Call to move health staff ‘bizarre'
A call to transfer mental health workers from Dunedin to Central Otago is "bizarre", Taieri MP Ingrid Leary says.
The Labour Party MP responded to a provocative stance taken by Waitaki MP Miles Anderson, of the National Party, who suggested Dunedin's mental health staffing should be slashed by 100, and also that too much money was being poured into the $1.88billion regional hospital in Dunedin.
Money should instead have been directed to the growing Central Otago and Queenstown Lakes districts, he said.
Ms Leary said Mr Anderson had looked to pit Dunedin against Wānaka and his proposed solution to health shortages in Wānaka and surrounding areas was bizarre.
"It is no secret that the lower South suffers from a shortage of mental health workers across the board and some of the longest specialist wait times, including in Dunedin," she said.
"Moving health workers from one location to another resolves nothing."
Ms Leary, Labour's mental health spokesperson, said the government appeared to be taking "a Queenstown-centric approach" to healthcare, including mental health.
Mr Anderson had spoken of inequities between Dunedin and the rest of the region.
"Those employed in the mental health side of things — Dunedin has 300-plus staff, and only another 100 are spread throughout the entire Otago-Southland area, so Wānaka have very few," he said.
"So for it to be equitable, 100 need to be taken out of Dunedin and put into other areas."
Ms Leary suggested the government ought to be more constructive.
"Cutting pay equity claims for burned-out mental health workers will only exacerbate the mental healthcare shortage, so why doesn't Miles Anderson instead tell his Cabinet colleagues to reverse that short-sighted decision?"
Construction of the new hospital in Dunedin started under Labour and the project was reviewed by the National-led government once it gained power in the 2023 general election.
After delays, the government ended up approving continuation of the build and the project was not altered substantially.
Mr Anderson said the people who planned the hospital "didn't give much thought to the outlying areas of North Otago and Central Otago".
"The Dunedin hospital makes sense with the med school and specialists, but if they thought about it, did it really need to be as big?"
Ms Leary said Mr Anderson seemed to lack understanding of the project.
He appeared to have "no depth of knowledge regarding the Dunedin hospital and its role in the wider region, including the need for tertiary-level care and a medical training facility".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Two New Bills Show Cross-Party Support For Modern Slavery Laws – Parliament Needs To Act!
World Vision New Zealand is urging the country's two main political parties to join together to progress modern slavery legislation, after MPs from both parties plan very similar Private Members Bill to address the issue. Today, Labour's Camilla Belich, announced she will lodge a Private Members Bill, Combatting Trafficking in Persons and Modern Day Forms of Slavery Bill, which seeks to introduce reporting requirements for businesses to address modern slavery in their operations and supply chains, , and stronger protections for victims and survivors of trafficking and slavery. In April this year, National MP Greg Fleming put his Modern Slavery Reporting Bill as a Private Members Bill in the ballot which would require businesses to report on modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains. World Vision's Head of Advocacy and Justice, Rebekah Armstrong, says there are aspects of both bills that are very similar which shows that MPs from both sides of the house want legislative change to combat forced labour, worker exploitation, child labour and trafficking. 'We're thrilled to see support from both National and Labour for robust modern slavery legislation, but we can't understand why they won't work together to legislate on an issue they both fundamentally agree on. 'We want to see our politicians doing the right thing, rather than scoring political points. We want to see them come together to actually pass a Modern Slavery Act, not just talk about it! This could be the reality if National and Labour agreed to both back the same bill,' Armstrong says. Under current Parliamentary Standing Orders, if 61 MPs agree to endorse a Private Member's Bill then it can progress directly to first reading at Select Committee. Armstrong urges both parties, and all MPs, to put politics aside and endorse one of the bills. She says MPs need to focus on doing the right thing. She says this is about people, not politics. 'Taking steps to address modern slavery is not something that should be politically contentious. We hope all parties will unite to end the trafficking of children, forced labour, and exploitative working conditions both overseas and here in New Zealand.' Public and business support for modern slavery legislation is strong, with 8 out of 10 New Zealanders backing modern slavery legislation, according to an independent IPSOS poll[i] and nearly 40,000 signatures collected in a petition[ii] lodged with Parliament in 2021. Armstrong says the business community is also calling for laws to address modern slavery so that Kiwi companies can retain a competitive edge in global markets. 