Smithsonian?': 'Here we are: A former Fox News host is leading the Pentagon. A vaccine skeptic is running the Department of Health and Human Services. A former professional wrestling executive is head of the Department of Education.'
If that doesn't crack you up, you are either too highbrow or too lowbrow to appreciate the real-life irony being presented. Who's on fourth? The Fourth Estate, of course!
Skip Strobel, Washington
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US employers added just 73,000 jobs last month as labor market weakens in face of Trump trade wars
US employers added just 73,000 jobs last month as labor market weakens in face of Trump trade wars

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

US employers added just 73,000 jobs last month as labor market weakens in face of Trump trade wars

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month and Labor Department revisions showed that hiring was much weaker than previously reported in May and June. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2%. The unexpectedly weak report raises questions about the health of the job market and the economy as President Donald Trump pushes forward with a radical and erratic overhaul of American trade policy, imposing hefty tariffs on imports from almost every country on earth. The Labor Department reported Friday that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2% last month from 4.1% in June. The number of people in the labor force – those working and looking for work – fell modestly last month, and the ranks of the unemployed rose by 221,000. Manufacturers cut 11,000 jobs last month after shedding 15,000 in June and 11,000 in May. The federal government, where employment has been targeted by the Trump administration, lost 12,000 jobs. Jobs in administration and support fell by nearly 20,000. Healthcare companies added 55,400 jobs last month – accounting for 76% of the jobs added in July and offering another sign that recent job gains have been narrowly concentrated. The stock market tumbled on the news. The current situation is a sharp reversal from the hiring boom of just three years ago when desperate employers were handing out signing bonuses and introducing perks such as Fridays off, fertility benefits and even pet insurance to recruit and keep workers. Weighing on the job market are the lingering effects of higher interest rates that were used by the Federal Reserve to fight inflation; Trump's massive import taxes and the costs and uncertainty they are imposing on businesses; and an anticipated drop in foreign workers as the president's massive deportation plans move forward. The rate of people quitting their jobs — a sign they're confident they can land something better — has fallen from the record heights of 2021 and 2022 and is now below where it stood before the pandemic.

Trump hits Canada, Brazil and many other trading partners with steep tariffs
Trump hits Canada, Brazil and many other trading partners with steep tariffs

Fast Company

time12 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Trump hits Canada, Brazil and many other trading partners with steep tariffs

U.S. President Donald Trump slapped steep tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, pressing ahead with his plans to reorder the global economy ahead of a Friday trade deal deadline. Trump set rates including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 25% for India, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, according to a presidential executive order. The order listed higher import duty rates of 10% to 41% starting in seven days for 69 trading partners as the 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT) deadline approached. Some of them had reached tariff-reducing deals; others had no opportunity to negotiate with his administration. Trump included an exception for some goods shipped within the coming week. Goods from all other countries not listed would be subject to a 10% U.S. import tax. Trump had previously said that rate might be higher. The administration also teased that more trade deals were in the pipeline as it seeks to close trade deficits and boost domestic factories. Facing a Friday deadline of his making, the Republican president has tapped emergency powers, pressured foreign leaders, and pressed ahead with trade policies that sparked a market sell-off when they were first announced in April. This time, markets had a more muted reaction. Stocks and equity futures fell modestly in Friday morning trading in Asia. Trump's order said that some trading partners, 'despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters.' Other details are still to come, including on the 'rules of origin' that will determine what products might face even higher tariffs. Trump also said 'we have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' and a U.S. official later told reporters that they were still to be announced. CANADA, MEXICO Trump issued a separate order for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35%, from 25% previously, saying Canada had 'failed to cooperate' in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the U.S. The higher tariffs on Canadian goods contrasted sharply with Trump's decision to grant Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs of 30% on many goods to provide more time to negotiate a broader trade pact. Trump complained to reporters earlier that Canada had 'been very poorly led.' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was disappointed by Trump's decision, and vowed to take action to protect Canadian jobs and diversify the country's export markets. 'While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong,' he said in a post on X. The extension for Mexico avoids a 30% tariff on most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade and came after a Thursday morning call between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow,' Sheinbaum wrote on X, adding that the Trump call was 'very good.' About 85% of U.S. imports from Mexico comply with the rules of origin outlined in the USMCA, shielding them from 25% tariffs related to fentanyl, according to Mexico's economy ministry. Trump said the U.S. would continue to levy a 50% tariff on Mexican steel, aluminum and copper and a 25% tariff on Mexican autos and on non-USMCA-compliant goods subject to tariffs related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis. 'Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many,' Trump said in a Truth Social post, without providing details. INDIA DISCORD Goods from India appeared to be headed for a 25% tariff after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture sector, drawing a higher-rate threat from Trump that also included an unspecified penalty for India's purchases of Russian oil. Although negotiations with India were continuing, New Delhi vowed to protect the country's labor-intensive farm sector, and the threat of higher rates from Trump triggered outrage from the opposition party and a slump in the rupee. Trump's rollout of higher import taxes on Friday comes amid more evidence they have begun driving up consumer goods prices. Commerce Department data released Thursday showed prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3% in June, the biggest gain since March 2022. Recreational goods and vehicles prices shot up 0.9%, the most since February 2024. Prices for clothing and footwear rose 0.4%. TOUGH QUESTIONS FROM JUDGES Trump hit Brazil's exports on Wednesday with a steep 50% tariff as he escalated his fight with Latin America's largest economy over its prosecution of his friend and former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. The run-up to Trump's tariff deadline was unfolding as federal appeals court judges sharply questioned Trump's use of a sweeping emergency powers law to justify his sweeping tariffs of up to 50% on nearly all trading partners. Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare an emergency over the growing U.S. trade deficit and impose his 'reciprocal' tariffs and a separate fentanyl emergency. The Court of International Trade ruled in May that the actions exceeded his executive authority, and questions from judges during oral arguments before the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit in Washington indicated further skepticism. Meanwhile, China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. A U.S. official told reporters that they are making progress toward a deal.