'This year, New Zealand investors representing $295 trillion[iii] in assets under management wrote to the Prime Minister urging the Government to introduce modern slavery legislation. They want assurances that the companies they invest in are taking meaningful steps to identify and address human rights risks in their operations and supply chains,' Armstrong says. She says transparent, consistent rules create a level playing field and give businesses the certainty they need to operate responsibly. 'It's good for business, good for our trading relationships, and above all, the right thing to do.' Armstrong says politicians need to take action now to support New Zealand businesses so that they are in a strong position to trade internationally, but also to support Kiwi consumers. 'Our politicians need to focus on the long term and do what's right for the 50 million victim-survivors of modern slavery worldwide. This is a chance for Parliament to rise above partisanship and show ethical and economic leadership. 'If MPs from both major parties agree on the need for modern slavery legislation, then they should make this happen by working together,' she says.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Byelection: Te Pāti Māori candidate contender cops flak for supporting Labour MP's selection
'The party was quite disappointed at that, to be totally honest. I've just gone, well, I'm just going to sit back here and ... we have to allow the people to speak.' Panapa had worked in Parliament for former Tāmaki Makaurau MP Takukai Moana Natasha Kemp before her death after a battle with kidney disease. Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp with Te Pāti Māori president John Tamihere on election night in 2023. Photo / Mike Scott Continuing Kemp's work had motivated Panapa to offer himself to be her successor. However, he was narrowly beaten by Kaipara by about 30 votes from a crowd of up to 350 people, he estimated, during Te Pāti Māori's selection process last week. Over the weekend, Labour selected Henare - a former Tāmaki Makaurau MP of three terms - as its candidate to contest the byelection set for September 6. Panapa attended Henare's selection event at Ngā Whare Waatea Marae in Mangere and posted to social media, congratulating the Labour MP and thanking him for acknowledging Kemp. A few days later, Panapa again took to social media to 'clear a lot of the noise' having been 'hammered, good and bad, from all ends' for his comments. 'It's okay to be passionate, but let's keep the discourse respectful,' Panapa wrote. 'To clarify, Peeni is my whanaunga, and before politics, we're whānau and Māori first. 'However, Takutai's influence led me to Te Pāti Māori, and I've come to appreciate and support their unapologetic stance on being Māori in spaces that often threaten our existence.' Panapa said his post had prompted some to believe he had left Te Pāti Māori and was joining Labour. 'Peeni had some beautiful words to say about Takutai, so I tended to listen to that. 'It was never about going against the party.' Panapa said he hadn't heard from Te Pāti Māori president John Tamihere, also his grandmother's first cousin, about the matter, saying he believed Tamihere 'understood where I was coming from'. Former Manurewa Marae youth advisor Te Kou o Rehua Panapa in Parliament. Photo / Supplied Tamihere has been approached for comment. Still a Te Pāti Māori member, Panapa said he had not decided whether to endorse one specific candidate. He had also not considered whether he would contest next year's election, despite being asked by Te Pāti Māori if he would want to run in an Auckland general seat. Panapa said it remained an open question whether, should he run, he did so for Te Pāti Māori, Labour or the Green Party. As for the byelection, Panapa suspected Kaipara would 'give it a good go' against Henare, whom he had worked for previously across three campaigns. 'Peeni's done some amazing work here in Tāmaki Makaurau but I personally think [Kaipara] could win this on the party, on the back of the party.' Citing his experience working with South Auckland youth, Panapa explained what might have been considered 'radical' views from Te Pāti Māori in the past were now attracting a growing young Māori audience in Auckland. '[Previously], it was grandparents-driven and you voted for Labour and that was it. 'That's changed now, I think it's more the young people making decisions for themselves to vote.' He encouraged candidates to avoid political sparring and focus on improving what was typically a low voter turnout. 'What both parties don't realise is that our people, especially South Auckland people, if there's too much narrative and it's too complicated, they don't turn up and vote. 'That's the problem, so the focus must be on getting people there to vote.' Adam Pearse is the Deputy Political Editor and part of the NZ Herald's Press Gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: Shane Jones, greatest ever Australian politician?
Nearly 30,000 New Zealanders crossed the ditch last year. Could the minister for resources be next? Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. The last time the 54th parliament of New Zealand was gathered in the House for question time was about two weeks ago. Back then, the price of butter was the main thing on the minds of the Labour Party caucus, who appeared to see the rising cost of dairy products as a sign of the end times. On Tuesday, the new objective was to put the spotlight on the nearly 30,000 New Zealanders who left the country for Australia in 2024. So long as there remains plenty of problems to pin to the government, Labour won't have to make the effort to dream up any of its own policies. There have been two significant changes in the House since then as well. The death of Takutai Tarsh Kemp leaves an open seat for either Labour to bring in the next candidate on its list or for former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara to make her parliamentary debut for Te Pāti Māori, depending on who wins the Tāmaki Makaurau byelection on September 6. And, following the sudden departure of NZ First MP Tanya Unkovich, the House welcomed a new politician into its fold: David Williams. There was heckling from the opposition benches right off the bat when Labour leader Chris Hipkins rose to ask prime minister Christopher Luxon whether he stood by the government's actions, which he took as an opportunity to laud vocational education minister Penny Simmonds' recent Te Pūkenga restructure announcement, but the jeers drowned him out. When Hipkins came back with 'how many Kiwis have left New Zealand since he became prime minister?', a group of high school students sitting in the public gallery gasped 'ooouusshh!' Resources minister Shane Jones, answering a question from NZ First MP Andy Foster about economic growth in his sector, announced – 'with characteristic modesty' – that he had recently travelled to Singapore and Sydney, and amazed his peers by waxing lyrical about overturning the 'foolish' ban on oil and gas exploration and giving a 'glowing account' of the fast-track laws, the 'most permissive regime in Australasia'. The Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick raised her eyebrows. Jones' characteristic modesty shone through again. 'I have endeavoured to assure investors in the resources sector that we have decriminalised the coal industry,' the minister declared. 'I had the privilege of addressing a host of mining investors [and] professionals in Sydney … They regard the quality of leadership I have shown on behalf of the government of such stature that they invited me to be a politician in Canberra.' 'Take it up!' Labour's Duncan Webb jeered. It's good to know that despite burgeoning opportunities overseas, our best talent stays at home. It wasn't over there. NZ First leader and foreign affairs minister – as he liked to remind his coalition partners before he entered the House on Tuesday – Winston Peters decided to rise and ask the minister if he was saying he'd stop 'virtue signalling' by using local coal rather than 'inferior' offshore coal? It gave Brownlee a moment to consider the importance of phrasing – well, he said, that question is sort of interesting, 'because it's hardly factual as soon as you say 'virtue signalling', but anyway'. When health minister Simeon Brown took patsies from fellow National Party MP Carlos Cheung, it gave deputy prime minister David Seymour a chance to show off his wealth of knowledge on political theory by quoting China's former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping: 'Does the minister subscribe to the philosophy … that it doesn't matter if the cat is black or white, so long as it catches the mice?' Brown grinned and rose to his feet, but Brownlee wouldn't let him answer – it would only be a reasonable question, the speaker said, if the minister was some kind of expert in rodent control. The Act Party leader sought leave for his question to be answered, but was shut down again. 'Well, the House is the master of its own destiny,' Seymour said, sagely. Then Swarbrick's voice popped up: 'Get a grip!' Back on the brain drain, Labour's jobs and income spokesperson Ginny Andersen wanted to know whether finance minister Nicola Willis thought the government was doing enough to 'deliver jobs' despite the tens of thousands headed across the Tasman. Andersen quoted Luxon and Seymour's sentiments that Aotearoa is where the opportunities are and having people leave is 'bad', to which Seymour took offence. Who would want a deputy prime minister who thinks New Zealanders leaving the country is a good thing, Seymour asked, then suggested that such a thing might be possible if the New Zealander doing the leaving was Ginny Andersen. His comment had Brownlee reminding the House, yet again, that question time is not an opportunity to attack the opposition. Up in the backbenches, Labour MP Shanan Halbert made his read of Seymour's comments clear: 'Misogynist!' Maybe Seymour could've tried it a different way: it doesn't matter if the cat is in New Zealand or Australia, as long as it still agrees the government is doing a good job.