Musk Gave $5 Million To MAGA PAC In June—A Day Before He Attacked Trump's ‘Insane And Destructive' Spending Bill
Musk Gave $5 Million To MAGA PAC In June—A Day Before He Attacked Trump's ‘Insane And Destructive' Spending Bill

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Gave $5 Million To MAGA PAC In June—A Day Before He Attacked Trump's ‘Insane And Destructive' Spending Bill

Elon Musk donated $5 million to a pro-Trump PAC in late June in an apparent effort to mend fences with President Donald Trump after they publicly feuded over the president's signature spending bill, a brief truce that fell apart again last month as the billionaire announced plans to form a third party and resumed his attacks against the president and his administration. Billionaire Elon Musk donated $5 million to a pro-Trump PAC in June. Getty Images Federal Election Commission filings published on Thursday showed Musk gave $5 million to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc. PAC on June 27. On the same day, the world's richest person also gave $5 million each to the Senate Leadership Fund and Congressional Leadership Fund, both of which support GOP candidates. The filings only cover the first six months of 2025, and it is unclear if Musk made any further contributions to the PAC in July before their feud reignited. Musk has not commented on the $15 million donations and has since announced the launch of his America Party to take on both the GOP and Democrats. No major follow-up announcement has been made about the party since then, and a key Tesla investor has claimed 'nothing of substance' has been filed with the FEC. The feud between Musk and Trump first broke out in early June, just days after the president's former 'first buddy' exited his role as a 'special government employee' overseeing efforts to slash government spending. The relationship between the two soured almost immediately as Musk began attacking Trump's signature spending bill. Trump eventually responded by suggesting Musk had 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' The feud then spiralled into a war of words on social media, with Trump threatening to scrap Musk's government contracts and subsidies and the billionaire alleging in a now-deleted tweet that the president's name was in the so-called 'Epstein List.' While Trump didn't respond to Musk's Epstein jibe initially, the White House has since firmly pushed back on reports his name is in the Epstein Files. After the initial blowup, there appeared to be a brief truce between the two as Musk expressed regret about some of his posts and said they went 'too far.' Musk made the donations to the pro-Trump and GOP PACs during this truce. But after the feud blew up again in July, Musk announced the formation of his 'America Party,' a move that Trump labeled as 'ridiculous.' Musk responded by dredging up the issue around disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's case again. What Do We Know About The Timeline On Musk's Donations? The filings show all three donations from Musk were made on June 27. Just one day later, the billionaire blew up a three-week detente between him and Trump as he attacked the president's signature spending bill again. In a post on X, Musk said Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill was: 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' A couple of days later, Musk ramped up his attacks on the GOP for backing the bill, which would add trillions to the national debt and called them the 'PORKY PIG PARTY!!' Musk also warned: 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day.' The billionaire also vowed that 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending,' and backed the spending bill, 'will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' Just like Musk's apparent peace offering in June, the president also appeared to extend an olive branch towards Musk last week, amid pressure from his base and Democrats to release the so-called Epstein files. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large-scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. government. This is not so!' The president, who has repeatedly threatened to scrap Musk's government contracts and subsidies since the two former allies began feuding publicly last month, insisted that he wants Musk to 'THRIVE like never before.' The overture, however, was quickly dismissed by Musk, who tweeted: 'The 'subsidies' he's talking about simply do not exist.' Referring to Trump simply as 'DJT', the billionaire said the president has 'already removed or put an expiry date on all sustainable energy support while leaving massive oil & gas subsidies untouched,' a dig at the president's signature spending legislation scrapping the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. He also rejected the suggestion that his rocket company, SpaceX, was receiving favorable treatment, noting 'SpaceX won the NASA contracts by doing a better job for less money,' and moving those contracts to other companies 'would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much!' Big Number $193 million. That is the amount Musk donated to his America PAC through Election Day last year to help support Trump's candidacy. Further Reading 'Subsidies…Do Not Exist': Musk Dismisses Trump's Apparent Overture Wanting Him To 'Thrive' (Forbes) The Musk Vs. Trump Feud: Timeline (Forbes)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store